Add RSS RSS

Peering Into The Crystal Ball for Obama’s Judicial Picks
(Plus a live chat with the New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin)

Barack Obama small President Barack Obama.jpgThe current New Yorker has an interesting piece by Jeffrey Toobin on President Obama’s judicial picks. Toobin took part in a live chat about the piece at NewYorker.com right now earlier today if you’re interested. (Try not to crash their website.).

UPDATE: The chat’s quite interesting. Toobin reveals why he likes Justice Souter best and answers this young wannabe judge’s question:

11:31 Guest: I’m a 25 year old law student, I want to be a judge, and my roommate smokes pot. How worried should I be? Do you think people will still care when I’m older?

11:32 Jeffrey Toobin: Don’t inhale! I’m kidding. I don’t think it will make a bit of difference. Our president has more or less admitted he was a pretty big pothead in his day, and it’s been a non-issue. Certainly the fact that your roommate smokes — not you — is irrelevant.

Toobin’s piece is available online to non-subscribers here. If you don’t feel like clicking through seven pages, here’s the ATL reader’s digest version:

Jeffrey Toobin small CNN New Yorker legal lawyer Above the Law blog.jpg

  • Aging liberal judges hung on through the Bush era, but once a Dem took over, they were ready to hang up their robes. Additionally, since 2006, Senator Patrick Leahy has prevented Bush’s nominees from getting through the Judiciary Committee. Now vacancies abound in the federal judiciary.

  • Bush kicked ass in choosing judges; Obama is taking his sweet time. In the first eight months of their respective terms, Bush nominated 52 judges while Obama has chosen 17.

  • Obama says he’s looking for “experiential diversity” in his judicial nominations: “not just judges and prosecutors but public defenders and lawyers in private practice.” But his first batch of nominees are mainly former judges, like SCOTUS justice Sonia Sotomayor and Indianapolis federal district judge David Hamilton, nominated by Obama to the Seventh Circuit.

    More bullets, after the jump.

  • Obama hoped to govern in a post-partisan age and has so far chosen judges who are middle of the road in terms of their judicial views. That hasn’t worked, though. A “conventional, qualified, and undramatic” choice like David Hamilton faced major opposition from Republicans.

  • Judicial nomination gridlock continues. Republicans in the Senate have refused to vote on anyone but Sotomayor.

  • Hey judge wannabes, we hope you’re friends with former Skadden partner Preeta Bansal. Now at the OMB, she drew up Obama’s initial list of nominees for judicial positions when he was running for president.
  • There’s a lot of other stuff — it’s a long piece — but basically Toobin crafts an argument that Obama’s judicial picks ain’t very liberal. And that’s due in part to Obama’s opposition to the political process unfolding in the judicial branch: Political battles should be won during elections, not in the courts. Read the piece, and its definition of the “new liberalism” as exemplified by Obama, here.

    One thing we found fun: more detail on the path that could have taken Obama to One First Street instead of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. We’ve noted Obama as the “man who got away” from the justices before. Toobin has more on the Supreme Court route that Obama could have taken:

    As the outgoing president of the Harvard Law Review, in 1991, Obama could have had his pick of judicial clerkships. “I asked him to apply to clerk for me,” Abner Mikva, a former federal appeals-court judge in Washington, told me. “I was a feeder. At the time, I was sending clerks to work for Brennan, Marshall, Stevens, and Blackmun. I don’t have any doubt that Obama would have got a Supreme Court clerkship if he wanted one.”

    But Obama decided against taking any clerkship and instead moved back to Chicago, where he joined a small law firm, started teaching law at the University of Chicago, and laid the groundwork for a political career.

    Instead of joining the ranks of the Elect, he gets to choose their bosses. Not a bad trade-off.

    Bench Press [The New Yorker]

    Comments

    avatar
    1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:31 AM

    Who's First? I AM!!

    avatar
    2 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:31 AM

    Ernie Anastos FTW?

    avatar
    3 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:32 AM

    Winston made offers.

    avatar
    4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:32 AM

    Could someone here please Autotune me some more George Brett remix? Thanks.

    avatar
    5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:35 AM

    This jackass lies!

    Coked up in SC.

    avatar
    6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:37 AM

    "Republicans in the Senate have refused to vote on anyone but Sotomayor."

    How does this work when, presumably, a few moderate Republicans would join Democrats in bringing candidates in for an up-or-down vote? Or how did it work when the Democrats had 60 votes? Isn't this just because Reid isn't making it a priority?

    avatar
    7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:37 AM

    Toobin is a TTTOOOL

    avatar
    8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:41 AM

    I think that, absent some *major* scandal, BHO will pull a Taft and end up on SCOTUS at some point after his term(s) are up.

    avatar
    9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:42 AM

    Cue PE post referring to Obama as a Commissar in 3, 2...

    avatar
    10 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:46 AM

    " Political battles should be won during elections not in the courts"

    Who has been making this argument in almost every opinion he has authored in the last 20 years?

    11 Posted by Dubya | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:48 AM


    There is no Harriet Miers in the whole group.

    avatar
    12 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:52 AM

    QUINN REMAINS

    13 Posted by MaTTT Foley | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:03 PM

    If someone wants to nominate me for a judicial position they can find in a van, down by the river.

    avatar
    14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:11 PM

    in b4 PE

    avatar
    15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:11 PM

    Could someone explain to me how Republicans could possibly be delaying the nomination process? Democrats had 60 votes until Kennedy died, they'll soon have 60 votes again. Any chance Toobin just likes blaming things on Republicans with not a shred of supporting evidence (or even a logical argument)?

    avatar
    16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:16 PM

    Very interesting - more posts like this, please.

    avatar
    17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:17 PM

    Who cares about this? You're all sycophants.

    avatar
    18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:23 PM

    @13 -- you became old very quickly.

    avatar
    19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:40 PM

    LEGALIZE
    .
    .
    CANNABIS
    .
    .
    NOW!!!

    avatar
    20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:48 PM

    Toobin is stoopid.

    avatar
    21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:04 PM

    Obama will no doubt nominate judges who, like him, completely disregard the Constitution in favor of their personal agenda and he will his typical Chicago-style bullying to push them through. No wonder America is having a change of heart about this guy.

    avatar
    22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:09 PM

    Who turns down a feeder judge clerkship? I call bullshit.

    avatar
    23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:11 PM

    toobin is a fucking partisan hack.

    avatar
    24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:47 PM

    Mikva was probably just trying to lower his acceptance rate to boost his prestige.

    avatar
    25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 8:53 PM

    "And that’s due in part to Obama’s opposition to the political process unfolding in the judicial branch: Political battles should be won during elections, not in the courts."

    Where the fuck is Toobin getting this from? Did he just pull this out of his ass, whole cloth?

    avatar
    26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 17, 2009 8:54 PM

    also, 11:31 Guest sounds like a massive pussy

    avatar
    27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:43 PM

    Are you weirdo attention-freak former Souter clerks going to finally take his picture off your collective walls? Yes, you are so special. We get it. Now, you are old too. I don't keep my finger paintings from kindergarten on my wall. Though, they were almost as awesome as you.

    Post Your Comment