Blind Item: Layoffs To Come At ‘A Law Firm in Manhattan’
The Washington Post had an article this weekend on Kim Hall of the Five O’Clock Club, who makes her living on layoffs. She advises companies on how to fire employees en masse and also offers guidance to the newly unemployed workers. At $2,000 per severanced head.
The article describes a “day in the life” of Kim Hall and discusses how her business is booming in the recession. Her company has doubled in size in the past two years. Scavenger, much?
The article caught our attention because during the day that the journalist trailed and interviewed Hall, she got a call from a Manhattan firm planning layoffs later this year.
The article contains a prediction of layoffs coming at a New York firm in August, with more to come in the fall:
It is 9:03 a.m. on a Wednesday, and another day of economic collapse has begun.“Five O’Clock Club, this is Kim,” she says. “How are you this morning?”
She rocks in her chair as she listens and scribbles notes: A law firm in Manhattan. Downsizing. Their third one this year. Twelve employees. Probably in August. More to come in October and November.
Unclear which firm this is, and whether attorneys or staff will be on the chopping block. But perhaps they will be relieved to know that the firm is likely paying $24,000 for the layoff advice that Hall will impart.
Hall has guided more than 200 companies and 1,500 laid-off workers through downsizings in the past six months. The Club, as it is sometimes called, charges each company about $2,000 per fired employee in exchange for providing layoff victims with a year of career coaching.
Why wouldn’t they pay her $2,000 per person? She’s got Dalai Lama quotes!
For fear of lawsuits, some outplacement firms advocate downsizings that avoid any impulsive or personal conversations. Instead, they tell companies to use what is known as the surgical method: terminations that last about 15 seconds each, after which former employees are ushered off company property.“Doing that scars people for the rest of their lives,” Wendleton says. “There’s a better way.”
She opens the confidential folder and pulls out a Five O’Clock Club booklet titled “How to Terminate Employees While Respecting Human Dignity,” which includes inspirational quotes about compassion from Theodore Roosevelt, George Lucas and the Dalai Lama. The introductory chapter asks managers to approach layoffs with the understanding that, “unlike facilities and equipment, humans have an intrinsic worth beyond their contribution to the organization.” Wendleton flips to a section called “Say a Kind Word,” in which a lawyer offers phrases that managers can use during a “compassionate downsizing.”
We hope she also gives practical advice about layoffs, like not booking every conference room in the office to the managing partner or the head of human resources on the day of mass firings.
Layoff etiquette aside, which New York law firm do you think is making a third round of layoffs in the next month, with a possible fourth round in the fall? We invite rampant speculation in the comments.
The Art of Letting Employees Go [Washington Post]




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
FIRST. Victory at last, how sweet it is
FIRST. Victory at last, how sweet it is
White & Case?
Proskauer
your mother
It can't be Cadwalader, they've already had three rounds (not counting the stealth layoffs in between).
K&L Gates.
The story is a little out of date, word on the street is that she just took a position in house with Latham.
What a greedy horrible witch. Starting a company that specializes in downsizing advice????? How do you sugar coat that partners are keeping their million dollar salary and you are out of a job.
I am sure that her karma is exceptional. What a c-bag.
I'd bet against White & Case bothering to lay off 12 employees. They're too big for that to make a dent if they're still hurting.
It has to be someone smaller.
This didn't happen in Texas.
do a report on V&E's offer rate
Bob, Bob
It's got to be a smaller firm. 12 cuts doesn't seem drastic enough for any of the larger ones.
Nice to see counter-cyclical business models at work. But the recession is over, so I wonder if Kim's boss will hire a consultant to explain how she's become "redundant"?
Cahill?
Old news. The Bobs did it first, and they did it best. All you junior associates still receiving paychecks - the glitches are going to be fixed.
Two chicks at the same time, man.
That Elie Mystal is a straight shooter with upper-level management written all over him.
"which includes inspirational quotes about compassion from Theodore Roosevelt, George Lucas''...let's stop there.
What the hell could be George Lucas' inspirational quote, other than shitty dialogue for three awful movies that ruined a once proud franchise?
Good intel, Kash.
Now, without even the benefit of a WashPo article, I'm going to predict that a large DC firm will lay off associates in August, October and November. But it might be more than one firm.
And that's why everyone says I'm psychic.
Oops, it's five o'clock. Time to bang that chick in accounts-payable before she gets laid off tomorrow, then head home to the wife and kids.
-BigLaw Partner.
17 Wins
22, remember to bring your O-face.
Oh... Oh... Oh! You know what I'm talkin' about. Oh!
Any idea if this could be DLA Piper? They already did 2 rounds. Or is the firm Manhattan based?
These people are completely useless and they make $ on the misery of others.
Proskauer?
Has to be DLA Pooper. This firm is sinking fast and pooping people all over the place. There is no amount of money they won't pay to third party consultants as the chief people pooper is a moron and HR and administration is bloated with useless hacks. Good bye DLA.
Orrick has done 2 rounds already.
What a horrible human being. Her business provides biglaw partners feel just a little bit better about laying off associates, but does absolutely nothing to help associates that get laid off.
Her business is basically, "pay us and pass us the buck, we'll give them career advice."
I hope all the money you make is worth it you lowlife scum.
Based on those numbers it could be Boies but I think they used a different consulting firm than 5 o'clock
Cahill Gordon
While it might have been stupidity that drove partners to hire this woman and her firm in the past, that they continue to do so these days is a sure sign of their mental retardation. Layoffs have been so common tht you only need look at how others do it and then copy their moves.
EAPD.
Anderson-Kill.
The word on the street is that it's Cahill. They've already done two lay-offs this year and the number (12) is right for a firm of that size.
She's the type of a**hole that plays the don't pass...
Not EAPD. They're hiring.
Fried Frank has had 2 rounds.
8
Does Latham have anyone left to layoff? Aren't they down to like 4 people?
Ding ding ding - we have a winner! #29
How could it be Cahill? They just made offers to all but one of their summers?
Mayer Brown New York is floundering.
Simpson Thacher: 2 rounds of layoffs, one lethal reaction. Who else is so worried about how they handled things before that they'd hire a professional
hit woman this time?
Cahill Gordon
Proskauer
I'd think Latham would be adept at laying people off by now I don't see why they'd need her.
Still, probably LaTTTham.
Sounds like 16,32,36,45 is that same poor guy from last week who got laid off or not hired at Cahill.
This woman has a cool job. Much better, and more intellectually stimulating, than what the associates she sees laid off do with their days. I wish her the best of luck.
A cool job? What are you #49? An in house attorney for a slaughterhouse? That must be your idea of the coolest of jobs.
Latham's NY office has been productive since April. In fact, our attorney pace to budget in the last 2 months have been phenomenal, especially in the NY office. Our NY associates out-billed partners by a wide margin in all practice groups. Only 2 departments were below 100% pace w/o pro bono and even those were in the very high 90%. This is how we want to utilize leverage. Our NY office is fine.
We did have an over capacity problem going into the fall of 2008 and we've addressed it. It's unfortunate we had to take those actions but like every other law firm, we hire 2 years out and when the forecasted demand doesn't materialize, we have to reduce our work force. We treated our folks right by not only giving them 6 months of severance, but also 6 months of paid medical.
Latham is in fine shape.
sounds good, Bob. Sounds real good.
Cahill has partners who love to talk about lay-offs when they get drunk.
Ok then : Orrick, Proskauer, or Cahill. Maybe all 3?
How is White & Case faring? -- NY, DC?
Sounds like 16,32,36,45,53 is that same poor guy from last week who got laid off or not hired at Cahill. Stop sharing your sour grapes and go get some fresh air.
Concerning Latham, I seem to remember that Bob Dell promised that nobody would be fired again and again only a few weeks before a lot of people were fired...so not sure about how reliable his statement is...
Probably Orrick NY.
The Cahill marketing department must be spending a lot of time on this web site. The truth is that the work at Cahill has dried up. Summers recently hired don't start until 2011. If it's a problem then it can be dealt with later.
Latham's 6 month severance package was more generous than that of many other firms. That gesture should be acknowledged and praised on Above the Law.
V&E fucking sucks.
I'm surprised so many people believe what they read in the newspaper. I'm Kate Wendleton, President, The Five O'Clock Club, the outplacement firm they wrote about.
Sorry to ruin the fun of speculating, but -- being the president -- I know that the author was using artistic license to make the article more dramatic.
There IS no law firm we're working with that fits that description and is planning those kinds of layoffs. What's more, we don’t have a “tally of destruction,” don’t pay monthly bonuses, have a larger office than he described, are not across from a laundry room where people come and go in their pajamas, Kim does not pop Tylenol -- ever -- and it's all meant to add drama to the article.
The technique obviously worked and I am sorry you were misled. We were upset at first, but then realized that this is what sells newspapers. That's show biz.
Warmest Regards,
Kate Wendleton