Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: Layoffs Weeks in the Making Finally Come to Dechert

Dechert logo.JPGDechert’s stealthiness when it comes to layoffs have been well documented in these pages. But it has been an open secret around the firm that another round of layoffs were coming. Above the Law has spoken to sources that have been talking about Dechert’s impending layoffs for nearly a month.

Today, the ax is finally falling. We don’t have official numbers (Dechert has ignored our numerous requests for comment), but we have information suggesting that around 25 associates are being let go today. In addition to the associates, other tipsters report that “a bunch” of paralegals have been laid off, as well as some staff attorneys and legal secretaries.

Sources report that the pain is being spread between Dechert’s Mass Torts and Product Liability group (about a dozen attorneys) and its general litigation practice (another dozen or so attorneys).

We also understand that the vast majority of cuts affected 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year lawyers.

Today’s moves are the culmination of weeks of planning at Dechert.

More details after the jump.

Information first started leaking out of Dechert a month ago. On June 22nd, a tipster reported:

Dechert plans on cutting 25 associates - first through third years. Paralegals and more senior associates to follow (though in the case of senior associates, the numbers will be lower).

But that move was delayed. Since Dechert hasn’t responded, we don’t know precisely why. But some sources believe that the cuts were delayed because Dechert made a high profile hire at the beginning of July. The firm hired Steve Bradbury, former Acting Assistant Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice. Thought the announcement was made on July 13th, sources report that there was internal disagreement at Dechert over the hire:

I hope it doesn’t go unnoticed that Steven Bradbury, the former head of the Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel is joining Dechert today. There was serious internal strife about hiring the man who sold his soul for torture, but no surprise, the forces of evil within the firm won the day.

Insiders at Dechert expected the layoff announcement to come just before, or just after the Bradbury announcement. But perhaps the firm needed to get everybody comfortable with the Bradbury decision before turning to layoffs?

Still, heading into this week it looked like the firm might have totally reconsidered the layoff decision. Just yesterday, we received a text message suggesting that the firm had backed off its plans to fire associates.

That might be because Dechert was honored with the Award for Excellence in Products Liability by Chambers USA earlier this month. It would be pretty cold to fire a bunch of products liabilities lawyers weeks after the department was honored for its excellent work.

But the hammer fell today. News about the layoffs started pouring into Above the Law from email, instant messages, and even over the phone.

Sources tell us that Dechert plans to make no official announcement about today’s layoffs. But we’ll keep you posted as we get more clarity on how many people were let go today.

Earlier: Dechert: Inside The Black Box
Dechert Ices 72 Staff Positions
Nationwide Layoff Watch: Dechert Cuts 19
Nationwide Layoff Watch: Dechert Fires 125

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:26 PM

legalize cannabis please. it will help the economy.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:28 PM

I have never heard of this TTT firm.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:28 PM

The ship be sinking. Abandon ship! Abandon ship!

4 Posted by Paul Bearer | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:29 PM

This is not an axe, although the result is the same.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:29 PM

Truly Third Tier Toilet

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:30 PM

smoke two joints in time of peace, and two in time of war
smoke two joints before I smoke two joints, and then . . .

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:30 PM

god, that firm sucks.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:30 PM

what the hell is Philadelphia going to do with us?

morgan lewis and ballard = no summer program
wolf block is dead
dechert is bleeding

where am i going to work after graduation?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:32 PM

What about the layoffs at K&L Gates??? Elie, for once get off your fat ass and report.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:33 PM

drinker
pepper
reed smith?
cozen?

the mid-sized regional firms (Archer, Flaster, etc.) are doing really well. you'd be wise to look at them.

11 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:33 PM

The effect of Obama's lack of leadership and myopic vision on economic recovery has claimed another victim in the non-peer firm of Dechert. I am sure the departed 25 personnel would exchange the empty promises of hope and change for their jobs back.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:33 PM

I have a hard science degree. I'm considering law school to get into patent law. Would that be a wise move considering the market? Seems like a lot of the pain is on the corporate transactional side of things.

Or should I just take the patent bar first and see if that lands me a job before jumping in.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:33 PM

Dechert's stealthiness when it comes to layoffs HAS been well documented in these pages.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:34 PM

REPORT DEBE'f'in'VOISE

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:34 PM

I've learned that the new Paul Hastings layoff list does include staff. Nothing on numbers or offices yet.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:35 PM

"We also understand that the vast majority of cuts affected lawyers 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year lawyers"

Elie.

Harvard. Debevoise.

Really?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:37 PM

Guys used to torture each other at my highschool all . . . wait, is that an ad for Foxwoods?

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:37 PM

Partner Emeritus

Who's worse, the bumbling dumbfuck of a President who's 8 year FUBAR helped create this mess (and certainly did nothing to stem it), or the liar your peers elected after him? The person to blame is yourself (or anyone else you know that votes for one of the two major, corrupt political parties).

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:38 PM

While patent has usually been considered the most secure area of law, every patent person I know from my schol has gotten their offer rescinded. Be a technology specialist and let a firm pay for your law degree if they have a job for you. Also, if you want to go big in any way, go Finnegan, Kenyon or maybe a general firm like Kirkland - Fish is a sinking shit hole and others that have been players are floundering as well.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:39 PM

Elie, just out of curiosity, has it ever once crossed your mind to review and edit your posts? After all this time, I'm still undecided as to whether you are exceptionally unprofessional, or exceptionally inept. Or both.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:39 PM

can we start a counter on how many typos Mystal makes? I'll start.


Mystal.Typos = 1

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:40 PM

Mintz Levin just fired a senior associate after she shit all over a partner's desk and then stole his wallet.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:40 PM

19 = complete retard..."go Finnegan" Puhlease!

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:41 PM

Sad news...i worked with some good attorneys at Dechert. I hope things get better in the fall.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:41 PM

We also understand that the vast majority of cuts affected lawyers 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year lawyers.

_____________________________________

Wow.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:41 PM

13 minutes in, multiple references to the typo, it's still there.

Gangbusters, Elie.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:43 PM

12...take the patent bar and try to get a job as a patent agent. see how you like that for a few years. if you still want to go to law school, the firm will usually pay for it. do NOT simply pack up and go to law school without knowing what you're getting in to.

what degree (BS, MS, PhD)? what scientific area?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:43 PM

When I see a laid off 1st year associate, I think of my immigrant grandparents.

ALITO SECURE

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:45 PM

This is terrible news for the U. Penn State -- Philadelphia.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:45 PM

Laying off lots of attorneys and staff but still participating in OCI. Stay classy Decherttt

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:45 PM

nothing new at the firm...their way of life is shadiness and backdoor douchebaggery

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:46 PM

23 - Do you have a reason to dislike Finnegan? Do tell...

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:46 PM

19-I wouldn't advise Kenyon, unless you want to do patent prosecution for seven years and then be told you aren't partnership material so step off.

not enough litigation work

no partnership w/out litigation work

no partnership for you!

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:46 PM

um, how does everybody know that Elie is black?

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:46 PM

"The effect of Obama's lack of leadership and myopic vision on economic recovery has claimed another victim in the non-peer firm of Dechert. I am sure the departed 25 personnel would exchange the empty promises of hope and change for their jobs back."

Hilarious. Yeah, cracker. Arlen Specter's firm, which just hired a torture attorney from the previous administration, is a victim of Obama's economic policies.

Cracker.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:50 PM

If 35 can call someone a cracker and not get edited, will it be moderated if someone calls him a n............

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:51 PM

Let the good times roll.
And by good times, I mean heads.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:51 PM

15: Keep us posted. We've noticed a lot of high level meetings in LA this month.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:51 PM

What's going on with Debevoise?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:51 PM

ABOVE THE LAW ARTICLES ARE ABOUT:

1) UNEMPLOYMENT
2) HOW MANY CRUMBS ARE ON ELIE MYSTAL'S FACE
3) MISCELLANEOUS NEWS LOOSELY INVOLVING THE "LAW"

IF ELIE GOES ON A DIET AND THE ECONOMY GETS BETTER, I'M AFRAID THIS SITE IS RIGHT IN THE SHITTER.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:51 PM

I guess its my own fault for not asking my secretary where she is from before pounding her in the ass.

Boston attorney covered in feces and missing a stapler

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:52 PM

Class of 2011 is the lost generation.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:52 PM

Class of 2011 is the lost generation.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:52 PM

"open secret"?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:54 PM

Take this layoff as a blessing in disguise.

Why in sam **** did you want to be a biglaw associate to begin with? When you were a kid, I KNOW that you did not say, "When I grow up, I want to be a biglaw associate."

You want it for the money. You want it to pay off your loans. You want to use it as a springboard into more fulfilling legal careers.

Stop. Just stop. Take it from me. I was an associate and left biglaw several years ago after realizing that I was getting fatter, less energetic, weirder, etc.

You can make enough money to live a comfortable life and pay off your loans in another job (or another career).

What interests you about the law so much, anyway? If you like the law for what it is, then stay in the legal industry. But if you don't like the law or if you think you'd be happier in another career, then go for it.

You only live once, and while money is important, it's not everything. When you're lying on your deathbed, you're not going to wish you spent more time in the office or that you make another $10,000 or that you had another boat or whatnot.

Remember the important things in life: your family, your friends, your health, your happiness, and last, but not least, God.

God bless you and I wish you the best in your future endeavors.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:54 PM

Take this layoff as a blessing in disguise.

Why in sam **** did you want to be a biglaw associate to begin with? When you were a kid, I KNOW that you did not say, "When I grow up, I want to be a biglaw associate."

You want it for the money. You want it to pay off your loans. You want to use it as a springboard into more fulfilling legal careers.

Stop. Just stop. Take it from me. I was an associate and left biglaw several years ago after realizing that I was getting fatter, less energetic, weirder, etc.

You can make enough money to live a comfortable life and pay off your loans in another job (or another career).

What interests you about the law so much, anyway? If you like the law for what it is, then stay in the legal industry. But if you don't like the law or if you think you'd be happier in another career, then go for it.

You only live once, and while money is important, it's not everything. When you're lying on your deathbed, you're not going to wish you spent more time in the office or that you make another $10,000 or that you had another boat or whatnot.

Remember the important things in life: your family, your friends, your health, your happiness, and last, but not least, God.

God bless you and I wish you the best in your future endeavors.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:55 PM

If only the Republicans would stop blocking socialized medicine, this would all... Oh, wait. What the hell is Obama doing for the economy?

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:56 PM

45 / 46: Quitter.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:56 PM

all laid off attorneys are white, not cool. Dechert acting stupidly.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:57 PM

Just because my girl friend's name is Shabeefa, does not mean you should automatically assume she is black.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:57 PM

It's such a relief that now that Bush is gone the world loves us again.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/23/AR2009072300299_pf.html

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:59 PM

I have a hard science degree. I'm considering law school to get into patent law. Would that be a wise move considering the market? Seems like a lot of the pain is on the corporate transactional side of things.

Or should I just take the patent bar first and see if that lands me a job before jumping in."

12 don't waste your time, do something productive like engineering.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:59 PM

45 / 46: Got his ass kicked big time by BigLaw, begged to come back but they said no. So decided to turn on them instead. Typical BigLaw associate behavior.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:59 PM

Obama is going to spend money until we look like the Weimar Republic and have worthless currency.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:00 PM

A Shabeefa S'd my D once. She was most def. black.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:03 PM

I agree with posting all firms which feature layoffs -- big or small. Exposure is key.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:03 PM

27,

B.S. in computer science from a university well known for quality engineering education. ('hard' computer science that qualifies me for the patent bar, I checked)

thanks for the advice, 27 and 19

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:04 PM

anyone smell any juicy insides lately?

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:04 PM

56 - I agree you are fat and ugly.

Love,
BigLaw Partner

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:04 PM

Looks like Heller's former chairman, Matt Larabee, brought his good luck with him to Dechert.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:06 PM

45 / 46: What a beautiful sentiment. Now, go fuck yourself.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:10 PM

When will people realize that Islam is the answer

63 Posted by BHO | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:12 PM

I lied, jobs died.

I'm Barack Obama?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:13 PM

Why do pompous idiots like 46 post such long comments? I wish ATL would impose a limit simply so I wouldn't have to scroll so far.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:15 PM

P.E. is a retard. Can he explain how the jobs would have been saved under McCain/Palin. What a joker.

How much work do you have sir? Because you are on this site everytime I am - maybe your firm is not as hot as you think.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:17 PM

All laid off Attorney's were not all white and let me say that Barton Winokur is single handedly destroying that firm. Him and his pals are looting that place . He raised the rates and they don't have any new clients. All the work they have is old work. What is gonna happen when that disappears? More layoffs! ABANDON SHIP!!! This is the same douche bag that made an associate bend his knees in a holiday video to make himself shorter than him. All the money in the world can't make you taller little man, you can regrow some hair but you'll always be a LITTLE MAN.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:21 PM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:22 PM

62 is right. A much larger military mobilization would do wonders for the economy. It got us out of the great depression, it would get us out of this.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:22 PM

I dont mind being called a cracker. it's not as hurtful as some people think. I mean, who cares.

What bothers me is that racial minorities can call whites by an epithet but whites can't use them back on the minorities.

THAT's the racism here, not the label "cracker."

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:23 PM

65 = successfully trolled. way to go 65.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:24 PM

Can we start a petition to gather signatures to get Elie fired? Surely ATL can replace him with someone who can, you know, actually write?

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:24 PM

Hey, 11, I'm impressed that in six short months Obama could bring Dechert down. The dude has power.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:24 PM

68, are you saying we should invade peace-loving Muslim countries?

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:25 PM

PE ran out of cash last night at Rick's Cabaret. They won't even run his Discover Card after all the declines. He should have been saving his dough over the last forty years. Now we will have to support him in his dotage.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:27 PM

I am a non-equity partner at a T-15 firm. Laying off first and second year lawyers is an absurd strategy if a firm is intending to be successful in the long term. First of all, firms don't have anything to offer but their talent. First and second year lawyers add no value to a firm, so nobody knows which ones are going to be any good a few years down the road. So when firms lay them off, they are probably firing some future great attorneys and rainmakers. It is as dumb a strategy as hiring ridiculous class sizes two years ago. Cutting way down on summer hiring is also an absurd strategy. as is deferring start dates. (Sticking your head in the sand doesn't making a problem go away). In four years, the economy will be ticking along and firms will have to fill their classes with subpar lateral talent. To make matters worse, the attrition rate will return when the economy bounces back, and even if firms can hire enough to fill their ranks, there will be no cohesive culture because their associates will all be laterals.

It is truly amazing how stupid law firms are being. Even in good years, smart businesses fire poor performers. Any smart law firm should take every class from third or fourth years on up and fire the bottom third of the class performance-wise. (They should include non-equity partners in this trimming strategy). If firms did this, they would be in an especially good position to get some truly good people at OCI this year, as there will certainly be plenty available.

My firm starts the rounds this week. If we don't hire at least 60 summers this year, I'll think we're total idiots.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:28 PM

PE has seen hard times since the price of Depends went up.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:28 PM

If you somehow thought Obamanomics was working, talk to someone who's not.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:30 PM

73 - Building war machines takes real man-power. It would create ten times as many jobs as Obama's paying people to put energy efficient light bulbs in schools.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:30 PM

75 - your lack of undestanding is why you are NON NON NON NON NON equity.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:33 PM

PE is my favorite ATL character. Keep up the good work.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:36 PM

79, I made non-equity two months ago after 6 years. I was the fastest person to do it at my firm since we started having non-equity partners. I have lunch with the chairman of the firm twice a week. I've been the highest paid person in my class every year since my third year. I think I'm doing okay. (Maybe not though).

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:37 PM

I like the idea that someone proposed yesterday about offering to work for firms at a pay cut. This is simple supply and demand economics. If the market says that I cannot get a biglaw job at $160k, I will see if I can get one at $125k (or lower if necessary). Not much different than contractors bidding for a job. Everyone has to look out for themselves, right?

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:37 PM

Maybe the USA should just expand and add Saudi Arabia as the 51st state.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:38 PM

77:

Obamanomics may be slow working because Bushonomics did such a fantastical job destroying America.

Thank you! Thank you! I'll be here all week.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:39 PM

25 more bodies to compete with for non-existent jobs.

Attention all Junior Ex-BIGLAW Assocates: Lease New York. There's nothing more for you here.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:39 PM

25 more bodies to compete with for non-existent jobs.

Attention all Junior Ex-BIGLAW Assocates: Leave New York. There's nothing more for you here.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:39 PM

25 more bodies to compete with for non-existent jobs.

Attention all Junior Ex-BIGLAW Assocates: Leave New York. There's nothing more for you here.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:40 PM

81 - good start on your resume! (which you may need)

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:40 PM

45/46 - God should have been first on your list and pre-phrased with "most importantly"

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:40 PM

Barton Winokur = Douche Bag

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:43 PM

52, did you really tell 12 to be an engineer? That's pretty brutal, dude. Do you suffocate kittens in your free time?

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:43 PM

Was that an American Red Cross ad? Jesus Christ!

93 Posted by Dubya | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:45 PM

I never had much use for lawyers, except for lawyers like Steve Bradbury, who told me it was okay to use "enhanced interrogation techniques" on "high value detainees." I admire that lawyer lingo, but I just called it my TTT program, Torture The Terrorists. I'm glad good ole Steve-O was able to get a job with this firm.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:48 PM

75, I disagree. It's a buyers market for associates. Get rid of them now, they can get them later when they need them. There's no longer any stigma associated with layoffs, so pare down expenses while you can. There'll be plenty of laid off attorneys who'll be happy to get a job next year.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:48 PM

75: Post of the Year!

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:48 PM

75: Post of the Year!

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:51 PM

Is that true, 66? Bart really made some tall associate bend at the knees so he wouldn't look short in a video? If so, that is hilarious. You have to post that video!

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:53 PM

12 - don't bother. Lots of out of work Patent attorneys. Try something useful to society - like a telemarketer or a serial killer.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:54 PM

Barton Winokur for 2012!

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:01 PM

there is a dinner tonight at the home of one of the Dechert NY partners - all associates, partners and summer associates are invited to attend. very classy. if any of the laid of attorneys RSVPed to attend, please still go. Take this opportunity to warn the summers to run, and actually maybe make the party somewhat eventful and fun.

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:01 PM

12,

Do it. Patent work is holding up well compared to other areas of law, particularly in the litigation side.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:02 PM

100

I like the way that you think.

This is nothing but good news for JOHN MCCAIN!

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:04 PM

You know, Law Shucks covers this kind of thing. I wonder if they could team up with the excellent coverage on Above the Law.

Like the reporter for the story here, I am shocked that these firms would wait until after the summers were gone to announce layoffs. Surely, they could have done this before the summers arrived so the summers would have something to do. And really, don't you think the law firms would cancel summer associate programs, or cut salaries rather than lay people off if they could. This must just be a way of enhancing partner profits!!

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:05 PM

100

What a marvelous opportunity for those of you who have just received the Barton Winokur pill! Please be creative and make this a memorable evening!

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:07 PM

"another round of layoffs were coming"

I believe that's at least 3 in this post alone.

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:10 PM

Stealthiness when it comes to layoffs HAS - not have -been well documented in these pages.

It has been an open secret around the firm that another round of layoffs WAS - not were - coming.

Geez!

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:11 PM

12 - if you are dim enough to seek advice from the ilk populating this blog, and not knowing who the heck the are and whether asking the nameless for advice is a good idea, then you are clearly lawyer material.

dipshit.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:11 PM

Is this the coat hanger firm?

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:12 PM

12 - if you are dim enough to seek advice from the ilk populating this blog, and not knowing who the heck they are and whether asking the nameless for advice is a good idea, then you are clearly lawyer material.

dipshit.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:15 PM

PE and I are listening to the Thompson Twins right now.

avatar
111 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:16 PM

More overpaid, unqualified lawyers being laid off brings a smile to my face!

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:18 PM

What happened to litigation? Drying up or client's just paying 50% of old rates? Going to mid-sized firms? All of the above?

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:26 PM

Oceans Rise
Cities Fall
Quinn Remai......

Oh shit, scratch that.

avatar
114 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:40 PM

Staff layoffs at Debevoise dammit

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:48 PM

I am so screwed. Why did I ever want to work in Philadelphia?

Well, I can always interview as a 3L. Oh, wait....

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:51 PM

can someone with access copy and paste Gina Passerella's Legal Intelligencer story just published about today's Dechert layoffs? it's subscription only. maybe it has more information.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:58 PM

To #84 - Perhaps we can blame the Cambridge (MA) cops for the layoffs at Dechert and Fulbright, and the failure of Obamanomics. They seem to be getting blamed for other things that are equally ridiculous.

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:02 PM

Ah hahahahah! You got laid off!

Whatever are you going to do with no job, 150k in debt, and RUINED CAREER PROSPECTS?


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!

Good luck, suckers!

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:04 PM

Latham is still the worst firm of the Financial Crisis and will be laying off all of its foreign associates. Dave Gordon is a douche bag. They lay off based on who is the biggest suckup and not based on work like most other firms. fuck you latham, die.

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:09 PM

Does anybody know if they finally got rid of this secretary (as described in the Comments section of "Dechert Ices 72 Staff"):

The crazy, rolling on the floor and screaming person IS a secretary at Dechert... still. She was apparently not affected by this massive lay-off, nor was she let go when she should had been, back when we were still at 30 Rock. All of the attorneys I worked for then spoke to the administrative people, because they were worried for their safety and the safety of the other secretaries. Of course, admin did nothing about it.... except move her down the hall to sit by other secretaries.

In my opinion, and the opinion of anyone I've relayed this story too, it has to do with the fact that she's black, and that she'll threaten a law suit.

Well, she threatened another secretary, took 2 hr lunches, came in a hour late, always claimed to be busy yet would be snoring at her desk, showed up in housecoats and sweatsuits to work, and physically assaulted our supervisor.

**********

Anybody still at Dechert know?

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:24 PM

i don't understand why they are still wining and dining the summer associates when they already know a lot of them are not getting offers.

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:25 PM

To #116: Gina Passerella's Legal Intelligencer article on today's Dechert layoffs can apparently be accessed for free at: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202432485931

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:26 PM

YOU ARE ALL A BUNCH OF MEAN IDIOTS! You were probably playground bullies when you were younger. Idiots, idiots, IDIOTS.

I PAID $150,000 to go to law school. That is ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. More money than you can count.

And this is how I get repaid? THIS? What a crock of bullshit. I can't believe this.

All I wanted was to go to law school and get good grades. I worked my ass off day and night in college and studying for the LSAT and in law school and this is what I get in return?

On the fairness scale, this gets a flat out negative -10.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:36 PM

How long does Dechert's Charlotte office survive--they are barely hanging on.

125 Posted by Quinn_Remains | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:36 PM

OCEANS RISE

CITIES FALL

QUINN REMAINS (IN THE LIMITED SENSE THAT THEY HAVE NOT CONDUCTED LAYOFFS OR DEFERRALS TO THE EXTENT OF OTHER LARGE CALIFORNIA FIRMS)

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:42 PM

#123: The revulsion I feel over your childish sense of entitlemetn makes it hard for me to feel sorry for you. What is it you think the world owes you?

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:45 PM

#126: I thought #123 was satirical, not for real. But who knows ...

128 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 4:49 PM

The ship be sinking...

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:00 PM

LOL now means laid off lawyer....in internet parlance.

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:00 PM

For those who don't believe it's happening, just look at these layoffs. SP500 companies are moving away from using NYC BigLaw to defend it's tort litigation in favor of using regional MidLaw firms. It's happening everywhere. The companies get better and more experienced attorneys working on their cases, along with much lower rates for everyone on the team. The savings are more than 50% across the board, frequently much higher. BigLaw has fucked over their clients for too many years, and now many of the senior partners in BigLaw are now the general counsels of many SP500 companies. As a result, they know first hand the total screw job their companies have been getting at the hands of BigLaw, and they know exactly what to do about it. The end is here, and you don't need to wait.

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:04 PM

All we need is for a V20 firm to collapse Lehman style. Its a matter of time. Once one falls, then another, then another, then mergers, until you're left with a similar model to accounting firms. 4-8 massive law firms and everything else is shit.

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:22 PM

130 -- big companies have not been using NYC firms for tort litigation for many, many years. The only real exception is Big Sheila at Skadden. The top litigation BigLaw firms really are not NYC based. Think K&E, Orrick, Dechert, King & Spalding, Quinn Emmanuel plus some boutiques (Bartlett Beck; Kecker Van Nest). That's the problem for NYC BigLaw -- when the transactional work is dead, there is not a robust litigation practice to keep up profitability. At real NYC firms (except Skadden and Paul Weiss), litigation is a support function.

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:22 PM

130 -- big companies have not been using NYC firms for tort litigation for many, many years. The only real exception is Big Sheila at Skadden. The top litigation BigLaw firms really are not NYC based. Think K&E, Orrick, Dechert, King & Spalding, Quinn Emmanuel plus some boutiques (Bartlett Beck; Kecker Van Nest). That's the problem for NYC BigLaw -- when the transactional work is dead, there is not a robust litigation practice to keep up profitability. At real NYC firms (except Skadden and Paul Weiss), litigation is a support function.

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:31 PM

I really hate CareerLink, and that new asian poster girl makes me want to vomit

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:45 PM

For Penn people entering OCI, don't think you'll be immune. Dechert has recently laid off many Penn Law grads, including first and second years.

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:57 PM

Class of 2011 is the lost generation.

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:03 PM

End of month PHJW layoffs will affect primarily LA, NY, DC, ATL & SF. Staffers are included.

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:34 PM

107,

Over half of the "ilk populating this blog" hold JDs and work in firms where they are paid over $150k per year. If you are dim enough to look past the value of that ear simply because of the humor and sarcasm that is rampant on any blog, then clearly you are a successful lawyer.

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 7:31 PM

138,

I'd say "over half" is very generous. Its probably more like: 50% 1L/Rising 2Ls, 25% Rising 3Ls, 10% studying for the bar, 10% latham trolls, 5% big law first/second years. Otherwise, correct statement.

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:05 PM

BART IS SHORT.

He always has been . . .

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:08 PM

RICK JONES WEARS OUTDATED 80'S SHIRTS.

You are not Gordon Gekko, Rick, join the new Millennium.

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:25 PM

131 - one a week (out of the v100) starting mid-october and running through mid march.

Eye of the hurricane my friends, not just in big law. Appreciate it while it lasts.

Big Eurinal banks are in far worse shape than US, and no big ben to print money (and the nazis have made it quite clear they are not bailing out dutch, austrian, spanish and italian banks ... well ok they maybe invade austria but that's it this time).

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:26 PM

139,

What "you'd say" doesn't matter. I got what seems to be good advice from others who are not douchebags.

you are an asshole

avatar
144 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:30 PM

Is Dechert accredited by the American Bar Association?

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:31 PM

Is Dechert accredited by the American Bar Association?

avatar
146 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:35 PM

124 - Why do you say that?

avatar
147 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:44 PM

132,

Dechert may be nominally based in Philly but it in reality is a NY firm.

avatar
148 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:14 PM

What's the word on severance for this round?

avatar
149 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 12:02 AM

132,

Dechert may be nominally based in Philly but it in reality is a poor impression of an NY firm.

fixed that for you, 147.

avatar
150 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 12:47 AM

Thanks 149

-147.

avatar
151 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 7:25 AM

test

avatar
152 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 8:12 AM

This is the firm that will probably completely implode by the end of the year. I surmise that they have a lot of debt. They bet very big on real estate and securitization. Now they are paying the piper.

avatar
153 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 8:42 AM

152 where did you get that info? When I was there Dechert had very little debt.

avatar
154 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 8:47 AM

8- marshall dennehey is looking for a first-year to do coverage work in their king of prussia office- pays $50k a year- law license and literacy is preferred but not required

avatar
155 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 9:36 AM

You mean putting a "Hope" bumper sticker on my car hasn't saved the economy ?

avatar
156 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 10:11 AM

Rick Jones!!! Now there is a douche bag's name I haven'd heard in some time. What a clown that guy is. Small time player who always thought he could play with the big boys. Kind of like that ass clown Lebovitz. All in all, I love seeing this firm slowly implode. And Bart. That guy is such an absolute douche bag that I have a hard time narrowing down my favorite story. As this is DecherTTT and they will have to lay off more people soon, I will save the really salacious stuff for the next round. No use wasting good material at 155.

avatar
157 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 11:01 AM

personal foul on 156 - for using the sublime, yet at the same time more than slightly scuzzy insult, "douche bag" insult twice in a sinlge rant let alone in one paragraph. 10 yard penalty.

avatar
158 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 11:25 AM

There was an article about two months ago in the NYT featuring Dechert's efforts to sublet its unused office space in NYC -- which it leased at the top of the market.

Another shining example example of BART'S boneheaded real estate moves.

This guy used to teach a mini-course on negotiation, but the truth is the only thing he's a successful negotiator at is his own comp.

Dechert to 700 lawyers by 12/09 -- the way Bartboy wants it.

avatar
159 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 24, 2009 9:44 PM

At an "art of negotiation" seminar I attended way back when on the Dechert london trip, Bart told the entire summer class how much he paid for his condo in aspen, and bragged about missing his kid's birthday because some middle eastern guy needed to fly him over to assist in some deal. He also said he couldn't imagine how anyone could ever want to spend anytime at home with their kids, which is obviously an abhorrent comment, but after meeting his son the comment doesn't seem quite so bad. It's really a shame, because there were a lot of good, talented lawyers at Dechert who have either been forced out or moved on because it has been ruined by this egomaniacal jerk.

avatar
160 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 25, 2009 8:54 AM

Bart has always seemed nice to me. Perhaps a little egocentric, but some of these stories don't ring true. That said, it's terrible what Dechert is doing to many young attorneys, including a huge number of first-year attorneys whose careers are now in tatters.

avatar
161 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 25, 2009 1:06 PM

Key word in 160's post is "seemed." The stories may be difficult to believe, but they are true. Bart is a lot of things, but a nice person he is not. That said, he would not be in the position he is if the majority of the Dechert partners didn't want him there. In other words, Bart was not alone in ruining Dechert.

avatar
162 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 25, 2009 2:23 PM

Layoffs are sad and scary and bring unfortunate consequences onto good people and their families. I would think a blog such as ATL would be a great place for laid off attorneys and staff to vent and to share info and tips. From reviewing this comment section re: Dechert's layoffs, it is no wonder that you people were laid off. So much education seems to have been wasted on too many spoiled, full-of-themselves, classless brats, i.e., the majority of people who post here. If you're interested in really being a lawyer and making huge salaries you should use this down time to brush up (1) on your marketing skills (don't just expect a paycheck, learn how to boost revenues); (2) your social skills - your posts prove you lack any sort of empathy for anyone but yourselves, hardly a good lawyer would any of you make when it comes to client service and needs; (3) READ THE NEWSPAPERS and try to comprehend that no matter who was President of the US right now, the problems we all are facing happens to stem from a culture that embraced the "ME" generation and greed; and (4) wash your mouthes out with soap! If you have the moral and ethical standard to really be a terrific lawyer you would be spending your time doing non-profit and/or charity legal work in order to hon your skills. You would not be spending your days writing trash on a blog that any potential employer can easily access. If the comments in this section are an indication of who you really are, it is no wonder the group of you were the one's that were laid-off. You all sound like mud wrestlers, trailer-park trash and/or graduates of law schools found on the back of a matchbox cover. Do you think your past employer couldn't see through you?!

avatar
163 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, July 25, 2009 8:56 PM

Anyone who writes something like "From reviewing this comment section re: Dechert's layoffs, it is no wonder that you people were laid off" is a total douche. I had a successful run at dechert, left for other opportunities, but know many of the people who have since been laid off. For the most part, they are all excellent lawyers and excellent people who made the bad choice of going to Dechert. Also, when you choose to do the "I am an asshole" post, at least review your grammar so you don't look like an idiot.

avatar
164 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 27, 2009 11:15 AM

DECHERT DOUCHEBAG HALL OF SHAME:

Bart Winokur
Rick Jones
David Howard
Joe Heil
Peter Astleford
Rich Wild
Bob Helm
Rich Rizzo
Artie Newbold

Each of these scumsucking weasels would sell their own mother to collect more profits and move further up the AmLaw 100. They all can share a private jet to Hell.

Any I missed?

avatar
165 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, July 27, 2009 6:07 PM

159 --- I heard the stupid sheik story 15 years ago.

164 -- Rizzo is just a tool. Heil wasn't a bad guy during his first tour of duty. Haven't talked to him in years. You've missed a number of other truly reprehensible characters. Look harder at the transactional practice for more scumsuckers and weasels.

160 -- you obviously never worked at Dechert. Actually the stuff posted on here is pretty tame compared to some of the stuff that has actually happened over the years.

avatar
166 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:03 AM

Take the bad comments about Dechert with a grain of salt. Over the past 10-15 years the firm has been transforming itself from one of the best firms in Philadelphia into an international firm with top 15 PPP. This transformation is the vision of senior management and has been imposed on the rest of the firm. The strategy involves casting off less profitable practice areas, deequitizing less profitable partners, hiring lateral rainmakers outside of Philadelphia and focusing on work where the firm can charge premium rates.

The upside is that the strategy has been an incredible success. The downside is that senior management has stepped on hundreds of toes. You can't totally transform a 100 year old firm in 10 years without pissing off a lot of people, especially when that transformation is accomplished with an iron fisted executive at the helm. Partners that were thrilled when the firm got rid of the dead weight to raise PPP to $1 million per year where less thrilled when they found their own heads on the chopping block as the firm eyed PPP of $2 million.

avatar
167 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:20 PM

166 -- Your firm will implode in the next 10 years as the "visionary" senior management that has lined its pockets during the current reign retires. Your associate and non-equity junior partner ranks aren't what they once were in terms of talent (recruiting top students at the T7 schools fell off in the 90s and never recovered) and the sausage they grind out isn't of as high a quality as it used to be. Far too much of the client base is an institutional base that has been around for years (and hoarded by certain billing partners who fancy themselves as "rainmakers" or "finders", when they are really overpaid "minders"). Your culture is now held together by money, nothing more (hardly novel in the BigLaw world of 2009); but there isn't anything to hold that firm together any more other than your precious PPP. Hope you guys get it to $3m soon.

avatar
168 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 30, 2009 9:40 AM

167,

I don't buy for a second that the non-equity junior partner ranks aren't what they once were. 20 years ago making partner basically meant staying at the firm for 8 years. Making the jump from partner to associate today is much harder. The rare lawyers who make it are exceptionally good. Junior partners in the old days may have had more of their own clients, but that was back when Dechert's rates were dramatically lower and the firm was competing with the local Philly firms for work. That's not the playing field today.

As for the "institutional" client base argument, I just don't buy it. Dechert certainly has its share of old and loyal clients, but I would be very suprised if half the firm's most significant clients today were clients 10 years ago. 10 years ago the New York and London offices were small satelites. Today those offices produce a huge percentage of firm revenue.

avatar
169 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 30, 2009 6:54 PM

167:

YAWWWNNNNN. The "Bart is a great CEO, Bart should be paid like a great CEO, great CEO's make waves" arguments has been hashed, re-hashed, and re-re-hashed time and again. Your junior partners are worthless and couldn't carry the jock of junior NY (non Dechert) Big Law associates.

Want me to start outing them, Big Guy?

This firm won't exist in 10 years. Frankly, I would take the under on 7 if Vegas is making a book. It is a TTT, in a TTT city, and won't be able to keep pace with T-1 Firms in real cities.

BTW, for a Firm that is printing money, shouldn't equity partners have better things to do than resurrect a dead blog?

avatar
170 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:06 PM

Sorry. Meant 168.

BTW, this is the same "visionary" senior management that bet so heavily on Rick Jones, Mac Dorris, and Joseph Forte. This is the same "visionary" senior management that is on its 4th or 5th(????) round of layoffs since Cadwalader dropped their 100+ bomb. In other words, the ship be sinking because Bart and team can't bring in the "premium" work any longer.

The irony here is that you are posting to defend brilliant senior management on a post devoted to your firm's LATEST round of layoffs. If recruiting hasn't tailed off (as you assert, but that is not the truth), but associate layoffs have increased dramatically, one would have to assume that the partners aren't carrying their weight to support these talented associates with sufficient workload. Hardly the stuff of giants. But, your logic is consistent with a junior level non-equity partner at a mid-tier firm in Philly. Either that, or some clown Dechert equity partner with too much time on their hands.

Instead of duking it out at the bottom, why don't we get this rolling at post 4 or 5 on your next round of layoffs? Deal???

avatar
171 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:57 AM

Bottom line: Dechert has priced itself out of most markets. Clients will not pay big $$ for mediocre work, most of the good, competent people have either left or have been let go. Black Bart is running this firm into a ditch as he squeezes all the $$ he can out of Dechert before he walks away......DOUCHEBAG! Dechert used to be a great place to work.....now it just sucks!

Post Your Comment