Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Salary Cut and/or Freeze Watch: A Request for Updates

pay freeze salary freeze pay cut law firm.jpgThese days, salary cuts at large law firms appear to be more popular than salary freezes. A salary freeze may actually be "good" news to associates, insofar as it's not as harsh as an outright salary cut.

On the other hand, having your salary cut is better than being laid off -- at least according to ATL readers. In our recent poll on the issue, 58 percent of you said a firm should cut salaries for all associates in order to save jobs. Yesterday we heard from a victim of Cadwalader's latest layoffs -- the firm tried to cast them as "sabbaticals," but please see our updated post for a reality check -- who expressed anger that the firm didn't try to cut salaries across the board to avoid cuts.

We try to keep our coverage of salary cuts and salary freezes as up-to-date as possible. A quick reminder: if you have information that we haven't previously reported (do a site search to check), please email us (with either "Salary Cut" or "Salary Freeze" in the subject line). Thanks.

Update: Pay cuts -- they're not just a Biglaw thing. Midsize firms are contemplating them too. Hello, deflation!

Midsize Firms Weigh Salary Cuts [The Recorder via Law.com]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:15 PM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:20 PM

Nice to call out Cadwalader. Those "sabbaticals" were a load of BS.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:25 PM

I am a Seton Hall summer at Orrick. Should I be scared?

Also,

I am firsty

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:26 PM

1 - Roxana

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:27 PM

Locke Lord Houston salary freeze.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:28 PM

cadwalader's green website background makes me want to puke

7 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:30 PM

The ship be sinking...

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:32 PM

I remember last year when Cadwalader came to campus interviewing, everyone treated them like they were the plague. Nobody with a choice wants to work for Cadwalader anymore, and as soon as people START to have a choice again, they're going to be in a whole different kind of trouble.

That said, slow news day Lat?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:35 PM

I agree with 8 - slow news day?

This is a weird post. What is the point of it?

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:36 PM

I think the point of this post is to (1) announce the poll results and (2) take a swipe at Cadwalader (which deserves it).

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:37 PM

PE was tracking cougars on the Upper East Side last night.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:44 PM

Latham's remaining associates are still cooler, more attractive, and much poorer than associates at other firms.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:52 PM

Uh, at least Cadwalader is trying to help its associates, unlike some other firms in the V50. Do you people seriously expect a firm to keep paying people who specialized in a field now obsolete?

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:54 PM

The Recorder article (in the update) is worth reading. I am impressed that so many smaller firms pay at or close to Big Law levels.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:54 PM

Ditto to 13. CWT made some big mistakes over the past decade, but ensuring its own survival while being relatively upfront about it is not one of them. And from what I understand, the severance packages are among the best.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:59 PM

Stop fearmongering. This place used to stick up for associates.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 12:59 PM

As usual, about 50% of the comments add no value to the discussion.

Lat, when are you guys going to do something to clean up the comments? You realize that statements like comment #1 are likely to make people nervous about even reading ATL because of filtering software.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:01 PM

17 - Haven't you noticed the moderation around ATL these days? It has gone too far, in my opinion.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:01 PM

Co-sign 18. The comments are getting out of hand.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:04 PM

18 - Are you kidding me? I'm all for full and open dialogue, but what possible value does comment #1 add?

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:11 PM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:14 PM

#20 - You are fun and really brighten my day. Wanna hang out this weekend?

Louis Ziccareli Esq

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:26 PM

Way to go closing comments on the racist "Polack" thread. Closing comments for content is obnoxious.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:27 PM

21 - Roxana

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:31 PM

@13, capital markets don't exist anymore? That will be news to everyone who ever needs to raise money. I guess companies will just have to call their parents and ask for extra money when they need it.

Cadwalader made a disastrous decision to chase the money machine that was the securitization business. Now they are deciding what areas to stay in based on who is bringing in revenue right now, which will in the long run mean that Cadwalader will be out of business within two years. Not letting cyclical trends warp your business out of control like that is why other firms have lockstep partner compensation.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:36 PM

23 - The comments are open on that post.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:37 PM

@25, from what i understand, associates in cadwalader's former capital markets practice group specialized to an insane degree. in a sense, many of their specialties are obsolete, as 13 contends, and it is not entirely clear that they will all be worth practicing again anytime soon.

i would imagine that those who remain in the group are capable of handling a broader array of legal issues than those who were let go. if so, then cadwalader will have all the manpower it needs.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 1:50 PM

K&L GaTTTes has cut associate salaries. They're now being paid in fried chicken and coupons to Dairy Queen. Reputable sources say the annualized value of the compensation is roughly $13K.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 2:03 PM

23 : they reopened comments.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 3:17 PM

MOAR BAREBACK

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 3:26 PM

“i would imagine that those who remain in the group are capable of handling a broader array of legal issues than those who were let go. if so, then cadwalader will have all the manpower it needs. “

Those who remain? Cwt went from like 200 securitization associates to about 4. Those who remain are just there to handle any administrative tasks that may come up from old deals.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 4:13 PM

Bryan Cave just lowered in St. Louis to $50,000 plus revocation of parking privileges.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 4:21 PM

Barnes & Thornburg is reducing 1st year salaries in Fort Wayne Indiana to $27,500.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 4:28 PM

WGM deliberately chose not to rely on real estate and securitization as the primary money generating machine to run the firm. CWT did, and there are not in big trouble. Just a matter of time before the partners turn on each other like they did in 1994.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, July 10, 2009 5:03 PM

Let's please not lose sight of the fact that cutting associate salaries does not save associate jobs, except possibly in the very short term. The problem isn't simply that firms are paying associates too much, it's that the firms don't have enough work to give those associates. After the salary cuts have gone through, you're still going to have associates billing 1400 hours a year unless the firms adjust billing rates downward to stimulate demand for discretionary legal spending among clients. So in six months, the same firms that are cutting salaries now will still cut jobs.

Post Your Comment