In(de)cisive Media? ALM Reclaims Its Name
(Or: Which industry is more troubled, law or media?)
Gawker reports that Incisive Media — the legal media giant behind the American Lawyer magazine, Law.com, and many other excellent and influential print and online publications — is taking back its old name: American Lawyer Media (ALM).
ALM adopted the Incisive moniker back in 2007, after being acquired by Incisive Media for $630 million. Incisive itself was acquired in 2006 by Apax Partners, a private equity firm.
The full memo about the ALM rebranding appears after the jump. Here’s the most interesting part:
While we will continue to be majority-owned by funds advised by Apax Partners, our lender, Royal Bank of Scotland, will swap a portion of its existing ALM debt for a 49% equity stake in the company and become a minority owner of ALM.
Turning over almost half of the equity in the company to a lender — that doesn’t sound good, does it?
But there’s more to the story here.
This rebranding is actually part of a larger restructuring. From Paid Content:
B2B publisher Incisive Media’s private equity backer is splitting the business in two, FT.com reports.Apax Partners, which owns 59 percent of Incisive, will take full control of its US-based American Lawyer Media portfolio of magazines, websites and events, which Incisive bought for $630 million (£387 million) in 2007.
Apax is investing another $15 million (£9.2 million) into the spun-out unit as part of a debt restructuring drive - as a result of a debt-for-equity swap with Royal Bank of Scotland, the unit’s debt falls from $450 million to $300 million, according to FT.com.
So American Lawyer Media — despite having problems of its own, such as layoffs — is the healthier part of the company. At least it’s the part of the company that Apax wants to keep.
But that doesn’t mean ALM has been a great investment for Apax thus far. From efinancialnews.com:
Apax Partners’ losses on its investments in magazine publishers Incisive Media and American Lawyer Media are in the region of $150 million (EUR105 million) it emerged today, marking a rare loss for one of Europe’s most highly regarded buyout firms.The firm, which has lost control of Incisive and had its equity in ALM cut, is estimated to have so far recorded a combined loss of about GBP60 million ($98 million) on Incisive and $50 million on ALM, according to Financial News calculations.
A $50 million loss? Ouch. The media business is probably one of the few industries more troubled than the legal profession. The challenges faced by the media, especially print media, appear to be more profound and existential than those faced by law firms.
This might explain why print reporters are abandoning the newsroom for the classroom. Here’s an explanation by Steve Kiehl, formerly a reporter with the Baltimore Sun, of his decision to head off to law school at the University of Maryland:
Looking back on my last year in journalism, I’ve struggled to identify that turning point, that moment when I decided to give up what had been my lifelong passion and pursue another career. Was it when I registered for the LSAT last summer? When I spent hundreds of dollars on application fees to law schools last fall, or when I sent in a seat deposit this spring?When did a hypothetical exploration of leaving journalism become my real life?
…. I would not be going to law school if newspapers were healthy, if I believed that journalism could support into the future a sizable group of people making a decent living doing it. Perhaps it was a happy accident that newspapers in the second half of the 20th century could employ a large professional workforce, could give people the means to buy decent homes in nice neighborhoods, send their kids to college and take pride in their work. I no longer believe that is the case.
Readers, what do you think? Who’s more screwed: journalists, or lawyers?
P.S. We do not consider ourselves exempt from the troubles of the news business. If you’d like to support ATL through advertising on the site or sponsoring an event, please email advertising@breakingmedia.com. Thanks!
INCISIVE MEDIA / AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA — MEMORANDUM — RENAMING AND REBRANDING
TO: All Employees
FROM: Bill Pollak
RE: A New Beginning
As you may be aware, today the press has reported a restructuring and rebranding of the company. As a result of new agreements signed by our owners and lenders, we will once again become an independent, standalone company, with our own management, board of directors and financing, operating under the ALM brand. While the agreements are pending regulatory approval in the U.K., we expect to make a formal announcement next week.
While we will continue to be majority-owned by funds advised by Apax Partners, our lender, Royal Bank of Scotland, will swap a portion of its existing ALM debt for a 49% equity stake in the company and become a minority owner of ALM.
Although we have a new name and structure, our business positions are fundamentally unchanged. ALM remains the leading provider of current legal news and information in the largest legal marketplace in the world. Despite the severity of the commercial real estate downturn, our publications have retained their leading market share in their sector and GlobeSt.com has strengthened its position as the leading online provider of news and information in that arena.
Coming new product introductions will broaden our reach in the legal information marketplace and our investments in digital technology
are already bearing fruit. And, as the media world moves to a greater reliance on paid content and more sophisticated advertising and sponsorship models, ALM is well-positioned for future success.
Incisive Media in the U.K. will continue under the Incisive brand, headed by Tim Weller, and will retain ownership of the ClickZ/SEW/SES businesses, which will no longer report to ALM management. Between now and the end of the year, we will transition the separation of our shared infrastructure and operations from Incisive Media and complete the rebranding of our company as ALM. In addition, we are currently discussing a formal content-sharing agreement with Incisive which will enable us to continue to collaborate with Legal Week and other properties.
I’m sure that many of you may have questions regarding the restructuring and rebranding, and their impact on your job and your customers. To help answer them, I’m attaching an FAQ document covering key issues.
As always, feel free to contact me directly if you have additional questions or issues.
Bill
William L. Pollak
CEO - North America
incisivemedia
(Gavel bang for title: Gawker commenter.)
Incisive Media Is Now ALM, Again [Gawker]
Apax and banks move to split Incisive Media [FT via Paid Content]
Financial News: Apax Makes Rare $150M Loss On Media Companies [efinancialnews via Wall Street Journal]
After 10 Years, Why I Left [crumbler]
Afternoon Journalism Depression [On the Record]




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
"I would not be going to law school if newspapers were healthy, if I believed that journalism could support into the future a sizable group of people making a decent living doing it."
Wow. Somebody is in for a surprise.
I suppose I should know the answer to this already, but is The University of Maryland School of Law accredited by the American Bar Association? A member in good standing of the AALS?
2, it is not. The University of Maryland is an online knockoff that is not eligible for accreditation. It's rising 1L's take the baby bar and, if they pass, continue their studies and may take the Maryland state bar (and only the Maryland state bar) upon graduation. If they pass that, they may eventually get into other jurisdictions by reciprocity.
FourTTTh.
49+59 > 100. You sure that you have the ownership percentages right?
5 - The difference is between "Incisive Media" (old parent) and "Incisive Media" (new spun-off British entity).
WHO CARES?
POST FIRM SA OFFER NEWS! IT'S A FRIDAY, DECISION DAY FOR SOME VAULT FIRMS. GET ON IT.
CAPITAL LETTERS DENOTE URGENCY
7 - I'm tired of SA offer news.
Go back to the sandbox, kids.
5 / 6 - I find this transaction confusing. Can some transactional lawyer walk me through it?
- Confused Litigator
I have it on good authority that one V17 law firm will soon change its name to Layoffs & Wastebins.
5, 6, 8 - It looks like Apex will wind up with (a) 51 percent of American Lawyer Media (the U.S. arm) and (b) 59 percent of the original Incisive Media (the U.K. arm).
1 - But newspapers are even worse off than Biglaw. Look at the poll results. Over 90 percent say newspapers are more screwed.
12-- Acknowledging the need to leave journalim, why jump to a ship that's in almost as bad a shape? Why not move to an industry that is less oversaturated than law?
13 - "I want to say one word to you. Just one word. Plastics."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061722/quotes
10
lol, love it
Wait, what, 3? So this guy is leaving a job in a struggling industry to go to an online school? Wow. Does he know he'll never be able to take the bar exam?
Kash drives a Mercedes.
Lat, please, please, please consult someone else when you discuss business analysis.
I know it helps your little website to terrorize the barrister ranks with tales of impending doom, but to equate the problems with print media with those in the legal industry is to reveal your callous stupidity and self-driving drivel.
Print media, including magazines, have a business model that is almost completely destroyed. The heavily indebted, increasingly unemployed consumer cannot waste money on frivolous compilations of random news they can get for free online. They certainly see no reason to spend money posting classified ads in newsprint when a better alternative exists for free online. So drastically fewer readers lead to higher ad rates lead to fewer advertisers (aside from those like the auto industry who can't even afford big ad spends any longer). This business model is otherwise called a death spiral.
Contrast that with the legal industry. Fattened by Greenspan's bubble, Lat's favorite supply-sider tax cuts and rampant deregulation and nonregulation foisted on us by Bush, DeLay and Hastert, BigLaw gorged on a rapidly expanding FIRE sector that everyone thought was left for dead after 2001. But after the hedge-fund fakers, private-equity frauds and overleveraged sociopathic I-banks drove us all into a ditch the size of the Great Depression (but 10X as deep since our economy is so much bigger now), the legal industry has a few less customers to go round.
So the legal industry shrinks. But unlike the newspapers and mags, there is no craigslist.org for your securities fraud class-action. And your shareholders would not like it if the board of directors decides to get some witty blogger to handle your M&A deal instead of that overpriced midtown firm.
So the law firm revenues shrink, outrageous rates get less outrageous (but still socially harmful) and greedy dreams die for a considerable portion of associates and lawyers-to-be.
But a drop in revenue of 15% is not a drop in revenue of 50%.
The two industries are very different. Let me know Lat if any of your other stupid posts need clarifying and I will drop by again sometime.
18 - Too long, didn't read.
Hey, 18, careful, you might get called on in torts while you are busy posting!
Lat understands the differences between the legal and media industries - he's making a point and stoking discussion. Don't let the obviousness of it run you over like a truck.
18 - Work on your reading comprehension skills:
"A $50 million loss? Ouch. The media business is probably one of the few industries more troubled than the legal profession. The challenges faced by the media, especially print media, appear to be more profound and existential than those faced by law firms."
"This might explain why print reporters are abandoning the newsroom for the classroom. Here’s an explanation by Steve Kiehl, formerly a reporter with the Baltimore Sun, of his decision to head off to law school at the University of Maryland...."
19 - yeah, we know all about your short attention span - which is why we focused heavily on it during your performance review.
Hopefully you find some contract work after that severance runs out!
Good luck!
21 - hmm...yes...Lat's incisive analysis in that paragraph is quite a nugget. I think there are a "few industries" in far more trouble than the legal industry. But fleshing that out would result in Lat's alarmist postings generating far less traffic.
Just take a look at the winter issue of the ABA Journal about the law firm carnage in the early 90s. Life goes on people. Just like real estate, the sector will return to relative health after finding a new equilibrium (yes, something well below the last 3-5 years which were the result of a loosely orchestrated fraud by our nation's political and financial elites that the average joe was allowed to buy into), it just sucks for those whose timing was just awful (like all those 2Ls, and 3Ls and young no-longer-BigLaw associates.
Last I heard, Cravath wasn't in bankruptcy proceedings, but the parent companies of the LATimes and the OCRegister (among many many others were). When the high-quality standard-bearer institutions of a profession go under (as opposed to middling, poorly managed ones like Brobeck, Heller and TPW), you have a real sea change.
In law we have some structural changes going on, but the fundamentals are sound for the industry as a whole. And Lat's shitty headline attempts to equate the two as does his stupid paragraph you cited which makes his headline question even more asinine).
18 / 23 - You need to relax. It's a blog post.
Have a beer. Put your feet up on some furniture.
Happy Labor Day!
I tend to agree with 18.
An industry in decline is what is happening in media. It is getting so bad that comparisons with the buggy-whip industry are apt.
But the legal industry is not in decline, it is merely less lucrative. A partner who made $2mm in 2007 and now makes $1.6mm is a partner who is making less PROFIT, not becoming extinct.
Lat is a fool for suggesting that the problems of lawyers as an industry are anywhere near as bad as the problems of media (or of retail, or of auto-making, or trucking, or any of many other industries in far worse shape than the law).
Lat makes it sound worse because his industry is the media not the law. And no one really needs to send a lot of money to his blog to further their business plan.
I tend to agree with 20. Lat is just a blogger generating discussion (and successfully so, based on comments like 18 and 25).
I tend to agrezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ....
not surprising...my firm eliminated its advertising budget , $200k, completely.
If young lawyers want someone to blame for the hours-driven, soul-deadening life that BigLaw has become, they couldn't find a better target than Steven Brill and his American Lawyer. It was Brill who, in the early 80's, started the PPP arms race that is modern BigLaw by publishing lawfirm profits per partner and celebrating firms like Finley Kumble that went into debt to poach the highest producers. A curse on AmLaw.
I would love to quit biglaw and become a solo practitioner and steal business away from biglaw. Too bad im a pussy.
Print Media is dead.
Legal media is a barely-surviving oligopoly: Above the Law breaks stories and NLJ/ ALM fills in with more in-depth coverage.
The legal market is ill, with a chance of recovery?