Proskauer Rose Defers Current Summers to 2011
Proskauer Rose has joined the growing list of firms to defer current summer associates to 2011. But unlike other firms on that list, the Proskauer deferral pushes the 2010 class to “fall” 2011. Other firms have at least told their summer associates that they could start in January 2011.
Proskauer has already deferred its incoming class of new associates to March 2010, and the firm only gave those new hires a $20,000 stipend for their trouble. And the firm has asked incoming associates to voluntarily defer until January 2011 with a $60,000 stipend. Maybe participation in the voluntary deferral program by the class of 2009 has been so great that the firm felt it had to involuntarily defer its current summers to the fall of 2011?
But at this point, it doesn’t appear that Proskauer is offering any kind of deferral stipend to the class of 2010, and that has some summers grumbling.
Some summer reactions after the jump.
Right now, summers are still concerned with whether or not they will receive offers from Proskauer. Apparently, the firm has told them that “most” summers will receive an offer, but we don’t yet know what that means.
But it’s the apparent lack of a deferral stipend that seems to be rankling most summers. One tipster put it this way:
“Fall” (probably November) 2011
No stipend
No salary advance
No healthcareBut they’d really. really like us to come back… Oh, and doing public interest work in the interim would be great, they say, but it doesn’t seem like they’ll be doing all that much to help us find somewhere to work for a year. Why bother? Every other firm is sending out eager new law grads to public interest organizations who will work for them for free. The summer was miserable, too, by the way.
Proskauer did not respond to Above the Law’s request for comment.
Just because Proskauer hasn’t told summers about a deferral stipend doesn’t mean the firm won’t eventually pay one. It took Ropes & Gray a little while to announce its deferral stipend, but the firm did eventually decide to offer deferred summers $60,000.
Of course, one would hope that Proskauer will be more generous than that, since it is asking current summers to be out of work all the way until the fall of 2011.
We’ll see how this progresses and whether Proskauer’s decision to defer its current summers has any affect on its recruiting efforts with the class of 2011 this fall.
Earlier: Deferral Friday Rolls On: Next Stop White & Case
The Latest and Greatest Nationwide Start Date Round-up
Good News for Ropes & Gray’s Future Associates




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
First!
First!
man. proskauer really sucks.
pushes is pushing
Proskauer Rose is a TTTerrific Frim taht I wrok for.
PE is the poster child for why birth control is necessary.
The subprime mortgage bubble will turn out to be nothing comparing to the law school bubble.
will have no affect of recruiting since they will probably cancel next summers program all together -- most firms will, just waiting for this summer to end.
My bet --- next week 10 top 100 firms cancel OCI and summer 2010 program -- another 20 will follow in two weeks
"But unlike other firms on that list, the Proskauer deferral pushes is pushing back its 2010 class to 'fall' 2011."
Oh, dear.
Proskauer is such a shiTTTy law firm. I wouldn't hire them to tie my shoe.
Elie's racist.
10: what about to buckle your shoe?
Things don't look so good through those Rose colored glasses anymore!
Seriously? So these douchebags have been studying for the past twenty years of their lives only to achieve their dreams of MAYBE getting an offer for a job which they wouldn't start for OVER TWO YEARS.
What a crock. Sucks to be an SA at Proskauer. I didn't even think they were a firm that would be worTTThy of coverage on above the law.
These summers need to find a job with another law firm...it sucks...but its the truth.
12 -
I wouldn't hire them to buckle my show, though I would let them try if they did it pro bono.
I might hire them if my shoes had velcro straps however.
-10
Now, I've -- I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, but I think it's fair to say, number one, that I did lie and jobs did die.
I'm Barack Obama?
12 -
I wouldn't hire them to buckle my shoe, though I would let them try if they did it pro bono.
I might hire them if my shoes had velcro straps however.
-10
How many summer associates were there at Proskauer this year? I heard PR really enlarged its summer program compared to prior years. Is it possible that many will be no-offered?
- Effects of overdosing on Tylenol: severe pain, eventually death.
- Effects of overdosing on alcohol: severe vomiting, eventually death.
- Effects of overdosing on cannabis: laughing too much, eventually perhaps going to sleep.
Why is cannabis illegal? The fact that Big Pharma, Alcohol, and Oil are contributors to the "Partnership for a Drug Free America" should key you into the answer, especially if you look at who held power in the 1920's when cannabis was made illegal. These powerful groups have a key interest in making sure the people's cheap drugs and products stay illegal while their expensive drugs and products stay legal.
Legalize hemp and tax it, and it will go far in getting this country out of the recession. From clothing to paper to oil to medicine to recreational/spiritual use, it is one of the most useful and cost-effective plants known to man. Our Founding Fathers grew it before big banks, corporations, and industrial monopolies turned this country from a republic to an effective oligarchy.
Legalize it. Tax it. Stop the government from spending billions on the ridiculously stupid "drug war" and see recovery.
As a former Proskauer Associate - this is the NORM at this firm. They have (some) great people but it is the most stingy place on the face of the earth. Better you learn this now than later...too bad for the SA's - but this is how that firm operates. But they are so concerned about their image and pier standing that if this post gets enough attention, they might feel pressured into acting more like their "peer" firms...
Umm...why is everyone so shocked? Virtually every firm has done this or is about to. BigLaw really is over.
"It took Ropes & Gray a little while to announce its deferral stipend, but the firm did eventually decide to offer deferred summers $60,000."
No, they're not offering deferred summers $60,000, at least not ones who don't take the year-long deferral and work for a public interest cause -- they wouldn't be starting until September 2011 or January 2012. Deferred summers who want to start in January 2011 might get a $20,000 advance like this year's deferred associates did, but not even that's for certain.
Geez, Elie, people had been badmouthing the previous article for misinterpreting the Ropes deal, and you just copied the incorrect facts right into your article. Not good journalism to say the least.
23 - I think it's obvious that the ATL editors aren't exactly "journalists" but simply write in order to generate ad revenue from gossip. It works however.
This is outrageous. We will NEVER FORGE -- oh, who am I kidding, nobody's even surprised by this anymore. Welcome to biglaw.
Mystal, I hope a person more obese than yourself shits in your mouth this weekend after you pass out from eating a 6ft sub all by yourself.
A friend
How you like me now?
I just don't get the outrage by all the deferred/unhired SAs.
I've always approached SA gigs as paid internships. Sometimes interns get hired for full-time positions, sometimes they don't, and hiring decisions are made for a variety of reasons. If I didn't get hired from a place where I had interned, it wouldn't have occurred to me to demand that they (1) pay me a percentage of what they pay new hires; (2) put me on their health plan; or (3) find me another job. Likewise, if I opted to not accept an offer, I shouldn't be expected to (1) repay what I earned during the internship; or (2) find the employer a replacement hire.
I'm just flabbergasted by the continuous whining. Jesus, people, if you don't like what the firms are doing DON'T WORK THERE.
It just seems like all the fresh faced law grads want everyone to accommodate them: big money, nice perks, interesting work, kindhearted coworkers and supervisors. The world doesn't work that way! Eventually you'll have to realize that you just aren't worth $150K with no appreciable skills or experience. Sorry.
28 has a great point. These really are people who have no skills in most cases except for a high GPA and some cite checking hours in a closet for the law review. No idea where they get a sense of entitlement from.
The sad part is, the management and partners at all these law firms are the exact same type of people who have now moved up the ladder. They don't have the brain or business sense to realize that it is a waste of money to pay summer associates to NOT WORK FOR YOU. I mean jesus. Is there any other industry which pays you to work for someone else? NOPE!
Get over yourselves.
I'd like to know if all these deferred associates actually got jobs at Public Interest/Non-Governmental Organizations
"Is there any other industry which pays you to work for someone else? NOPE!"
Trading overpriced players in baseball. Being traded to another team where your original team agrees to keep paying most of your salary is not uncommon at all.
Sad to say, and experience, but Proskauer is a firm in serious decline.
21 - "pier standing?" I prefer sitting, thank you.
-Otis Redding
30, only the "urban" ones with a "richness of experience."
6 = PE's father
28 = Managing partner at Proskauer. No need to defend yourself.
has anyone else heard that cravath has made all their summers offers?
I don't feel sorry for these people. The people I do feel sorry for are those who despite high grades and good work experience, did not find summer associate positions at the firms or organizations they wanted this summer.
Large law firms are completely overrated with many people leaving after a few years. There is life out there aside from large law firms!
Look for the standard BigLaw treatment of 2009 SAs (Class of 2010) to be offering at near normal rates, but with deferred offers to 2011. Seems like a smart strategy, since they can wait and see how things play out and can quietly rescind the offers later if they need to.
Ropes showed that you can defer to 2011 and still come out looking pretty good.
What about Sullivan & Worcester? Any info?
-Harvard 2L wnating to stay in Boston at all costs
Classes of 2009 and 2010 are just such weak classes both... making for some real ugly choices firms are having to make.
40, why do you want to stay in Boston at all costs? Because you are a masshole or because you like having nothing to do but go to Irish bars until closing time at 1am?
Is Heller deffering its Suffolk summer associates?
41: This is a stupid meme for a lot of reasons. Law school selectivity at top schools is at an all time high in terms of LSAT, GPA numbers and an all time low in terms of acceptance rate. Those who got into HYS 5-10 years ago would be at CCN or maybe even lower T14 schools. And, the students who got into adequate schools in the past would have been forced to go to TTTs.
And, yes, there are dysfunctional, incapable of working people in every year. There's nothing to suggest 09 and 10 have any more of those people than previous years did. Based on the law firm attrition model, most people aren't expected to last very long, so a high percentage of any year would be considered "weak."
37:
I heard that the SA's receiving offers are now on notice thereof.
Every rose has its thorn,
just like every night has it dawn. . .
31 - Trading overpriced players in baseball is a matter of contract between players and teams. It also involves an industry where profitability is based on winning. While winning in the legal industry is also the driver of profit, the talented players behind a winning team in baseball generally possess unique skills and qualities which they can leverage in making contracts that ensure someone will pay their salary no matter where they go. In the legal profession, there are literally thousands of graduates who possess membership on a law review and a high GPA. Thus, there is no justification for analogizing the current style of law firm deferrals with baseball contract disputes.
Also, you mention that baseball players are overpriced, but how much money do you think Alex Rodriguez, Albert Pujols, and Manny "Roid Rage" Ramirez bring in by playing on a team. Is this really different than paying a 25 year old law school grad $160,000 with no genuine experience or qualifications?
Well done, 33. Well done.
I'm currently a summer at Proskaur, and I'd just like to point out that that email is entirely inaccurate. They didn't say probably November, they said they didn't know when a summer asked if fall meant as late as November. At no point did they even mention healthcare or a stipend or a salary advance. It's entirely possible that we won't get that but it was not announced. Personally, I had a great summer. I'm not sure which summer wrote that rambling incoherent email, but I award him no points, and may god have mercy on his soul.
49, I'm sure your employer would be thrilled to know you can't even spell it's name right.
Say it with me: "You want fries with that?"
I heard Sidley is about to defer its summer class as well.
I heard WachTTTell is deferring its summers until 2013.
Proskauer is doing what will be the standard policy for most larger firms: Defer class of 2009, defer class of 2010, have very small or no summer program in 2010 (law school class of 2011).
This spreads out the new hires over three years (fall 2009, fall 2010, and fall 2011) and effectively reduces the size of the classes. This makes perfect sense. Too bad for the class of 2011, though.
friend of mine got an offer at cahill today. said they offered pretty much the entire class.
sucks to be at proskauer.
Not to beat a dead horse too much, but if this is happening to the class of 2009, I sure would not want to be graduating in 2010, 2011, or actually anytime after that,
proskauer has laid off tons of 1st years from class of 2008. people in the top 5% of their respective schools....
proskauer has laid off tons of 1st years from class of 2008. people in the top 5% of their respective schools....
Proskauer should give me a $5000 stipend not to walk into the MP's office drop trou and take a huge dump on his credenza.
56-57: Uh, Proskauer doesn't get people in the top 5% of their respective schools unless we're talking about TTTs.
54: Proskauer isn't considered that prestigious of a firm, but bragging about Cahill is pretty amusing as well. They're not considered to be a name NY firm by any stretch of the imagination, and they've done their own rounds of layoffs. So, karma may yet bite your friend in the ass. Plus, why is it good that they offered the whole class? That just means they'll be bloated (do you really think every person deserved an offer) and have to layoff more people in the future.
What they are not telling these poor kids is that next year when the market comes back, they will continue an albeit lesser amount of normal hiring so that bu the time 2011 rolls around, the rising first years will have graduated law school 2 years prior to the rising third years. This year was a very bad year to graduate law school. Very Bad.
With the U.S. market crawling with foreign lawyers, why should any big law firm be committing itself to hire American law grads next year?
49, I'm sure your employer would be thrilled to know you can't even spell it's name right.
Say it with me: "You want fries with that?"
______________
I think you meant "its", 50. You weren't kidding about taking that fry order...
-Not 49
Ouch for those who went with Proskauer over "less prestigious" regional options.
Every day, I bless my lucky stars I went to Thompson Hine instead of Proskauer Rose. What a TTT firm.
You know who hasn't gotten shit on in a while? Ropes and Gray. The TTT law firm who thinks they're number one. It'll be interesting to see whether they give their whole giant summer class offers just to show how unswayed they are by economic events.
49-
I spent the summer at Proskauer, too. I don't think that description was remotely inaccurate. It's basically a blanket cold-offer. They don't really want us back. And, as far as I'm concerned, good riddance.
How about some positive news for once and reporting on NYC firms giving offers to the entire summer class?? It is happening! Or will a story like that be too upbeat for this drab excuse for a blog?
Oh snap!!
Tip for Proskauer kiddies: They don't want you.
OMG, 67! It's happening?!? At some firm that you can't possibly be bothered to name?!? Wow, thanks for the tip!!!
66-
Why don't you tell Proskauer you won't accept an offer from them and to take you off their list? The other 79 summers will be glad you did and I am sure you can find another job right away.
Proskauer fucking blows - bunch of dickhead wanna-bes.
nuff said.
58: He has a nice credenza full of pictures. Please!
#54- Clearly you know NOT of what you speak. Cahill is a highly respected firm. And, they know how to run their firm. Cahill unlike many other firms, is doing serious campus interviews too, (see their schedule below) making offers and hiring top talent. Plus, I can tell you it's hard work, but you work with some of the smartest lawyers in the business at Cahill. I'm a first year there, and I am grateful for all that I'm learning and to be around attorneys who are so good at what they do.
Aug 3, 2009 Emory Law School Job Fair Alumni
Aug 4, 2009 National Law School Consortium Job Fair
Aug 7, 2009 Vault Diversity Job Fair
Aug 10, 2009 George Washington University Law School Job Fair Alumni
Aug 12, 2009 Columbia Law School On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 12, 2009 Brooklyn Law School On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 12, 2009 Cornell University Law School On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 13, 2009 University of Virginia School of Law On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 14, 2009 Northwestern University On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 17, 2009 New York University School of Law On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 17, 2009 St. John's University School of Law On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 18, 2009 Duke Law School On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 19, 2009 Fordham University School of Law On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 19, 2009 Yale Law School On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 26, 2009 Harvard Law School On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 27, 2009 Georgetown University Law Center On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 27, 2009 University of Pennsylvania Law School On-Campus Interviews Alumni
Aug 28, 2009 Howard University On-Campus Interviews
#74 Here - A correction: I meant #59 in my last comment
address.
74-75: Dude, I'm sorry you're so defensive about Cahill, but Cahill is neither a selective firm, nor does it get top legal talent. Yes, it interviews at many of the top schools, but the only students that end up there from, for example, Cornell, UVA, or GULC were the types of students that just had to be in NYC, but who weren't good enough to get to a top or even middle of the road NYC firm.
And re: the top schools like Harvard, Yale, I would be shocked if more than a trivial number HLS or YLS students end up at Cahill. Right now, the firm has 2 YLS associates (one of whom is really old, and the other is from 2006). And, the firm seems to average one or less HLS students per year.
Lots of firms interview at top schools. That doesn't mean those firms are draws for students from those top schools. If anything, Cahill seems to draw the mediocre T14 students and more competitive students from more regional NYC schools (Fordham, St. John's, Brooklyn, etc.). That's not necessarily a bad thing, but far from the "top talent" myth of yours that makes Cahill sound like Sullivan or Cleary or some other top NYC firm.
Holland & Knight held a late Friday meeting to announce pay cuts for associates. Please put a heading on this. Thanks.
Can someone please tell me what TTT means. I am new to this blog. Thanks.
78 - http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ttt
Used to be at this firm, left just before the legal job market collapsed. There's a lot of talk about quality of life and caring about associates but really nothing more than lip service, really a miserable place to work. Laid off associates, including a lot of first years, got market minimum. Glad ATL finally called them out for what they are - cheap
8 -- is a deadbeat proskauer partner who is calling armagedom
80 summers? in 2007, they had 40 summers and most of them are unemployed now. good luck to all those 09 summers...
49 -- yes, the summer's great but as you as you come back (I mean if you get an offer) first thing they'll tell you is that summer is over
#76 -Where do you get your information, and where is your bitter point-of-view coming from? I went to Harvard and NYU and am at Cahill. I chose it over three top firm offers, because as a born and bred New Yorker I liked the feel and location of Cahill. You derision of this firm is suspect. Where are you working?
Sounds like 76 got laid off from Cahill.
wah wah wah, its funny how all the commentators on this site post mid-day, and yet claim to be successful top tier students/lawyers. If you were lawyers you would be working, and if your students... well hell its the middle of summer and your sitting inside constantly refreshing abovethelaw... get a freaking life. Please proceed with the TTT accusations and commenting on my spelling/grammar.
At my Cahill interview, they told me that they don't get many people with my credentials, but the ones who do go there really thrive. That's not what I heard from actual top firms.
#87 - You are too obvious in your ridiculous lie. Who EXACTLY is the "They" you quote?
i heard that above the law regularly talks with major law firms about limiting and censoring posts
this site is a crock of shit
What's a Cahill and why does it only go to alumni recruiting events? I guess it goes to normal recruiting at Howard. But what's a Howard?
Wow- I rarely read this blog, but it is clear that the legal profession is in sorry shape.
I'm so glad I went government- I graduated in '07 and right now I've been working 2 years. I don't know what I'd do with myself for 2 years without a job.
I just hope my husband's situation works out OK- senior associate at a large firm- because we'd be eating ramen noodles on just my salary!!
#76,87,90 Your prose completely gives you away.
1. Clearly that interview list was taken from their website which lists the alumni who went to that school next to interview schedule. And,"What's a Howard?" Watch your mouth sonny-boy.
2. You've now made it apparent that it's not that you were fired, it's that you were not hired. Wonder why? Could it have been that mean nasty streak down your back and up your tail?
Comment removed by moderator.
Almost every "fact" in this "story" is wrong. The "reporting" on this blog is a joke. Say what you want about Proskauer -- good, bad or indifferent -- but get your facts straight first.
Proskauer isn't even giving offers this year until the fall (and I hear thay will only give out a handful). What a terrible firm. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
What are the chances that Proskauer remains a top 100 firm over the next 2 years???
I hear they are trying to re-brand by making a new web-site and branding itself Proskauer rather than Proskauer Rose.
Why not just give up? Everyone knows what you have done. Why not fire some more first years within a month of them starting work? PR sucks.
Wow, I can't believe this post. Did Proskauer really just cold offer their entire summer class??
97 - No, they did not cold offer the entire summer class. They did not cold offer anyone. They told their summers that most of them would get offers but that they were going to take time to make sure they get it right. So that is wrong/bad because . . . ?
Why wouldn't they give out offers at the end of the summer like they have done every other year? If I had to guess, they may be looking for cover before cold-offering a substantial part of the class. They don't want to be the first to make such a move becasue they experienced a huge public relations hit when they were the first big firm to lay off first years in November/December.
99 - I concur. Also, Proskauer may be waiting until the summers disperse and go back to school, so the public will not realize how many were actually no-offered.
Is it really all about saving face, then?
98, what would you call a Fall 2011 deferral?
Two years of working at McDonalds?
102 - I'd call it a job that pays well.
Anyone who thinks "sit on your butt in a non-law job for a year without any support" is anything but a cold offer needs their head examined.
Dear Law Students:
It is not all about you. You are not that important.
Regards,
The World
People plan, God laughs. It's true, but #106 we don't need to be reminded that no one cares. Or perhaps we do, but then we also need to perhaps give that thing that we all need--care--to one another, instead of these brutal cracks over the head to each other. You can't stand the students sense of entitlement? OK, then say that. But don't hate them for having plans that have been turned over. For having no sense of where to go and what to do. Help them find and figure out new plans instead. Operating from your bitter place is not only not good for them, it's not good for you. Play your highest game, not your meanest.
89 - i heard the same thing from a headhunter who regularly calls up the hiring partners to b.s. one hiring partner was supposedly laughing about how his firm was able to get above the law to shut down comments about his firm that were directed to a hiring partner at a satellite office that slept with clients at her prior firm
posting here is like watching cnbc - a waste of time
#108 -Then why do you post here?
Those Proskauer partners are a sneaky bunch. Now they are free to cold offer or no offer a large number of summers this fall and it will be difficult to figure out what percentage they did this too.
Yes, 110, except that all firms have to report offers/no offers to NALP, which publishes them. And why, my dear cynics, would Proskauer or any other big firm spend all that time, energy and money on a summer program just "to cold offer or no offer a large number of summers . . ."? Just for shits and giggles? Does that make any sense?
Maybe they committed to the 2009 SAs before the bottom fell out . Next steps at Proskauer: Salary cuts, no 2010 summers, more layoffs .......?
For the record, the above article only applies to the NY office. Other offices were given different (earlier) time lines both for when summers can expect to hear whether they received offers and when they will be starting if they do. The NY office had too many summers.
With these revelations today (where multiple firms offered most, if not all, of its summer class positions), why can't Proskauer Rose announce offers now rather than "sometime in the fall?" What are they planning?
What firms announced that all of their summers will be getting offers? I thought there was always some percentage that got cold offers............
Please see http://abovethelaw.com/2009/08/summer_offer_rate_open_thread.php#more
Proskauer, obviously, ain't on the list. Don't know why they're making us wait...
Perhaps the Proskauer employee situation is due to the fact that Proskauer is in a Trillion Dollar Federal Lawsuit, legally related by Judge Shira Scheindlin to a Supreme Court of NY WHISTLEBLOWER case claiming Supreme Court of NY Officials physically harassed her, a sixty year old staff attorney and Whitewashed Complaints against "favored" Lawyers and Law Firms.
08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
(07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT
(07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,
(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
(08 cv 6368) John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
Eliot Bernstein
Mad Inventor
iviewit@iviewit.tv
Perhaps the Proskauer employee situation is due to the fact that Proskauer is in a Trillion Dollar Federal Lawsuit, legally related by Judge Shira Scheindlin to a Supreme Court of NY WHISTLEBLOWER case claiming Supreme Court of NY Officials physically harassed her, a sixty year old staff attorney and Whitewashed Complaints against "favored" Lawyers and Law Firms.
08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
(07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT
(07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,
(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
(08 cv 6368) John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
Eliot Bernstein
Mad Inventor
iviewit@iviewit.tv
Watchout, the PROSKAUER SHIP IS SINKING LAWYERS AND RATS JUMP FIRST LEAVING WOMEN AND CHILDREN BEHIND
July 21, 2009
Perkins Coie Lands Life Sciences Group From Proskauer Rose
Perkins Coie announced today that it had swiped seven intellectual property lawyers and one scientific adviser from Proskauer Rose.
see www.iviewit.tv for the Proskauer Criminal Enterprise Allegations now pending in a Trillion Dollar Suit against Proskauer
Ahhh, the iveiwit guy. It wouldn't be a Proskauer story with him. I hope the partners put that "trillion dollar lawsuit" on the balance sheet as a liability. You know, want their accounting to be accurate and all.
Why isnt a legitimate trillion dollar law suit against Proskauer bigger news on ATL? It seems more important than how much soda costs at a law firm's vending machines...
Proskauer is a shitty place to work. Always has been and always will be----especially in the other Prokauer offices!!!