Judge of the Day: James Morley
Here’s an interesting question. How do we know that animals involved in bestiality don’t actually like it?
This question was recently on the mind of one New Jersey jurist. From the Philadelphia Daily News:
During a bizarre hearing [in Burlington County, NJ], a Superior Court judge dismissed animal-cruelty charges against a Moorestown police officer accused of sticking his penis into the mouths of five calves in rural Southampton in 2006, claiming a grand jury couldn’t infer whether the cows had been “tormented” or “puzzled” by the situation or even irritated that they’d been duped out of a meal.“If the cow had the cognitive ability to form thought and speak, would it say, ‘Where’s the milk? I’m not getting any milk,’ ” Judge James J. Morley asked.
Got milk? Or milky discharge?
Children, Morley said, seemed “comforted” when given pacifiers, but there’s no way to know what bovine minds thought of Robert Melia Jr. substituting his member for a cow’s teat.“They [children] enjoy the act of suckling,” the judge said. “Cows may be of a different disposition.”
In its weirdness, this is all very Ally McBeal-ish (although too explicit for that show).
So, how did the prosecutor feel about all of this?
Burlington County Assistant County Prosecutor Kevin Morgan was certainly irritated by the ruling, claiming the grand jury didn’t see the videos of the alleged incident, including one in which one hungry calf allegedly head-butts Melia in the stomach.
Should the alleged head-butt be construed as an expression of dissent? Or perhaps the calf just wished that Melia were more well-endowed?
“I think any reasonable juror could infer that a man’s penis in the mouth of a calf is torment,” Morgan argued. “It’s a crime against nature.”
Ah, but what is a crime against nature? Many sexual acts once viewed as “crimes against nature” are now perfectly acceptable. If at least some human beings enjoy administering fellatio, how can we say — as a per se rule — that all cows do not?
Here’s the legal reason this matters:
Although a bill was introduced in 2005 to ban bestiality, New Jersey still has no explicit ban on the sexual penetration of animals, which is why the Burlington County Prosecutor’s Office charged Melia with animal cruelty.
We’re with Judge Morley on this. If New Jersey had a law on the books criminalizing sexual penetration of animals, then perhaps Melia would be guilty. But in this case, where Melia is charged only with animal cruelty, shouldn’t the rule of lenity apply?
The ambiguous criminal statute should be construed in favor of the defendant. Robert Melia deserves to get off (pun intended).
Morley said it was questionable whether Melia’s alleged crimes against cows, although “disgusting,” fit the definitions in the animal-cruelty statute.“I’m not saying it’s OK,” Morley said. “This is a legal question for me. It’s not a questions of morals. It’s not a question of hygiene. It’s not a question of how people should conduct themselves.”
Indeed. Mouth-f**king a cow may not make you a model citizen. But should you go to prison for it — especially if you live in a state that does not explicitly prohibit sexual penetration of animals?
Morgan, the prosecutor, said in court that the owner of the cows was “very upset” by the incident.
Trespass to chattels? Maybe. Animal cruelty? Surely not.
“If the penis doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”
MOO!!!
UPDATE: There are some excellent comments on this post. Our favorites are comment #19 — if you don’t get it, you probably need to read this post — and comment #26.
Animal-cruelty charges dropped against Burlington County cop [Philadelphia Daily News]
(197) Comments
Comments
First
firsty - for MILK
WTF? That is the craziest thing I have read in a long time. This judge is off his rocker
Can you give more details. Such as, were the cows in question cute or was the guy really depraved doing this with cows that were not that cute. Or, did he have a wingman to take on the fattie cows and cows that were not cute
i think the cows wanted it. that's why they do the things they do. always flirting.
Lat,
You can't seriously be defending this nonsense can you? The judge's reasoning is twisted. Are you arguing that this type of thing is ok unless there is a law specifically banning it.
-I hate PETA, but think this is wrong
Are Jersey laws really so liberal that this guy cannot be convicted of lewdness or indecency? Or has the "sexual revolution" enlightened them to the point of waiting for animal victims to come forward?
Those cows sucking today are your dinner tomorrow. I think THAT paints a different picture for you ow, doesn't it. What's in your beef?
Actually, I think the judge got it right.
I'm not a PETA person either, but this is terrible. Clearly, this is abuse. And for the Judge to even analogize this situation to children using pacifers is disgusting.
Indecent exposure? Criminal trespass? Hello?
I'm not a PETA person either, but this is terrible. Clearly, this is abuse. And for the Judge to even analogize this situation to children using pacifers is disgusting.
OK, I liked the post earlier today on the girl-on-girl sexual harassment. But this story is a complete buzz kill, especially for a friday afternoon.
Lat is a superb writer. And witty as hell, to boot. You're a fine piece of man, Lat.
It's actually applicable.....WAIT FOR IT....
SUCK IT!!!!!
This is an "udderly" ridiculous "tail"; another "rare" cop on the "skim". Not to "cry over spilled milk", but they should "roast" or "bottle" his "spoiled" ass in the slammer before the "expiration date" on the SOL.
16 - can you imagine the "ribbing" that cop is in for down at the station house!
Animal cruelty is a crime, not a tort. The animal's experience of pain or pleasure is irrelevant. Only the intent and the act of the officer are relevant. This judge's rationale is that this is a victimless crime, which is, of course, easy to declare when the victim cannot think or speak.
The judge seems to hink animal cruelty laws exist merely to protect animals. This is absurd for the very reason the judge points out in his decision (that we do not know what animals think is cruel). But animal cruelty laws are in place to prevent individuals from graduating to humans after acting out their perversions and indecencies on animals.
Incidentally, by relying upon such a narrow view of the purpose of animal cruelty laws and conflating criminal and tort law, this judge has ironically provided an impenetrable (please pardon the pun) defense for those who would molest infant humans:
"Children enjoy the act of sucking."
"Hey cow, you have great dick sucking lips."
- Meredith Sossman
19 FTW
20 - hardly.
21
Evidently you missed the lesbian sex post earlier. I stand by my statement.
-20
no i saw it. read whole thing. just don't think your comment (since you are also 19) is all that and a bag of chips
In a related piece of news, Partner Emeritus will be spending the weekend looking at properties in Burlington County, NJ.
See 19/20, comment #24 just laid you out as far as humor goes.
Sounds like a classic case of trespass to cattle.
20/22 is not 19. Although I thank him/her for the compliment.
And I will admit that the joke certainly could have been refined. I was going for speed.
- 19
Lick My Love Pump
"Hey cow, you have great dick sucking lips."
- Mark Wahlberg
Say hi to your mother for me.
Sounds like the prosecutor was just lazy. He could have charged the guy with a variety of things but couldn't be bothered cause he was too busy having wet dreams over tv drama murder trials.
Seems the Judge got it right to me. N.J.'s legislature should have passed the proposed legislation banning this conduct. Its failure to do so does not mean that the animal cruelty statute should be strained to fit the conduct at issue.
If sticking your johnson in the mouth of a cow is a crime in NYC, a few girls from my first year section could get me disbarred.
I'm telling you guys, if you let this freakiness into the governor's mansion, it'll roll all the way down hill. There's no way to stop 'em. First it's Corzine, then its Barney Fife. I've seen it a thousand times.
32 - Strained? Do you really think any act is barred by an animal cruelty statute if it requires direct evidence of an animal's experience of pain?
19
I have your back against the mis-informed hater.
20
partners at quinn used to stick their penis into the mouths of calves all the time. it was no big deal.
--quinn stud
Guys in my old high school used to mouth-f*** cows all the time. It's not that big a deal.
19 wins the thread. Literally LOL.
24 is not even remotely close.
-Not 19 or 20
"Children, Morley said, seemed “comforted” when given pacifiers, but there’s no way to know what bovine minds thought of Robert Melia Jr. substituting his member for a cow’s teat.
“They [children] enjoy the act of suckling,” the judge said. “Cows may be of a different disposition.”"
AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO IS TROUBLED BY HOW THIS JUDGE WOULD RULE IF THE MOLESTED WAS A TODDLER AND NOT A COW?
More like trespass to CATTLE!
35 - That is not my point. Certainly, no animal can expressly articulate that it is experiencing pain in the fashion that a human would. However, the burden is on the state to outlaw conduct that it deems objectionable BEFORE prosecuting.
Here, N.J. apparently attempted (or considered) a bestiality ban in 2005, but didn't follow through with it, for whatever reason. Presumably other states have such laws in place, although I am no animal law expert.
Without a bestiality statute to work with, the prosecutor in this case attempted to prosecute under the animal cruelty statute. Judge Morley refused to do what the N.J. legislature has failed to do -- outlaw bestiality. Any other outcome would have usurped the legislative role.
41 is retardedly hilarious. Such an awful...awful pun. Nice work.
-19
Hey guys, when you kill a cow to make beef, it experiences pain too.
44 - You're perfectly right, it is dinnertime!
18 - How can the determination of "cruelty" be divorced from pain or pleasure?
Hitting a dog repeatedly with a metal pipe is cruel because it causes the dog pain.
Making the dog perform tricks does not cause pain. It is not cruel (unless maybe you are in PETA and object to using animals in circuses).
So wait, it's okay to drive an axe through its forehead and turn it into kebabs, but god forbid you degrade a calf by imposing oral sex. How cruel, I'm sure the calf is dying in shame and agony.
It is no more aware of the sexual insult, and suffers no more, than if you had given it an Oscar Meyer.
Granted we outlaw child abuse even when children are too young to be aware, but that's because they will grow up and acquire sentience at some point, not to mention that the parents of the child will take offense and kill you, etc. You can't BBQ a toddler either, for much these same reasons, but it's A-OK to BBQ a calf.
What I want to know is why didn't the cows bite.
@40 I think the difference is that there is no "torment" or "cruelty" element to child molestation. So even if the child in the judge's hypo were untormented by the experience, the judge would presumably still throw the book at the perp.
I actually think the judge is right. And I will go @6 one better: I happen to think that all conduct is "ok" (at least in the sense that you should not be thrown in jail for it) unless there is a law specifically banning it. Sorry, but neither judges nor lawyers in general should be in the business of throwing a person in jail for conduct they "think . . . is wrong" if it's not actually unlawful.
41, that's fine work.
Yuck! This milk is thick...and salty.
- Violated T14 calf
42, Your argument is dead on correct, and if this is the basis of the judge's decision, I agree it is the appropriate outcome. However, the judge himself based the decision on insufficiency of evidence that is not relevant to animal cruelty---namely, the animal's experience of pain.
This is a classic case of a judge appearing to defer to legislative intent while also doing some surreptitious legislating from the bench.
40,
That bothered me big time.
18
41, I liked you comment the first time I read it . . . when it was called comment #26.
i'm not sure how atl is going to be able to top this and the harassment story all in one 24-hour period.
This is the crap we have to deal with now that Millsian libertarian types have infiltrated top lawschools and spawned all sorts of judges whose heads are overflowing with that tripe: All criminal law is now tort law and is only for rectifying harms felt by victims. Wipe away all laws that even sniff of trying to promote decency. Any conduct is good conduct if it doesn't cause harm to another. Blah... Blah... Blah...
It is a good thing the rule of law sticks its neck out to protect the old bovine dirty sanchez.
The defense moooooooooved to dismiss.
56 - Can you offer a rebuttal to Mill? His philosophy seems to be the only proper basis for legislation.
You seem to like legislating morality. In some religions, interracial marriage is seen as sinful. Would you support bans on miscegenation?
What do you think of gay marriage?
44 & 32, The fact that we kill and eat cows proves that animal cruelty laws aren't merely for preventing animals (as "sentient beings") from experiencing pain. Sure, some have supported such laws on those grounds because their bleeding hearts so compell them. But from Leviticus, to ancient Greece and Rome, from the common law to modern statutes, the prime and overriding purpose of animal cruelty laws is to prevent humans from becoming indecently barbarous: if some acts are forbidden from being committed with an animal how much more grave the commission of that act with a human becomes.
What if it was a hetero male cow? Lat - I need a ruling. Imagine if a female cow raped you while you slept.
pics?
20 - i think you are the funniest person ever.
love,
19
19 - you have written the greatestr jest of the season.
- seriouslty I am not 19 or even 20 (mentally I am more like 9)
58,
My rebuttle to Mill is reality. Mill does not offer the only basis of legislation. The constitution of the united states, for example, offers a very different and equally sufficient basis for legislation---democracy: "We the people of the United States, . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." The legitimacy of legislation does not reside in Mill's principle of liberty. Rather, it resides in whether the governed believe the sovereign is legitimate, and that can occur even when a law criminalizes victimless conduct.
The antimajoritarian Millsian argument is just a headfake. No people will ever be any freer than they want themselves to be. If courts try to get in the way, the people just politicize them (as every president since FDR has done). Law is made in legislatures, where morals, values, manners, and mores are always pertinent and prevalent. Law will have no purchase on an individual if it does not comport with or appeal to that person's sense of morality. Thus, at best, Mill's liberal system is a mere part of the debate that animates the laws of a democratic republic, and not the basis of their legitimacy.
My opinions on homosexual marriage are exactly opposite of Mill's own opinions, as are my opinions of heterosexual marriage---state licensure of heterosexual marriage has a unique purpose of promoting procreation of individuals to whom the civil sovereign, and thus, the state has a justification for ensuring procreation is not done to the detriment of the procreated. No such justification exists for infertile or homosexual marriages. If we want to extend the benefits of heterosexual marriage to homosexual couples it will have to be on some other basis than equality, as the two couples are qualitatively different.
Incidentally, if any argument supports homosexual marriage, it must be simply that democratic citizens values have changed to find homosexual couples as desirable as procreative couples.
What's you're opinion of polygamy?
56
19 and 20 are the ding-dong-golly LOL razzy LALZLZ of the whole board. dig it.
digging it;
- 19, but NOT 20
54 -- something about 41's delivery was much better than 24's.
19 & 20, LOL neither of you are not funny, I don't think.
-19 & 20
66,
Agreed, but novelty has to count for more than style. I mean Atari is still way cooler than XBox, right?
54
Don't have a cow, man
63, 65 and 67
I don't get it.
47-- has it occurred to you that we outlaw animal cruelty to keep people decent, regardless of what the cow feels?
Stop it! This was a silly post desrving of a silly comment. And so I made it. 20 Thinks it is very Funny -- let's stop it there. Some people don't think it was funny. Well I think you just don't appreciate good humourous jokes that are pithy and great. Mine was one in the funny/kinda funny to 20 VERY Funny catagory. So that is that. I and the people who count (20 and i'm sure MANY MANY others) think mine was the very funny joke on here.
- 19
19 & 20 = 39
71
72 is not the real 19. Although I can see why he wants to take credit.
I am sparticus.
19 - how are we supposed to stop it when 23 coldcocked you hard than a cop with a baby calf.
72 & 19 & 20 = 111
73 -- YOUR comment is RIGHT on the MONEY (and funny like you ready about).
- 19/20 (we have merged)
19, Get over it. The best joke in this post is #26's, which was totally plagiarized by 41, and I do not here the author of that joke whining.
What is 77 talking about?!?!? 75 kicks 73's butt.
Funny nothing. I just love posters who are so supportive of each other. Both 19 and 20 need to get a room and find a willing baby calf!
Yeah, I don't know that I get it either. So 62, 65, 67, and 72 think its funny to pretend to be the guy that wrote an anonymous internet joke.
78, I doubt you "here" anything.
80 -- you sounds like 19/20. Didn't #78 tell you to give it up.
(by the way - 79 is funnier than the other cuts -- but you probably think 79 is like the rest of the litany. Do us a favor an take 78's advice)
- Not 80
Get back to work peons -- You are all fired. Particularly anyone who posted at below 20 and is still posting/reading now -- YOU ARE FIRED.
--- The Partner
"I am 23/25/26/62/67/72/75/77/78/79."
- Meredith Sossman
Screw you Partner or I'll write something so funny milk will come out of 20's nose.
- 19
Hey guys, he should've been sued for trespass to cattle!
"I am Meredith Sossman."
- 23/25/26/62/67/72/75/77/78/79."
85/19,
If that happens, I submit you are screwing cows improperly.
- not any damn number prior to this one
88 FTW. Period.
Does anyone else get the feeling that when you visit ATL, you are the only person reading it and some lone wacko has posted all these comments to himself? You know, like Norman Bates in Psycho.
Idiots. Last time I write something that is empircally the funniest thing that has ever been written on this board. You will miss me!
- 19
Really? 88? Different strokes I guess.
True, but since I am 90 I'll work it through myself.
I still think that 64 is the funniest, in that absolutely right kinda way.
91 and the rest of you pretenders:
stop being all like "I am 19" and stuff; 19 knows who he is and i've totally got his back (and if he is willing his front too)
- 20
Magnificent, 95. Magnificent.
19 here. Setting the record straight. These are me: 19, 27, 43, 70, 74, 80, 84 and 92.
I actually think the best jokes on here were 29/30 and 41. Sorry 26, your version was too wordy.
Carry on taking credit, fake 19s.
Seriously, cut this cross talk out. You've turned a discussion of man on cow sex into something meaningless and confused.
Has anyone read 86? That one is funny.
-not 86?
95,
Are you a chick?
-19
100, Do you mean like an immature chicken?
HEY GUYS - 98 is right. This guy had sex with a cow. Don't let that point get lost.
98, Let's not call this "sex" and imply, as the judge did, that something pseudoconsensual was going on here. This is man-on-cow rape; there's no mincing words.
19 again. I also did 90. I also think that just because someone finds a joke funny doesn't mean the one who found it funny is the author even if he comments on it in the same minute it is written.
I am NOT 20. And I also wrote post 95. I think I might have a problem. What with 8 and now 11 confessed posts.
- 19 (then again, not)
Let's also not forget that there has got to be a 1983 claim here. I mean, what are the chances that a cop didn't abuse his power and authority to gain sway over the cow and convince it to let its guard down.
101 -
Yes, I like chickens too (though cow is preferred as long as it is not a fattie).
- 19
104 -- have you commented on this site? The fact that its the same minute shows it can't be the same person. It takes at least 2 minutes for the page to load after you comment. hence all the double postings. That's probably the strongest evidence that 19 and 20 aren't the same person. Unless he had 2 computers open. That diabolical genius. He probably planted the Sussman story and the cow/penis story all so he could get in that joke and them immediately compliment it.
For the record, because I care what you readers think, I did not author or authorize anyone to write post 106.
- 19 (and this will be my last post so the record can reflect that any subsequest post bearing the sign "19" are purely false)
Were I the judge, I would have gone medieval. I would have judged him guilty of fraud for dangling an udder without producing any milk, and I would have sentenced him to have is udder milked until he produces enough milk to match what that cow makes in a week. That'll show him.
Very funny 108. I would suggest you read my comment at 107 again.
- 19 (and I will continue to post as much as I want (all of it TBS (i.e., VERY FUNNY))
Don't look now 19 but . . . . .
Okay, guys. 20 here. I confess. I have actually been on the phone with three other people who are all posting as 19. We wanted to stop, but damn that #19 was so funny, we just had to make sure it got its due.
. . . . .two posts in the same minute.
easy ya idiot.
19 is so funny I killed an old lady with its rapier wit.
111/113
Fail.
This is a question for all of you who are decrying animal cruelty: how many of you are vegans or ethical vegetarians? What's that? I can't hear anything.
Exactly.
110, I just cannot believe you because of what you wrote in 108. Sorry.
Multi posts in the same time period . . .
. . . . go against the laws . . .
. . . of Newtonian physics and are . . . .
. . . an impossibility
HAHAHA 111/113 FTW. UNINTENTIONALLY HILARIOUS. WHAT A TOOL! HAHAHAHAHA
116, animals deserve more protection than human beings do in their first three months of existence. Didn't you go to law school.
Soon we'll have an animal president and no more babies, then people like you will be sorry. Oh yeah! Really sorry! HAHAHAHAHA!
107 - Multiple computers not needed. Ever heard of multiple-tab web browsing?
Time for you to ditch Internet Explorer 5.0 and move to Firefox.
It has been settled for me. 118-121 wins flat out for the pants job done on 19 and the rest of his posts.
- 20
118 is Albert Einstein circa 1909.
122 - the fact that your post cums on your face right after 118-121 is poetic
125 is NOT me
- 20
Though I am impressed with 118-121 - don't see what is so funny about it.
I read 107. Then I read 118-121. Then I laugh. Hard.
Congrats, 19 and 26 - you got a shout-out from Lat:
"UPDATE: There are some excellent comments on this post. Our favorites are comment #19 — if you don’t get it, you probably need to read this post — and comment #26."
Good job, 118-121. But it would've been even better if your posts read:
The . . .
. . . is . . .
. . . flat.
127 -- YEAH, EXCEPT THAT 111/113 COULD NOT DO IT. FUCKING TOOL! HAHAHAHAH. HE THOUGHT HE WAS HOT SHIT. HAHAHAHAHAHA.
129 - It's called getting pwned. Ask 19, who is really 88 who is really 100 (who again gets pwned at 101) who is really 117 who is really 122 who REALLY NEEDS TO START WORRYING ABOUT HIS JOB.
132.5 should read ". . . world . . .".
I read 107. Then I read 118-121. Then I laugh. Hard.
yep, but he blew it. only 118-121 nailed it so far.
Now I get it, 19 is Lat.
What the hell does "PWNED" mean?
19 -- we will be impressed if you own up to the fact that you are actually the nimrod in 107
Fine. For the record I (19) also wrote 107. So I was wrong. Impressed?
- 19
Wait, I just looked up "pwned." It sounds like its from gamer nerds. I think anyone that uses the term is actually getting "pwned" by the person they are claiming to "pwn."
I am always impressed with 19.
- 20
Thank you 20
- 19
PWNED means "perfectly owned," which depending on how you classify the person may be acquired by possession or by filing a financing statement along with a security agreement.
Well it has been an experience but I must say that getting donw on your posters' level is hardly worth it. Your not funny and not worth my time. Good riddance.
- 19
Kudos for Lat in not giving that poser, 41, the nod.
148/19 - I think you mean "You're" jackhole.
19, here. I just came back to say that it wasn't worth my time after 20, and I believe I've been wasting my time reading (and mostly writing) posts 21-148 (as well as this one).
The defense moooooooooved to dismiss.
good stuff
I read 107. Then I read 118-121. Then I laugh. Hard.
- 19 (what can I say - I HATE myself)
19 again. Please insert something here ______________ that is wickedly funny. Then that's what I said.
- 19
20 here 19. Don't be that way. YOu are good enough and funny. Knock down funny. I saw that immediately. They shoulda closed this post down once I pronounce yours the funniest thin on here FOR THE WIN!
- 20
If I was 19 (and I swear I am not) I would be outraged by everybody but 20 (and I mean the real 20) for being so immature and childish and meanspirited for (1) not laughing at clearly the funniest joke since words were invented; and (2) laughing at people who just want to defend how funny the joke is. I mean come on, is nothing sacred?
Truly, nothing is more pathetic than people who make fun of a jokester.
Cow here. I wish you guys would stop feeling sorry for 19 and remember that some asshole cop tricked me into blowing him off and got off scot free, while I still didn't get any damn milk.
157 - you are wrong. 19/20 is much more pathetic
I read 107. Then I read 118-121. Then I laugh. Hard.
- 19 (what can I say - I HATE myself)
154, That cop has got something to insert for you that is wickedly funny. Zing!
20 here 19. Don't be that way. YOu are good enough and funny. Knock down funny. I saw that immediately. They shoulda closed this post down once I pronounce yours the funniest thin on here FOR THE WIN!
- 20
COW FUCKER
Why is everyone on 19's case? It is 107 who is the douche.
Cop here. I want to thank the editorial staff at ATL for so courageously defending my civil liberty to go around tricking cattle into letting me love on their sandpaper tongues.
164 -
Read the comment trail. 19/20 IS really 107.
Makes them DOUBLE DOUCHE.
Come on, 19. You said you'd leave. Why did you post again @164?
Yeah, not only is 19 the same as 170, but he's also 20, 27,45, 72, the Cow, and the Cop's partner.
Whatever, I'm not into flame wars. Whether 20 is 107 or whatever, all's I know is 107 and 122 are douches.
- 164
19/20 again. I realize I made a tactical error in that I have identified myself and that has only been used against me. Then I switched tactics by making a slew of other posts -- but stepped in it at 107 and 122. So I have now switched to random other posts to cover myself. The problem is that I am beset on all sides by you people who have not clearly identified yourselves in posts. So I call upon you to come out of the shadows and stop stiking me down. So what, I made a joke as 19 and then said I liked the jokw as 20. SO WHAT!!??!?
19 -
Go screw yourself already. You now are risking losing even my support.
- 20
So anyway I posted #20 and left work. . . .I come back and see a ton of comments about it. Then Isee people that took credit for being me. This truly shows the demented people on thie site.
-The Original 20, I only posted the first two and this one.
If mouthf%$#ing a cow is wrong, I don't want to be right.
Working on a sex farm
Hosing down your barn door
Bothering your livestock
They know what I need
David, you forgot:
Can't you see my silo growing high, high, high, high, HIGH!
Nigel
This is a very interesting post. I have long been interested in purchasing a farm in the Burlington County, NJ area. Perhaps now is the righ time.
Idiots. Last time I write something that is empircally the funniest thing that has ever been written on this board. You will miss me!
- 19/20
Idiots. Last time I write something that is empircally the funniest thing that has ever been written on this board. You will miss me!
- 19/20
Idiots. Last time I write something that is empircally the funniest thing that has ever been written on this board. You will miss me!
- 19/20
If These Walls Could Talk 3: The Barn
172 - You can keep pretending to be me. You are obviously a psycho. I don't care. I really don't . And before you comment that I have been responding all on my Friday night and now on Saturday - it is exactly because I DON'T CARE taht I am posting. So go ahead. You and I know the tructh.
- 20 with knowledge that I am NOT 19
Thank you for making me famous. The legend of 19 grows.
- 19
Thank you for making me famous. The legend of 19 grows.
- 19
Guys in my high school used to give cows pappy milk all the time. It was no big deal.
Trespass to cattle! This is what I'm all about!
Idiots. Last time I write something that is empircally the funniest thing that has ever been written on this board. You will miss me!
- 19/20
Well, gee, some people like to be beaten during S&M. Is a guy going to get off the next time he kicks his dog since we don't know whether or not the dog "wanted" it???
Animals cannot consent, just like children cannot consent.
How this defendant's act is any more "cruel" to a cow than the electrocution, decapitation, and other slaughter practices in factory farms is beyond me. If the prosecutor eats beef, ever, the prosecutor should be prosecuted for animal cruelty (separate counts for every Big Mac!).
This is not a defense of the defendant (if he acted as alleged). There should be a more appropriate law to prosecute the man (at the very least, disorderly conduct, trespassing, etc.). If it is going to be animal cruelty, lock up all the meat eaters and meat producers while you're at it, as their behavior results in far greater animal suffering.
Those cows are sluts.
Excuse me waiter, my steak tastes a little too salty.
Whatever, this case was in Jersey. That cow-loving cop belongs to someone, and the judge got the messsage loud and clear from his patron that the cop walks.
Have you ever been to Burlington County? Mouth***king cows is the only thing to do there.
Serious question:
What if the guy had been found putting his penis in a loaf of bread at the local supermarket?
What if he'd been caught putting his penis in the mail slot of someone's door?
What if he'd been photographed peeing on someone's house?
Wouldn't he be arrested and charged for all of those?
At the very least, the calves deserve as much protection as a loaf of bread, a door or a wall.
Can he be labeled a sex offender, so his neighbors will always know?
Calves will suck endlessly on a prson's finger just as a baby will suck on a pacifier. (Cows have teeth only on the bottom in front, and since the tongue covers the teeth when the calf sucks, biting is not a problem. That cop knew what he was doing, obviously,) As for indecent exposure, I've seen quite a few bulls and cows naked.
OTOH the comment regarding cows and first year law students was pretty offensive.
Seems as if that wasn't the officers only peccadillo.. sex with children along with his girlfriend who was difficult to distinguish from a cow is going to earn him some nice friends named Bubba in Trenton State.. He'll end up being the calf in the pen.
Seems as if that wasn't the officers only peccadillo.. sex with children along with his girlfriend who was difficult to distinguish from a cow is going to earn him some nice friends named Bubba in Trenton State.. He'll end up being the calf in the pen.
This is Donna Goebel's X husband who turned her in.
I thought Morley's comments were a little too perverted that it was OK to seek comfort from a minor special needs student.....while her own teenage daughters and I were at home. She violated bond at least twice....and the local police let her get away with it. She slammed her youngest daughter's arm in the door and got away with it. She brought home a teenage girl drunk and made our youngest drive her around...INCLUDING to meet the 'victim" at a bowling alley. She got away with more than she was convicted of...and made us suffer for it....who's cruel here??????