Fulbright & Jaworski: The Latest Firm to Abandon Lockstep
Today is the start of performance review season for associates at Fulbright & Jaworski. As you well know, performance reviews are now very important. We’ve noticed that firms which are miraculously unaffected by the economic recession coincidentally have the toughest performance reviews.
We don’t know if this round of performance reviews will lead to another round of layoffs at Fulbright. But according to an internal Fulbright email obtained by Above the Law, there is a lot on the line even for associates that will keep their jobs at Fulbright. This year’s reviews come with a cash prize — or penalty.
Read the email after the jump.
Fulbright put its associates on notice that this review season would be “candid.”
[O]ur annual evaluation of non-partner attorneys will begin on September 8. As you know, Fulbright is moving from a lockstep advancement program for associates to a competency-based advancement program and our written evaluations are an essential part of this program. This year, we will be using a new evaluation process and its success is dependent on partner participation, including providing honest, careful and candid evaluations to inform our associates on how to progress in the Firm and become better lawyers.
What in the world is a “competency-based advancement program”? We asked the firm, but Fulbright spokespeople did not clarify which factors would go into associate compensation. We asked Fulbright tipsters about the firm’s new system, and received a number of quizzical responses:
“Beats me, aren’t you the expert?”
“A system sufficiently vague enough to justify no annual raises?”
“I … no longer work at Fulbright & Jaworski.”
Without knowing what — if anything — associates can do to improve their chances under Fulbright’s new compensation structure, do people have any great “acing the performance review” tips for our Fulbright friends? They’ll be reading the comments.
Earlier: Nationwide Layoff Watch: Fulbright & Jaworski
Morgan Lewis’s New Compensation Structure = Less Base Compensation?
(34) 
Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
Firsty McFirstein
mcsecondy second
Suggestion: Create two ATL sites. One for the big boys and another - Junior ATL - for small firms in small cities. Hate to sound like a snob, but I don't come to this site for stories about some firm I've never heard of. The new site could be called Below the Law or Below Above the Law.
Suggestion: Create two comment threads. One for the big boys and another - Junior Comment Thread - for idiots who repeat post, post memes, whine about being a 2L, or complain about Latham firing first years. Hate to sound like a snob, but I don't come to this site for the same old schtick from some d-bag sitting on his couch in his pajamas. The new comment thread could be called Commenting for Idiots and Law Students.
I am an intelligent person who just ate lunch. I guess you could say I am both full and bright.
Suggestion: Do not claim that you are interested only in reading about big firms in big cities and then COMMENT (a manifestation of interest) on a firm that does not match your interest criteria.
It would apprear F&J has adopted a mutated version of my hybrid tough love model. Kudos to F&J's management committee for being brave and bold.
The new system is just showing law students what a douchebag the firm really is...
You know you competency review is not going to be positive when Partner Emeritus is the one giving you the review.
Until a good firm does it, "abandoning lockstep" just means abandoning market pay.
I suggest that our Fullbright friends quit reading the comments on ATL and get back to work.
Maybe sounds a little too obvious, but one means of securing a positive performance review is to, you know, perform. Positively.
HTH.
That number 3 hasn't heard of F&J (an AMLaw 100) says more about him than the firm.
12, I can't keep track of every firm. F&J does mostly dog bite cases?
-- 3.
Hey 4 - go away.
i agree with 12. if you haven't at least heard of every top 50 firm, you are clearly a law student (likely at a y regional school on the east coast)
Anyone giving Commenter #3 flack clearly does not recognize the amount of dedication and devotion that #3 has for ATL. #3 not only manages to repeat the same post on every thread but manages to get that post out there early in the Comments. This singular focus on a legal gossip blog is both commendable and impressive. Kudos to you, 3. Your ability to seemingly ignore every other aspect of the world outside of ATL is something special.
I can't wait until ATL follows your suggestion and does cleave itself into ATL and Junior ATL. Imagine how much better #3 will be able to fixate once he no longer has to worry about small firms and small cities. It's a future we should all work toward.
any word on the VE Houston stealth layoffs?
17 - Are they doing more? VE already canned multiple associates earlier this year and it's not review time yet - unless they drastically moved it up from the usual December - February time.
#3 does it for the lulz
#12 --- you have been trolled.
#3 does it for the lulz
#3 does it for the lulz
V&E fucking sucks.
1.I'd suggest you pepper subtle insuations that
I wonder how many Fullbright associates will still be just as compentent as they were before when the firm bills clients, but suddenly become totally incompetent when it comes time for Fullbright to pay the associates.
The email refers to advancement no longer being lockstep. It does not say that compensation is no longer lockstep.
What does non-lockstep advancement mean? Sounds like buzzwords to justify unfair favoritism toward a chosen few.
Fulbright will have 3 tiers: junior, mid and senior level associate. Each tier will have a different base pay. A 6th year could get stuck as a mid-level associate making the same base pay as a 3rd year (or superstar 2nd year).
It is a money grab, pure and simple.
Staff layoffs in D.C. have occurred.
Last week (September 8th), the entire marketing staff (3 total), and at least three secretaries were laid off. About one month severance was provided.
Last week (September 8th), the entire marketing staff (3 total), and at least three secretaries were laid off in the Washington, DC office. About one month severance was provided.
The firm definitely had some attorney "stealth" layoffs in its Texas offices.
32: how many? what years? when were the layoffs?
also, which Texas offices?