A Message of Inspiration From Ballard Spahr
Here at Above the Law, we appreciate and encourage openness from law firms. Law firms don’t have to make quarterly reports to the SEC. But partners, associates, staff, and prospective law students should have as much information as possible about the firms they work for.
So we honestly applaud Arthur Makadon, chairman of Ballard Spahr. He decided to communicate directly with his associates and partners. In the middle of a recession, Mr. Makadon seems to understand the importance of having open communication. We post the following not to make fun of Ballard Spahr, but to encourage other firms to do the same. Here is how Makadon starts off his firm-wide message:
With the year half over, and with significant changes taking place at Ballard, at other law firms and businesses, and, indeed, at virtually every enterprise throughout the country, you understandably must wonder how we are doing. And so I want to take the opportunity in this quarterly message to provide some perspective on where we stand in 2009 and where we expect to be six months from now, two years from now, and a decade from now. Not that any of us wants to skip ahead to this winter; at least here in the East, after sloshing through an unusually rainy spring and enduring a gray and rainy June, we are still waiting to see some consistent sunshine and feel the warmth (and in my case humidity) of summer.
This email is going to be great. More from it, after the jump.
Mr. Makadon addresses the terrible economy head on:
We all know that 2009 is an extraordinary year. The country’s treacherous economic climate requires every organization to make material changes and to continue to fine-tune its strategy. Thus, we have been extraordinarily busy. And in a firm as widespread and diverse as ours, there is no one-size-fits-all approach. It is department by department, office by office, practice group by practice group, person by person. At the same time, we are pursuing cost savings vigorously. Thus, like everyone else, we have faced exceedingly difficult choices in restructuring compensation, deferring incoming associates, paring staff positions, and shortening the summer program. We fully appreciate that these changes were a jolt to those affected, and I deeply regret that. But to pretend that the world has not changed and, therefore, to take no action, would have been unthinkable, irresponsible, and, ultimately, highly counter-productive. So, in order to move forward, we took the steps that we believed were necessary in as fair a manner as possible. And anyone who expects that we will return to old ways when the economy improves (and it will) has failed to appreciate the profound shift that is taking place in the world. We will certainly get to a place that is much more comfortable than today, but the lessons of 2008-2009 will influence our decision-making for a long time to come.
There really isn’t a managing partner on earth that isn’t thinking this way. Of course, “fair” is in the eye of the beholder. We’ll see how the associate and staff compensation cuts match up with the partner compensation cuts soon enough. But our partner readers know that their ability to make money is also important to the long-term viability of the firm.
But Makadon does thank his employees. And it certainly sounds like heartfelt appreciation:
The story of the first six months of 2009, then, is one of difficult decisions, fiscal discipline, shifting priorities, attention to business development, a lot of hard work, and, most important, the unequivocal loyalty and dedication of our people - staff and professionals. At times like these, people show their true character, and it is reassuring to see that we have so many people of real character. They deal with their anxieties, keep their outlook positive, and do everything in their power to encourage others to do likewise, because only with that frame of mind can we continue to be successful and continue to enjoy what we do. (It is more difficult when an enterprise has both success and enjoyment as goals.) We know that in rebalancing our workforce, we have placed a greater burden on many of you and you have handled it with grace and professionalism. You continue to work cooperatively, think imaginatively, and, in big ways and small, contribute to the economic well-being of Ballard. Many thanks!
Obviously, this message isn’t intended for the people who have been “rebalanced.” But for the soldiers still standing, that is a pretty nice thank you.
The rest of the message is more of a standard “all is well” list of the positive things that are happening at Ballard Spahr. We’ve heard a lot of that language from other firms.
But at the end of his message, Makadon makes a point of talking about positive press the firm has received:
[T]his morning brought good news from, of all places, the American Lawyer. Although I am not a fan of the American Lawyer, I appreciate its impact. Thus, we should tout the good because our competitors sure love to elaborate, to the nth degree, on the not-so-good. (These so-called competitors will be the subject of a separate memorandum soon.) Today we were named among the top 50 law firms for pro bono efforts. This endorsement would not have taken place without Mary Gay Scanlon as our executive director of pro bono and without the grit and determination of so many of our professionals and staff. (One such story, about associate Amy Shellhammer’s efforts, can be read by clicking here.) I wrote Mary Gay a note thanking her and asking that we step up our effort and move into the top 20 this year - yes, 2009. For the rest of us, a similar message. Let’s get to the AmLaw top 50. We should be tired of hovering between 90 and 100.
Brilliant! Law students are not the only people that are obsessed with rankings. And cutting associate and staff salaries is certainly one way to keep revenue and profits per partner high, two factors that influence the firm’s rankings. Honesty is awesome.
We wish Ballard Spahr the best of luck in their drive towards the Am Law top 50.
Read the full memo below. There is a lot of excellent communication about partner departures in there as well.
BALLARD SPAHR — MEMORANDUM — STATE OF THE FIRM
Dear Colleagues,
With the year half over, and with significant changes taking place at Ballard, at other law firms and businesses, and, indeed, at virtually every enterprise throughout the country, you understandably must wonder how we are doing. And so I want to take the opportunity in this quarterly message to provide some perspective on where we stand in 2009 and where we expect to be six months from now, two years from now, and a decade from now. Not that any of us wants to skip ahead to this winter; at least here in the East, after sloshing through an unusually rainy spring and enduring a gray and rainy June, we are still waiting to see some consistent sunshine and feel the warmth (and in my case humidity) of summer. Business, though, demands that we look toward year-end and the goals we have set.
But before turning to this business, let me start by saying that it is never easy to say goodbye to a partner, even when we part as friends and fully intend to continue our professional association, as is the case with Ben Levin and three other New Jersey partners. Ben, Rich Hluchan, Bill Hyland, and Mark Shapiro are forming their own practice with a number of senior counsel and associates, and returning to the “simpler life” of a small firm. We wish them every success, and on a personal note, I will very much miss a friend in Ben. Steve Suflas, our New Jersey managing partner, has an office full of deep talent and vitality with which to continue to advance our profile and productivity, and he and our New Jersey office have our full and unequivocal support. Just watch how they continue to flourish, and watch us grow into the most sought-after firm in New Jersey.
Now, to business. We all know that 2009 is an extraordinary year. The country’s treacherous economic climate requires every organization to make material changes and to continue to fine-tune its strategy. Thus, we have been extraordinarily busy. And in a firm as widespread and diverse as ours, there is no one-size-fits-all approach. It is department by department, office by office, practice group by practice group, person by person. At the same time, we are pursuing cost savings vigorously. Thus, like everyone else, we have faced exceedingly difficult choices in restructuring compensation, deferring incoming associates, paring staff positions, and shortening the summer program. We fully appreciate that these changes were a jolt to those affected, and I deeply regret that. But to pretend that the world has not changed and, therefore, to take no action, would have been unthinkable, irresponsible, and, ultimately, highly counter-productive. So, in order to move forward, we took the steps that we believed were necessary in as fair a manner as possible. And anyone who expects that we will return to old ways when the economy improves (and it will) has failed to appreciate the profound shift that is taking place in the world. We will certainly get to a place that is much more comfortable than today, but the lessons of 2008-2009 will influence our decision-making for a long time to come.
The story of the first six months of 2009, then, is one of difficult decisions, fiscal discipline, shifting priorities, attention to business development, a lot of hard work, and, most important, the unequivocal loyalty and dedication of our people - staff and professionals. At times like these, people show their true character, and it is reassuring to see that we have so many people of real character. They deal with their anxieties, keep their outlook positive, and do everything in their power to encourage others to do likewise, because only with that frame of mind can we continue to be successful and continue to enjoy what we do. (It is more difficult when an enterprise has both success and enjoyment as goals.) We know that in rebalancing our workforce, we have placed a greater burden on many of you and you have handled it with grace and professionalism. You continue to work cooperatively, think imaginatively, and, in big ways and small, contribute to the economic well-being of Ballard. Many thanks!
Despite the challenges of the first half of the year, and the complicated decisions we faced, we did things - big and small - that should make us proud. One I will never forget is the Board discussion on whether our budget for legal services to the indigent should remain 100 percent intact for 2009. I lost my way for a while on this issue and found myself recommending that we cut the budget and/or defer legal services spending until we had a better idea of how the year would turn out. But, driving home from the Board Dinner the night of the discussion, I thought what a mistake it would be to approach our obligation to the indigent in that way, asked the Board to revisit the issue, and reinstated the budget at 100 percent. Whatever insecurity we might feel internally as a result of the economic crisis is magnified many times for the truly needy in the regions in which we have offices.
As for the remainder of 2009, we have many reasons to be hopeful. In sum, the answer to the question, “Will we be OK?”, is unequivocally, “Yes.” But that “yes” means that each of us needs to pursue our firm goals diligently and with a sense of urgency. In this regard, I would note that the Litigation Department, for the first time in a while, is operating over budget (and with the influx of new matters, will continue to do so); the Real Estate Department has had terrific initial success with its Distressed Real Estate Initiative and there is much promise there; Business & Finance is targeting new clients and going after them with a vigor I have not seen before; Intellectual Property is beginning to see success from cross-marketing efforts; and Public Finance is definitely on the upswing. On a more individual basis, a number of partners are engaged far beyond capacity - indeed, beyond any other year - and the trickle-down effect is healthy and palpable. I would encourage others to follow their example. In essence, I think the environment is far more positive than last fall or even two or three months ago.
In this message, I also want to address a concern that some of you might feel whenever you hear that a partner is leaving. It is natural at Ballard (but not at many other firms where there is far more frequent movement amongst partners) to wonder why a partner leaves and to be curious about what it means for the firm. Lawyers leave for a variety of reasons. They might have a client conflict that can only be resolved by changing firms. They and the firm might jointly agree that they can no longer achieve what is expected of them. They might have an opportunity that is simply too good to pass up. Whatever the reason, partner departures happen and you should not make any assumptions without knowing more about the circumstances.
I have been urged from time to time to communicate directly about the reasons for partner withdrawals. I have been (and will remain) ill-disposed to do that. As I said, partners leave for a variety of reasons and I do not want to single out the partners who have been asked to find a position elsewhere. I appreciate that such explanation might answer some of your short-term questions, and put an end to unproductive speculation, but I know that there are partners in leadership positions with whom you can speak privately who know the truth and will share it with you. I am sure you understand this sensitive point and its ramifications.
I also want to caution you against falling prey to rumors. It takes no more than one misguided individual communicating misinformation to cause limitless distractions - internally and externally. Internally, rumors cause needless anxiety; externally, they cause havoc by creating a “frenzy” among headhunters and other firms seeking to gain an advantage based on misinformation that seeps out. My position requires that I keep Ballard moving ahead, but not by withholding information from you or by “spinning” the media to paint an undue rosy picture. So if you hear information that is contrary to the information provided by the firm, you should at least question the contrary information and the motive of the person providing it. I am at the top of the proverbial food chain and have no axe to grind, am not running for anything, and have no reason at all not to see that you have the best and most thorough understanding possible, because, among other things, you must have that level of comfort to have confidence in the management of the firm. So if you have a question and cannot get a satisfactory response, please ask me. If I do not have the answer, I will see that you get it.
Today we welcome our newly elected Board members - John Langel, Ray Truitt, and Blake Wade - for three-year terms and we look forward to the contribution they will make. I want to thank Tom Eshelman for his thoughtful and diligent service as a member of the elected Board and for the incredible contribution he has made and will continue to make in his role as our Financial Partner. I also want to thank Brian Doerner for his exceptional service as a member of the elected Board and for the Herculean job he is and has been doing as head of our Business & Finance Department. This also is a day of transition for seven terrific lawyers who today become partners, having been voted into the partnership at the Partners Meeting in April. We are delighted to welcome Jim Cooke (Washington), Patrick Gillard (Philadelphia), Bill Kennedy (Philadelphia), Randy Larsen (Salt Lake City), Michele Bax (Phoenix), Paul Lantieri (Philadelphia), and Jason Leckerman (Philadelphia).
I am sure that many of you are eager to know when we will introduce our new identity and Web site. The answer is, September 8. There is much painstaking work to be done, but [Redacted] says we are getting close. Only when I hear [Redacted] talk about all the people working toward the conversion do I begin to grasp what a monumental task it is. Countless online, electronic, and hard-copy files and other materials are being redone through the efforts of Marketing, Information Services, ARC, Office Services, and Accounting. The Office Administrators and many others throughout the firm are playing an invaluable role.
[Redacted] unveiled the Web site and firm materials at the Firm Seminar. The predominant color is yellow and the look is vibrant. For some, I am sure it will take some getting used to. Others cannot wait to say goodbye to the pyramids (in haphazard colors) and the mishmash of styles that has grown out of control over the years. I have had a chance, as the site is constructed, to look at many of the pages. My favorites are the lawyer bio pages. They have personality - not to mention outstanding photographs. [Redacted] plans a presentation to the staff as well. I ask for your support as we cover the final, grueling few miles of this ultra-marathon.
Another conversion, far less visible to the outside world but absolutely integral to our work product, is largely complete. Replacing our old document management system with FileSite was a massive undertaking, and not without frustration - nothing of this magnitude ever is - but the conversion was accomplished with sanity intact (maybe). My thanks to Information Services, including the trainers who had to make sense of the new system for everyone in the firm, and to all the others who played a part.
Our Summer Associates are here and I encourage you to stop in and say hello while they are here. If you are a partner who can offer them an interesting opportunity, please do so.
Today we will present the Alan J. Davis Award during a ceremony at the Philadelphia office at which Alan’s widow, Lyn, will be present. The award, named for our distinguished former colleague, is being given this year to the Wills for Heroes Team, which includes more than 100 of our lawyers and staff from almost every office. Our people have helped to organize and staff events in cities and towns across the country - sometimes in concert with clients - at which we prepare wills and estate-planning documents for police officers, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians. Team members from other offices will join the presentation via videoconference. All deserve applause for their role in this worthy pro bono effort. Special thanks, though, go to associate Dan McKenna. With Dan as our leader, we have helped expand the program to more than 20 states and have produced nearly 2,000 wills for first-responders. At the winners’ request, the $25,000 award will be donated to the Wills for Heroes Foundation.
On this same note, this Message was put to rest yesterday, but this morning brought good news from, of all places, the American Lawyer. Although I am not a fan of the American Lawyer, I appreciate its impact. Thus, we should tout the good because our competitors sure love to elaborate, to the nth degree, on the not-so-good. (These so-called competitors will be the subject of a separate memorandum soon.) Today we were named among the top 50 law firms for pro bono efforts. This endorsement would not have taken place without Mary Gay Scanlon as our executive director of pro bono and without the grit and determination of so many of our professionals and staff. (One such story, about associate Amy Shellhammer’s efforts, can be read by clicking here.) I wrote Mary Gay a note thanking her and asking that we step up our effort and move into the top 20 this year - yes, 2009. For the rest of us, a similar message.
Let’s get to the AmLaw top 50. We should be tired of hovering between 90 and 100.
As always, my thanks.




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
first
I was wondering why there had been no post in two and a half hours. Mystal was writing this book which no one will read past the jump.
EVERYONE appreciates honesty. Every associate knows that things are awful right now - what we want is partners to be honest with us.
LEGALIZE IT
What's he talking about? Did something happen while I've been getting meaningful trial experience?
DOJ Secure
Arthur Makadon:
Go to hell. Go straight to hell.
There is nothing worse than a law firm that tries to be something its not. In the end it's the associates who will be hurt most.
What a corny memo. I hate when people write about weather, get to the fucking point.
Elie MysTTTal
I'm a summer associate at a large law firm. An employee at the law firm has been blackmailing me for affection. She holds considerable power over whether I get an offer. I finally broke it off and now the shit has hit the fan. HELP!!!!!!
Ballard is done.
Too long, didn't read.
There's nothing quite as interesting as reading total bullshit from a master bullshitter. Lawyers are great at it. What I've never understood is how they can think that anyone else would eat it with a spoon.
There is an SA in my office that an associate keeps calling "Duncle Man". I can only assume that this is negative given the other comments being made. I normally wouldn't do this, but does anyone here know what, if anything, this means? Yes, I googled and checked wikipedia (and even urban dictionary), but nothing.
4 "it" is legal
Mary Gay Scanlon and any associates who participate in Ballard Spahr's pro bono efforts are now on the chopping block. That's the only reason he highlighted them -- provide cover for that later on.
ctrl-c, ctrl-v, pithy commentary, ctrl-c, ctrl-v, DONUTS!!!!
12 - can't tell if your request for information is genuine, but in the event it is:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=duncle+
But if it was a genuine request, you clearly didn't check urban dictionary.
Whatever.
So whatever came of that coward bloviating about how he/she was going to report PHJW's billing practices to the state bar?
I agree with the commenter who called them on it, I don't think they have the guts.
BTW - I like a good trainwreck every so often (sorry DC).
did he do the whole eight ball before writing that? talk about rambling.
This content give a beneficial for me. I still follow this topic. http://www.narongrit.net
http://www.diggbookmark.com
Thank you for good information.
"you must have that level of comfort to have confidence in the management of the firm"
-That is the same line of BS they fed us at Arthur Andersen.
Interesting article in the Philadelphia Inquirer last weekend about Makadon's ethics. Took the ostrich approach when his client showed him that a state senator tried to solicit a bribe.
Say what you will but a class act right there! It shows that some Philly firms are responsible UNLIKE Andy Kassner, Alfie Putnam and F. Douglas Raymond at Drinker Biddle & Reath. Don't believe the DBR lies...
Here's a link to the article that 21 referred to: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/50826062.html. For those without the attention span, 21 was referring to this specific tidbit:
No one stood in Fumo's way, because he was quick to reward friends and punish enemies. In many ways, that's how the political omertà in Philadelphia works. Pols and business leaders learn to go along to get along - and get rich.
Just ask David L. Cohen and Art Makadon, two respected Philadelphia power lawyers, who seemingly turned a blind eye when the former head of Verizon detailed Fumo's alleged $50 million shakedown attempt of the telecommunications firm.
In the end, Cohen and Makadon were among the scores of political and business leaders who wrote letters to Buckwalter begging for mercy for Fumo.
Mystal was writing this book
__________________________________________
Mystal wrote this?
11 - 2 lawyers one cup?
Another instance of a partner spouting platitudes, and sticking associates with the brunt of the pain, while mostly maneuvering to improve their BS ranking to help PPP.
I call this more of the same, not honesty.
My shit firm - Thompson Hine - doles out the shit in mass quantities, but the shit is pretty much the same everywhere.
I've had a very busy run keep me from posting as much as I'd like, but the quality of the projects we're getting in the door is still complete gutter tripe.
The real road to cost savings for clients? Get rid of the partner and start servicing the clients yourself. Why haven't I done it yet myself? Well, I'm still having some fun being a rat on the Titanic, but stay tuned...
This memo can be boiled down to four words: The ship be sinkin'.
As one of the former Ballard associates who was part of Ballard's "rebalancing our workforce" (read stealth layoffs of attorneys since at least December 2008), I have to admit that Makadon always struck me as pretty sincere in his memos, like this one, to the firm. That having been said, I don't believe that loyalty is a quality to which Ballard aspires.
And it's true that Ballard does encourage pro bono. I tried to load a bunch of it on my plate last fall when the billable work dried up. They canned me anyway.
Holy shit, Partner Emeritus wrote that memo.
Memo seems a bit different than his quote referring to the firm as a "prep school,"
http://abajournal.com/news/ballard_spahr_a_prep_school_no_more_after_staff_atty_axings_lockstep_pay_ma/
WTFL. Did not read.
I missed you Rogue Associate.
The spic be stinking......
"These so-called competitors will be the subject of a separate memorandum soon."
ELIE-- YOU HAVE TO GET A COPY OF THIS MEMORANDUM!!!!!
Glad to see you're back, Rogue Associate! I've been missing you.
The ship be sinking...
Glad to see you're back, Rogue Associate! I've been missing you.
Rogue Associate has just the right amount of 80's sleaze to make it in this business.
8 - if that's really the case you must do some research on what happened at one of the largest Chicago firms four years ago when a female senior associate demanded 'specific performance' from a summer associate. She was terminated and walked out of the firm. Anyone recall that wonderful vignette?
why aren't we focusing on the major event of the day - the re-naming of the Sears Tower to the Willis Tower - whatchyoutalkinabout Willis?
How ugly does a female associate have to be to resort to coercing SAs for sex? Are we talking Sotomayor ugly or just run of the mill female lawyer ugly?
Does anyone have any tickets for the Earth, Wind, and Fire concert?
41: ugly enough that she couldn't get any pot-bellied, skinny-limbed, balding, "5'10,"" middle-aged, male lawyers to sleep with her.
Granted, I work at an IP bigtique, so the ugly is off the charts, but even so...
rogue associate -- i am in love with you
12 - I think the reference is to Brian Dunkleman. He was the 'co-host' of the first season of American Idol with Ryan "A**hole!!" Seacrest. He didn't focus test well and was gone the next season. My guess is that the associate's saying your SA won't be getting an offer.
It must suck rubber donkey lungs to be in law school right now.
Ballard insider here. The last time Makadon sent a letter like this to the firm - December 11, 2008. The next day, 18 attorneys at the Phil. office and a half dozen or so out west were invited to look for other employment.
The ship, indeed, be sinkin'.
ahh yes, this is why we want to be lawyers.... so we can work with women who appease to the eye... that is, after all, their only worth, right?
since male associates go after female associates with a great deal more frequency than the reverse, i can only conclude these male associates themselves are uglier than even you, 43
"Mr. Makadon addresses the terribly economy head on."
When will ATL address the terribly editing head on?
FFS, you have to at least pretend to proofread, MysTTTal.
I haven't seen crap piled this high since the last time I visited some relatives in Oklahoma.
It is widely known that Ballard is struggling more than most. The fact they have to celebrate their top 50 placement in pro bono is just sad. As for the "so-called competitors" line, that's just Makadon saying he's getting read to send out a memo dancing on MLB's grave.
Casual Observer; I must make love to you as soon as possible. You remind me of one of my favorite meats, spam, and spam makes me horny. Holla at me!
Mystal
Interesting. Are they still paying associates in the IP practice up to 100K more than the other associates? Or did Mak-done-did-dat too?
As a Ballard lawyer who bailed a decade or so ago, allow me to say that Arthur Makadon is the least sincere person in the universe. Essentially, if his lips are moving, he's lying. (For a juicy local story, read this: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/philadelphia/50551392.html. Makadon essentially participated in a shakedown of Verizon by a local pol with whom he was close. Then pretended it didn't happen. No one who ever met the guy believes it.)
That said, he had to write something. The reason the firm is in trouble is, in part, the result of some practice acquisitions he was behind. Digesting new firms can be difficult and in a hard economic environment, it can take more than Prilosec. He was always a better administrator than a lawyer, and this memo amply demonstrates that skill.
51- you mean like opening an LA office by raiding Baker Hostetler's least effective "hospitality law" rainmakers?
I haven't seen crap piled this high since Casual Observer's last post.
52,
That link is read. Post the article.
ATTENTION BALLARD ASSOCIATES AND NON-EQUITY STYLE PARTNERS - if your office's managing partner asks to speak with you in the coming days, tell him/her you don't have time. (S)he is trying to arrange your farewell meeting.
Makadon is all right in my book. Double Penn State-Philly grad. Go Nittany Quakers!
Makadon is all right in my book. Double Penn State-Philly grad. Go Nittany Quakers!
Rogue Associate - I would like to buy you a drink!
55, 52 here. Sorry. The link was working when I posted it, but philly.com is a notoriously bad site and I can't seem to find it in another forum. Here's the bottom line:
State Senator Fumo was recently charged, convicted and sentenced in a political corruption trial. His MO was typically to ask entities/people who needed some help from the Legislature to make donations to worthy causes he sponsored (though a foundation he started and which gave him certain perqs), but he also might ask that you send work to a law firm where he might receive a kickback, aka profit share.
Makadon and David L. Cohen, currently of Comcast and formerly managing partner of BS are both Fumo "intimates." Cohen moreso than AM. Anyway, Fumo sends a document with a list of demands to Verizon, upshot being they either comply or he (Fumo) would seek a breakup of Verizon. Verizon exec, together with its general counsel, seek a meeting with Makadon for his white collar criminal lawyer opinion as to whether he needs to go to the FBI with this list of demands. Cohen shows up at the meeting. Neither evidently mentions the extent of their closeness to Fumo. They refuse, by Verizon's account, to even look at the document containing the list of demands and instead tell Verizon it's better to "work it out with" Fumo. Meeting lasts, maybe, 15 minutes. At trial, Verizon guy testifies. Makadon claims not to recall the meeting, but certainly never refused to look at a document. Cohen won't admit anything.
The meeting as described is vintage Makadon. There's lots of discussion in the community regarding whether this is formally a breach of ethics or just an a-hole move. But no one believes for a second that he doesn't remember the meeting, or that he didn't refuse to look at the document, instead telling a company under threat of extortion by a politician to, in essence, pay up.
Duh. Quote from recent article -- philadelphia inquirer, July 12, 2009:
Once they all gathered in the glass conference room, a meeting ensued that by Whelan's account was brief and unsatisfying, almost farcical.
The phone company executive carried with him a key document given him by Wojdak. It listed Fumo's requirements, the most drastic of which were handwritten by the lobbyist after conferring with the senator.
Whelan testified that he told Cohen and Makadon "that the document that I had with me had a number of demands from Sen. Fumo, and we were concerned about the propriety of agreeing to those demands.
"I took it out of the folder that I had and pushed it on the table, and it was pushed back to me. They specifically didn't want to see the document.
"After several minutes of discussion, Mr. Cohen said, 'Dan, find a way of working it out. That's our advice to you. Find a way of working it out.' "
Whelan added: "They said find a way to work it out with the senator. That was the sole and repeated language they used."
Conover, who was also at the meeting, declined a request for an interview.
According to a source, she corroborated to the FBI Whelan's failed attempt to show the lawyers the document.
Whelan also testified that he and Conover asked Cohen and Makadon whether they should report Fumo's demands to federal prosecutors, but never got an answer. Conover also corroborated this.
Cohen is now a top Comcast executive, chairman of the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce, and the incoming head of the board of trustees of the University of Pennsylvania.
He has declined to discuss the meeting.
"I'm not interested in talking about this," Cohen said recently.
Makadon spoke briefly with The Inquirer during the trial. Asked for a follow-up interview, he said, "I have nothing more to say."
In the paper's one interview, on Jan. 5, Makadon said he did not remember telling Whelan to "work it out" with Fumo.
"I don't recall that phrase," Makadon said.
Of the demand list, he said, "I never saw it. He didn't try to hand me a document."
Makadon also said that it was "unlike me to tell somebody I wouldn't read a document."
In general, Makadon said, "the only thing I remember from the meeting was there was a [Verizon] case up on appeal. I don't remember anything about demands, or anything like that. I told him he should try to win that appeal . . . get the best offer possible. That's all that I remember."
Here's a question. Aren't partners in the Philly office supposed to "turn him in" to the state bar, so to speak, when they have knowledge of his serious ethical failings? Shouldn't they anyway? What does it say that they don't?
41 - incomprehensibly ugly. but great dental skills
47: tee hee, hit a nerve, did I?
Don't worry, somebody will love the pot-bellied, skinny-limbed, middle-aged balding guy that is the big law lawyer (i.e., you). You can call that somebody "Mom."
Inspired to do what?
So which Philly firm folds next, Ballard or Morgan Lewis?
66 - the answer is Ballard. The collapse starts in the anemic LA office, and moves steadily eastward.
nice try 22.
17- Not that poster, but if you have such balls of steel, why don't you tell us who you are???
Coward.
This is the same BS that Mark Alderman at Wolf Block was feeding people in January (although Makadon is more eloquent). We've got a plan!! Stick with us!!
17 = obsessive troll. This is the putz who insists on using expressions such as "asshat" and "internet cock." Why doesn't 17 shove that big internet cock up his ass???
64: your powers of perception befit your glowing personality.
you couldn't be further off the mark.....
not a nerve, i guess i have just gotten tired of reading comments like yours on this site. until logging on with regularity, i was under the mistaken impression that those in our profession had a bit more going on up top.
but i bet i can guess YOUR demo: late 20s-mid 30s, male, single and sad about it -- poor little ego -- or unhappily in a shallow relationship (why won't it work? hmmmm.... what DO you value, again?). might as well just stick to the internet. you're not getting anyone truly gorgeous with a mind like that.
-- 47
71- That moron thinks he's a tough guy with his anonymous posts. So pathetic.
73= Roxie
72 = roxie
73 - Agreed, pathetic.