Add RSS RSS

Law Firm Merger Mania: Bingham McCutchen Acquires McKee Nelson

Bingham logo.jpgBingham McCutchen has found a way to expand during the recession. Just weeks after losing 11 lawyers (5 partners and 6 associates) to Morgan Lewis, Bingham McCutchen has acquired McKee Nelson. The American Lawyer reports:

After enduring a rough few years caused by the collapse of the structured finance market, the elite specialty firm of McKee Nelson has agreed to be acquired by the larger Bingham McCutchen.

Partners at both firms were informed Monday morning of the merger, which is scheduled to take effect August 1. The combined firm will be called Bingham McCutchen, and will include all of McKee Nelson’s lawyers.

No word on whether the McKee attorneys have the CHARACTER to become Bingham attorneys. But the merger looks good on paper:

McKee Nelson, which is known as one of the pre-eminent firms for tax planning and tax litigation, was viewed by Bingham as an attractive addition. “It’s really rare to find a firm that is this size that has three market-leading practices,” says Bingham chairman Jay Zimmerman, referring to McKee’s expertise in tax, financial institution litigation, and capital markets-structured finance. Structured finance might be moribund now, but Zimmerman sees it as an area worth investing in. “It will be part of our longterm strategy for serving the financial institution industry.”

How does this work on the McKee side of the ledger? We check in after the jump.

Thumbnail image for McKee Nelson Logo.jpgMcKee has been shedding people, but firm management says that the firm wasn’t desperate to find a merger partner:

Reed Auerbach, a co-chief executive partner of McKee Nelson, says his firm wasn’t under pressure to find a merger partner. “We had already done the hard work to size the [structured finance] practice appropriately,” he explains. At its peak in 2006, Auerbach notes, the group had more than 120 lawyers; today that number is about a quarter of that with roughly 30 attorneys. (Twenty-three lawyers were laid off, 30 joined Ashurst in February, 26 departed under a voluntary program, and 9 moved to other practice areas.) McKee is not carrying excessive debt, Auerbach says, noting that it owes less than $10 million to banks.

Certainly, slimmer is better if you are looking to merge. And it appears that McKee had already done the heavy lifting of firing its structured finance attorneys in response to the near-death experience of the structured finance market.

But this merger feels a lot more like an acquisition. Bingham McCutchen will still be the name of the firm, and only a few McKee partners will hold leadership positions at their new firm:

McKee Nelson’s leaders will hold some positions of power at the combined firm, but Bingham’s management will clearly be in charge. Auerbach will be the only partner from the smaller firm to sit on Bingham’s 12-person management committee. Nelson and McKee will co-head the tax group, Jeffrey Smith will run the financial institutions litigation group, and Auerbach will manage the capital markets group.

Good luck to Bingham McCutchen and former McKee Nelson attorneys.

Bingham McCutchen Acquires McKee Nelson [American Lawyer]

Earlier: Musical Chairs: Morgan Lewis Expands Banking Practice in Boston
Stepford Secretary Responds to Above the Law
Nationwide Layoff Watch: McKee Nelson (Redux) (Or: The proper way to do layoffs.)

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:10 PM

first is the worst

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:11 PM

The West is the best.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:12 PM

eeeek. yum yum yum.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:12 PM

Stealth layoffs at mckee for months and months

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:13 PM

Thirdsty!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:18 PM

TTTx2.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:22 PM

The new firm will be called McKutchen McKee & McDonalds

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:23 PM

1, 5 = fail

Good job getting this up only half an hour or so after WSJ blog. Now go fix the Ropes & Gray post. (Hint: think Skadden, not Cravath, when considering comparable summer associate pre-deferals.)

9 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:28 PM

Bingham's acquisition of McKee Nelson makes neither entity a peer firm. Every week we get calls from smaller firms wishing to be absorbed by or merged with us. We are not fools. It is obvious to me that some firms are cooking books to appear financially healthy on paper. They are looking for a lifeline that I personally will not condone throwing at them. Let these non-peer firms dissolve so that only the strong peer firms remain standing.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:30 PM

PE, you should see Kash's balance sheet. Fort Knox.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:31 PM

are they letting people with banned accounts come back? or is it a one and done kind of thing?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:35 PM

No clip art of lawyers getting their ties tied together? TTT

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 12:40 PM

Glad to see that Red Auerbach has found gainful employment after all those years of serving as coach and general manager of the Celtics.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:01 PM

Good for Bingham. I've been wishing my firm would merge with McKee for years.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:04 PM

PE, if you actually were an attorney, you would know that real law firms don't care about peer this or peer that. They care only about money. Green is green, as they say.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:05 PM

Are you going to post anything about the Villanova law dean's resignation?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:06 PM

Bingham is getting a gem.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:09 PM

Weil cuts salaries in London!!!! Is US next??

http://www.thelawyer.com/weil-gotshal-cuts-nq-salary-to-%C2%A385000/1001294.article

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:09 PM

This is fucking garbage. Maybe Bingham can give me my job back now?

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:10 PM

PE,

You obviously no very little about tax practices. Go back to your bar studies.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:17 PM

Wrongful termination lawsuits are up according to this article: http://lawblog.legalmatch.com/2009/06/24/what-fired-but-why/ Bingham better be ready for a wave of them from all the "redundant" employees.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 1:41 PM

20 - are you sure you "no" what you're talking about?

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 2:05 PM

There is know way that 20 nos more than PE.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 2:08 PM

McKee >>>>>> Bingham. I have no clue how Bingham pulled this one off.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 2:26 PM

So, will Bingham hire back the Stepfort Secy now???

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 2:38 PM

PHJW will be the next to fall. They're having a big problem with their credit line.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 2:40 PM

well played, 13. that was the first thing that sprung to mind while reading the post.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 2:51 PM

26- The story here in LA is that the bank is asking for personal guarantees from the partnership. This ship is fucked.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 2:55 PM

28

I've heard this rumour from a friend on the management committee.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 3:10 PM

A merger like this doesn't necessarily mean that McKee was in trouble. This may have happened with or without the recession. Note that all McKee's attorneys will continue at the new firm.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 3:17 PM

Future revival of structured finance? You mean these guys will get a second chance to destroy the financial markets (and lives)?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 3:23 PM

This was not such a great move by Bingham. McKee was founded by and filled with Structured Finance partners who bolted from several other big firms for their own shop during the boom times. They were very proud of their independence.
IF this market ever comes back, they've already demonstrated a strong desire for independence. In better times they may try to leave again.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 3:27 PM

I have a top 3 JD and a LLM in tax and I am having enormous difficulty finding a job in tax.

I've been told that tax sucks right now and that the only places hiring are accounting firms.

Anyone want to confirm or deny that?

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 4:15 PM

30 - you're wrong on both counts. (Presumably you still work at McKee.) They were in trouble; although the recession (and death of structured finance) is the primary reason. Also not all lawyers will go over to Bingham -- there are several still remaining who have been given the old "take as much time as you need to find a new job" speech, but will not be making this move.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 4:17 PM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 4:18 PM

30 - you're wrong on both counts. (Presumably you still work at McKee.) They were in trouble; although the recession (and death of structured finance) is the primary reason. Also not all lawyers will go over to Bingham -- there are several still remaining who have been given the old "take as much time as you need to find a new job" speech, but will not be making this move.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 4:21 PM


Bingham has nice offices, which makes working there really, really fun.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 5:13 PM

I also heard that not everyone will be heading to Bingham.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 5:22 PM

38, what have you heard?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 5:57 PM

why not talk about how bingham plans on no-offering a significant portion of their summer class? hell, they're not even pretending that's not the case. what a rancid TTT

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 6:18 PM

39, I haven't heard anything in particular. -38

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 6:43 PM

40 - how is that different from any other firm? If that's even true, which I doubt, at least they're being upfront about it.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 7:15 PM

33 - I am out here looking for a job as well, and will concur. But, what's your problem with working at an accounting firm? Law firms suck - if you don't already know this, then you can take my word for it.....

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 8:51 PM

It's interesting that neither McKee nor Nelson, the name partners who ran their firm until Auerbach took over when things got ugly, are going to be in senior management. I hear Auerbach is a stud.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 6, 2009 9:05 PM

33, you don't want to work for an accounting firm. It is awful - you get stuck in a pool of hundreds of employees, most of who are right out of college and just want to get drunk and hook up.

Okay maybe the last part isn't so bad, but working here is totally de-humanizing. And the salary SUCKS.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, July 8, 2009 7:57 AM

I heard it’s been rough going at McKee for a long time. They’ve suffered through buy-outs, legit layoffs, stealth layoffs, two attorney suicides, partner and practice group defections, months of merger rumors and more. This is the kind of stuff that builds CHARACTER, which is exactly what they need to succeed at Bingham. Good luck guys.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 10:29 PM

Hey 19! That's what I thought? WTF? forget the lawyers it lost to Morgan -- what about all of us who just got laid off over the past four months? I laughed really hard when I saw the published comment that Bingham Boston would retain all management functions. Now, that's a surprise. Those control freaks wouldn't know how to share or collaborate if their lives depended on it.

Post Your Comment