Add RSS RSS

Nationwide Layoff Watch: Curtis Mallet Cuts Corporate Associates

curtis facebook recruiting.JPGDespite last week’s welcome reprieve from Biglaw layoffs, it looks like some firms didn’t get the memo. Above the Law has learned that Curtis Mallet conducted layoffs early this week. We believe that 10% - 15% of its corporate associates have been let go. Multiple class years were affected, but it appears that first years were spared.

Curtis Mallet would not respond to our multiple requests for comment

Perhaps the firm is embarrassed to be laying off associates on the heels of last year’s strong profit numbers. In February, Am Law Daily reported:

Bucking the trend among New York law firms, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle reports a 13.5 percent surge in revenue to $125 million. Curtis Mallet has chosen the worst business year in memory to cross the million-dollar profits per equity partner mark, with PPP up 11 percent to $1 million. Revenue per lawyer for the firm’s 225 lawyers, scattered among 14 offices worldwide, nudged up 3.5 percent to $570,000….

Firm chairman George Kahale, who was profiled in The American Lawyer last year, says that Curtis Mallet has the right mix of groups for the current economic climate.

So you see, laid off associates should be proud that they helped the partners make a million dollars before being shown the door.

After the jump, we learn that the work of soon-to-be-former Curtis Mallet associates is not quite done.


Continuing with the stealthy theme of these layoffs, displaced Curtis Mallet associates will still be coming into the office for the next ten weeks. But there’s a catch:

The real kicker to all this…most of us who got laid off are still getting new assignments.

Well how is PPP supposed to stay at $1 million this year unless associates are still working hard for the firm right up until the point they are put out on the street?

Good luck, former Curtis associates. Hopefully you’re getting laid off near the end of the downturn and will quickly be able to get back on your feet.

The AM LAW 100: Curtis Mallet-Prevost Sees Revenue Surge [Am Law Daily]

Earlier: Curtis Mallet Defines ‘Business Casual’ for its New York Associates

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:02 PM

first?

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:02 PM

These pretzels are making me firsty.

3 Posted by Lloyd Christmas | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:02 PM

We got no food, no jobs... our PET'S HEADS ARE FALLING OFF!"

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:04 PM

we're near the end of people thinking we're near the end of the downturn

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:05 PM

I know Curtis Mallet-Prevost from law school. That guy could really play some basketball.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:06 PM

Digging the Lloyd Christmas bit, but be careful not to over-expose too quickly....

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:07 PM

Isn't their logo some sort of nod to a satanic cult? I mean, that whole crescent moon thing is creepy.

And am I the only one that wants to call them Curtis' Mullet?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:08 PM

Emeritus Brothers:
I have not posted at ATL before. I choose to do so now in order to thank you for your posts. Please disregard those who lambaste you; a "silent majority" is behind you.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:11 PM

Latham

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:15 PM

Does anyone know if Latham conducted layoffs this year? If so, did they layoff any first-years? If so, in what offices? This needs to be brought to light.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:15 PM

CurTTTis MalleTTT

12 Posted by baby animal | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:16 PM

GO BYE BYE

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:16 PM

From what I can tell PE has stopped tweeting and appears to have deleted his Twitter account. This is a sad day.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:16 PM

ugh

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:16 PM

3 has potential

16 Posted by Nick Nolte | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:17 PM

whose got the name of the good reflexologist in the valley? no way am i going back to north hollywood to see billy friedkin's guy.

yours,
nick nolte

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:17 PM

PH will continue to stealth by drips and drabs. The last thing they want is another ATL story.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:17 PM

13: He and his half-brother, Stan, still post on ATL.

-8

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:17 PM

Please post more descriptive numbers.

Searching "corporate" and "associate" on the CM website yielded 65 results (including all international offices).

So, 6-10 associates total.

Good luck to those folks.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:24 PM

17 - Even the favorable ATL stories wind up back-firing on PH. I'm hearing that some PHNY staffers will be let go tomorrow.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:25 PM

I think the title should have been 'Curtis Mallet Drops the Hammer'.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:27 PM

17 - Tell them to get a shot of penicillin, that should take care fo the dribs and drabs.

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:29 PM

8: Yes, I am ecstatically aware of their valuable contributions (worthwhile except when PE falls into a senile haze and begins ranting about "Obamacare"). But PE's tweets were golden! I think he benefits from the enforced brevity of such a medium.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:40 PM

Not true. I saw PE tweeting a stripper at Rick's Cabaret.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:42 PM

Maybe they didn't reply because you're a dumbass fat fuck, Mystal. Why should a law firm respond to you?

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:45 PM

I once interviewed a corporate associate from Curtis Mallet who was applying at my litigation-only shop. I asked why he was interested in a mid-career switch to litigation. He responded: because when I was younger I used to fight with my brothers a lot and I would always win.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:48 PM

25 - Aren't you just a lovely ray of sunshine. Clearly Mystal has caused you some level of harm to warrant your naked hostility. That or you're just a basic ass living like a keyboard commando.

28 Posted by Paul Bearer | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:00 PM

After they work an additional ten weeks, will the laid-off associates then get their severence?

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:07 PM

I know Elie LOVES reporting layoffs/deferral news, but let's try showing some restraint and TRY being impartial once in a while.

How bought reporting on a law firm that is doing well enough ITE that it's pushing UP its start date for first years.

The new associates at Brown Rudnick are starting in September instead of November.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/20/the-good-news-we-have-work-the-bad-we-need-you-to-do-it/

In case Elie is too lazy to create a post or is afraid of the typos he will inevitably make, WSJ has already done the work (as it has in most cases). One of these days, the interns at ATL need to show Elie how the Ctrl+C function works.

30 Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:20 PM

The ship be sinking...

31 Posted by BHO | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:31 PM

You know the drill.

I'm Barack Obama?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:46 PM

31: Your bs is getting old.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:48 PM

32 - You're right, I'm really over Obummer.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:52 PM

31 - By your logic, you might as well blame Obama for global warming.

35 Posted by mcnasty | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:54 PM

"I might have to rely on a vice president that I select for expertise on economic issues."

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:59 PM

Does anyone really know where these numbers come from? Do firms just call up and say, we made $XX PPP, and AmLaw publishes it?

I have a hard enough time trusting public companies' audited financials, but we're supposed to take a private firm's unaduited numbers as gospel?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 5:15 PM

It wasn't just corporate associated who got axed.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 5:36 PM

Don't you mean "Curtis Mallet *Hammers* Corporate Associates?"

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 5:44 PM

I'm a CLS 2L who interviewed with Curtis at EIP. The interviewer sucked. She didn't ask me anything about myself or my interests, and she obviously hadn't bothered to look at my resume.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 5:49 PM

From what I've heard, it wasn't even close to "10 to 15% of corporate associates."

It was a handful of people (5-10 total), across departments, who probably shouldn't have had jobs to begin with.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:03 PM

39 - first with the hammer joke

-21

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:07 PM

It took me forever to get the hammer jokes.

Probably because it's pronounced "muh-lay."

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:01 PM

20 - how do you you know about PHNY staff? Is this only true for New York? What about the other offices?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 10:11 PM

44: Don't know about other offices. The info from my hr tipster only pertained to PHNY.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 11:19 PM

And another firm to add to TTT.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 20, 2009 11:47 PM

Another firm built on the corpses of its associates.

This would never happen at JONES DAY.

48 Posted by Waaaaaaaaambulance Chaser | Permalink Friday, August 21, 2009 11:57 AM

40: Call me at 922-2222. Sounds like you have a good case with which I'd like to help you.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 21, 2009 12:04 PM

41- then you've heard wrong.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 21, 2009 1:23 PM

40--nobody cares about your interests. In fact, had you any real interests, you'd not be a CLS 2L.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 21, 2009 3:59 PM

There were prior Curtis Mallet layoffs earlier this year, in real estate and other departments. Then this group in corporate. Rumor within Curtis Mallet is that litigation and other departments are now being considered. Another rumor is that the Stamford office is to be closed.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:37 PM

What is going with ATL? NYLawyer reported today that there is another layoff in the works at a London firm. Second round.

ATL is behind the news!

Post Your Comment