Add RSS RSS

Now Law Schools Are Spawning Colleges

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover.jpgAs if creating new law schools from scratch wasn’t enough, now the schools themselves are starting to breed. Legal Blog Watch reports that The Massachusetts School of Law at Andover is metastasizing and creating a hybrid undergraduate program:

The Massachusetts School of Law at Andover is branching out. It is launching the nation’s first college dedicated exclusively to the teaching of history, including American legal history. To be called the American College of History and Legal Studies, the college will open its doors in August 2010 in Salem, N.H., according to an MSL announcement.

The ACHLS will be an undergraduate “completion college,” offering only junior- and senior-year courses. After completing their junior year, students who meet certain criteria will have the option of starting law school at MSL. These students will receive their bachelor’s degrees after the first year of law school.

Let me get this straight: you spend a whole year of college learning legal history, and then you still have to go through three years of law school at Andover? So it’s kind of like an extra fourth year of law school that is even more useless to a practicing attorney than the long three years that come after it?

HOW DOES THIS HELP ANYBODY GET A JOB??????

Sorry, I didn’t mean to go all-caps there. It’s just my head, and the blood coming out of my ears. And the eye: lidless, wreathed in flame.

I take my blood pressure medication after the jump.

According to school officials, actually helping its students get paying legal work — or even helping its students learn anything of critical importance to a future attorney — is manifestly not the point of the new college:

As for why MSL is starting the new school, Velvel said that the public and leaders are too often ignorant about history. “As a high percentage of elected officials, judges and corporate executives are lawyers, it is imperative to begin the process of trying to ensure that American leaders, especially its lawyers, have the historical knowledge needed to make intelligent decisions in the national interest,” Velvel said.

So the new college program is trying to train people to make decisions in the national interest? That’s great, it’s a good thing that lawyers work for “the nation” instead of pesky, unenlightened clients.

Even if you agree that a “high percentage” of elected officials are ignorant of history, what does that have to do with the law? When I wanted to learn about history, I took history courses! When I wanted to be an elected official, I took Government courses. When I wanted to learn how to be a lawyer, I went to law school. Too bad I didn’t realize that law school was code for “learning esoteric legal concepts which have little or no relation to the actual practice of law.”

I know I’m doing nothing more than spitting into the wind here, but there has to be something that can be done. There are too many lawyers. Doesn’t anybody understand?

Another New Law School, Sort Of
[Legal Blog Watch]

Earlier: Great News! Cooley is Opening Another Law School Campus. Yay!
More Law Schools + More Lawyers + Recession = FUBAR

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:28 PM

First

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:28 PM

First

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:29 PM

im pretty sure you can be illiterate and get into that law "school"...same goes for suffolk

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:32 PM

This school is not even accredited and you don't need to take the LSAT to get in.

This guy that worked in Litigation Support at my firm used to brag that he graduated from this "law school" and he was so annoying. He used to try and give his "legal opinion" about every case he was assigned to. Eventually they fired his ass because he was such an idiot.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:34 PM

5th to say this is a terrible idea.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:34 PM

Fistfth!

avatar
7 Posted by Kunochan | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:35 PM

Your fury seems to be based on the notion that the sole purpose of college is to train for a career. I feel sorry for people who throw away their college careers like that. Although it supports my contention that law programs (and MBA and medical programs) are not academic -- they're trade and vocational schools. Like car repair, or forensics.

Maybe I'm confused -- isn't this one LESS year to get your law degree? Plus, do those first two years at a community college with 18 credits, and you can shave off another 6 months!

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:39 PM

Elie, you're an idiot. Check out this progression:
2 years at JUCO. Then transfer into ACHLS and get your BA and JD in 4 years. 6 years instead of 7 for a JD. Now if one can figure out how to transfer to Columbia after your first year, they will be golden.

LSATs and accreditation be damned.

9 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:40 PM

I have more respect for a paralegal who obtained a certificate from the Sally Struthers School of Continuing Education than this sham of a program. But really, aside from paper credentials is there any difference between the fool willing to gamble his/her life in an education from this "institution" and the dolt who will be insolvent and miserable for most of their life due to the pursuit of a law degree?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:41 PM

Massachusetts School of Law > Northeastern School of Law. All day.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:41 PM


3, thank you for the dig on Suffolk law.

-Ignorant Nesl student.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:42 PM

Normally I am not against you Elie, but you really messed up with this one. This school is offering one less year to get a law school degree, not one more.... Futhermore, going into the law school is optional.

Wow, your reading comprehension is way off today

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:43 PM

Normally I am not against you Elie, but you really messed up with this one. This school is offering one less year to get a law school degree, not one more.... Furthermore, going into the law school is optional.

Wow, your reading comprehension is way off today

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:43 PM

"There's one truth in American legal history. The white man is a threat to us all and must be eradicated."

-- SotomayOR!

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:46 PM

Bukake party tonight in Mystal's mouth. Tell your friends.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:49 PM

Oh God. Elie, you whiny bitch, just SHUT UP. Why should lawyers be cushioned from competition for law jobs? Are we really that frail and pathetic?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:52 PM

#3 you're a no talent ass-clown who went to new england. they should revoke your school's accredation immediately. you idiots have no idea what you are doing.

I went to Suffolk, work in BigLaw and make tons of money winning cases.

As for this article, this college will do NOTHING for society since NO ONE WHO ATTENDS UMASSLAW (JOKE IN THE FIRST PLACE) WILL EVER BE A JUDGE, POLITICIAN OR A REAL LAWYER. The ABA should place an embargo on these idiots a la Cuba. Further, other mass lawyers should rise up and put a stop to this joke.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:52 PM

The economy is picking up...this has been reported by every major news organization for hours each day. The media has been reporting on a possible "recovery" for some time now. The questions are: 1) is it really a recovery; and 2) if so, how bumpy will the recovery be?

Of course, ATL does not report anything about the recovery. All we get is bad news and "the world is falling" and "the end of biglaw" hype. MORE EVIDENCE THAT ATL IS LINING ITS POCKETS WITH FEAR AND PANIC. Do not be fooled.

The economy is picking up, people. By January, there will be enough work to go around...and even if there isn't in January, firms will keep bodies around for when it does.

2 more things:

1) law firms are lagging indicators - if things have picked up in the last 2 months or so, law firms will feel the benefit a little later than other businesses.

2) there are A LOT of deals and LAWSUITS that aren't happening right now because of the economy...but they WILL happen once the economy is stable (provided the SOL hasn't run).

Fuck ATL, MysTTTal, and even Lat. This site is not our friend. Lat may think he's sticking it to the man (biglaw firms) but he's sticking it to us right now. Talk about entitlement....he's a Yalie who didnt like his lifestyle at Wachtell. You're pathetic, Lat, and this site is the enemy.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:53 PM

#10 - I went to Washington and Lee and am now at Locke Lord. So what?

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:53 PM

Great place for low IQ gunners.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:53 PM

Shaving time off your education is the new trend in legal education. This trend didn’t start with a TTT either (see Northwestern’s new two-year JD program). I anticipate many TTTs will try similar schemes though.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:55 PM

#3 you're a no talent ass-clown who went to new england. they should revoke your school's accredation immediately. you idiots have no idea what you are doing.

I went to Suffolk, work in BigLaw and make tons of money winning cases.

As for this article, this college will do NOTHING for society since NO ONE WHO ATTENDS UMASSLAW (JOKE IN THE FIRST PLACE) WILL EVER BE A JUDGE, POLITICIAN OR A REAL LAWYER. The ABA should place an embargo on these idiots a la Cuba. Further, other mass lawyers should rise up and put a stop to this joke.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:56 PM

How much does it cost for 1 night of passion with Mystal?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:57 PM

How does MSL, based in Mass, open a school in NH? This is just craptacular.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 1:58 PM

This would never happen in Texas.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:00 PM

17/22 - if you can't understand that Massachusetts School of Law is NOT UMASS LAW (there is no such thing), then I seriously doubt you were in the top 10% of your class at Suffolk, which is the baseline for the school allowing you to even interview with local Biglaw firms. Fail.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:00 PM

21 - Yeah, Northwestern does have a two year program, but the tuition is exactly the same as for the traditional three year program. I still can't figure that one out.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:01 PM

MSL is a crappy, private school that does not deserve to exist. The Dean talks about how he wants to charge Bush with war crimes. This is just what we need, more super liberal/terrible law schools.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:03 PM

Louis Zaccareli feels sorry for all of you.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:04 PM

17 & 22: Amazing that someone who went to Suffolk is calling for the accredation of other schools to be revoked. Shut up.

Congrats on making it to big law. I too, went to a TTT school and work in BigLaw. But, I am under no illusions that just because my law school sends three people to BigLaw every year that somehow it is now an amazing producer of top legal talent.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:04 PM

I stepped in a pile of SMU once.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:04 PM

Suffolk is a 38K joke. No one makes money coming out of that hole. It is the Suffolk lobby that has kept Mass from having a cheap state law school in the first place. If you are going to go to a TTT, then make it a CHEAP TTT. Everone is pining for the slip & trip 45K no bennies jobs anyway.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:05 PM

Who cares? My balls are still in your mother's throat.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:06 PM

Law school *is* a bachelor's degree anyway (and barely so).

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:06 PM

17/22 - you went to suffolk...i'm sorry to hear that..

I mean I'm just a lowely Harvard grad with a JD/MBA from Michigan....

NOW WHERE'S MY BOY VINNIE CHASE!?!?!?!


Ari Gold

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:06 PM

saves a year of tuition (i.e. loans) 'nuff said. . . .now find me something interesting or something I can be mean about

37 Posted by Hard Anal Tvetenholdt | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:07 PM

I will pork their arse!!!!

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:07 PM

Since when is the ABA an equal employee opportunity institution? This school is a disaster. I'd rather waste my live savings on lottery tickets than enroll in your fly-by-night law school. Losers.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:08 PM

I just tell people I went to law school and they just give me money and sex.

law school grad

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:11 PM

"HOW DOES THIS HELP ANYBODY GET A JOB??????"

Unqualified faculty and second-rate administrators will earn some nice $$$ (well, $$, at least), by churning the brain-mush of idiots in exchange for useless diplomae.

A

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:13 PM

After the softball tourney last year, I was so drunk that I shit myself and left my boxers on the steps to the UVA colonnade.

Northeastern grad

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:13 PM

Suffolk is the Standford of the east.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:13 PM

I’d rather be ruled by the first 100 Suffolk grads then by the Harvard Law Faculty.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:13 PM

lol @ 35

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:14 PM

18 - I would appreciate more examples or evidence to support your optimism. Becuase the massive layoffs that have occurred and continue to occur seems to indicate otherwise.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:15 PM

32, Northeastern School of Law is also very active in lobbying against UMass starting a public interest law school. My guess is because that would make the public-interest -oriented Northeastern look like the worst deal in the world at $65k a year. Which it is.

Not that Northeastern actually HAS any public interest jobs in Massachusetts on its job board. It does have a guy looking for part time work for $15/hour, though. That will pay one's $195k education off pretty quickly...

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:15 PM

Hey PE -

You're a douche!

48 Posted by Elie Mystal | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:15 PM

They are not offering one less year of law school. They are letting you start law school one year earlier. Instead of being a senior in college, you'll be a 1L. But you only have the opportunity if you sacrifice your junior year of college to this new program. Law school = 3 years. College = 3 years (with one year ruined by this program).

Now, tell me, what was better for you? Being a senior in college, or being a 1L?

The point shouldn't be starting the useless three years of law school sooner, the point should be not having to go to three years of law school in the first place.
--Elie

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:15 PM

The sense of entitlement of some people is amusing to me. Yes, there are a lot of lawyers, and yes some people go to a private 3rd or 4th tier law school. Where a person went to school doesn't reflect on their ability to become a successful attorney. Work ethic and legal skill determine that. Closing down a bunch of schools because there are too many lawyers will help no one. Competition is good. If your 1st tier education is so superior, what do you care how many people graduate with their 3rd or 4th tier diploma... they won't be any competition to you.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:16 PM

@41 - Thats disgusting.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:16 PM

The sense of entitlement of some people is amusing to me. Yes, there are a lot of lawyers, and yes some people go to a private 3rd or 4th tier law school. Where a person went to school doesn't reflect on their ability to become a successful attorney. Work ethic and legal skill determine that. Closing down a bunch of schools because there are too many lawyers will help no one. Competition is good. If your 1st tier education is so superior, what do you care how many people graduate with their 3rd or 4th tier diploma... they won't be any competition to you.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:16 PM

The sense of entitlement of some people is amusing to me. Yes, there are a lot of lawyers, and yes some people go to a private 3rd or 4th tier law school. Where a person went to school doesn't reflect on their ability to become a successful attorney. Work ethic and legal skill determine that. Closing down a bunch of schools because there are too many lawyers will help no one. Competition is good. If your 1st tier education is so superior, what do you care how many people graduate with their 3rd or 4th tier diploma... they won't be any competition to you.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:16 PM

zomglol suffolx.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:17 PM

Elie, shut up. You suck.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:17 PM

Northeastern is the Northwestern of the East.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:18 PM

18 - I would appreciate more examples or evidence to support your optimism. Becuase the massive layoffs that have occurred and continue to occur seems to indicate otherwise.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:18 PM

"Where a person went to school doesn't reflect on their ability to become a successful attorney."

- EMPIRICALLY FALSE

avatar
58 Posted by Kunochan | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:21 PM

#18 "The economy is picking up, people. By January, there will be enough work to go around...and even if there isn't in January, firms will keep bodies around for when it does."

That is so true! I was at a meeting last night, with the unicorns and the mole people, and they said the same thing!

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:23 PM

I pounded a Yeshiva chic in the ass once at a party in the Plaza Hotel in Boston. Does that count?

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:23 PM

I don't understand how a crappy nobody law school in massachusetts can open a college in new hampshire? does anyone else think thats F'ed up?

By the way, Masslaw is unaccredited and ALWAYS WILL BE. its sad we have to deal with them in Massachusetts. at least they can't take the bar anywhere else. You guys have it lucky.

Also, I recently graduated Suffolk Law and have worked in Boston for 4 years. I have YET to encounter a practicing lawyer from this law school. Doesn't that also strike anyone as odd?

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:24 PM

I just saw a commerical for this school and a 2 hour promo-how to become a lawyer in 2 years sponsored by The Massachusetts School of Law at Andover.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:24 PM

This just in: Latham is a GREAT place to work!!!

http://abovethelaw.com/2008/04/featured_job_survey_and_your_f.php

hahahahahahaha

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:26 PM

NAILING SHEEP

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:26 PM

Probably more prestigious than Dave Gordon's syracuse law degree

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:26 PM

Why is this not a story? http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=reilly_rick&id=4247723

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:27 PM

58 = hilarious

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:28 PM

Eli: What part of "After completing their junior year, students who meet certain criteria will have the option of starting law school at MSL. These students will receive their bachelor's degrees after the first year of law school." do you not get?

Apparently all of it.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:29 PM

55, Northeastern is the Cooley of the East. You'll learn after you graduate.

Unemployed '07 grad. One of many.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:29 PM

56/58 = Lat or Elie

not 18

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:31 PM

for those moron lawyers or students who believe they are entitled to a job when they graduate - THINK AGAIN (oh, yeah, I went there all caps).

The American economy is undergoing a severe transformation from an 70% service industry (like lawyers, drs, and all the other dreamy jobs we make up) to one of 70% manufacturing (like China) because quite frankly American education does not create more than unthinking, monkeys.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:34 PM

55, NESL fights war crimes. Does NE even have an international law presence? I mean geeeez, brah.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:34 PM

So just to get this all straight, Northeastern is the Northeastern of East MA?

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:35 PM

70:

citation, please.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:36 PM

Its ok, UVA is used to random people leaving their shit filled undergarments on school grounds.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:37 PM

I was raped by SMU day laborers.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:38 PM

18: Take a chill, get a clue. This site is not your "friend" and doesn't want to be. It is a LEGAL TABLOID. (See the top of this page if you don't believe me.) Nothing more, nothing less.

It is not the fault of ATL that you suck at what you do, or that your ass is about to be canned. (Wait, was that last month?)

And no, the economy isn't getting all better yet. Keep dreaming.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:38 PM

70 = ignorant troll bait.

The tactic - make the most inflammatory and utterly unsupported allegation you can think of in an attempt to get rational people upset enough to waste their time arguing with your troll ass.

The appropriate response - silence/chirping crickets

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:40 PM

35, all that education and you still can't spell. At the very least, you should be smart enough to use a web browser with spellcheck. Try Firefox.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:40 PM

@77 - Don't be so hard on your mother.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:42 PM

Who is Louis Ziccareli, and why do we care?

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:45 PM

70/79 = Bored DLA Piper paralegal.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:46 PM

76 = ATL apologist aka Elie or Lat

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:47 PM

I've lived in Massachusetts my entire life and have never heard of this school.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:48 PM

#60
They can take the bar in several states, if they've already passed Mass.

As far as "success" goes, if success = $$$$ in the first five years of private practice, then yes, where you go to law school correlates with success.

But after 5 years, nobody gives a crap where you went to law school. Either you can do the job, or you can't.

After almost 20 years in private practice, I've seen both Ivy Leaguers and not who couldn't get a piece of evidence admitted in Judge Wapner's court; and I've seen so-called bottom-tier graduates wipe the floor with Ivy Leaguers and vice versa.

Your law school gives you opportunities. Beyond that, you're on your own.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:49 PM

"[B]ecause quite frankly American education does not create more than unthinking, monkeys."

Well, your shitty punctuation use certainly supports your point.

See you on the docks?

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:50 PM

Is GULC the Yale of the Mid Atlantic?

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:56 PM

Please, please do not think that "Massachusetts School of Law" is affiliated with the University of Massachuetts ("UMass"). It is not. That is very insulting.

UMass, although a mere state school, at LEAST provided me with an inexpensive undergraduate education that allowed me to jaunt off to an overpriced T10 private law school.... where I promptly took out 20 years worth of student loans, but I digress.

Also, it is total bulls^%t that there isn't an affordable in-state law school in Massachusetts. Suffolk, Northeastern and yes, even crappy New England School of Law actively lobby against it. They know that their crappy overpriced programs would be destroyed by an instate school...

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:00 PM

I went to Washington and Lee.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:07 PM

Wait, so you spend two years at a community college, then you spend two years at an upper-level community college, and then you go to a shitty law school? How is any of this worthwhile?

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:08 PM

Is it bad that in college once I jerked off into my hand and then slapped a random person in the face?

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:13 PM

90- Only if it was offensive unwanted contact

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:17 PM

When I was a kid I got no respect. The time I was kidnapped, and the kidnappers sent my parents a note they said, "We want five thousand dollars or you'll see your kid again."

With my wife I don't get no respect. I made a toast on her birthday to "the best woman a man ever had." The waiter joined me.

I tell you, with my doctor, I don't get no respect. I told him, "I've swallowed a bottle of sleeping pills." He told me to have a few drinks and get some rest.

-Massachusetts School of Law

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:18 PM

Damn elitists. What's wrong with more people learning the law? Just because in the end the value of your degree might drop a miniscule amount, doesn't mean you get all ass angry about more people getting an education.

Shut up.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:18 PM

Am I the only one not surprised to learn that Ellie takes blood pressure medication?

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:22 PM

93 -

Speaking for myself, I am not angry about increased competition but about an unscrupulous school taking advantage of idiots by charging them for worthless degrees.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:30 PM

Every Tuesday I roofy Mystal doughnut and then pound his moobs until I am sleepy.

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:31 PM

95--
The degrees are only worthless in the eyes of Ivy League - BigLaw circle-jerksters trying to justify crushing debt and the rarified air where their farts don't smell.

(I am not a Mass School of Law graduate. But I know some. Not really better or worse than anyone else.)

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:37 PM

Suffolk is the Touro of Boston.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:41 PM

Hofstra is the Cardozo of Long Island.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:43 PM

97 - You don't need to be an elitist snob to question the value of a degree granted by an unaccredited law school. A smart law student who chooses Mass Law over *any* accredited law school does himself a massive disservice.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:48 PM

you're all stupid and don't understand economics.

8==D

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:06 PM

100-
FWIW- Acc. to wikipedia
Unaccredited only by the ABA. Accredited by Mass Bd. of Regents and NE Assoc of Schools and colleges

--97.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:11 PM

"Unaccredited only by the ABA"

selfp0wn complete.

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:13 PM

102, I recently bought some pills at a pharmacy. They were unapproved, but only by the FDA.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:19 PM

Northeastern is the Bunker Hill Community College of law schools.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:28 PM

Reasons Northeastern is the best law school in Boston:

1) it is the most expensive (Harvard is in Cambridge, remember)
2) it has the fewest class offerings
3) it has almost no financial aid (which, of course, means only elite people go there)
4) it has a lightly renovated building from the 1960's that they have the gall to call "new"
5) it has a career services office that specializes in drinking coffee and talking to each other all day instead of, you know, helping people find jobs
6) it consistently transforms a surprisingly high number of kids from Brown and Bowdoin who got 170's on the LSAT into unemployable wrecks
7) it has a mandatory co-op system where you can go be the ass-bitch for some family court judge or insurance defense firm
8) it games the system by saying it is a "public interest law school" while maintaining a $65k/year student budget and claiming the median starting salary is just under $90k and providing almost no loan repayment assistance for the folks who do go into public interest.
9) it is run by a bunch of 1960's Eugene McCarthy-era liberals who turn their courses into harangues about how pharmaceutical companies have a duty to give all drugs for free to everyone, or how every company should be forced to have union labor.
10) it has no grades, no class rank, and no law review, so you just know it is academically rigorous.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:34 PM

really, very little in fin aid?

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:37 PM

really, very little in fin aid?

avatar
109 Posted by Kunochan | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:45 PM

106: "pharmaceutical companies have a duty to give all drugs for free to everyone, or how every company should be forced to have union labor."

Pharmaceutical companies DO have a duty to give all drugs for free to everyone who needs them and can't pay, since all the drugs (ALL the drugs) were developed with public money and public research. Oh, and the people who need them will die.

And every company SHOULD be forced to allow their workers union representation, if for no other reason that the right to free speech and assembly. Oh, and because you like 40 hour weeks, worker's comp, health benefits and no child labor.

Seriously, are "conservatives" serious? Could you imagine if these people had to live in the world they claim they want? Oh wait -- that's happening NOW.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:47 PM

107/108 - average aid package is about $8000. Cost of one year is $65,000. So, average aid package is a touch less than 1/8 (12.5%) of total cost. I would say that is pretty little.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:49 PM

I know a girl who went to NE. Solid under grad but a 160 LSAT. I'm guessing that's their medium?

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:50 PM

109, I am well left of center. The professors (and many of the students) at Northeastern aren't even on the circle anymore.

And as a graduate of Northeastern, the jobs I am applying for do not have forty hour weeks or health benefits.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:57 PM

Northeastern average LSAT is 161-163, depending on the year. But they always get two or three dozen Ivy-Little Ivy-equivalents who got low 170's but somehow bought into all of the school's public interest or co-op BS, or like how they get evaluations instead of grades, or whatever.

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:11 PM

the law school scam continues unabated

The law schools put out bogus stats about the employment and income of their grads.

The legal profession media collude with the law schools to disseminate the statistical lies.

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:36 PM

there's an interesting history MSL, "against the tide" by debbie hagan.

MSL tuition is 14.5K/year. the school's mission is to provide a decent, low-cost legal education to people shut out of traditional law schools, generally lower-income people from the commonwealth. i gather they have succeeded in this mission.

faced with the choice between increasing fees to meet ABA's accreditation guidelines and keeping costs low, MSL chose to keep costs low (after its challenges to the ABA's policies failed). that's a good thing - it increases options for consumers who prefer a cheap, unaccredited school. the new legal history program also seems to be providing a new option. how is that a bad thing?

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:34 PM

Suffolk Law School is the Bunker Hill Community College of all law schools in the Boston area.

They even insult it in the movie "the Departed"

Suffolk law grads can't pronounce Tort- Tat

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:36 PM

Widener is the Suffolk of Delaware

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:04 PM

116, Maybe, but they have a killer building.

Northeastern is the true Suffolk of Boston.

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:28 PM

Do you people want WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW to get full ABA approval?????????????? Just asking, since you may have an opinion.

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:34 PM

It's amazing how stupid Elie really is. Elie, nobody said the program is offering one less year of law school, but that the program is offering one less year in attaining a law degree. College plus law school in 6 years equals one less year.

You know, I never thought affirmative action was that big of a deal before I encountered Elie. Imagine the intellect of the White/Asian guy that was robbed of an admission at HLS because they snuck Elie in for his skin color. It's enough to take your breath away.

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:30 PM

@116, they "make fun" of Suffolk in the Departed only in that it has a night program and Harvard doesn't. Considering the only schools that DO offer night programs are Suffolk and NESL, Suffolk's not a bad option.

Plenty of PhD's and scientists go through Suffolk's night program and work for BigLaw during the day. They'd probably prefer to go to BU, BC, or Harvard if those schools had night classes, but they don't so they make the best of what they have. Suffolk > NESL

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:32 AM

93, I can assure you this will not lower the value of my degree at all.

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:46 AM

There are too many lawyers in Massachusetts. If you cannot get into an accredited school do not bother. You will have a degree and be able to practice law, but you be doomed to mediocre salaries until you finally decide to move onto some other career. Drop out and go work for a large bank or something like that. You'll make more money and enjoy life more.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:51 AM

115--
That makes sense. (unless you just shelled out 10 times that to go to law school, and you;re afraid to admit that maybe you could end up in the same place by spending a lot less).

104--
Do you really think that FDA approval is the same as ABA accreditation? Nothing wrong with ABA accreditation, but its expensive, and is it really any more of a guarantee than Mass. Bd. of Regents or NE Association of Schools and Colleges?

Most everyone here seems to think that the ABA approves some pretty crappy law schools. But suddenly ABA approval is the only approval worth anything.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:52 AM

There are actually many very competent and talented attorney from Suffolk in practice. Not sure the same can be said about Mass. School of Law, or SNESL, or any of the other jokes.

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:55 AM

ABA does approve some crappy law schools and so if your lawschool cannot even get approved, isn't that something you have to consider? MLS does not have ABA accreditation because it wanted to keep costs low? Yes, keeping costs low is a much better idea than having a good library or having competent professors.

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:30 AM

Suffolk lawyers will swep the floor with the rest of your no talen ass clowns. Suffolk is Suffolk, a great law school with top professors. Thats all that needs to be said.

Would you ever want to buy a drug that's not FDA approved and risk the side effects? The side effects of not going to an ABA accredited law school is no job security, low pay, and having a crap resume. But if you want to work in a non-profit setting, who knows, it may just work.

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:01 PM

Right after I tell people not to waste their time this news article pops up, don't know this lady. Maybe she is a great lawyer.

Westborough lawyer tapped for Worcester Juvenile Court
June 10th, 2009 | by julia |
Deborah A. S. Capuano, who has run a law practice based in Westborough since 1993, was selected Wednesday by Gov. Deval Patrick for a Worcester Juvenile Court judgeship. If confirmed, Capuano would replace Justice Martha Grace, who retired in February.

Capuano lives in Westborough. She’s a graduate of Worcester State College, Assumption College, and the Massachusetts School of Law in Andover. She’s focused her legal work on child protection and youth offender cases, mental health law and criminal defense.

– State House News Service

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:53 PM

126--

All fair points. But in the 21st century (or whenever they went before the ABA) is the number of books in a library as important as electronic access?

Does the ABA still define "competency" of professors by how often they are published?

From what I;ve read, the Dean is sort of a whack-job and really has a hair across his back for the ABA. But he has raised some seemingly valid points about the disconnect between some of the ABA criteria and the actual things that go into a quality legal education.


128--
Pretty funny. No matter what one thinks of MassSchool of Law.

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:27 PM

Northeastern is the Massachusetts School of Law of Boston.

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:22 PM

Suffolk is the Phoenix University of law schools in Boston.

Post Your Comment