Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Salary Cut Watch: King & Spalding Is So Last Season

Salary Cuts.jpgI thought we were done with salary cuts. It’s almost September! Fashion week is on the horizon, but King & Spalding is coming out with an old style. I mean, it’s been multiple weeks since I used this picture.

Just before 5:00 p.m. yesterday, King & Spalding decided it was ready to cut associate salaries:

As you know, the past year has been a difficult one in all industries. The economic turmoil has led to a reduction in demand for legal services and increased pressure on firms to reduce costs. Although King & Spalding remains strong thanks to the quality of our people and our diverse portfolio of practices, clients, and offices, we are not immune to the broader economic environment. As a result, over the course of the past year, we, like other leading firms, have had to make a number of difficult but important changes to ensure our cost structure remains competitive and we are able to generate the opportunities that keep us all engaged.

Earlier this year, many firms “froze” salaries at 2008 levels or reduced them even lower. After closely monitoring those changes, we have decided to make commensurate adjustments to our salaries. Effective September 1, 2009, the annualized salary for U.S. partner-track associates will be equal to their 2008 salary. Partner-track associates in Atlanta and Charlotte will have an additional market-based reduction equal to $10,000 on an annualized basis. The salary for U.S. counsel, other lawyers, and consultants will be reduced by five percent. These salary changes will only apply going forward and will not be retroactive to the beginning of the year. Our plan is to announce 2010 salaries some time during the first quarter of next year, as some firms already do.

Ugh. Doesn’t K&S know that the cool thing isn’t just to cut salaries? All the popular kids are busy making fun of lockstep compensation. Oh wait, I guess K&S did get that message.

After the jump, another wedgie for lockstep.

King Spalding logo.jpgIn his email to the firm, King & Spalding chairman Robert Hays tried to convince everybody that lockstep was already a thing of the past.

The legal industry continues to move toward more individualized, performance-based compensation. To that end, we will continue to rely on our bonus programs to reward superior performance, and our current bonus thresholds and basic structures will remain the same, with one exception. Beginning this year, as is the case at most firms, the bonus amounts paid for performance in one year will be subject to market review early the next year. This means that distribution of bonuses could occur later than the end of February. Thank you for all of your hard work on behalf of the firm and our clients.

Okay, if there was one thing lockstep compensation was really good at, wasn’t it making sure associate compensation was subject to “market review”? If you are going to move to more “individualized performance-based compensation,” shouldn’t that review have more to do with the individualized performance of your associates, as opposed to what the market is paying other associates?

It’s a serious question. Will high-performing (whatever that means) K&S associates get a bonus commensurate with high billers at the vast majority of firms that have not abandoned lockstep? Or will they receive bonuses like high performers at the few firms that have abandoned lockstep? Will it be whatever number is lowest?

Lots of firms are trying to find ways to reduce the amount of money they pay to associates. With this message, King & Spalding seems to be saying nothing more than that they will wait to see what everybody else does, and then do the same thing. That hardly sounds like a compensation system that is based on performance.

Earlier: Nationwide Layoff Watch: King & Spalding Is Making Cuts
Prior ATL coverage of salary cuts

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:10 AM

Much more of this sort of thing to come!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:10 AM

shit was so cash

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:11 AM

Lockstep is becoming lockschlep.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:12 AM

A brilliant move, because those who are the most valuable right now-- bankruptcy attorneys, IP attorneys, and the like-- have the most ability to jump ship to a firm that pays market. So, they'll quickly have plenty of do-nothing finance associates as they lose the people who are actually billing. Brilliant.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:12 AM

Didn't they just hire Paul Clement for $5 million?

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:16 AM

Don't you think we're about to have a flurry of starting salary paycuts? I think the class of 2009 will give that picture a lot more use...

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:16 AM

4 - And what defines market, lockstep?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:18 AM

Didn’t this firm Latham its first years?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:25 AM

Overpaid associates are having their salaries cut?! Wah!

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:25 AM

I wish these firms would just bit the bullet and announce that associates starting in January of 2010 will be paid 100 or 110 or something. I think most of my peers would much rather take that pay cut and actually start than 'make' 145 or 160 and never start working at our firms.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:29 AM

7-- The market by definition is what other firms are paying attorneys in their class year/specialty. Cutting all salaries, even for those associates who are really busy, is a guaranteed way to lose those who can get their old salary somewhere else, and keep those who can't find other work. It'

12 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:30 AM

The ship be sinking...

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:31 AM

We're not done with salary cuts.

14 Posted by Dubya | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:32 AM


How you like me now?

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:32 AM

They will never cut 1st year salaries just for prestige reasons. The cost savings is nil and the prestige cut is huge.

End of month. Time for time entry Chrometa style so I can pretend I was productive this month.

16 Posted by The Truth | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:34 AM

Let's see if King & Spalding reduces their billing rates by a similar proportion...

If so, this can be spun as a sensible repsonse to a new economic reality, by a firm that understands the pressures facing its clients...

If not, then its nothing more than a cash grab by greedy partners.

Odds that billing rates are reduced?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:46 AM

"It's serious question."

It's serious that Mystal can't write and yet, by some grace, managed to graduate from HLS. How is this possible??

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:47 AM

Problem is, in Atlanta, K&S is basically the last major firm to annouce a pay cut--so there aren't many places for those "top billers" in busy practice groups to go.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:47 AM

Any word on incoming/deferred associate salaries?

Please "investigate"

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:48 AM

18, sure, but the Atlanta/Charlotte folks have the 'additional' cut-- the associates in NY are now getting paid below market and should jump ship ASAP.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:49 AM

If K&S did it today, I'm sure Atlanta's "also-ran," A&B, will feel free to do it next week. After all, the two firms' managing partners are brothers, and have no doubt strategized together. A little incest, a little collusion . . . How very southern!

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:49 AM

10 - Bite your fingers, you are dead wrong. I'd rather go do something else

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:50 AM

"...should jump ship ASAP."

What firms are hiring?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:51 AM

"These salary changes will only apply going forward and will not be retroactive to the beginning of the year." = We regret to inform you that we realize that the law prevents us from taking back money we are paid you.

25 Posted by Scared 3L | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:53 AM

10 - I agree with you 100%. We "January starters" need to face reality -- we will not be starting at our firms any time soon unless salaries are reduced significantly.

I almost want to email my firm and let them know that reducing our salaries is an easy way for them to save money. And, best of all, we will take the salary cut with a smile!

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:54 AM

23-- At least in NY, almost every firm with a bankruptcy group would be happy to take on a lateral who had 1+ years of bankruptcy experience. I don't know who's hiring for other specialties.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:55 AM

25 - I'm glad to see that you feel entitled to a smaller salary!

28 Posted by Scared 3L | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:00 AM

27 - I am so sick the "entitlement" argument. We do not feel entitled to anything. But we did work hard for our "offers" and are eager to start our careers.

Tell me, oh wise one, how did you feel when you were just getting started? Of course, you don't remember that, just a few short years ago, you were in the exact same situation as us, only with luckier timing.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:02 AM

Uh, 4, hate to break it to you, but the IP attorneys are sitting on their fat asses, waiting for the tsunami of litigation to come from all the corporations that have drastically cut prosecutions, or are farming them out to cheaper fees for services firms.

Unfortunately, that litigation isn't manifesting.

30 Posted by Quinn_Remains | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:04 AM

QUINN REMAINS at market (for now)

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:07 AM

1. k&s is no longer at the top of the atlanta-based salary market. alston & bird did a freeze + 5k cut; k&s did freeze + 10k cut. prestige, schmestige--this is not a time to jump ship, especially in atlanta.

but never for a minute did any associate at k&s ever believe that they would get paid less than their classmates at alston & bird

2. it is interesting to point out that the firm's average for billable hours is annualizing near 2000 hours for associates and counsel

3. for a fact, i can attest that many clients of k&s have adopted 2008 billable rates and not even acknowledged the seniority of the associates working on their matters. it would theoretically make sense to adjust salaries likewise, except...

4. we'll see what the profits per partner is like. my bet is $1.2 million at least

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:12 AM

Scared 3L,

I too am a "january starter" and absolutely hate the "entitlement" argument. However, I feel much better now, because over the last few weeks, it has become apparent that the people making those comments are students/grads of TTT schools, that will never work for big law firms. This is their way of sticking it to us.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:12 AM

I wonder if the salary cut allows a K&S employee to revert to business casual? You monkeys should have a "polo-in".

34 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:14 AM

What this website has failed to report is that there are some peer firms that have started reducing associate compensation on a case by case basis. The affected associates are brought into offices and told under sub rosa conditions that they will incur a 8-15% salary reduction. They are also warned that if this information is shared or disclosed with anyone, including this website, they will suffer career ending repercussions (i.e., termination with extreme prejudice and general blacklisting within the profession). Trust me when I say that my hybrid tough love package is slowly making the rounds at peer firms. Thus far my income has not been affected by Obama's incompetent economic leadership. I will be riding the silver wave to retirement. That is all.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:15 AM

33 - was just thinking that. Will K&S associates still have to wear suits every day? Does the firm realize that it's in Atlanta, which is 1) irrelevant; 2) hot as fuck? There is no need for you all to wear suits every day.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:16 AM

I am personally very glad I did not take my offer from K&S in Atlanta and decided to bite the bullet and try my luck in a larger legal market up north. The hours and expectations of K&S in Atlanta are beyond what they pay and this is definitely a step in the wrong direction for the firm.

The management of K&S is fairly clueless. A cursory review of the problems they have had with the NY office, and the assumptions they made about opening said NY office, evinces the leaderships' inadequacies.

37 Posted by Your Future | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:19 AM

K&S, where will you draw the line?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:19 AM

This cycle shall one day pass and not long after there is another boom in the legal industry, firms will rush back to lockstep, claiming that it is far easier to administer and results in a more equitable result.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:22 AM

31: is there any talk of bringing on laterals/doing any hiring or are the partners going to just work their bare bones staff to death to maximize their profits?

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:24 AM

PE - just letting you know, in your case, it's hard to "retire" from unemployment

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:24 AM

27 = douche with extremely limited reading comprehension. He/she/it is unable to tell the difference between "I'm entitled" and "I just so badly want to keep my job that I'll take a huge pay cut if that would save it, please!".

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:25 AM

Nobody is going to jump ship. If the firm wants to keep a particular associate who is planning on leaving, the firm simply will pay the associate more money to keep him/her. The bottom line is that most associates aren't worth a fraction of what they are paid in salary and benefits, so it's way past overdue for firms to cut their pay, lay them off, defer hires, and generally start to operate the firm as a real business.

43 Posted by Met Lat at a Bar | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:27 AM

The only thing that was so last season were the pants Lat wore at the Ritz bar last night.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:27 AM

This is a big big day for the 'special' folks at Atlanta's WorsTTT Law Firm© McKenna Long & Aldridge.

Note that now even the mightiest Atlanta firm stooped down to this level! AWLFMLA would like to remind all of you considering Atlanta, that it is a LEADER in the Atlanta market. (LEADER in salary cuts and LEADER in awful culture, even a LEADER in NO OFFERING multiple people in 2007 so a LEADER of the recession!)

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:33 AM

39: haven't seen lateral associates for a real long time. still bringing in partners... lots of points to give out for lateral equity partners when we de-equitize or push out lots of other partners.

does anyone know who suzanne feese is? has her departure email gotten any abovethelaw burn? if not i'll try to find it and cut and paste... it's pretty priceless.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:34 AM

45, please post and send to tips@abovethelaw.com.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:36 AM

11 - Actually, market is nothing more then a data point. Your job, more specifically, YOU in that job has a market value of what YOU are getting paid.

Much like real estate. The average price for something similar may be X, but if you accept a different number, you have just set your market value.

48 Posted by Partner Emerimom | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:40 AM

My son is afflicted by the rare medical condition known as micropenis. His Micropenic Complex causes him to post outlandish lies about his stature on this website.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:41 AM

@26: That's not entirely true. I work at a bank (used to be at a law firm) and deal with bankruptcy events as they occur. Truth is, there aren't that many right now--most companies are restructuring their debt outside of bankruptcy, thereby avoiding a filing (and giving a lot of work to law firms that deal in high yield financing). There have been some major bankruptcies recently, but these are generally handled by a small group of firms. So, your average BK practice in NYC isn't booming.

50 Posted by Rhett Butler | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:41 AM

With enough courage, you can do without a reputation.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:46 AM

I love all these "jump ship" prognostications. To what ship will they jump? If their current firm doesn't value them, what makes you think the new one will?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:49 AM

Did they change the definition of "entitled" without telling us old folks? Now I know how the people who didn't get the memo must have felt when "gay" suddenly meant something new.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 11:53 AM

Wait a minute here! King & Spalding is a real firm? All this time I was thinking it was a made-up name like the Law Offices of Hugh G. Rection.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 12:01 PM

53 - I thought they were a roadside custard stand.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 12:05 PM

Even the allegedly strong V40 or so firms will begin to wonder why they are paying NYC market in DC/Dallas/Miami/Houston when every day another of the regional firms they compete with in the provinces cries uncle.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 12:06 PM

At least the firm can always fall back on its sporting goods arm. However, they might want to find a way to terminate their endorsement deal with Greg Oden, just to save some additional dollars.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 12:29 PM

Jumping ship = heading to Davey Jones.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 12:56 PM

Who the hell would want to live and work in Atlanta, the Africa of the South.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:01 PM

PE mom for the win... I enjoy her posts much more than PE's

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:01 PM

ATL is the National Enquirer of the legal community.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:16 PM

PE(merimom):

Keep it coming, granny. I'm a big fan.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:20 PM

So, hmm. If a current first year in the ATL office is making $145K and then as of September he stays at $145K (no class advancement in terms of salary) and then they cut $10K - he is making $135K as a second year.

So in January when the new first years start - they are going to have to make less than $135K - which means that first years in ATL could soon make less than they would have in 2006 (when starting salaries were $130K, and when NYC jumped to $160K, ATL went to $145K).

Interesting.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:36 PM

62 - Interesting, but still extracts a big hairy, sofa king what?

64 Posted by Scared 3L | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:37 PM

62 - that's really not an issue given that no first years will actually start in January. Phone calls will be made in the coming weeks.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:37 PM

Where is futuer Ellie?

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:42 PM

Thanks, Obama.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:53 PM

66-you remind me of a funny story.

Last summer, just before starting work, some friends of mine and I were spending a week at Litchfield Beach in SC. One day, a couple of us went out to play golf at Litchfield Country Club. Since we did not have a full foursome, we were paired with a "single" who was about 5 years older than us. We later learned that he was an associate at K&S in Atlanta. In almost the some breath, he asked us if we were voting for Obama, because he was convinced that if Obama were elected, his entire life would be ruined by the adverse impact it would have on his firm (and if we were planning to vote for Obama, then we could just go ahead without him).

How prophetic.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 1:58 PM

To all of you morons out there who blame this mess on Obama, think again. The financial meltdown and all of the deregulation, including, the decision to allow Lehman to fail was a decision made by George Bush, Chris Cox and Hank Paulson, occurred while George Bush was president.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:06 PM

I don't know who this Obama person is, but he must be mighty powerful to ruin the entire U.S. economy in a matter of months. I wouldn't mess with him if I were you.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:09 PM

Elie, good job with the critical questions. Good post.

-Post judger

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:12 PM

Funny how K & S hires foreign attorneys that are not even qualified in any US jurisdiction and then have to fire US attorneys. i.e. see Houston Office for instance.

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:15 PM

more about Suzanne Feese !!!

http://www.facebook.com/people/Suzanne-Feese/681721685

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:20 PM

What is a salary cut and salary freeze? The way it works at my firm is that we get raises each year. And, boy, am I enjoying my job security.

-Small firm attorney (laughing as his salary continues to approach the salary he was making at his big firm - yet still no billable hour requirement)

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:21 PM

58=Dumbass. Atlanta is the New York of the South, for whatever that's worth, and it has been for some time.

There is a reason there are no old houses there.

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:27 PM

Thanks, Obama.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:30 PM

Thanks, Bush. You too Reagan.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 2:47 PM

Waaah Foreign attorneys take our jobs! Waaahhh

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 3:10 PM

Thats nothing. In addition to freezes and salary cuts, Sonnenschein is cutting the use of paper coffee cups.

79 Posted by BHO | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 3:10 PM

75: You're very welcome. But this isn't about me. I have great health insurance.

I'm Barack Obama?

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 3:46 PM

74 – You are also a dumbass. I lived in Atlanta most of my life. I now live in New York, but I still go back to visit family in Atlanta. You can’t even begin to compare the two cities. Atlanta has little in common with New York and it is simply absurd to call it “the New York of the South.” More like “the Houston of the Southeast.” I don’t even mean that as an insult—I like Atlanta. It’s simply a more apt comparison. And wtf is with the “there is a reason there are no old houses there”? There are plenty of old buildings in New York, so it doesn’t work too well with your comparison. That being said, I think 58 is simply afraid of black people. And if you are afraid of black people, you shouldn’t live in Atlanta.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 3:53 PM

Suzanne Feese email, please

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 4:33 PM

"And if you are afraid of black people, you shouldn’t live in Atlanta. "

What and New York is black-free? Southern blacks have manners.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 4:51 PM

82 - There is a FAR greater proportion of black people in Atlanta than in New York. Atlanta is 57.3% African American and 38.6% White. It is one of the most African American cities in the country. I'm not bothered by being a minority in certain situations--something you get used to growing up in Atlanta. However, it is a sad fact that many white people are. It is something they just aren’t accustomed to. Moreover, I find it racist that you say that "Southern blacks have manners." I haven't noticed any significant difference in the black folks that I've met in the Northeast from the ones I've met in the Southeast.

avatar
84 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 7:00 PM

The reason there are no old houses in Atlanta = Sherman

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 7:20 PM

Friends:

I am no longer a KS partner or employee as of a couple of weeks ago. However, I will always be a member of the KS family in my heart. I am proud to have been associated with the firm for 21 years. KS is the only job I've had (other than my great career as a paper delivery person from ages 13-17, and summer jobs). The firm has changed greatly since I started on October 24, 1988, some for the better, some for the worse. I've been through three office buildings, lord knows how many managing partners and policy committees, and many comings and goings of friends from the firm. One constant positive from day 1 is my secretary. I don't think many KS attorneys have the privilege of having the same secretary for their entire careers, especially one so sui generis and excellent and professional and caring. I surely got lucky and am immensely grateful. I also send my thanks to the other income tax secretaries who have always been so supportive and work as a real team. I also send my heartfelt thanks to the many excellent staff people, top to bottom, with whom I've worked, particularly in recent years as PGL and Hiring Partner and all the many other things we've done together (partnership agreement, opening foreign offices, etc). I'm sure the firm's profitability will increase markedly now that I'm not there to drink countless cups of decaf coffee, but I will miss my daily 11 am meeting with our floor attendant who always, without fail, was there with my fresh pot of decaf ready to go and to enjoy a bit of conversation. As for KS lawyers, many of you are good friends and always will be. There is such immense talent at this firm, on par with the very best firms in the world, which is why I chose KS decades ago when I could have have gone anywhere. I dont regret the choice nor was I wrong about the standards of excellence and client service that the firm demands and delivers. I am confident KS will emerge from this unprecedented period of economic upheaval and law firm consolidation and implosion stronger than ever, and will remain a leading firm. I ask only that you try to adhere to the firm's values, which in recent years seem to be slipping away. Money means a lot, but it is not the most important thing at the end of the day, the week, the month, the year or your life. Your status as a KS lawyer/partner gives you two huge advantages: money and access. By access I mean opportunities to give back to the community and world in whatever way and form suits you. Being a KS attorney gets you in the door to places that equally competent and committed people are not invited because they dont have the "KS" seal of approval. Take advantage of this. Be generous with your time and resources. It can make a big difference as I've experienced in spades -- a very positive addition to life, especially when you are working really hard as we usually do (present times being an exception for some). Also, try to keep a sense of humor no matter what happens. I firmly believe being a great person and great lawyer are not incompatible, it just takes some focus and effort at times on both ends. As for me, have no idea what I will do, except that it will be something of value and interesting. Perhaps paid, perhaps not. Please stay in touch and I will try to do the same.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 28, 2009 10:58 PM

31 -- You are an idiot. K&S reduced salaries to 2008 levels minus $10K, annualized, in Atlanta. Alston froze salaries at 2008 levels 8 months ago and, in July, reduced salaries for the remainder of the year by $5K (which is the same as an annualized $10K reduction). Learn how to do math. Compared to A&B associates, K&S associates at least got the benefit of 8 months of 2009 salaries, before K&S brought the associates back to A&B levels. Thanks A&B.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:09 AM

King & Spalding Socked with $90k Discovery Sanction
This is one of those "think before you leap" lessons. Lawyer A says Lawyer B had obstructed discovery and misrepresented facts to the court. Judge says he's going to figure out who's telling the truth. He did so. Essentially, the court lambasted K&S's counsel for accusing Duane Morris's counsel of being uncooperative in discovery. The order in the patent infringement suit of CBT Flint Partners v. Return Path, No. 1:07-CV-1822 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 2008) is here:
http://www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/PDF/PDF%20Archive/Cisco-order2-081908.pdf
and the an article about it, is here:
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202423885428
Based upon my experience there, this is how they operate all of the time in all offices and in all practice areas - a cut throat, unprofessional, and, often, unethical law firm
Why would anyone in their right mind want to work at or hire King and Spalding ?

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:12 AM

i heard a rumor that associates at KS who are willing to have sex with at least client will not have their salary reduced ?

can anyone confirm ?

does anyone have pictures ?

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:12 AM

i heard a rumor that associates at KS who are willing to have sex with at least one client will not have their salary reduced ?

can anyone confirm ?

does anyone have pictures ?

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:12 AM

i heard a rumor that associates at KS who are willing to have sex with at least one client will not have their salary reduced ?

can anyone confirm ?

does anyone have pictures ?

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:14 AM

does bobby hays still wear those ugly cowboy boots ?

a shaved head looks kinda stupid on a white guy ...

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:16 AM

Since KS makes graduates of St. Marys law school partners, they are a 4th tier firm - their associate salaries should reflect this ?

avatar
93 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 9:32 AM

Since KS sets the standard, this is a great thing going forward. Clients should lower in house salaries by at least 10 to 15 %. People need to stop going to law school. If there are no other jobs in the U.S., people need to emigrate to other countries to find opportunities. This is how history has always worked when a great power goes into decline. The U.S. will fade like Great Britain did in the last century. You people need to learn Mandarin asap - Chine is the future. The U.S. is part of the past.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:24 AM

Suzanne Feese = Channeling the Bingham "Stepford Secretary," but with better grammar and syntax.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:44 AM

PE @ 34 is onto something. I heard of individual pay cuts of up to 40% at a large firm.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, August 29, 2009 8:23 PM

68 - Think again. Trace ti back to the administration which allowed the repeal of GLass-Stegall. THAT was teh decision that fostered the financial services meltdown.

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 8:50 AM

Since KS sets the standard, this is a great thing going forward. Clients should lower in house salaries by at least 10 to 15 %. People need to stop going to law school. If there are no other jobs in the U.S., people need to emigrate to other countries to find opportunities. This is how history has always worked when a great power goes into decline. The U.S. will fade like Great Britain did in the last century. You people need to learn Mandarin asap - Chine is the future. The U.S. is part of the past.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 8:50 AM

Since KS sets the standard, this is a great thing going forward. Clients should lower in house salaries by at least 10 to 15 %. People need to stop going to law school. If there are no other jobs in the U.S., people need to emigrate to other countries to find opportunities. This is how history has always worked when a great power goes into decline. The U.S. will fade like Great Britain did in the last century. You people need to learn Mandarin asap - China is the future. The U.S. is part of the past.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 8:50 AM

Since KS sets the standard, this is a great thing going forward. Clients should lower in house salaries by at least 10 to 15 %. People need to stop going to law school. If there are no other jobs in the U.S., people need to emigrate to other countries to find opportunities. This is how history has always worked when a great power goes into decline. The U.S. will fade like Great Britain did in the last century. You people need to learn Mandarin asap - China is the future. The U.S. is part of the past.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 8:52 AM

Whatever happened to the KS partner in the Charlotte office that committed suicide ?

Who ended up with his clients ?

avatar
101 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 10:04 AM

100 = Low Class

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 1:37 PM

The $10K salary cut for the associates still employed by K&S pales in comparison to the first-years they laid off and the incoming associates they deferred until January with NO $$$. I'm not disputing that K&S has every right to do this, but morale in Atlanta has been shit for over a year. When the opportunity presents itself, those who can leave will.

avatar
103 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 2:15 PM

102, don't hold your breath.

avatar
104 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, August 30, 2009 7:28 PM

As a former K&S associate, I can honestly say this firm was the worst place I have ever worked at -- not just worst law firm, but worst workplace period. I thank God every day that I no longer work there or have to list them as my employer. The firm is grossly mismanaged, compounding repeated terrible decision-making with a dog eat dog culture (a bunch of independent contractors sharing space to reduce overhead) that makes the firm's touted "no jerk" policy look pathetic and ridiculous. I have painted my description of K&S with a broad stroke because although there are some good people at the firm, these few individuals are, unfortunately, not in positions of authority, so they are unable to control the wretched decisions made at the top. I would NEVER recommend this firm to any client, much less anyone looking to begin their career here.

avatar
105 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, August 31, 2009 1:53 PM

I thought this article was about Sutherland, no?

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, August 31, 2009 3:08 PM

Hey! King and Spalding doesn't allow comments about Sutherland on its blogs.

avatar
107 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 1, 2009 10:35 AM

does anyone have pictures of the lesbian hiring partner ?

has she had sex with any clients ?

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 2, 2009 6:38 PM

Most clients did not allow firms to raise rates in 2009. As I understand what this firm did, they gave a raise before the rate results came out., and the pay cut was back to 2008 levels, where clients are setting the rates.

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 9, 2009 8:29 AM

104, which office?

Post Your Comment