Add RSS RSS

Quinn’s Redskins Case Goes to SCOTUS — On Petition for Certiorari

quinn redskins.jpgWho can forget Quinn Emanuel’s victory in the 17-year-long dispute over the name “Redskins”? Above the Law readers will remember Robert Raskopf’s happy victory email … and the first-year associate who had a problem with the firm’s representation of the Washington Football club. The first year was (eek!) fired for reasons unrelated to his disagreement with the firm’s position.

But is the firm’s position as strong as Raskopf thought? The Blog of the Legal Times reports that the Redskins case has made it all the way to the Supreme Court:

The long-running dispute over the appropriateness of the “Redskins” name for the Washington D.C. NFL football franchise reached the Supreme Court today. Philip Mause, partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath in D.C., representing a group of Native Americans offended by the name, filed a petition for certiorari in the case titled Susan Harjo v. Pro-Football, Inc.

Was Raskopf’s victory email premature? More details, plus an UPDATE about the Native Americans’ game plan if SCOTUS doesn’t want to play, after the jump.

In response to the Quinn associate’s email about the Redskins name controversy, a “pissed off Quinn partner” had this to say:

Bob and I represent clients, not causes. We like Native Americans. If Native Americans had hired Bob, the Redskins would have lost the case. But they didn’t. They hired someone else. So it was incumbent on Bob to kick their ass in court. It is really that simple.

You wonder if that quote was “bulletin board material” for Drinker Biddle’s Philip Mause, who represented Native Americans — or at least some Native Americans offended by the team moniker — in front of the Court:

“This is a derogatory term for Indians that sticks out like an anomaly,” said Mause today. “No other group still has to deal with this kind of a term being used” in such a public and widespread way.

UPDATE: Kash wrote about this case for Washingtonian magazine in July. If the Supreme Court declines to take the case, Philip Mause has another play. From Washingtonian via True/Slant:

Philip Mause, a partner at Drinker Biddle & Reath who is representing the Native Americans, says that all is not lost: Another petition challenges the Redskins name. With a much younger set of petitioners — led by Amanda Blackhorse of the Navajo Nation — they won’t face the time delay problem that caused the other case to be dismissed, raising the possibility that this time the courts could decide the case on the allegation of disparagement.

It’s worth noting that Drinker Biddle is representing the Native American petitioners pro bono.

Will the Court grant cert? If so, the Washington Redskins will be happy to know that its own lawyers support the team’s cause.

Challenge to Redskins Name Reaches Supreme Court [The BLT: Blog of the Legal Times]

Earlier: Quinn Emanuel Associate Has Reservations About ‘Redskin’ Victory
Second Bar Failure Is Proximate Cause for Quinn Associate’s Ouster

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:06 PM

Has anyone else noticed how fat Firstie Alley has gotten lately?

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:09 PM

Whatever happened to Future Elie? Is he now a thing of the past?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:10 PM

SCOTUS hasn't granted cert yet.

Headline is very misleading, implies cert was granted.

Sigh.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:11 PM

You mean Kirstie Elie?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:11 PM

Quinn no-offered and cold-offered summers!!!

TTT firm!!! TTT!!! Triple exclamation points!!!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:11 PM

Future Elie died of e coli poisoning from a spoiled turducken he snarfed out of Kash's trashcan in 2014.

7 Posted by JaKe Emeritus | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:16 PM

News about the NFL is not newsworthy to the upper echelons of society as football is a sport played and watched by ignorant laborers who toil in such irreputable industries as mining and logging. I, for one, excel at the illustrious sport of polo.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:16 PM

why would the firm cold-offer if they were no-offering (i.e. nearly half the class in LA)?

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:17 PM

7 - offensive jerk

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:22 PM

We need to bomb those reservations back to the Stone Age

-DOJ Secure

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:22 PM

the fist year! the fist year! the fist year!

ahahahahaha year of the fist

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:22 PM

9- That's the point. Idiot.

13 Posted by Quinn_Remains | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:24 PM

The only reservations I have are for dinner

QUINN REMAINS (full of palefaces)

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:25 PM

12 is on point.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:26 PM

14 - agreed, 12 on point. 7 a riot.

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:28 PM

yumyumyumyumyum

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:31 PM

yumyumyumyumyumyumyum

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:32 PM

To #1:

What do you mean "lately?" She's been a balloon for a few decades now.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:35 PM

“This is a derogatory term for Indians that sticks out like an anomaly,” said Mause today. “No other group still has to deal with this kind of a term being used” in such a public and widespread way.
----

It's a matter of degree: http://www.angryasianman.com/2009/09/lsus-chinese-bandits-fight-song.html

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:35 PM

I suppose I should know the answer to this question, but are the "Redskins" recognized by the NFL?

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:38 PM

This post is lame.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:42 PM

Mystal is the Walrus
Mystal is the WALRUS
Goo goo gaa jooob!

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:42 PM

To be more representative of the community it represents the team should change its name to the Washington Negroes.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:43 PM

What's a fist year?

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:44 PM

20, the answer is no. Jason Campbell is such a shitty QB they have been ex-communicated from the league.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:48 PM

Conservatives do and will always suck.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:48 PM

20 - No, they are a minor league "player development" team in a minor backwater town nobody's ever heard of. However, members of this team may be eligible to enter the "NFL Draft" through which they may be recruited to NFL teams in bigger markets.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:48 PM

As a Native American attorney living and working in Washington DC...end this stupid shit.

FU Dan Snyder. FU Roberts, Scalia, Alito and Thomas. If you don't end this ridiculous farce you aren't half the Judges that Judge Rakoff is.

Sotomayor baby, when are you going to hire the first native American S.Ct. clerk...namely me?

I'm waiting for your offer.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:53 PM

There should really be two ATL sites: One for news about truly elite NFL teams, like the Patriots and Steelers, and another for these TTT NFL teams like the Redskins.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:54 PM

IT'S CLERKSHIP SEASON

WE NEED MORE COVERAGE AND THREADS.


FIST YEAR.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:54 PM

Assfowl?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:01 PM

Great, if the SCOTUS can fix our racist name, maybe they would be willing to throw in an order that we also get a new coach, quarterback, owner and stadium. Sigh.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:03 PM

mmmmmmm some downhome assfowl cookin is what this boy needs... and maybe some a dat tube turduken too...

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:03 PM

The appropriate term is "American Indian," not Native American, which I find offensive as I am a native born American. Most American Indian organizations continue to use the "Indian" nomenclature.

35 Posted by EllieWeasel | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:03 PM

“This is a derogatory term for Indians that sticks out like an anomaly,” said Mause today.

Isn't Indian itself a derogatory term for Native Americans? They're not from India, after all. Does Mause really believe in his clients, or is he just taking their money like Abramoff did?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:05 PM

28 - judging by your atrocious writing and poor grammar, the answer is "never"

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:07 PM

Re "If so, the Washington Redskins will be happy to know that its own lawyers support the team’s cause."

When, in defense of representation, lawyers refer to every client's right to representation, that generally means they don't support the client's position. At all.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:07 PM

19 - Why link to such a loser? People should stop thinking of themselves as "oppressed" minorities and start celebrating that they're the luckiest people in the world - Americans.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:07 PM

This post does a horrible job explaining what the case is actually about.

The DC Court of Appeals decided the case on the basis of laches and upheld the district court's holding. Even if the Supreme Court grants cert, they would only be deciding the issue of laches and wouldnt address whether the REDSKINS trademark is disparaging.

I expected to see this type of confusion on the espn boards but I expected more over here.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:09 PM

"Native American" is offensive as well as they are not native to the Americas. They came over from Asia and are thus immigrants like everyone else. Illegal immigrants to boot since I imagine they did not have the proper paperwork to enter.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:09 PM

D.C. is also home to the new "American Indian Museum" so that's the appropriate term. Thank you for bringing that to Elie's attention, 34.

- Native-born American

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:09 PM

This entire case is a waste of time and resources. If a PRIVATE ENTERPRISE wants to call themselves the redskins what standing do the P's have and what cause of action?

This is just a bunch of whiny loons spending money because they don't like the name. What's next Swedes complaining about the Vikings or Spaniards English and French complaining about the Raiders or Tampa Bay Bucs?

43 Posted by EllieWeasel | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:11 PM

40--Does their skin have a hue that, for lack of any better unifying label, can be used to identify this group?

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:12 PM

The merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions, do not deserve to have a football team named after them.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:12 PM

42,
the lawsuit is to cancel the trademark of the REDSKINS. this wouldnt prevent them from continuing to use the name. It would just make it difficult to prosecute people selling counterfeit goods.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:14 PM

Hey come on guys, don't you know that we are all pink on the inside?

The Asslobster

47 Posted by EllieWeasel | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:15 PM

Oh, and if a black person is an African-American, how do we refer to an American of Indian heritage, if the term American Indian is taken by a bunch of redskins? This is enough to make a weasel's top-hat go limp.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:15 PM

34 - We are not beholden to being named for Columbus ignorance. Even if my own tribe does use the term. Stupid BIA organizied tribes.

And 40 - The land bridge THEORY is just that. I point you to the Clovis and recently discovered Delaware arrowheads for proof that we were here before the ice bridges.

Respectfully,
28

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:16 PM

I agree with 23. Change the name to "Washington Negroes" and use a silhouette of Obama as the logo.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:16 PM

45

Thanks . . . On what grounds are they trying to get it done? That their tribe owns it from way back in the day when John Smith and Pocohontas were canoodling in Ye Olde Commonwealth of Virginia. This is still stupid and a waste of the court's time. Has anyone else noticed the backlog of cases?

-42

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:19 PM

28

You're not wise and Latino enough for her racist policies.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:22 PM

41 - The proper name in the National Museum of the Amierican Indian, as they 20th Anniversary fundraiser invitation clearly states.

Would your firm care to "pony up" $500 for a seat?

Respectfully,
28

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:23 PM

Let's start a hockey team and call them the "Whiteskins." That way, the redskins can stop complaining.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:25 PM

53

Drunk Northern Whiteskins eh? We want to be inclusive of all of the peoples in Canada no doubt aboot it eh?

-Firewater Drinker

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:25 PM

53 - It's been done. The Fightin Whites. google it.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:25 PM

47, that would be Indian-American.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:25 PM

By the ancient laws of combat, I accept the challenge of the so called "natives." They plague our people at every turn, but from this day out, they shall plague us no more.

Seriously, fucking natives...

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:26 PM

I thought people who lived in India -were Indians
and Native Americans were Native American Indians.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:28 PM

I've been to the D.C. Indian museum. It's promising on the outside, but it's barren and boring on the inside. Quite a disappointment. The Buffalo Bill museum in Cody, Wyoming is 15 times better.

Smithsonian fail.

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:29 PM

"We're anything but racists."

-- Nigel Tufnel

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:29 PM

58 - We are indigenous peoples.

See Indigenous Peoples Day aka Columbus the Colonizing Slave Master Rapists Day.

Respectfully (no disrespect to the Genoans out there),
28

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:31 PM

So the Cleveland Indians should change their mascot to a turban wearing dothead.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:33 PM

61 - How much for a box of Camels?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:34 PM

@61

28 I hope you're a troll, otherwise you are one of the least intelligent people I have ever come across on the internet. You're a) mixing up who did what historically b) blaming the wrong group.

-Hoping we can reboot the education system so dolts learn something

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:35 PM

"Fighting Whities"? Sounded good, but it was created by a bunch of sorry liberal apologists who were doing it to prove that Indian mascots were wrong. BUT they didn't get the response they were looking for: white people loved the idea and viewed it as a way to prove that the Indian mascot wasn't so bad after all.

The result: The creators of the Fighting Whities added the phrase "Fighting the use of Native American stereotypes" to their shirts AND created the unnecessary and discriminatory "Fightin' Whites Minority Scholarship"

Fail.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:36 PM

I don't understand why they are offended by this. However, I don't actually care enough to look into it. I'm sure they have their reasons. I'll be pissed if they have to ditch the name though.

67 Posted by EllieWeasel | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:36 PM

They sell cheap gas and cigarettes, but don't get stopped for speeding there or you'll get Lathamed. (Did I use that term correctly?)

68 Posted by Chocolate City | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:37 PM

Not only is "Redskins" wrong, but so is "Washington." I propose that the team be renamed the Chocolate City Chips.

"We didn't get our forty acres and a mule, but we did get you, CC."

avatar
69 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:37 PM

50--the basis is that the mark is disparaging. see registrability guidelines in the PTO.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:38 PM

42/50,

they are trying to cancel the mark under the Lanham Act. §2 (a) of the Lanham Act bars registration of a mark that consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection w/ persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute


The original complaint argued that the mark is disparaging to native americans. The current appeal isnt even regarding whether the mark is disparaging, it is whether the court properly applied the laches defense to the facts. I dont think the SC will take a case to decide a laches argument.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:38 PM

"Christopher Columbus (c. 1451 – 20 May 1506) was a Genoese navigator, colonizer and explorer whose voyages across the Atlantic Ocean led to general European awareness of the American continents in the Western Hemisphere."

I'm sorry 64, should I be blaming Leif Ericcson for your misuse of the term "Indian"?

Less respectfully (jk),
28

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:41 PM

These are the ways of the Yangize, the French Traders, not the ways of the Huron.

Magua's heart is twisted.

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:45 PM

Sure, 72, but:

When the Grey Hair is dead, Magua will eat his heart. Before he dies, Magua will put his children under the knife, so the Grey Hair will know his seed is wiped out forever.

avatar
74 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:48 PM

70

See they waited too long and now are wasting time dragging this through the court system. They are still holding up important cases.

42/50

avatar
75 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:50 PM

That's probably true 73, but will he take the Dark daughter of Monroe or the Yellow daughter of Monroe to preserve his own seed?

avatar
76 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:52 PM

3 ftw, I was going to post the same thing, sloppy writing. I expected better, don't know why.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:53 PM

Magua understands that the white man is a dog to his women. When they are tired, he puts down his tomahawk to feed their laziness.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:53 PM

@71

I was referring to this quote of yours "Colonizing Slave Master Rapists Day." If you had studied your history you would know that the Spanish Crown and the Portuguese to a lesser extent were the ones that conquered the Americas and enslaved the native peoples. In what is now called the United States there was little to no enslaving of the people, just killing and taking their land.

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:54 PM

Speaking of laziness, the French haven't the nature for war. Their Gallic laziness combines with their Latinate voluptuousness with the result that they would rather eat and make love with their faces than fight.

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:54 PM

PREDICTION: SCOTUS denies cert -> new Quinn victory e-mail -> another associate fired for inappropriate response = 1 less to layoff.

avatar
81 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:58 PM

The frontier moves with the sun and pushes the Red Man of these wilderness forests in front of it until one day there will be nowhere left. Then our race will be no more, or be not us.

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:02 PM

Over 80 comments and no reference to Eeek boy? We need a "Where are they now" thread.

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:05 PM

68 -- Put a glide in your stride, a dip in yo hip and come on over to the mother ship.

84 Posted by Lady Soto | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:23 PM

No voy a reconocer el término América India porque no reconoce la legitimidad de los Estados Unidos! No hay "Estados Unidos". Solo hay gente de las tierras nativas. Mi pueblo de Puerto Rico, y no Estados Unidos. No somos parte de tierra firme! No puedo contratar a un indio americano, porque no hay tal cosa como los americanos! Yo soy una latina sabio!

Desde los primeros seres humanos llegaron a tierra hace miles de años, la isla conocida como Puerto Rico ha protegido indios, españoles, africanos y sí, incluso los anglos. Los españoles tuvieron la primera y mayor influencia a la isla a su llegada en 1493. Durante su permanencia de 400 años los españoles violaron y saquearon a nuestro pueblo! Cerca de 4 millones de personas que viven en la "Isla del Encanto", con más de un millón en el área metropolitana de San Juan en paz! No te atrevas a la ira de un latinista como yo!

Mi primer acto será la de la demanda de un Museo de Puerto Rico en el Mall Nacional. Mi pueblo merece la justicia! Esta es nuestra tierra!

Llámame señora, perra.

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:24 PM

what is worse, the name "redskins" or the billions of dollars of gambling losses inflicted upon the people of the US by these native americans? they have exploited our people for far too long. we need to take a stand.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:27 PM

@48 - You are a tool

Clovis theory is bs

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:33 PM

I can't decide which translation of Lady Soto's rant is funnier: google's or yahoo's.

I think this is the real Sotomayor.

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:10 PM

yahoo translation:

I am not going to recognize the term America India because it does not recognize the legitimacy of the United States! There is no " The United States ". Only there is people of native earth. My town of Puerto Rico, and the nonUnited States. We are not part of mainland! I cannot contract an American Indian, because there is no such thing as the Americans! I am a Latin wise person! From the first human beings they arrived at earth does thousands of years, the well-known island since Puerto Rico has protected Indian, Spanish, African and yes, even the anglian ones. The Spaniards had the first and greater influence to the island to their arrival in 1493. During their permanence of 400 years the Spaniards violated and sacked to our town! Near 4 million people who live in " Island of the Encanto" , with more of a million in the metropolitan area of San Juan peacefully! You do not dare to the wrath of a latinista like I! My first act will be the one of the demand of a Museum of Puerto Rico in the National Mall. My town deserves justice! This is our earth! Llámame lady, dog.

avatar
89 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 5:16 PM

Google translation:

I will not recognize the term American Indian because it recognizes the legitimacy of the United States! There is no "U.S.." There are only people of native lands. My people of Puerto Rico, not the United States. We are not part of the mainland! I can not hire a Native American, because there is no such thing as the Americans! I am a Latin scholar!

Since the first humans came ashore thousands of years ago, the island known as Puerto Rico has sheltered Indians, Spanish, African and yes, even the Anglos. The Spanish were the earliest and greatest influence to the island on their arrival in 1493. During his stay of 400 years the Spanish raped and pillaged our people! About 4 million people living in the "Island of Enchantment," with more than one million in the San Juan metropolitan area alone! Do not you dare the wrath of a Latin scholar like me!

My first act will be to demand a Museum of Puerto Rico on the National Mall. My people deserve justice! This is our land!

Call me lady, bitch.

avatar
90 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 7:52 PM

I am la Long Carabine!!!

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:48 PM

I assure all of you, the only thing truly offensive about the Redskins is the play of Jason Campbell. He's the TTT of QB's. If the people offended by the name could only watch Campbell struggle through an entire football game, they would relent and give up their appeal out of sheer compassion. There but for the grace of God, they shall say.

avatar
92 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:29 PM

I hope SCOTUS accepts the case and shoves it up the arses of those arrogant pr*cks at Quinn. I've gone toe to toe with those douches on several occasions and can say with certainty that they are not half as good as they think they are.

Post Your Comment