Add RSS RSS

When It Comes to Law Firm Names, Does Size Matter?

taking some names off above the law.jpgThe Legal Intelligencer had a piece yesterday on the continuing debate over law firm names: to shorten or not to shorten? Gina Rubel says the debate has been raging for years, citing an article she wrote about it as early as 2003. She says most legal marketing experts agree that firms should keep their names snappy and provides eight reasons why:

1. Better branding;
2. More memorable;
3. Easier to say and repeat;
4. Easier to register Web site URLs;
5. More marketable;
6. Supports name recognition;
7. Works better with social media and emerging technologies;
8. Easier to say in media interviews.

One of the firms that has fully embraced the “shorter is better” approach is Morrison & Foerster. The firm is already just two names, but it has chopped it down even further, usually marketing itself as “MoFo.”

We love the simplicity and brazenness of a firm branding itself MoFo. Plus, it makes referring to acquaintances there more fun. E.g., “How’s Dave doing? You know, MoFo Dave?”

After the jump, we have some suggestions for other law firm name elisions. Would you rather work for ClearGo or Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton? We’ve also got a poll to find out whether “length matters.”

Rather than firms shortening to a couple names, perhaps they should shorten to a couple syllables. MoFo conveys a sense of personality — forceful — that “Morrison & Foerster” does not. What opportunities do other firms have to rebrand themselves by going short?

Here’s a few of our suggestions for Biglaw’s top firms:

  • Cleary Gottlieb —> ClearGo. Upside: ClearGo says “we’re the obvious choice.” Downside: It sounds like a toddler’s game.
  • Covington & Burling —> CoBu. Upside: This white shoe firm is known for excellence, but doesn’t have much of a personality (i.e. quirks) beyond that. This would give it a cuddly touch. Downside: It’s a bit cuddly.
  • Sullivan & Cromwell —> SuCro. Upside: SuCro rolls off the tongue. Downside: It sounds like an artificial sweetener.
  • Kirkland & Ellis —> KirkEl. Upside: It’s quirky. Downside: Sounds like a cousin character that would have a cameo on Family Matters.
  • Shearman & Sterling —> ShearSter. Upside: Nice alliteration. Downside: Has a vaguely negative connotation.
  • Williams & Connolly —> WilCo. Upside: Great name recognition. Downside: The name’s taken.

    We invite you to suggest other nicknames in the comments, and to take our poll:

    Shorter Law Firm Names — the Debate Continues [Legal Intelligencer]

  • Comments

    avatar
    1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:06 AM

    Ola y'all :)

    and


    wait for it

    FIRST!!!

    avatar
    2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:08 AM

    SAMSF = Skarps

    avatar
    3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:09 AM

    In David Lat's stinky bedroom, increased size means more pronounced slurping sounds from his derriere.

    avatar
    4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:09 AM

    Size matters? Is this something I should be scared of?

    Seton Hall summer at Orrick

    avatar
    5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:09 AM

    Most consumers of BIGLAW legal services likely aren't the on the same wavelength as those with the idiot ad-agency mentality that brought us "JLo" or "Benifer."


    avatar
    6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:10 AM

    That tool in the picture looks like he belongs at MoFo.

    avatar
    7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:12 AM

    K&L Gates could be rebranded as KilL. Too soon?

    avatar
    8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:13 AM

    How about fightbiglaw.com? A K&E Story.

    avatar
    9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:13 AM

    If the name is already two syllables why make up a two syllable "short form" of the name, e.g. cleary to cleargo.

    The best from a branding standpoint is, of course, the only firm with a one syllable name in the V10: WEIL. And no Kash, changing it to Weilgo is not an improvement.

    avatar
    10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:13 AM

    S&C is already called "SullCrom" by everyone. They haven't made it official like MoFo though.

    And that guy in the picture is kinda hot

    avatar
    11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:15 AM

    If this post was any gayer, it would have been written by Lat.

    avatar
    12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:16 AM

    As the general counsel of a fortune 100 company, I choose all my outside counsel based on the snapiness of their name, and whether they've branded themselves well, i.e., does the font used on their firm's website match the letterhead.

    avatar
    13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:18 AM

    Let's be honest: the more money firms spend on crap like this, the less money there is to pay the people who have the clients and do the work. A lot of large law firms are looking at a lot of the things that they spend money on, and they're deciding that many of them, while part of the status quo, are just wasteful.

    Without question, this examination of expenditures is going to hurt "legal marketing experts" a lot. Also, in my experience, these "experts" don't really know that much about the practice of law or the marketing of a law firm to existing or potential clients.

    Anyway, I'm not sure if the reference article is really suggesting a "MoFo"-style shortening. (Also, back when I worked in California, they were called that because most of the lawyers there are, in fact, motherfuckers. It was not a compliment to call them that. MoFo was wise to seize that as their own brand, and turn it positive. Whichever "legal marketing expert" came up with that added some value.) Most well known law firms already have a brand: "Wachtell", "Cravath", "Skadden" "Kirkland" and "Sidley" are all well-known firms with a one word brand, and there are plenty of firms with two word brands: "Sullivan and Cromwell", "Paul Weiss", etc. Anything beyond that is unnecessary.

    Firms which are really in the middle have to choose, though: Is it Mayer or Mayer Brown? Gibson or Gibson Dunn? Other than those specific issues, who cares what some former Philadelphia trial lawyer thinks about law firm branding? Her view is not relevant.

    avatar
    14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:19 AM

    I call bs on 12 - based on your grammar and sophistication, you seem like the general counsel of a mom-and-pop store.

    avatar
    15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:19 AM

    Is this a real article? A bullet on the Morning Docket I'd understand, but this?

    avatar
    16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:21 AM

    Haynes & Boone = Hayboo = slightly racist

    avatar
    17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:21 AM

    at firms like HARNESS DICKEY, and MoFo, do women feel comfortable, know working for the man at these firms?

    Just what is MoFo short for anyway? Are they are real law firm to put such misogynistic gall into their name??

    I suppose if partners names were Tea and Bagger, then TeaBag.com would be appropriate naming to, you know BEG the question?

    avatar
    18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:22 AM

    the guy in the photo resembles the K&L shooter. Is that a picture from the "practice day" where he chickened out?

    avatar
    19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:23 AM

    17, did you just get back from the bar? I don't think there was a coherent thought in there.

    avatar
    20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:23 AM

    Two words - e.g. Cleary Gottleib - is short enough. Most firms are technically four or five words long (e.g. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld), and people just naturally shorten them (Akin Gump). No marketing necessary. If a firm wanted to go further - AkGu? - that is starting to get retarded. So, yes, I prefer short names, but that is a relative concept.

    avatar
    21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:23 AM

    Sidley Austin = SiAus,
    pro - sounds like a star trek character
    con - sounds like something Elie puts on his eggs.

    avatar
    22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:23 AM

    The name of my law firm is "Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton". There is no such thing as a "Cleary & Gottlieb". That's a pretty egregious and idiotic error.

    avatar
    23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:24 AM

    10 -- maybe that's what they call it at your law school. But every practicing lawyer in NY calls S&C ... S&C. Never heard of SullCrom.

    avatar
    24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:26 AM

    Better humor for Kirk-El being the cousin from Family Matters would be the cousin of Superman aka Kal-El.

    avatar
    25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:27 AM

    Jones Day = Joda. "Solve your legal problems we will."

    avatar
    26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:29 AM

    23 - Nice try. http://www.sullcrom.com/

    avatar
    27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:31 AM

    Come on, who wouldn't want to bask in the presTTTige of a long ass name like Dibb Lupton Alsop Piper Rudnick Gray Cary?

    avatar
    28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:31 AM

    25- the force is strong in you.

    avatar
    29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:31 AM

    Is this MysTTTal pretending to be Kash? S&C is SullCrom, which you should probably know.

    avatar
    30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:33 AM

    I agree with 5. Also, to say that a debate "has been raging" about this issue is gross hyperbole.

    ATL, get some better stuff to report.

    avatar
    31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:34 AM

    girls in my high school used to discuss size frequently....apparently it matters

    avatar
    32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:35 AM

    Skadden Arps = SkAr: As in "we will SkAr you for life."
    Paul Weiss = PaW: As in "get your PaWs off me."

    avatar
    33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:35 AM

    Sullivan & Cromwell should change its name to "Sully".
    It would make it sound more "heroic".

    avatar
    34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:37 AM

    Whoa. There are some real good ones not mentioned yet

    Goodwin procter = good pro
    Fulbright & jaworski = full jaw

    avatar
    35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:41 AM

    Years ago my firm, Hopkins & Sutter (long since merged away), considered a merger with another old-line Chicago firm, Bell Boyd & Lloyd. I was hoping for BellHop, at least for our URL.

    avatar
    36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:42 AM

    #7- Comment of the year..lol

    avatar
    37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:43 AM

    King & Spalding = KingS

    (and only if there were just one more "L" in this one: Kilpatrick Stockton = Kils).

    avatar
    38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:44 AM

    "Shearman & Sterling --> ShearSter. Upside: Nice alliteration. Downside: Has a vaguely negative connotation."

    What? I fail to see one single example of alliteration in the name "ShearSter". The "Sh" sound is far different from the "S" sound that follows. I don't even start law school for another two weeks, but I'm feeling pretty confident about my chances in this profession based on the articles in this blog and the posts in the comments. If this is a BigLaw demographic, how incredibly telling about the actual quality of the worker bees that compose prestigous firms. I suppose the image of elitism is more important than actual intelligence. Of course, you all are the same people who place more value on a home in the Hamptons than developing healthy relationships with people who actually care whether you live or die.

    avatar
    39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:45 AM

    14- you must be fun at parties.

    avatar
    40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:47 AM

    "4. Easier to register Web site URLs;"

    WTF? I presume this is a reference to a domain being available-- how is sjj.com or smithjones.com more likely to be available than smithjonesjohnson.com?

    avatar
    41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:47 AM

    25- "Joda" FTW

    Better than Elie the commenter is.

    avatar
    42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:48 AM

    How about Greenberg Traurig, LLP:

    GreeT

    Makes perfect sense to me.

    avatar
    43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:49 AM

    This is so strange - why doesn't ATL ever mention Davis Polk, even when relevant to the discussion... Sherman etc. but no DavisPolk come on....

    DavisPolk has just changed its name for marketing purposes and has dropped wardwell out - mention of DPW should have been made in this article. I am disappointed.

    avatar
    44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:50 AM

    Foley Hoag = FoHo

    I like it.

    avatar
    45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:53 AM

    All hail The Botts!

    avatar
    46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:53 AM

    the previous discussion of abbreviating names is titillating, but it is of no help to me in my search for tips on getting an SA position in WILDMAN HARROLD's produce law practice group. should i mention my note on the tropical diseases afflicting southeast asian mangos that are dangerous to humans in my cover letter, or save that bombshell for the callback? please advise.

    avatar
    47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:54 AM

    Baker Hostetler = Bake Hos

    avatar
    48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:55 AM

    "MoFo" is how layers outside the firm had been calling it for years. At some point they just decided to go with it.

    As far as I know, it is the only firm brand name with a double meaning--which sets it apart.

    avatar
    49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:55 AM

    The lead photo for this article should instead have been used for the glued-penis article. That is, if they had also chopped off his manliness. Then it would have been 100000% funnier.

    avatar
    50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:55 AM

    I agree - lopping off a few of the names is good. I.e. Jones Day. It's simple. But shortening down to syllables is a bit much. MoFo just kinda got lucky with their rebranding, I think they are the exception, not the rule.

    avatar
    51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:58 AM

    Howrey did the same thing. It used to be H&S but now it's just plain Howrey.

    Howrey sucks.

    avatar
    52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:02 AM

    Guy in picture: "You shorten your name Lebowski, or I CUT OFF YOUR JOHNSON!"

    avatar
    53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:02 AM

    "ScCro" sounds like something your balls are contained in.

    It might work.

    avatar
    54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:04 AM

    Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. = Wallip

    avatar
    55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:08 AM

    I always thought Goodwin Procter should re-brand as Goo-P (pronounced like "goopy"). Just Goop would work too, but it's not as good.

    Also, there are some more natural ones, like Mayer Brown could be MayBro. There are probably others like this.

    Finally, Wachtell Lipton should consider re-branding as WaLip, as in "We're going to WaLip you in court tomorrow."

    avatar
    56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:10 AM

    Switching two names would change Skadden into ASSMF.

    Not even MoFo is as cool as Payne & Fears.

    avatar
    57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:12 AM

    38, you're right, but exactly how many examples were you expecting to find?

    avatar
    58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:12 AM

    Dewey & LeBoeuf = DewB
    as in, "since we might get laid off, let's smoke a doobie!" I know it's a stretch but would've been perfect before the merge.

    avatar
    59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:12 AM

    Am I the only person that thinks "mother f**ker" every time they hear MoFo? I can never take them seriously.

    avatar
    60 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:14 AM

    I vote you don't always have to use the front of the names. For example, Ballard Spahr could become "Lard Spa." And if you've seen some of the people working there on Market Street, you'd know that's on point, sucka!

    avatar
    61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:14 AM

    Cravath = AssCravath

    avatar
    62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:14 AM

    38 = Future "public interest" lawyer.

    avatar
    63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:14 AM

    Skadden could be shortened to "Damn this is an extremely boring and not funny fucking post"

    avatar
    64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:15 AM

    What about the prestigious firm if Dewey Cheatem & Howe?

    http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2009/08/dewey-cheatem-and-howe-makes-appearance-in-fraud-case.html

    DewCheHo might work...

    avatar
    65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:15 AM

    Lat is a gay homosexual?

    avatar
    66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:17 AM

    47... does anyone actually care about or know who Baker Hostetler is outside of Ohio? Go back to pretending to bill hours to your piss-ant clients, and leave this discussion to the big dogs at real firms.

    avatar
    67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:18 AM

    DewBeef?

    avatar
    68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:19 AM

    46, it would have mattered more if you were trying to score a position with Wild Dix.

    avatar
    69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:19 AM

    FulJa FTW!

    avatar
    70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:21 AM

    I concur with 24. Kirk-El is an obvious Superman character. That joke would have been funny and well-researched.

    If Kash wanted to make a "sounds like a black guy on a black sitcom" joke, A Different World would have more been appropriate.

    avatar
    71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:21 AM

    62 = dying alone.

    avatar
    72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:21 AM

    I concur with 24. Kirk-El is an obvious Superman character. That joke would have been funny and well-researched.

    If Kash wanted to make a "sounds like a black guy on a black sitcom" joke, A Different World would have more been appropriate.

    avatar
    73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:23 AM

    Yeah 66 you tell him.

    avatar
    74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:24 AM

    It's the Fried Frank et al's big moment: Fri-Fra-Ha-Shri-Ja . . . and you stealth fired out the door!!!

    avatar
    75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:25 AM

    66 = IT Analyst for Baker Hostetler

    avatar
    76 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:27 AM

    Morgan Lewis = Mole, as in a dark raised mass on the rear end of the legal community.

    avatar
    77 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:27 AM

    71 = 38 = PE.

    avatar
    78 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:28 AM

    SkaddenDC = FuPa?

    avatar
    79 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:31 AM

    75 is all up in yo face 66!!!

    avatar
    80 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:32 AM

    38 - If you are looking to have people care whether you live or die, perhaps law school isn't the right choice for you.

    avatar
    81 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:33 AM

    Clifford Chance = Dumb Idiots

    avatar
    82 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:34 AM

    16 - I think HayBoo is pretty cute. It represents well the firm's slightly laidback/fun cullture.

    avatar
    83 Posted by Barry_Hope | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:35 AM

    Kash: "That's what she said."

    avatar
    84 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:36 AM

    Do you want to change your name to Homer Junior? The kids can call you Ho-Ju!

    avatar
    85 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:39 AM

    Those 8 reasons are more like 2 half-assed ideas repeated in marketing speak. Is this the quality of advice legal marketing experts are giving to firms?

    avatar
    86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:41 AM

    Latham & Watkins should shorten its name to Latham Off.

    avatar
    87 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:44 AM

    I am 38 and 71 and I am not PE. These were my first comments to this blog. The idiocy displayed by those who are the supposed "success stories" of my chosen profession finally moved me to speak up. I am already a working professional who has chosen law because it is actually something that I want to do. The fact that the majority of commenters on this Blog derive happiness from petty competition and artificial distinctions in status is no indication of my own character. As I said before, you guys are the worker bees. You are widgets in a system that you have allowed yoursevles to buy into. That is fine. It is lucrative, as well. At the end of the day, you've got to be able to live with yourself. I could never be like you, but I promise you I will be successful.

    avatar
    88 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:44 AM

    Debevoise & Plimpton = DePlimp

    Upside: Sounds like what Lat shrieks when he sees Elie from afar. Dowside: Reminds everyone that Herve Villechaize is dead.

    avatar
    89 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:51 AM

    If Mystal was a law firm, he would be DeBlimp.

    avatar
    90 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:53 AM

    23 = EPIC FAIL. (www.sullcrom.com) Good luck at OCI!

    -10

    avatar
    91 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:55 AM

    23 -I am banging your mother with my sullcrom right now. Suck it, sugartits!

    avatar
    92 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:55 AM

    10, dude, seriously, S&C is what you hear (and say), not SullCrom, despite the fact you keep listing the website's address.
    -Not 23
    (can't believe I wasted my time responding to you as you obviously want listen to reason.)

    avatar
    93 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:57 AM

    This article and the suggestions in particular are at best idiotic. Kash I had higher hopes for you.

    avatar
    94 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:57 AM

    26 -- you're an even bigger idiot than I thought. You're relying on their URL? Did it ever occur to you than maybe someone took www.sandc.com before they did? Nobody -- including the firm itself -- calls them sullcrom. Enjoy your classes this year.

    23

    avatar
    95 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:01 PM

    Haha, Mystal = DeBlimp!

    avatar
    96 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:01 PM

    10, my sincere apologies--meant 23 with his SullCrom as am tired of seeing S&C's website address being waved around as the smoking gun.

    -92 (who admits the typo)

    avatar
    97 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:04 PM

    SullCROM, the Destroyer!

    avatar
    98 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:05 PM

    So by 10's reasoning, the colloquial name for "Baker & McKenzie" is "Bakernet," since that's their website address.

    avatar
    99 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:13 PM

    Blubberlover

    avatar
    100 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:13 PM

    66---

    How is your paralegal-level work going? I suppose that reading e-mails for a prestigious bank is tough stuff, compared to what others do for "piss-ant" clients.

    avatar
    101 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:16 PM

    Who wants a Fresca?

    avatar
    102 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:17 PM

    Most people here would rather work in MidLaw than at Baker.

    Regards,
    v25 Ohio 3L

    avatar
    103 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:18 PM

    Most people would rather work for Thompson Hine than at Baker.

    Regards,
    v25 Ohio 2L

    avatar
    104 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:21 PM

    100 -- 66 here. Go back to whatever personal injury settlement negotiation you are working on, and I will go back to my Fortune 100 clients. You will never match my prestige, so don't try.

    avatar
    105 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:22 PM

    MI firm Dykema Gossett PLLC = Dyke

    avatar
    106 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:25 PM

    V25 Ohio 2L (or 3L?) - hmm, are you at a firm that rhymes with Stones Gay? Those documents wont review themselves. Get back to work!

    avatar
    107 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:26 PM

    LOL, 25!!!

    avatar
    108 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:33 PM

    WilCon is so much better than WilCo

    avatar
    109 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:42 PM

    Willkie Farr & Gallagher = WILF

    avatar
    110 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:47 PM

    Is there anything to be done with the Roanoke firm
    Morgan, Inverness, Logan & Frank?

    avatar
    111 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:49 PM

    Hating on 38 obscures his/her first point. ShearSter is not alliterative. Elie covers the basic grammatical and spelling errors; Kash at least messes up only more "advanced" literary terms.

    avatar
    112 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:50 PM

    LOL, 25!!!

    avatar
    113 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:51 PM

    How are there 100+ posts and none of the Kash groupies have yet taken up the cause of Kash, doing a pole (poll) as to preferences between liking it long vs. short & sweet?!

    Maybe the kids are on their bar trips.

    avatar
    114 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:52 PM

    I'm at a loss for a way to shorten the name of the Portland firm Butters, Funderson Clark and King...

    avatar
    115 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:53 PM

    Surprised no one has already suggested that Orrick, Herrington, and Sutcliffe re-brand itself as "O-Ring"

    avatar
    116 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:56 PM

    Debevoise = DePimp

    avatar
    117 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 12:57 PM

    Debevoise = DePimp

    avatar
    118 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:08 PM

    No, no, Debevoise is just DP.

    Wilmer Hale = Whale?

    avatar
    119 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:12 PM

    110 - They are one HOT MAMA

    avatar
    120 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:24 PM

    #13 - Don't generalize about legal marketing experts.


    Gina Rubel is one of the best at what she does and you might learn something if you actually paid attention to the content.

    The good legal marketers -- inside and outside the firm -- are actually helping law firms increase revenues and teaching thousands of attorneys how to grow their practices. They rarely get enough credit for their contributions but don't underestimate their talents.

    avatar
    121 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:24 PM

    #13 - Don't generalize about legal marketing experts.


    Gina Rubel is one of the best at what she does and you might learn something if you actually paid attention to the content.

    The good legal marketers -- inside and outside the firm -- are actually helping law firms increase revenues and teaching thousands of attorneys how to grow their practices. They rarely get enough credit for their contributions but don't underestimate their talents.

    avatar
    122 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:26 PM

    In these trying economic times, DP has offered a two-for-one deal when staffing with new associates.

    avatar
    123 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:33 PM

    Augusta firm Asselman, Lobo & Sterling?

    avatar
    124 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:38 PM

    McGuireWoods = McG

    avatar
    125 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 1:47 PM

    Steptoe & Johnson --> Ouch!

    avatar
    126 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 2:35 PM

    Ted Kennedy's law firm is the BEST NAME EVER.

    Weiner, Diner, Dicker & Dunker.

    avatar
    127 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 2:48 PM

    Dorsey & Whitney = "Do!" Homer could be their spokes"person".

    avatar
    128 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 2:59 PM

    Dear 65:

    Might I respecfuly suggest not posting after smoking more than 2 joints or drinking more than six beers?

    ["I said gay homosexual, teehee.]

    avatar
    129 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 2:59 PM

    Dear 65:

    Might I respecfuly suggest not posting after smoking more than 2 joints or drinking more than six beers?

    ["I said gay homosexual, teehee."]

    avatar
    130 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 2:59 PM

    Dear 65:

    Might I respecfuly suggest not posting after smoking more than 2 joints or drinking more than six beers?

    ["I said gay homosexual, teehee."]

    avatar
    131 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 3:10 PM

    There is something to be said for the prestige of a long string of names. It sounds very old school, inspiring trust and conjuring images of "white shoes."

    avatar
    132 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 3:31 PM

    Payne & Fears.

    Best. Name. Ever. I didn't believe it until I looked it up.

    avatar
    133 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 3:32 PM

    120/121 = Gina Rubel

    avatar
    134 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 3:33 PM

    33 - You should check your dictionary for the definition of "sully." Besides, I like SuCro because it reminds us that S&C does indeed suck.

    123 - I see what you did there.....

    avatar
    135 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 3:48 PM

    104--

    I wish I was negotiating personal injury settlements, because all of the halfway decent PI attorneys I know bank far more than you and I combined.

    If prestige is what gets you off, so be it. The rest of us will keep laughing at you, because nobody cares.

    avatar
    136 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 4:00 PM

    66/104 = big dick with a small dick. What a loser.

    avatar
    137 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 4:04 PM

    114

    ButtFuCKing?

    Holy shit, it's a real firm. I'm laughing out loud at this.

    avatar
    138 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 4:24 PM

    92/94 - You are confused. Let me illustrate with examples:
    "I work at S&C" = what someone at the firm says
    "Yo, I know that douchebag, I think he works at SullCrom" = what someone not at the firm says

    hth

    98 - you are stupid and that was a terrible non-analogy. Obviously the url is evidence of a colloquial name (sullcrom, mofo) but is not alone conclusive.

    avatar
    139 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 4:29 PM

    It should be noted that our internal newsletter here at Cleary Gottlieb with articles written by associates is called "ClearGoLaw News."

    avatar
    140 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 6:13 PM

    Hey 136 - did it ever occur to you that 66 is not a guy? Or does it just bother you THAT MUCH that a woman is smarter than you - and smart enough to know better than to go to a crap regional firm (masquerading as biglaw)? Stop pretending. NO ONE cares about Baker Hostetler. You are midlevel, at best. Now stop your whining, and get back to pretending you graduated from a real law school. And while you're at it, take all of your friends from Thompson Hiney and Squire Sanders & Dipshit with you.

    avatar
    141 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 6:52 PM

    Stop talking, 138. Just stop.

    avatar
    142 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, August 6, 2009 7:15 PM

    Joda. Heh.

    avatar
    143 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, August 7, 2009 6:48 AM

    133 - No. I did not and would not respond to 13 - everyone is entitled to an opinion and our results in business speak for themselves. - Gina Rubel

    Post Your Comment