Add RSS RSS

Top. Universities. In the World.

world college rankings.JPGWe know how much everybody loves rankings. By now, everybody has had time to digest the new law school pecking order — even George Washington Law School students.

But true prestige whoring begins much earlier than law school. U.S. News has just released (hat tip: Tax Prof Blog) a list of the top 400 colleges and universities in the world.

I’m not sure how useful these rankings are, to anybody, anywhere, ever. But I’m sure they will make some people feel good about themselves — and other people mercilessly attack the schools that are more highly ranked than their alma maters.

Of course, U.S. News just did this eight months ago. We posted about it and everything. How many different ways can this magazine come up with to slobber all over Harvard and Yale?

In any event, this time U.S. News is ranking the top 400 universities, instead of the top 200.

After the jump, take a look at the top 10.

It doesn’t look like the magazine bothered to make any changes at the top:

1. Harvard
2. Yale
3. Cambridge
4. Oxford
5. Cal Tech
6. Imperial College London
7. University College London
8. University of Chicago
9. MIT
10. Columbia

But now that the list has been expanded from 200 to 400, which schools can now be recognized?

Well, apparently Michigan State students (#203) now officially know that they are way more prestigious than students at Sciences Po Paris (#207). And surely University of Miami students (#237) wouldn’t be seen in the same room as Bandung Institute of Technology students (#315). Unless there was coke in that room. In which case Miami, Bandung, and even Florida State (#300) students could probably find common ground.

But the biggest winners of this new list are Bangor “I Hardly Knew Her” University (U.K.) and Kasetsart University (Thailand). Those are two schools most Americans would have never heard of, but for the yeoman’s work done by the people of U.S. News.

Find your schools and laugh at your rivals. Happy Friday everybody.

World’s Best Colleges: Top 400 [U.S. News and World Report]

Earlier: Brand New U.S. News Rankings: Colleges and Universities of the World
U.S. News 2010 Law School Rankings

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:18 PM

Everyone knows that fordham is firsty

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:18 PM

Cal Tech is short for Calcutta Tech, right? Right?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:19 PM

And SMU is secondy

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:19 PM

My top schools were I want to apply to are Oxford and the Sorbonne. My safety's Harvard.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:21 PM

Is this a good time to mention Emory?

Love and hugs,
Emory Troll

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:22 PM

The Johns Hopkins University is about 12 spots too low.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:22 PM

Is this a good time to mention Emory?

Love and hugs,
Emory Troll

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:24 PM

Is this a good time to mention Emory?

Love and hugs,
Emory Troll

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:28 PM

This ranking is retarded! According to USNews UCLA is better than Berkeley, when ranked against international schools. Yet, when it is just ranking US schools, it is the other way around? Yeah, awesome, that makes sense.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:28 PM

Where is Suffolk University Ranked?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:28 PM

Penn > Princeton? Cornell > Stanford? Michigan > Brown? UCLA > Berkeley? NYU > Dartmouth? Yeah, not exactly buying these rankings.

avatar
12 Posted by orderchecks | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:30 PM

Well, we all know the top 2 will never change. If you went to either of those you should be eternally proud. Maricopa County Public Records

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:38 PM

University of Texas at Austin, bitches. Suck it, Nanyang Tech.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:41 PM

Nanyang TTTech

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:44 PM

Princeton is # 2 and Yale is # 3 in the U.S. rankings, but somehow Princeton falls to # 12 in the world rankings and gets beat out by a slew of U.S. schools.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:53 PM

These rankings are lies. I lies I tells ya!

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:53 PM

These rankings are lies. Lies I tells ya!

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:55 PM

Finally, UCLA beats Berkeley in some (random) ranking!!!1!1!!1

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 6:58 PM

At least it isn't totally arbitrary... oh, wait

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 7:07 PM

Why do I see first years walking out with boxes crying?

-scared Latham NY SA

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 7:08 PM

PENN STATE >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PRINCETTTON

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 7:12 PM

Go Cornell.

Suck it Dartmouth.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 7:14 PM

HUMBOLDT STATE AND DAMN PROUD OF IT

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 7:21 PM

I used to care about petty things like rankings. But now that my career has been ruined -- I mean, deferred -- I only care about being able to put food on the table.

This depression is never going to end.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 7:44 PM

Have all of you considered that maybe the domestic rankings are based on different metrics?

Of course, I'll disagree with the top 3. No way the fake Cambridge beats the real one.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 7:59 PM

This is the dumbest list ever. It is ranking the schools on size

UGA, U South Carolina, Bama > the elite liberal colleges...

HAHAHAHAHAHA

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:05 PM

True rank:

Tier 1: HYP, Cambridge, Oxford, Williams

Tier 2: Rest of Ivies and NESCAC; LSE; Tech schools

the rest.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:10 PM

9 and 15, i think these rankings may be different because they are "ranking" the entire university rather than a specific program. this would explain why princeton takes a hit.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:21 PM

Just got out of conference call at the NY office of a V10. Expect big things on Monday. BIG. The calls will begin this weekend.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:22 PM

27 is hilarious

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:24 PM

26, this actually makes sense. In terms of a school's impact on the WORLD, bigger would generally mean better. They're not focusing only on quality of education.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:32 PM

I can confirm what 29 said. Offers are going to be revoked next week at MANY NY firms. They just can't wait any longer.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:38 PM

29, That is brilliant for firms. Revoke offers when the pre-associates are studying for the bar so they end up failing. That way they not only won't they have the cushy firm job, but they cannot get any legal job

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:41 PM

How the hell do Princeton and Stanford fall off the map. What a garbage ranking...

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:41 PM

How the hell do Princeton and Stanford fall off the map. What a garbage ranking...

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:42 PM

33 - firms don't give a fuck about incoming associates right now. they probably want them all to fail so they don't have to deal with them.

class of 2009 is so very fucked.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:44 PM

US News is in serious trouble these days. Anything to boost interest in their "magazine" (do they even publish a print edition anymore?)

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:46 PM

U.Wash > Wash.U

????

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:49 PM

How long until US News comes out with a ranking for all their various arbitrary rankings?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:49 PM

Jesus christ guys.

This ranks entire universities, not just their undergraduate colleges. Princeton has a great undergrad, but has no law school, no med school, and a relatively small grad school. Berkeley has some of the best grad programs in the country which explains why it's ranked higher than UCLA. UWash has perhaps the best medical school in the country (for primary care).

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 8:54 PM

Attention morons- these rankings concern the entire university, not just the undergraduate institution. That's why Princeton (no medical school, law school, business school, etc.) falls behind Penn, with a good medical school, etc.). Why are you people so dense?

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 9:16 PM

In what world is University of Chicago ranked above MIT?

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 9:21 PM

I dont see Devry. They tol me i would be presitigous and employers would love me.

WHERES DEVRY, DAMMIT?!

44 Posted by Pacific Reporter | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 9:22 PM

That list is fucking junk. UCLA beats Berkeley? Lame.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 9:28 PM

Why the preference for private schools (Penn and Michigan are the only two public US schools among the top 25)?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 9:37 PM

It is not the container--
it is what is inside.


Tweak any questionable variable a bit--
and guess what very different distribution.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 9:41 PM

OH MY GOD
Egypt has beaten Italy in soccer.!!!

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 9:59 PM

Uppsala University over Lund University WTF? Everybody knows Lund pwns Uppsala!

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 10:50 PM

Maybe Cal stole USNWR's girlfriend or something. As I understand, USNWR used to rank Cal consistently in the top 5. Then, for some reason, back in the 1990s, it start treating Cal shabbily. UCLA beats Cal? Carnegie Mellon beats Cal? What a joke . . . .

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 10:53 PM

WHAT!?

What about WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW?

That school is pretty prestigious due to its great moot court team.

Plus, "CHEYANNA JAFFKE" is a faculty member. That must count for something!!!

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 10:57 PM

good one 45

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 10:58 PM

Speaking of "WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW," I toured that school once.

I remember going to the library and some tall, blonde, creepy, weirdo guy whose voice sounds like Buffalo Bill from "Silence of the Lambs," kept on bragging about his good grades and how he accomplished so much.

That, along with the many "rubes" (lots of students from middle america) and "ringers" (students who were 30+ years old) made me decide on another school.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 11:04 PM

51 - no takers so far, though.

- 45

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 11:06 PM

47,

Soccer!? You foreigner!

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 11:07 PM

Go Blue!

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 11:16 PM

55-

Baseball is the dumbest sport in the world. It's boring and anyone with a brain would rather watch flies shit.

Only a person with no athletic ability and no testosterone in their body would like a dull game like baseball. This explains why lawyers love this crappy game.

What is even more amazing are the people in law school and lawyers in practice who can care less about baseball, but started to "like" it because others in those fields prefer this brain-dead game.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 11:21 PM

52-

The ringer comment reminds me of a joke.

A first grader goes into the bathroom and uses the urinals. He peeks over at the other boys and notices that his penis was bigger than the other boys.

Feeling good about himself, later that day, he tells his dad, "Dad, my dick is bigger than all the other students!"

The Dad says, "Of course you do son; it's because you're 20 and never passed the first grade!"

Sometimes it is as if this applies to the ringers in law school. If they are so smart, shouldn't they be years ahead of the other students with a good job and all? But instead they are on equal grounds as people half their age.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 11:30 PM

We 3L's are so fucked.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 19, 2009 11:31 PM

nice story 57!

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:02 AM

50...

WesTTTern STTTtatTTTe University College of Law.

Yeah, I've heard of it.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:08 AM

52,

People from Western State usually brag about their grades and/or "achievements" a lot. It's because they are from a TTT, so they have to compensate for it (natural process).

It's like saying, "Sure, I'm from a crap school, but on the other hand, I did get good grades and make law review."

I remember a person from Western talking about how he was so great because he had GOOD GRADES and "OUT-COMPETED" his classmates because his classmates were stupid.

A guy heard him and said that since he is the top student among other stupid students, wouldn't that make him "King of the Stupids."

avatar
62 Posted by kiwicamaraisbaaack | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:11 AM

Kiwi Camara's Top 10 Jury Skills

10. A huge hit with teenage graduates of Harvard Law School.
9. An expert on Batson challenges.
8. Not afraid to lose more of his client's money than anyone thought possible.
7. Arrogant, rude, and insulting--what's not to like?
6. Works pro bono, the only kind of lawyer his clients can afford after he's done with them.
5. Likes to show the common folk how much smarter he is.
4. Friends with Charles Nesson, the pulse of America.
3. Took a really useful bankruptcy class once.
2. Knows how to appeal his losses.
1. He's incredibly sexy.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:26 AM

61, LOL!!!!

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 2:12 AM

cal ranks in the top 5 (top 2 in all but biomed...they don't even have a med school) in all of the "rank by subject" lists, and yet isn't top 20 in the overall ranking? i don't understand their ranking system.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 2:46 AM

Chicago is clearly superior to MIT in every respect. Well, MIT might sport prettier women.

avatar
66 Posted by kellycraseoman | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:34 AM

Mine ranks quite high up, I'm very surprised.

67 Posted by MadMan | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 4:45 AM

Young Guns-

The fact that anyone cares about this ridiculous survey only further proves that none of you are worthy of a position with a growing firm.

You all seem to base your lives on fear and loathing: you fear that you will not be good enough to make it with a big firm (which is 50/50 based on what I've seen), and you loath the folks who provide you with the opportunity to work in the profession that you have chosen (partners). I shall offer one (1) tip:

1: Always include the partner you work for in anything you are doing. You are not going to get in good with the client and somehow steal him from the guy who has known him for xx Years. I know, you are much smarter, but realize the world which surrounds you...

This is to my friend, who has reminded me of my first sexual experience:

"Thank you, Dr. Malcolm, but I think things are a little
different than you and I feared.

MALCOLM
Yes, I know. They're a lot worse."

Good luck summers!
My hours suck for the year, so you might get some work from me.

mm

68 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:09 AM

I didn't know Boston was such a big college town.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:01 PM

UCLA has a solid medical school, while Berkeley has, well...an Optometry school. Haven't looked at the criteria for the rankings, but that could play into the rankings, at least in terms of the breadth of academic impact.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:04 PM

Where would Suffolk Law be in ranked in the US NEWS Top 400 Community Colleges of the World?

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:39 PM

CravaTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTh

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:10 PM

11-
Penn > Princeton is correct. Unless for some reason you think princeton undergrad has enough nut to match up against Penn's top 3 B school, top 3 med school, and top 10 law school. We are talking about UNIVERSITIES here. look at the bigger picture.

I'll admit-- the stanford thing is puzzling as fuk. stanford should be top 5 with harvard, yale, oxford and cambridge.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:12 PM

As a graduate of UW-Madison, I've always thought of my degree as about equal to Dartmouth.

Strangely, employers have viewed them differently.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:21 PM

Anyone with any knowledge of non-American schools can see this list is nonsense. Undoubtedly, the relative rankings of many British and Canadian schools are way of the mark. The laughable suggestions that UCL,Manchester, and Bristol are 7th, 29th, and 32nd in the world. McGill and UBC ranked higher than UofT?

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:38 PM

Hey Ellie,

What school would you have gone to if you weren't black?

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:42 PM

Indiana lawyer found asleep in trash can
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/O/ODD_LAWYER_IN_TRASH_CAN?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=ENTERTAINMENT

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:53 PM

74 =UofT troll. Get over it -- McGill has a better international reputation than UofT.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 2:06 PM

77

Pete, is that you?

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 2:10 PM

Nice find 76. If only Kash had posted on that yesterday . . .

http://abovethelaw.com/2009/06/lawyer_of_the_day_larry_wilder.php

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:17 PM

UBC > UofT

Sorry

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 4:01 PM

Chicago > MIT in a world where having a medical school and law school count for something.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 4:22 PM

UF>FSU. In everything.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 4:53 PM

Cal Tech is a pimple on the ass of MIT. What a joke.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 4:58 PM

University of Toronto is better regarded inside of canada.

But McGill is recognized internationally. People in europe/asia/USA think of University of Toronto like University of Phoenix- some kind of knockoff regional school.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:04 PM

80,

No one has heard of UBC either.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:23 PM

"Bangor (I Hardly Knew Her)." Sophomoric, perhaps, but well done.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:38 PM

Oh, like, yah, fer sure, yer Harvard or Yale B.A. makes you like, so kewl!

We'll save a spot for you in the bread line.

Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha!

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:48 PM

Stanford's ranking undoubtedly suffered because of its indictment in that unfortunate Antigua thing this week..

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 6:03 PM

Sorry 77, but 74 is absolutely right. I cringe every time I see rankings of schools outside the US. There is no doubt that U of T is the best school in Canada. McGill is an impoverished school with very little academic contributions compared to U of T. I can't believe McGill is still around based on its 19th Century "prestige."

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 7:43 PM

Has Above the Law suddenly stopped teaming up with Lawshucks?

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:00 PM

89=McGill reject

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:29 PM

1 & 3 - What's with all the Fordham and SMU references? I likeyyyy

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 8:49 PM

Sorry about your tiny pink career Latham 1st years.

ps. I was just joking when I told you at 1st year academy that there's a place for you at the firm. Tehe!

- Bob D.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 10:14 PM

i wish i was balck becasue then i coudl get into schoolz like harvrad desipte the fact thta i butchre the langage on a daily bsais

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 10:19 PM

I went to SMU law and now I work at Locke Lord Houston. Rankings mean nothing.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 20, 2009 11:27 PM

i'm calling BS on 29 and 33. If either of you were actually in a position to know such things, I doubt you'd be spilling the beans in the comments section of an unrelated article on ATL. Shame on you both!

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 1:20 AM

These rankings are idiotic.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 2:01 AM

The reason why these rankings make little sense is because the only variables with significant variation are student:faculty ratio, proportion of international students, and proportion of international faculty. Since for some reasons almost all the American schools in the top 50 have perfect peer reviews and employer ratings, this ranking basically orders schools based on how many international students and faculty they host.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:58 AM

Most of you idiots complaining about these rankings confuse the difficulty of admission into a school with other qualities, such as academic peer review or quality of research, etc.

They are different things. Lay person prestige tends to focus on selectivity when it comes to schools; that's not what these rankings intend to show.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:14 AM

Carnegie Mellon in the top 25...I love this list. It's pretty much meaningless but I love it anyway.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:23 AM

If UCLA is so much better than Berkeley, why is it filled with Berkeley rejects?

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:26 AM

Check out this d-bag of a HLS professor: http://dailyahole.com/2009/06/21/harvard-law-professors-are-assholes/

103 Posted by BookMama | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 11:02 AM

I always say with all school rankings, they should give you a general idea of the quality of a school, but never choose a school based on whether it is #1 or #9 or even #15.

I assume the comment: Michigan State students (#203) now officially know that they are way more prestigious than students at Sciences Po Paris (#207). -- was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. You definitely have to look at the rankings with a grain of salt. That being said, they provide a small amount of useful information (and a large amount of aggravation for schools I'm sure).

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 11:10 AM

Get over yourselves. These weren't created to guide students and employers in making wise decisions, they were created to generate controversy and sell magazines and online ad space.

Mission accomplished.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 11:44 AM

The fact that Berkeley isn't in the top 10 makes this list a joke.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 11:46 AM

BU > Dartmouth? In what fucking universe did this list come from?

BU > 111 points higher than Tufts???

And is it just me, or was BC not even on the list?

I must say, though, as a graduate who spent nearly two years unable to even get a retail job, Bates College is rightly excluded from the Top 400. Suck it, Bobcats!

107 Posted by Captain Canuck | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 12:05 PM

Okay it's not UofT, but Canada made it into the top 20.

20. McGill University (Canada) (89.7).

Captain Canuck is taking a road trip down to Carnegie Mellon (21) to laugh in their faces, I am calling the dean on Monday to make an appointment (to do otherwise would simply be uncanadian).

For those that are not feeling Carnegie, McGill also beat out NYU/Brown/Berkeley

-Bay Street is Awesome!

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 1:44 PM

107: That's not going to help your bid for statehood.

And what do the Vols have to do with this?

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 2:25 PM

108 -- in case you haven't noticed, Canada is fairing MUCH better than the US in this economy. We want nothing to do with you right now.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 3:02 PM

University of Florida is better than brandeis?

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 3:28 PM

105 --- You're wrong ... a bunch of people at my high school who got rejected from UCLA were admitted to Berkeley ... many who got into both (myself among them) chose UCLA

Additionally, many of the Berkeley undergrads who I met at my law school were HIGHLY unimpressive

Anyways, California needs to make sure that both of these schools don't tank when the state stops funding them (maybe the UC Regents shouldn't open a new law school in Irvine ... WTF?)

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 3:35 PM

Berkeley - Filled with Stanford rejects & transfers who received fantastic 3.0's in both high school and junior college

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 3:36 PM

How is BC not on the list? Also, what makes G-Town so damn low?

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:04 PM

All the Brown, Northwestern, and Wash U people are just salty because Michigan is finally being recognized for being a public Ivy. Suck it! Num num num. Go Blue!

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:43 PM

No. 45: Umm, Penn is not a "public" school.

Anyhow, all of this is completely, utterly irrelevant. A bachelor's in a hard science from just about anywhere could, possibly, advance one's career prospects. By contrast, a liberal arts education from the highest echelons, standing alone, is worthless.

The sad fact is that we churn out far too many unemployable college grads in this country. We need more vocational education.

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 4:55 PM

more information from 29, please

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 6:13 PM

Michigan should be ranked #1. Best professors, best campus, best undergraduate experience, keeps every door open.

Any of you Ivy Prestige whores missed out on a hell of a lot of fun, while the Wolverines were getting awesome and then joined you at your prestigious law school and law firm.

Suck it, world!

Go Blue!

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 6:42 PM

Hey 116, 29 is full of dog poo. don't let it get you down.

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 6:53 PM

[comment removed by an obese clown]

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 6:59 PM

[comment removed by an obese illiterate clown ... nice to see Elie is working on Sunday nights...]

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 7:10 PM

109,

Are you retarded? The Canadian economy is wholly dependent upon the Americans.

A fellow Canuck

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 8:25 PM

McCarthy's Toronto office, first of the Sisters to defer start dates for current articling (class of 2008) students.

The suck is moving north.

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 8:26 PM

Captain Canuck - enjoy Torkin Manes, you twit.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 8:27 PM

29 please give names.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 8:41 PM

[comment removed by a lazy, disgusting, obese retard]

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:06 PM

122 - CDDF?

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:14 PM

122 here. No I am not CDDF Lawbuzz sucks.

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:18 PM

wtf does CDDF mean?

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:24 PM

I am pounding a Canadian secretary who went to McGill in her ass right now.

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 9:31 PM

29 -

Why would any firm rescind offers right now in the middle of the summer program? That's going to be great PR for them.

Unless of course:

1) they have no summer program;
2) they aren't participating in fall OCIs; or
3) they are just going to cancel their summer program.

Please advise.

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:21 PM

Lawbuzz sucks

CDDF

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:35 PM

I had to say. This is a really great article!!!

Thanks

Richard
http://www.InsideRater.com

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:35 PM

I had to say. This is a really great article!!!

Thanks

Richard
http://www.InsideRater.com

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, June 21, 2009 10:35 PM

I had to say. This is a really great article!!!

Thanks

Richard
http://www.InsideRater.com

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 1:31 AM

LATHAM NY sucks. Man... I never thought they are that bad!!

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 1:45 AM

135

Don't you just hate those 1:00am phone calls rescinding your offer?

Oh wait, they don't exist.

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 1:59 AM

Soon US News will be ranking the States of the Union. CA = 1, NY = 2, and RI = 3, just ahead of the Dakotas.

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 2:18 AM

US News needs to rank my poo

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 8:23 AM

110: Yes. Eat it. Go Gators.

Enjoy the loan payments. I went to UF undergrad for free.

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 9:41 AM

Minnesota pwns VanderbilTTT and GeorgeTTTown. Truth.

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 10:03 AM

The international rankings are based purely on research output. The larger the school, the more output.

It has nothing to do with prestige, education, or quality of the students. It has everything to do with having as many academics as possible, cranking out as much research as they can.

You will see no liberal arts colleges. Universities that are prestigious and selective, but put an emphasis on undergraduate education will be ranked low. Those that are huge and put an emphasis on graduate programs will be ranked high.

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 10:03 AM

The international rankings are based purely on research output. The larger the school, the more output.

It has nothing to do with prestige, education, or quality of the students. It has everything to do with having as many academics as possible, cranking out as much research as they can.

You will see no liberal arts colleges. Universities that are prestigious and selective, but put an emphasis on undergraduate education will be ranked low. Those that are huge and put an emphasis on graduate programs will be ranked high.

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 10:14 AM

27= Lord Jeff :)

142 = nailed it

avatar
144 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 10:35 AM

The Chinese government does not read comments on this website.

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 12:00 PM

The United States has a disproportionate number of schools on this list and, yet, our populace is markedly less educated than most of the other countries represented. Sad.

avatar
146 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 1:37 PM

Is the article title from Countdown? That's what it reminded me of.

avatar
147 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 2:15 PM

Heidelberg Universität > Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München???

What is this???

Highly dubious...

avatar
148 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 2:18 PM

Heidelberg Universität > Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München???

What is this???

Highly dubious...

avatar
149 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 3:31 PM

Heidelberg Universität > Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München???

What is this???

Highly dubious...

avatar
150 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 3:34 PM

Heidelberg Universität > Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München???

What is this???

Highly dubious...

avatar
151 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 7:05 PM

Ridiculous. Including proportions of foreign faculty and foreign students as measures of quality inherently favors universities in small nations, explaining the higher number of British universities at the top than in better-conceived international rankings.

Also, comparing faculty to student ratios at schools that have medical schools with those that don't yields predictable - and meaningless - results. This score is the reason that this survey ranks UCLA over Berkeley. Even the chancellor at UCLA would find that odd.

avatar
152 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 7:09 PM

Ridiculous. Including proportions of foreign faculty and foreign students as measures of quality inherently favors universities in small nations, explaining the higher number of British universities at the top than in better-conceived international rankings.

Also, comparing faculty to student ratios at schools that have medical schools with those that don't yields predictable - and meaningless - results. This score is the reason that this survey ranks UCLA over Berkeley. Even the chancellor at UCLA would find that odd.

avatar
153 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 22, 2009 9:32 PM

61,

That is so true. When law students brag about themselves in job interviews and talk about how they out-compete their classmates, they are actually sticking their foot in their mouths. What they end up doing is they degrade their school and as a result, the employer will go, "Why should I hire your mongrul ass, if you came from such a crappy school!?"

52,

Yeah the students at THAT SCHOOL are weird. I noticed that they like to speak really loud (so that others can hear) when they are on the subject of grades and law review.

I toured the library at that school once and the students look like a bunch of smart-alecks. If you really want to impress some people, go own a business and make real money!

avatar
154 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, June 23, 2009 9:50 PM

ColumTTTbia

Post Your Comment