Add RSS RSS

Lawyer of the Day: Gary Appelblatt

gary appelblatt.JPGGary Appelblatt, 58, a California divorce lawyer, was a bit too thorough in his interviews with his clients. From the Associated Press:

Prosecutors say Appelblatt would tell clients that he had a pharmacy degree and touched them under the guise of performing medical procedures during divorce case consultations.

Appelblatt has admitted to improperly touching five of his clients — we assume they were female — and has been convicted of four counts of sexual battery and one count of attempted sexual contact. Apparently he offered one of his clients the $5,000-off-your-bill-if-you-sleep-with-me discount.

According to his website, Appelblatt is a “registered pharmacist.” He’s also a “certifid [sic] flight instructor.” We think we’d rather not have him in our cockpit.

Divorce lawyer pleads no contest to sexual battery [Associated Press]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:15 PM

Really, "assume they were female"? This guy is in Calfornia for crying out loud

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:16 PM

That dude looks just like Geraldo Rivera.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:16 PM

BERNIE'S COCK SIZE? STILL WAITING FOR AN ANSWER!!

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:17 PM

"Cockpit", eh? Classy.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:17 PM

Guys in my high school used to tell presumably female students that they had pharmacy degrees for the purpose of conducting bogus medical procedures on them all the time, it was no big deal.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:21 PM

"Cockpit" best double entendre in a long time.

Does this start a new fad of using cockpit that will end up being banned similar to ___ _________?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:23 PM

He is actually a good lawyer/pharmacist. Once, he pulled a lobster right out of a client's ass. Saved her a trip to the hospital *and* paid for dinner.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:23 PM

Cheers to the due diligence of the CA bar when it comes to character and fitness. Maybe they need to introduce a new CLE course "Do not molest your clients 101".

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:24 PM

There's more than one type on that website. MysTTTal obviously is moonlighting.

And why is it ok to refer to cockpits but not butt crustaceans?

10 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:26 PM

This story reminds me of my former physician, Harvard Medical School educated I may add, who had an office on Central Park West. He was accused of sedating his female patients and administering "injections" with a certain seminal fluid. Does anyone remember the good doc's name? It has been almost 2 decades.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:29 PM

I am pretty sure one of the clients was Lat.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:32 PM

PE

If the doctor had the credentials that you claim he does, then he is lame for not being able "inject" women willingly. I mean that's every tramp's dream hookup after a few glasses of cheap wine in a bar.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:33 PM

9 - glasshouse... stone... you know the drill

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:35 PM

PE:

Were you even born "2 decades" ago? Go back to popping those pimples and reviewing endless documents.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:36 PM

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/18/horror-in-knoxville-update-trial-begins/

Ask yourself why the MSM hasn't told you about this.

16 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:40 PM

This comment is addressed to post no. 14.

I was trailblazing through the legal profession decades before the prophylactic that was designed to prevent your creation "broke." As for document review, I am pleased to say in my day, associates were never assigned such menial and mindless tasks. I find it outrageous that my profits are dwindled by paying many self-entitled louts a generous salary just to review documents when I can very well pay less than minimum wage in Asia to have the same tasks performed.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:44 PM

I take it that Appelblatt's divorce clients are not the brightest bulbs on the tree.


avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:45 PM

Look at the big sloppy grin on that guy's face. He clearly loves his job.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:48 PM

How in the world does someone allow themselves to be touched on the basis of a Pharmacy degree? Retards.

PE, STFU, you have no idea what you're talking about whereas I went to Williams and then Yale Law. If you knew the lack of sophistication of any Asian (non American) lawyer you wouldn't trust them to get you coffee. Your writing is also terrible, look at how rambling your last sentence in comment 16 is. You are a complete fucking loser.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:50 PM

7, nice.

-19

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:53 PM

Trailblazing? More like TAILblazing.

22 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:53 PM

This comment is addressed to post no. 19.

I neither know you nor care to know about you. I am unimpressed by your credentials, which today, are meaningless. At this point in my life I don't have to justify anything to a snot nosed cretin like yourself. The success you will achieve in your lifetime could not even fit in a thimble compared to what I have accomplished. Go bore your family and friends with your "impressive" achievements. You put down Asians yet they own the world. Welcome to the new world order.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:55 PM

PE:

You misunderstood my insult. I called you a contract attorney, not a big law associate, because I believe that's what you do for a living.

I really hope ATL is paying you for this. Otherwise it's a colossal waste of time.

14

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:56 PM

He also worked at a Holiday Inn Express

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:57 PM

I <3 PE

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:00 PM

Isn't there a b52's song - Cocklobster?

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:00 PM

Isn't there a B52's song - Cocklobster?

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:00 PM

PE, 19 here, if you really think Asians own the world you've never worked on a deal in your life. I am a successful highly ranked 5th year associate in my group and realize, like any real lawyer, international lawyers are a fucking nightmare, especially the English and Japanese. You on the otherhand are a peasant who trolls on Abovethelaw. Retired partner or law student, you are a sick loser.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:01 PM

Gary Appelblatt, you gotta put me on.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:02 PM

28 - 10 bucks says you don't make partner.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:03 PM

Unless PE comes out today (8/18) and declares his twitter account the real deal, I officially will deem it fraudulent. PE, you are on the clock.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:06 PM

PE: You know what's more pathetic than non-peer firms...2L's who have no social skills and do not understand when their "schtick" goes from slightly amusing to f*cking annoying. Please, please, go away.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:09 PM

PE, you are awesome. Don't be discouraged by the haters on this site, especially since most people (myself included) only visit this site to read your comments. Keep up the posting and the tweeting.

A devoted fan.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:10 PM

PE, you are awesome. Don't be discouraged by the haters on this site, especially since most people (myself included) only visit this site to read your comments. Keep up the posting and the tweeting.

A devoted fan.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:11 PM

31 - Yes, no doubt your anonymous post surely has PE feeling compelled to "declare" anything. Speaking of twits - you are one.

36 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:12 PM

I wish to address the twitter account very briefly. Apparently, someone has decided to impersonate me by creating a twitter account. I find it comical in that imitation is the highest form of flattery. If that person wishes to continue his/her charade, so be it. I think most people know that I am not the same person as the one impersonating the twitter account holder.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:16 PM

28 - as a lawyer who has practiced in Asia, UK, and US (and admitted to jurisdictions in those three areas/countries), I find your remarks insular and uninformed. Based on my experience, the ratio of competent vs. incompetent lawyers is fairly consistent - I have dealt with highly incompetent lawyers in the US (some of whom are incapable of conjugating any verbs or distinguishing between "therefor" and "therefore").

Triple Threat

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:25 PM

37 - Triple threat=butt sweat.

You'se a punk therefore your comment is ad nauseating!

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:26 PM

Glad that the "cockpit" line was from Kash, not Lat...

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:31 PM

32, when did ATL comments become SERIOUS BUSINESS? You should swing by a certain Harvard-educated doc to get your dosage checked.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:35 PM

I love Partner Emeritus.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:00 PM

PE remains a cock-watcher.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:02 PM

28- lawyer here with 2 law degrees- a JD and an LLB.

I have practiced law in both Asia and the United States and frankly you're talking crap. In terms of ability and sophestication of work, there is little to choose. Yeah, if you work for a top firm here and with a crap firm across the world, then yes. It would be equally applicable the other way around. In terms of being aggressive, mean and seriously anal- yeah, there is a difference.

Just check out some of the comments on this blog, including yours and you will understand why I said this.

I call BS on your so called qualifications. I doubt Yale let you in except on a mercy mission and I wouldn't trust you with anything other than the ability to go and stand outside town halls and scream about how you're not going to let this socialist President euthanize your grandmother.

Now I am done with this thread and you can pour your poison out bravely, meaningfully and annonymously at those who give a shit about your half arse cock.

Not 37

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:05 PM

And your impersonation of a pimple on a donkey's dirty dick is also a form of flattery? Huh, PE? You're a shit-eating, pin-dick loser, and you should really kill yourself.

Damn, I'm tense today...waiting to hear back on a job offer.

PE, you are a cock-watcher, though-- at the very least.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:11 PM

43-- you're right; I'll bet just about any lawyer in a third-world doc review sweat shop has greater fluency in the English language than you.

It's not your fault-- someone in your TTT LR&W class told you to write like you speak, so...

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:17 PM

37 (and not 43)

To 28, 38 and 45

Me practice law long time. Give client good time. You not likee, you go practicee - flipping burgers!

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:36 PM

43,

It is disgusting to how fucking off point you are to 28's comments.

-Not 28

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:59 PM

Kash, you are trying too hard to be "cute." As cliche as it is, just be yourself. People are picking up on your desperate attempts at humor (e.g., "cockpit") and aren't going for the bait. Just relax and write and don't try so hard. You are talented and don't need to pander to drooling male readers.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:23 PM

I don't mind being pandered to. In fact, I like it. Keep up the good work.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:41 PM

Wow, I have to write in, since I actually am dealing with this guy on a case right now. I was just telling a coworker who's going to fill in for me at the next hearing about how creepy he is. I never suspected it went this far!

His website is great, though, especially the bio on his paralegal and how she's preparing to take the bar in July 1999.

51 Posted by Kashmir Hill | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:42 PM

Don't worry your pretty little head, 48. I'm not trying "too hard" at all. It took me about 5 seconds to come up with the cockpit quip.

Unfortunately, I still have the humor of a fifth grader. Fortunately, (most) ATL readers seem to appreciate that.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 5:48 PM

Catfight!

53 Posted by Pacific Reporter | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:31 PM

Is Appelblatt also a real estate agent? If so, he can join the leadership of the birthers movement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz
P.S. Kash, I love your humor! You can ride in my cockpit anytime.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 6:34 PM

I admit, I am just jealous that Kash gets all the eligible lawyers in NY.
-48

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:45 PM

1--you obviously know nothing about California. The demographics of Sacramento are probably more similar to those of some hick city in Texas like Dallas or Houston than they are to S.F. or L.A. California, in fact, has huge swaths of areas filled with ignorant, Republican, white trash.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:45 PM

1--you obviously know nothing about California. The demographics of Sacramento are probably more similar to those of some hick city in Texas like Dallas or Houston than they are to S.F. or L.A. California, in fact, has huge swaths of areas filled with ignorant, Republican, white trash.

57 Posted by Lady Soto | Permalink Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:36 PM

"Appelblatt, blatt, blatt, nut.
Appelblatt, blatt, blatt, nut.
Appelblatt, Appelblatt, Abelblatt: nut.

"Now I love crazies and crazy loves me.
Like a lemon to the lime, and the bumble to the bee.
You know I'm real hood, and no one can resit it.
But I couldn't be a white boy, so don't get me twisted."

Aye yae yieeeeeee!

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:27 AM

29 wins.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:16 AM

48 - You're soooo wrong. I need a good pandering to every now and again.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:25 AM

55/56 - Nice double dumbass post. You are an EPIC FAIL. You think LA is great because it's so liberal? Oy geveltafish - liberal, prior to being coopted by the extreme leftists, means open minded, and clearly your post and sentiments on various cities and members of political parties is not open at all.

You, sir, are the leading asshole in the state.

Post Your Comment