Add RSS RSS

Girl-on-Girl Sexual Harassment at Delaware Law Firm

Lesbian harassment law firm girl on girl.JPGHere at Above the Law, we’ve reviewed a lot of employment discrimination complaints over the years. But this one is special.

The firm (like it matters):

Maron Marvel Bradley & Anderson.

The plaintiff:

Jennifer Braude.

Why you care:

Braude v Maron 1.JPG

Do I have your attention? Click after the jump for more details, plus Maron Marvel’s response.

I think my favorite factual allegation is this one:

Braude v Maron 3.JPG

I did not know that women noticed things like that.

I do know that women notice things like this:

Braude v Maron 2.JPG

This firm sounds “dirty hot” to me.

But, shockingly enough, these allegations aren’t really at the heart of Braude’s complaint against Maron Marvel. Meredith Sossman, the woman who allegedly made all of these sexually charged remarks, was let go by the firm. The complaint states that Maron Marvel felt that Sossman was a “cancer” and Sossman eventually lost her job.

But perhaps not quickly enough. The claim against Maron really stems from the allegation that plaintiff Braude was so traumatized by Sossman’s behavior that she needed to take a leave of absence. Braude was put on temporary leave while Sossman was investigated. According to the complaint, Braude applied for an additional 30 days of leave after Sossman was let go. By that point Braude alleges she was no longer welcome at the firm.

A spokesperson for Maron Marvel provided Above the Law a brief statement about the allegations:

The complaint brought by Ms. Braude involves allegations of wrongful conduct claimed to have occurred in 2007 by an employee no longer with the firm. Our attorneys in this matter have advised us that it would be inappropriate to comment on the particulars of the allegations. Our firm has been, and continues to be, committed to providing a working environment for all of its employees in which sexual harassment will not be tolerated.

Do you think employees suffering from Post-Lesbianic Harassment Syndrome should be entitled to some extra time off from work?

Click below for the full complaint.

Braude v. Maron Marvel [PDF]

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:42 PM

wow

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:45 PM

Geez, learn to take a compliment, lady.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:46 PM

I just sent 900 copies of my resume to that firm.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:48 PM

Pics?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:51 PM

http://plannedgivingworkshops.com/i/meredith.jpg

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:52 PM

Plaintiff sounds like a giant pu$$y.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:52 PM

Maybe this was one of those "crying game" things and things aren't as they appear?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:52 PM

I think pics should be a mandatory exhibit to this complaint.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:53 PM

Dirty and attractive. I wonder if she needs a job.

http://plannedgivingworkshops.com/about.php?id=meredith

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:55 PM

i think she is married by what i saw on a google search

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:56 PM

Since my start date is delayed until January, is there any way I could summer at this firm?

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:59 PM

I think this is the plaintiff.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1297657864&ref=search&sid=17800398.611391721..1

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:01 PM

"She is the current Director of Gift Planning for West Chester University Foundation, where she has raised a record amount in deferred gifts for the University’s endowment, scholarships and special projects.

I wonder how she does it.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:01 PM

This story was dirty hot. I wonder how many times I can use that phrase before I leave the office.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:05 PM

The firm website is kinda goofy. Check out the head-to-toe, full body photos!

http://www.maronmarvel.com/about.html

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:08 PM

13- she knows how to grow an endowment

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:12 PM

11, if that's her, she's dirty but decidedly not hot.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:12 PM

12, if that's her, she's dirty but decidedly not hot.

avatar
19 Posted by HawkLaw15 | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:12 PM

God bless America. Land that I love! Stand beside her and guide her through the night with a light from above. From her mountains to her prairies to her ocean white with foam. God bless America. My home sweet home.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:13 PM

Oh god that is my fantasy. I wish the lesbian partners would sexually harass me.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:14 PM

"Here at Above the Law, we’ve reviewed a lot of employment discrimination complaints over the years..."

You didn't start ruining this site until last summer.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:16 PM

I like the football team pictures on the "attorneys" page. Cause when I think of complex litigation, I think of burly guys in shoulder pads who smash into other burly guys in shoulder pads.

http://www.maronmarvel.com/attorneys.html

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:20 PM

Elie, will you sue me if I say your chest is huge and you need to wear a DIFFERENT bra?

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:22 PM

"Harrasment"? In the HEADLINE? Jesus fuck.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:24 PM

I hate Fordham law school. The profs are terrible DONT GO DONT DO ITS A SCAMMMMM

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:24 PM

18- she may not be 'hot hot' but she is def '4some hot'

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:25 PM

20 -- I totally know who you are. You're right, you always do post truthfully.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:25 PM

Hottttttt

http://plannedgivingworkshops.com/about.php?id=meredith

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:25 PM

This post has all the maturity of a freshman dorm room with a poster of two girls making out.

Good work, Elie - you're digging up top drawer stuff.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:26 PM

These allegations aren't so bad. I made my secretary perform fellatio on her banana this morning.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:27 PM

21 - The "we" presumably refers to everyone at ATL (Lat, Elie, Kashmir, etc.).

Unlike Lat, Elie doesn't use the "we" to refer to himself. Elie uses the "I."

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:30 PM

Some chicks just can't take a compliment

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:34 PM

I'd have a threesome with Braude and Sossman!

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:37 PM

Every once in a while, this site fully redeems itself. This is one of those times.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:38 PM

After all the recent junk stories. Now we're talkin'!

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:41 PM

15,

the guy nearest the camera needs to have the jacket sleeves taken up at least 3 inches. Looks like a fuckin 7th grader wearing his father's suit to the school dance.

On the other hand, I'd totally lick the asshole of the defendant.

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:45 PM

You left the Plaintiff's home address and phone number on the complaint, dumb fuck. As if this poor woman doesn't have enough to deal with.

Stay classy, Elie, you fat fuck.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:45 PM

I love the older lady who looks NONE TOO PLEASED that there's a full length picture being taken.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:48 PM

Elie,

Are you really not going to respond to UVALawBlog's vastly superior (more mature, more reaosnable, more nuanced, more thoughtful, less knee-jerk, less mean) coverage of the Moot Court Threat?

Come on.

40 Posted by Partner Emeritus | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:51 PM

This non-peer firm needs to be raided by the fashion police immediately. Not only do the partners of this firm buy suits off the rack, they don't make the appropriate alterations. Capezio shoes with a suit? Are the male partners of this firm trying hard to emulate Bruce Cutler? Shoulder pads on a mens' suits? How distasteful can you get? Button-downed collars? Half windsor tie knots? Cuffs on the trousers? These partners look like defendants in a RICO trial during the early '90s.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:51 PM

37 = dike defendant

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:54 PM

PE,

You seem to be quite focused on the men of the firm.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Meredith Sossman to 69!

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:55 PM

To Elie:

Just when I think you couldn't possibly be any dumber, you go and do something like this…and totally redeem yourself!

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:56 PM

37 - You are the "dumb fuck," sir.

The complaint is a publicly filed document. Anyone with internet access can find it. ATL has no obligation to remove that info.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:59 PM

41- a "dike defendant" is someone being sued for levee failure. The proper spelling here is D-Y-K-E. That being said, I'd like to hear what Ms. Sossman has to say about "planned giving."

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:59 PM

Yeah PE -- they like feathery collars.

Give it a rest.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:03 PM

She also told her to get a vibrator and report back. And when she lost weight that she had switched her addiction from sugar to sex. That woman's a freak!

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:03 PM

37, thanks for pointing that out. I didn't notice it until your comment.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:14 PM

first post today that didn't make me want to jump off a buidling. well done.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:15 PM

Ginsburg down!

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:20 PM

"These partners look like defendants in a RICO trial during the early '90s."

Good stuff, that.

Anyhow, I'm a feminist NYer chick but wouldn't be complaint-filing angry about someone saying my lips were hot and sexy. Or telling me they like a bit of spanking in the sack. One female associate is telling another female associate about her sexual interests. What's the big deal. At my old firm, within 5 years I knew the sexual likes and dislikes of at least 5 fellow female associates (just by sharing tidbits here and there - talk, not dirty deeds).

This plaintiff probably got canned (or is too lazy to work) and is trying to get some $$ from her old firm with this bs lawsuit. To make out a colorable claim, she has to throw her former colleague to the wolves, divulging a bunch of stuff said in private while at a firm of matching-suit attorneys. I feel bad for the chatty lawyer - TMI in retrospect, poor thing.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:25 PM

PE = FAIL

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:27 PM

51 - marry me.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:31 PM

40,

I thought the country club folks wear cuffs on trousers?

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:35 PM

Ginsburg is in the hospital.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:36 PM

"Hounding to spend time with Plaintiff socially"?

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:45 PM

PE = jump the shark

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:02 PM

i wear cuffs on trousers. it's no big deal. i've been complimented on my suit many times.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:25 PM

http://photo.mylife.com/photos/000/069/261M.jpg

60 Posted by Partner Emertius | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:31 PM

I often wear crotchless trousers.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:42 PM

Meridith is simply too hot. I think the plaintiff should drop the suit and kiss her shoes for even giving her an ounce of attention.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:45 PM

51,

I used to rip girls like you apart back when I was fratting it up in Ithaca. And the fact is, you'll remember guys like me for the rest of your life.

CORNELL FRAT STUD

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:47 PM

62,

Yeah. You gave her your 3 inches of ivy league madness.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:53 PM

She's dirtier than Joe Biden's bumper in February. Her cooch must be Deleware's biggest Superfund site.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:59 PM

63,

That's all her ass could take.

62

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:06 PM

62/65,

Yours or hers?

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:10 PM

62,

Cornell frat stud ate the toast at his pledge class circle jerk event.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:11 PM

Cornell frat stud agreed to have sex with the farm animal when the brothers were only asking in jest if he'd be willing to do so.

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:13 PM

Cornell frat stud lost his virginity his sophomore year of college.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:15 PM

Cornell frat stud was a legacy admit.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:43 PM

Wait - so I've been hitting my girlfriends for years and now you're telling me there are some that actually like it?!?!

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:59 PM

Elie, has Lat or Kash ever told you that your chest is huge and that you need to wear a different bra?

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:05 PM

C'mon, redact her addres/phone #.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:06 PM

32, You stole my bit. And it wasn't a particularly good bit to begin with.

-2

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:54 PM

"Plaintiff Braude was so traumatized by Sossman’s behavior that she needed to take a leave of absence."

Bullshit.

Moreover, Braude would have obviously been a future source of friction and trouble at the firm (or anywhere she happens to be).

None of these women to woman comments are that upsetting--not even close.

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:00 AM

Elie,

Leaving the name and address was not cool. Perfectly legal, sure, but wrong.

Once again, this website makes lawyers and law students seem like lousy people.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:02 AM

You people did notice one of their attorneys is a woman with the last name Topchik, right?

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:17 AM

36 - I thought the same thing about the guy in too-long sleeves. Even better, he's the firm's chairman!

http://www.maronmarvel.com/bio_maron.html

avatar
79 Posted by Auduboner | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:22 AM

1. Meredith looks Dirty Hot. I would work under her, any time, any where.

2. Plaintiff looks sexy too, especially for being 35! No wonder Meredith had the hots for her...

3. There's a sex toy store in Concordville?!? How do I not know about this?

4. The complaint appears to be written by an eighth grader - except that an eighth grader knows how to use spellcheck, whereas plaintiff's counsel does not.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:40 AM

I don't understand what exactly this woman (Defendant) did that was so wrong. Much, much crasser things go on at my firm, and nobody's ever thought of suing anyone.

avatar
81 Posted by Auduboner | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:41 AM

On the other hand, perhaps Meredith should start following her own advice about accepting responsibility, and getting help for a problem...

http://media.www.muhlenbergweekly.com/media/storage/paper300/news/2003/10/16/Oped/Suspended.Students.Are.Lucky-530424.shtml

(Her maiden name is Frimpter.)

82 Posted by lipservice | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:59 AM

every firm i have worked at "sex-talk" between us women, is the norm.
we talk about the other, guys in the office
who looks good, who doesn't
who is an asshole
who looks the best in a suit
we talk about who we are dating, how far we went.
who looks like they have a big dick...and so on and so on.
shall i go on, this suit is frivolous!

and if someone ( another woman of course ) told me i needed a bigger bra for some reason, i would appreciate the fact that she told me.


avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:17 AM

"Shoulder pads on a mens' suits?" Nice one PE. You're getting sloppy in your old age. At least your doppelganger seems to have a firm grasp on things.

84 Posted by Roger Sterling | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:48 AM

What do women want? Who cares? What I want is to see paragraphs 20(g) through 20(q) to be posted immediately.

85 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 5:25 AM

What's wrong with being sexy?

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 6:49 AM

SUCK IT !!!!!!!!!!!

-DOJ Secure, DOJ Honors Program

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 7:34 AM

She does have DSLs. Isn't truth a defense?

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 8:05 AM

shocking that a BS claim of sexual harrassment would be made by an ambulance chasing PI attorney. LEss shocking that an ambulance chasing PI attorney would be so naughty.

The is better than awe-some

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 8:05 AM

Co-sign 43.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 8:49 AM

Plaintiff's address is now absent from the complaint, but is still in the attached exhibits- EEOC complaint. Please remove them. Thanks!

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 8:51 AM

best post ever.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 8:58 AM

Plaintiff needs a happy ending.

93 Posted by Nigel Tufnel | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 8:59 AM

85, you're a copycat and am riding my coattails, just like in Tap. Maybe come up with an original idea? Moreover, you should know that was my line in the movie, maybe you're not such a big fan after all.

avatar
94 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:06 AM

So, Cornell Frat Stud was talking with his girlfriend, and she said, "Honey, give me 9 inches and hurt me!" Frat boy thought for a minute, then said, "Ok." So he fucked her 3 times and hit her over the head with a hammer.

avatar
95 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:07 AM

DAVID SAINT HUBBINS = WORST ATL CHARACTER


Go back into hiding, loser

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:15 AM

82

You single?

avatar
97 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:15 AM

79 - it's called "The Birds and the Bees." On 202 just south of Rte 1.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:19 AM

Are they hiring? I'd like to work for a firm with girl-on-girl sexual harassment issues.

99 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:43 AM

93:

What? Are you here to pretend you're a real rock and roller? The gall!

I think you'll find that DSH was around on ATL while posting as Nigel was a silly idea that popped into your head whilst you studied for the Oklahoma bar exam.

Click our names and see historic postings before writing your apology post.

Bloody wanker.

avatar
100 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:44 AM

What's all the fuss. Just a little flirting among fellow bitch attorneys.

101 Posted by Nigel Tufnel | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:51 AM

99, never saw any of your postings, you've obviously not been around for several months and that's when I joined the ATL community. So, I won't call you a copycat anymore. But you're still riding on my talent, just like in Tap. You can't really play the guitar, and you are just a pussy-whipped frontman whose girlfriend dresses like an Australian's nightmare and nearly ruined the band until I reunited us for the tour of Japan. Long live Ian Faith, death to Jeanine.

102 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:55 AM

101:

I'm glad we reconciled. Otherwise I would have cried, cried, cried all the way home. I hope you're wireless is working better these days (and I'm not talking about your computer connection).

And listen, lay off of Jeanine. Before I met her my life was a cosmic shambles. I was using whatever bits and pieces of eastern philosophy that would drift through my transom. Things are better now.

Well, I should go back to work. I've been trying to tighten up some briefs.

Cheerio.

103 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 9:58 AM

Pardon me. I meant "your wireless," of course.

I would have caught that earlier if I weren't under such heavy sedation.

104 Posted by Nigel Tufnel | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:01 AM

David, you and I have always been like brothers. You know that I have a jealous streak that occasionally shows itself, especially when Jeanine is involved. Here's to some double guitar solos down the road. Rock and Roll!

105 Posted by Tibor | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:25 AM

@Nigel/David: You put a *greased naked woman* on all fours with a dog collar around her neck, and a leash, and a man's arm extended out up to here, holding onto the leash, and pushing a black glove in her face to sniff it. You don't find that offensive? You don't find that sexist?

avatar
106 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:32 AM

Evidently plaintiff never said to Sossman during all the instances of "distressing" sexy talk: "this makes me uncomfortable. I'd prefer that we limit our conversations to business"--see para 24, in which plaintiff alleges she "attempted" to tell Sossman to stop the hostile work environment only after reporting it to HR. Guess plaintiff was too preoccupied and intimidated to say anything during the "distressing" shopping sprees she was attending with Sossman. Wonder who paid for the "Big League" clothing Sossman helped plaintiff pick out?

107 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:32 AM

105:

First of all, I once again ask: what's wrong with being sexy?

Second, you should have seen the cover we *wanted* to do. It wasn't a glove, believe me.

I must get back to work now. I have meeting with a new corporate client, FTD. Guess I'll have to listen to what the flower people say.

avatar
108 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:35 AM

Spinal Tap schtick=Epic Fail.

Long live PE and JE!

avatar
109 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:47 AM

I saw this movie on Cinemax the other night. The ending is a little unclear, but I think the judge eventually takes out his gavel and solves the problem.

avatar
110 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:49 AM

it is such a cheap shot to put this in a complaint. this person needs to be put back in the womb.

111 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 10:53 AM

The pretentious, ponderous collection of PE and JE posts inspires the question: on which day did God create PE and JE, and couldn't He have rested then too?

avatar
112 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 11:21 AM

BEST. POST. EVER.

avatar
113 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 11:24 AM

108 - I respectfully disagree. I think the funniest thing to happen today was to see the competiton between two fictitious spinal tap characters who were genuinely competing for the status of the original poster. I really enjoyed it. Now if it goes on for more than a day I won't but for today, it was good.

114 Posted by Nigel Tufnel | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 11:31 AM

David, you are really on a roll. 105 was very funny too, but of course he needs to remember that we replaced the naked woman smellling the glove with the shiny all-black cover. I know that David and I still disagree to this day, he thinking that it is a dismal and depressing-looking album and me thinking that it is cool because it couldn't get none more black.

Here's to hoping that PE and JE (and 108 for that matter) spontaneously combust as do hundreds of people each year in unreported incidents. Or may they die in bizarre gardening accidents this weekend like our drummer Stumpy Pete.

avatar
115 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 11:33 AM

DE practitioner here. Maron Marvel is a TTT firm, even in this TTT market.

Does that make them 6th TT?

Besides which, Plaintiff couldn't even find a Delaware attorney to represent her, had to go up to Pennsylvania to get one. Good luck finding local counsel as required by D. Del. LR 83.5(d). Dipsh*t.

avatar
116 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:13 PM

The plaintiff was just upset that the defendant never once complimented her ass.

avatar
117 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:57 PM

http://jezebel.com/5367738/blogger-girl+on+girl-sexual-harassment-is-hot

for reals.

avatar
118 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 12:57 PM

http://jezebel.com/5367738/blogger-girl+on+girl-sexual-harassment-is-hot

for reals.

avatar
119 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:08 PM

Its not lesbianic so much as nyphomaniacal.

That said, my resume is in the mail for this firm.

avatar
120 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:15 PM

Here's another shot of her in a group photo. Obviously, not the kind of group shot I prefer but again, she demonstrates her hotness. What a fucking joke about the lawsuit.

http://www.maronmarvel.com/contact.html

avatar
121 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:24 PM

Recently interviewed over there - place is a joke, TTT; Lawsuit does not surprise me

avatar
122 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:44 PM

Harasser no longer works at WCU, she's at Drexel Law doing the same job and coaching their trial team. One of last year trial team members would have a similar complaint, that is if the ridiculously inappropriate relationship he had with his then-coach hadn't been so consensual. Drexel may be a brand new law school, but we really know how to choose them.

avatar
123 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:44 PM

Harasser no longer works at WCU, she's at Drexel Law doing the same job and coaching their trial team. One of last year trial team members would have a similar complaint, that is if the ridiculously inappropriate relationship he had with his then-coach hadn't been so consensual. Drexel may be a brand new law school, but we really know how to choose them.

avatar
124 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:45 PM

AT NO TIME SHOULD ANY BEHAVIOUR LIKE THIS BE TOLERATED, WHETHER SAME GENDER TO SAME GENDER, OR OPPOSITE GENDER TO OPPOSITE GENDER. THE ALLEGATIONS, IF TRUE, AS ILLUSTRATED, ARE NOTHING MORE THAN HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT AND THE NEED TO TAKE A LEAVE OF ABSENCE FOR POST-TRAUMATIC SYNDROME AS A RESULT OF THE AWKWARD SITUATION IS WARRANTED. FURTHER, THE MENTAL TRAUMA WAS SO GREAT TO PLAINTIFF THAT ANY ONGOING TREATMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THAT INCIDENT SHOULD BE PAID FOR BY THE EMPLOYER. IT APPEARS THAT LAW FIRMS FORGET THAT THEY PRACTICE LAW AND THAT THEY ARE NOT FREE TO IGNORE EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THEIR DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS.

avatar
125 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 1:59 PM

Are these chicks hot? I hope so.

avatar
126 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 2:00 PM

Are these chicks hot? I hope so.

avatar
127 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 2:01 PM

I just saw this on Jezebel and I am disgusted by this site, this post, and by your ridicule of this poor woman! You should be ashamed of yourself for this.

To the Commenters: When your employers find out that you have been posting those terrible things on this stie you will all be fired! You are as bad as the harasser.

avatar
128 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 2:42 PM

82, will you marry me?

avatar
129 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 2:44 PM

I believe the proper term is "Lesbionic." Thanks.

-- A lesbian

avatar
130 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:08 PM

Goodness. What a silly article, treating a serious subject in a silly, misogynistic way. (and yes, I am a male.)
I would hate for my daughter, who is in law school, to go have an experience like this and then be marginalized in this way.
-Bill

avatar
131 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:36 PM

I would gladly volunteer to give plaintiff Braude and defendant Sossman the best five minutes of their lives.

avatar
132 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:36 PM

130-

You are not a male.

avatar
133 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:40 PM

just checked out 5's link. Def is hot! What's she up to these days??

avatar
134 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:45 PM

Very hot indeed. Great post ATL.

But one has to wonder what's wrong with our society today when one gal can't open up and share thoughts with another without being sued!

Why did the Plaintiff sue anyway? Did she get fired from the firm.... Sossman was just an associate...

avatar
135 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:46 PM

Very hot indeed. Great post ATL.

But one has to wonder what's wrong with our society today when one gal can't open up and share thoughts with another without being sued!

Why did the Plaintiff sue anyway? Did she get fired from the firm.... Sossman was just an associate...

avatar
136 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:52 PM

All caps gives me a headache.

avatar
137 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 3:54 PM

I need to see the "DSLs" -- Plaintiff pictures pls!

avatar
138 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 4:00 PM

Cosign 132.

130 is probably a Wellesley or Smith grad who can't even begin to relate to men. Nice try though. Thanks for playing.

avatar
139 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 5:03 PM

133-defendant now is in charge of "Major Gifts" at Drexel Law School, and also works with Moot Court team
137-plaintiff photo is above at number 12

avatar
140 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 5:23 PM

Come on now, 139 comments and nothing on the names of other partners at this firm?

avatar
141 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 7:34 PM

I must find where Ms. Sossman works. Maybe with all the fallout she could use an unemployed law clerk who definitely failed the Delaware Bar, and can't even get an interview as a telemarketer.

avatar
142 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 8:01 PM

Did Tucker Max link to this post on his blog? If not, how did all of his fans get to ATL to comment here?

avatar
143 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, September 25, 2009 11:38 PM

40 proves beyond a reasonable doubt that PE = Lat.

avatar
144 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, September 26, 2009 8:52 PM

OMG. This place looks like the land of misfit toys. These people look like poster children for sexual perversion or other deviant. The firm's namesake looks like Napolean in his suit - although a little more clueless than the great French general. The number two guy looks like the moron who was involved in the "freakish" sexual behavior. Brehm looks like the pivot girl in a carnival circle jerk; or the belly side mule rider - even the donkey is shamed by what he did. OMG do they people have kids? Do they have clients? Pray for them all. I hope they have all have direct deposit. Nothing like a paycheck from a place as dysfunctional as this.

PS: I definitely would have done the three way Sossman is way hot - even dirty hot.

avatar
145 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, September 26, 2009 9:15 PM

Very difficuly question. I, for one, would invite a Post-Lesbianic Harassment Syndrome; EXCEPT if Brehm was the lesbian. My understanding is that she is not not. Rather she is a double jointed hermaphrodite capable of hours of self gratification and third-party chum hump at the same time - capable of chewing synphter while tlking. Truely a talented lawyer.

avatar
146 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, September 26, 2009 9:16 PM

Very difficuly question. I, for one, would invite a Post-Lesbianic Harassment Syndrome; EXCEPT if Brehm was the lesbian. My understanding is that she is not not. Rather she is a double jointed hermaphrodite capable of hours of self gratification and third-party chum hump at the same time - capable of chewing synphter while tlking. Truely a talented lawyer.

avatar
147 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:35 AM

Last sentence of TTT's chairman: "He the firm’s Chairman."

avatar
148 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, September 27, 2009 4:37 PM

You just can't treat Braudes today the way we used to.

avatar
149 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 28, 2009 8:07 AM

130 - your daughter would not be marginalized, she's be beatified!

avatar
150 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 28, 2009 6:56 PM

How am I first on this one?

avatar
151 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 28, 2009 10:45 PM

Meredith - I would totally work for you for free just for the opportunity for you to sexually harass me.

avatar
152 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, October 8, 2009 5:02 PM

you know, this lawsuit reminds me of a powerful documentary i once saw on cinemax one early morning about relationships in the workplace .

i guess i never fully considered the psychological and emotional ramifications that can result from an innocent foursome amongst female office mates. truly an eye-opener.

Post Your Comment