Add RSS RSS

DLA Piper Previews the 2009 Bonus Season

DLA Piper logo.jpgIt’s the first Monday in October. There is a chill in the air, the Yankees and Red Sox are gearing up for the post-season (while the Mets mercifully go away), and the hearts and minds of Biglaw associates turn to their year-end bonuses.

Some have predicted a “no bonus” season, courtesy of the Great Recession. But DLA Piper has given Above the Law the first concrete bonus information of the season, and bonuses will be paid.

Associates at DLA Piper were informed on Friday that while this year’s bonus won’t meet last year’s half-Skadden levels, the firm will be paying bonuses this year. Sources report that DLA’s bonus will come in between $5,000 and $50,000. A tipster reported the news this way:

I’m just finishing up my first full calendar year at DLA. I’ve got a job, I’ve got a bonus. I’ve got all my life to live, I’ve got all my love to give. I WILL SURVIVE.

Congratulations.

DLA won’t make a final decision until January. But as of now, we have a market floor for bonuses, and it is greater than zero! That is pretty awesome.

Other good news from DLA Piper after the jump.

There is actually a lot of positive news emanating from DLA Piper. The firm recently finished its offer process, and it made offers to 55 of 64 summer associates. That’s an 86% offer rate, and a lot better than what we’ve seen at some other firms this fall.

Meanwhile, DLA’s intention to share some wealth with employees come bonus time is not limited to DLA associates. On Friday, DLA Piper staffers also found out that they would be getting a bonus this year too. In addition, the firm plans to resume merit-based salary increases for the staff next summer.

This news closes the loop on a challenging 2009, but DLA Piper is already looking ahead to 2010. Like a few other firms, DLA is looking at moving towards a “competancy-based” compensation model in 2010. The firm is still working out the details and going through the process of taking comments from its partners and associates.

But that will be next year’s bonus issue. For this year, $5,000 to $50,000 has to look like Rudolph’s big red nose cutting through the fog of recession. Bonuses will be paid this year.

In the comments, share your thoughts on where you think the bonus market is going to end up.

Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Associate Bonus Watch - 2009

Comments

avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:01 PM

BCLS FIRST

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:05 PM

When are the incoming associates starting at DLA?

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:05 PM

amazing how with all of the bashing of DLA on this blog, they continue to thrive.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:05 PM

Good positive PR. However, absent from this article is what is the criteria beign used. It is nice that bonuses are being paid, but in a firm where only 40% of associates get a bonus in a good year, what can we really expect here?

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:06 PM

bonus! bonus! we in a recession and you talking bout bonus!

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:06 PM

First things first: I am first.

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:07 PM

5: Jim Mora, Sr.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:08 PM

This post is puerile drivel until JaKe Emeritus comments.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:10 PM

Didn't they slash to 145? So this is really meaningless for a firm that stayed at 160.

avatar
10 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:10 PM

what WHAT?

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:10 PM

Good PR spin. Unfortuantely, means nothing specific. DLA has always paid the bonus and the maount to only the select ppl they wanted to (a weird mix of hours and "merit" that always seemed thrown together ad hoc).

12 Posted by David Saint Hubbins | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:11 PM

Piper at the gates of pwn.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:12 PM

The best way to read ATL is to follow these steps (IN ORDER):

(1) Ignore the post.
(2) Go to comment section.
(3) Scroll through comments until you see JaKe Emeritus avatar.
(4) Prepare to be amused, entertained and/or enlightened.
(5) Be amused, entertained and/or enlightened.
(6) Repeat.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:14 PM

Comment removed by moderator.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:16 PM

2 - lookie here http://abovethelaw.com/2009/07/dla_piper_pushes_back_current.php

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:16 PM

Not bad. Better than nothing. If my firm is similar, I would be happy. And even happier since i'll be on the high end of that scale thanks to Chrometa which lets me track all my time and bill for every second. It is amazing how much time I forgot to bill without it. Check out its free trial. It's slick.

http://www.chrometa.com

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:17 PM

good thing ATL doesn't use a “competancy-based” compensation model. elie would go hungry.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:18 PM

uh, as a poster above pointed out, they cut associate salaries by 10% across the board in may. so this really is not a bonus. elie, for all your incessant trolling for that tired "half-skadden" meme, you need to use that big ol' brain of yours to call them like they are, and stop just playing into firms' PR spin. DLA Piper screwed associates (both with salary cuts and layoffs) and now it's trying to pretend like it's an industry leader in pay. jesus, it's your job to see through this b.s.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:20 PM

This means nothing. They will require impossibly unrealistic hours for the vast majority of bonuses and most associates will get nada.

20 Posted by Quinn_Remains | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:20 PM

For other California firms (with the exception of Quinn), they're more likely to think "Boned Us" instead of bonus.

-QR

21 Posted by JaKe Emeritus | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:22 PM

Only a $5,000 bonus? What a paltry sum; I would effortlessly expend that in one sojourn to a banana republic via chartered plane. Only a lethargic and inane chump would be pleased with such a contemptible "bonus."

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:24 PM

Sutherland no offers RIGHT NOW! get on it!

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:28 PM

20: i want my bagels back

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:28 PM

Very good point by 18.

25 Posted by Quinn_Remains | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:28 PM

22, Kiefer or Donald?

26 Posted by Al Michaels | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:30 PM

Do you believe in miracles, DLA Piper?

27 Posted by Quinn_Remains | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:30 PM

23: I would give some to you, but NONE REMAIN

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:31 PM

Guys in my high school used to get $5,000 bonuses all the time. It was no big deal. Seriously though- 5k? What a frickin joke. That wouldnt even pay for a vacation.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:36 PM

Bonuses will be "between $5,000 and $50,000." Translation: One person will get a $50,000 bonus, everyone else that is in good standing will get $5,000.

"No final decision on bonueses until January" Translation: We need more time to fire people to reduce cost of bonus program.

This is not good news, this is news of yet another round of salary cutting and layoffs disguised as good news.

avatar
30 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:38 PM

28 -

Really? 5K isn't enough for a vacation? Have you looked at prices lately? Fuck, you could take an entire family to Disney World for 5k these days. Jackass.

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:41 PM

30-

Maybe in coach

28

32 Posted by JaKe Emeritus | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:43 PM

This post is addressed to Commetner #30:

Only the wretched middle class vacations in Disney World. Grow up, bairn.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:44 PM

What's more, 18, it was Elie himself who covered the cuts back in May. All he had to do was go to the archive.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:58 PM

30, after taxes it's about $2600. No, you can't take a family of 5 to Disney World on vacation anywhere nice in Orlando for more than 3 days for that amount of money.

avatar
35 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:59 PM

STEPTOE AND JOHNSON IS A TOILET FIRM!!!

WHERE ARE THE OFFERS??? WHERE ARE THE OFFERS???

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 12:59 PM

STEPTOE AND JOHNSON IS A TOILET FIRM!!!

WHERE ARE THE OFFERS??? WHERE ARE THE OFFERS???

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:00 PM

JaKe strikes again.... as always, entertaining.

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:01 PM

I am at an LA firm having a great year (possibly best year ever) and most people in the 2nd and 3rd year classes are billing >1900 hours. I think there will be a lot of angst around here if the bonuses are closer to 5k than 50k.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:02 PM

34 - there is nowhere "nice" in Orlando. Absolutely no reason to go to the only big Florida city without a beach (aka, the only reason to go to Florida).

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:08 PM

37 = EPIC FAILURE IN LIFE THAT LAUGHS AT IDIOTIC POSTS.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:09 PM

If you get $5,000 in bonus, that's what you get for browsing Facebook during work hours.

You are an inane and dilatory loser.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:11 PM

13 = 21 = 32 = 37.

It's sad really.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:34 PM

Doc review is great work if you can find it. Nothing beats clicking your days away with no stress or worries. Of course, if you find yourself one of those horrible projects that stop and start and are otherwise unstable, then it becomes a little stressful.

But generally doc review rocks, and allows you the opportunity to build capital and plan for your future.

avatar
44 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:35 PM

isn't this about the time of year that firms start giving their annual lock-step increases to associates? have any firms done so yet? are the raises any different than previous years?

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:41 PM

How can a firm that CUT ASSOCIATE PAY now get any positive pr for announcing a bonus (especially one that starts at a paltry $5,000)?! Shouldn't the firm at least pay market rate first?! This press release is laughable. And so is DLA.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:44 PM

Where's that asshole with those annoying, repeated DLA Piper bashing comments now? For those of you who haven't seen it started in Feb, is posted every time DLA is on this blog and goes something like this: DLA bad business model ... blah ... blah .... dissolving ... merged with every small firm ... blah ... blah. What do you have to say now? Sorry you didn't get an offer. Die in a fire. Lockstep is dead, reward those who actually make money for the firm like every other business. Its about time.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 1:54 PM

46 -- here I am -- and, oh, by the way, everything I said still obviously holds true. Please see the posts above. DLA is a sinking ship. Do you not remember, THEY CUT ASSOCIATE PAY (in addition to cutting everything else). There's a reason why the crap firms that they merged with were crap firms. There's a reason why clients are refusing to pay their bills and going elsewhere. There's a reason why their #1 rainmaker (Amy Schulman) left the firm. It's a crap place with no management. A place that wanted to be "global" so they merged with anyone that would take them. NO QUALITY CONTROL at all, and horrible lawyers as a result. Now you expect your firm to be praised for saying they'll give 5k - 50k to the people they decide to give it to (with no set standards at all) -- AFTER THEY ALREDY CUT EVERYONE'S PAY! Ha!!! Go away you tool. Schill for your beloved firm someplace else!

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 2:24 PM

44 - I believe you're thinking of January.

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 2:31 PM

47 -

You still have not addressed whether your bitterness is because you were laid off or rather because you were never even offered a job. Please respond, I am dying to know.

- 46

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 2:49 PM

Hey 45, what's your firm doing regarding bonuses and salary increases? Please let us know, instead of bashing other firms that at least have the huevos to announce where they are going.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 2:54 PM

I think you can only evaluate this bonus news in light of:

(1) how many people actually get bonuses closer to 50k than 5k, b/c that's a huge range, and

(2) the across the board DLA salary cuts that took effect this summer (and then compare to bonuses at firms that did not cut base salary)

In other words, go beyond the press release.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 2:58 PM

46 -- please respond to the arguments and refrain from trying to figure out my identity, background or motive. (The same way I could care less whether you're a DLA partner, h.r. person, or associate -- my background similarly shouldn't matter.) Facts are all that matter here. And the fact is, DLA is a sinking ship. The crap firms that DLA merged with would have given their nuts to merge with a Wachtell, S&C, Davis Polk, etc. There's a reason those firm DON'T merge with podunk, crap firms the way DLA did -- it's called quality control. How can you possibly control the quality of your lawyers (something a peer firms obviously put a premium on) when you merge with EVERY FIRM THAT WILL TAKE YOU?! It's laughable. My only mistake was mentioning DLA in the same breath as any respectable firm. Why would a partner with a book of business not go to a firm that puts a premium on quality control and he knows there will be associates to truly handle his matters? Why would an assoicate with any options stay or go to DLA when there are firms that will pay that person more and treat him or her better? And why would a client with any smarts at all bring or keep its business at DLA when there are a ton of firms that could do better work for the same $$, and even more that can do the same work for less $$? Answer none would. Which is why DLA has had to slash its overhead. Which is why DLA is sinking. Have fun with your 5k "bonus" -- whether my firm gives me a "bonus" or not, my MARKET RATE is already higher than your base salary and "bonus" -- and I'm at a firm that is not a sinking ship like DLA. Bye bye DLA.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 3:05 PM

Dear 50: you're an idiot. I'm here at DLA with you. I'm just surprised that our firm is getting good p.r. spin for a so called "bonus" after the firm took away a huge chunk of my money in the beginning of the year. If you're happy with this announcement, and happy with your base pay and the way the firm treats us, then you're either a partner or an idiot. Either way, I'm sorry I have to share 1251 6th Ave. with you.
-45

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 3:18 PM

I'm glad that the result of the junior partners who were forced to equitize or leave, deferred associates, reduced salaries and layoffs have lead to a meager bonus for those left standing. I reject your spin, DLA Piper.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 3:25 PM

and i JIZZ IN MY PANTS

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 3:44 PM

To the person with a death wish for DLA Piper - 47?, 52? - how can DLA continue be a sinking ship if they can actually afford to give any amount of bonus?

DLA, like every other firm, was in trouble given the economic climate. DLA was leaking, and so it cut those same crap lawyers that you said it had when all the firms merged in the first place. You can supposedly argue that every one at every one of those firms were crap, but then how did those firms stay around for as long as they did, and how did they have the capital to create a global mega-firm?

No, while your argument about too many bad lawyers taken in with the good had weight prior to the economic collapse, you're kidding yourself if you think DLA didn't use the layoffs as a way to cut the dead weight.

Now that they have, lo and behold, they might actually be on solid economic footing! Enough to give a bonus! So, sorry to tell you, the ship isn't sinking.

And I'm truly sorry if you were in the dead weight that got cut, but from your own argument, you had it coming.

avatar
57 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 3:57 PM

Pay market rate before you trumpet giving a discretionary $5,000 bonus.

avatar
58 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 4:00 PM

David Saint Hubbins = Worst ATL Character

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 5:55 PM

What is DLA's point value? My firm just finished its fiscal year. While the partners are patting themselves on the back for keeping the point value within 10% of 2008, I'm thinking about all the staff and attorneys that were laid off or pushed out. Did you really have to ruin so many careers just to keep your own income from dropping more than 10%?

avatar
60 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 8:10 PM

47 / 52 -

I'm not trying to reveal your secret identity (paranoid much?) but you have posted another 500 word bitter post and still have failed to deny you are a laid off / rejected associate. So I'm pretty sure now that you did not leave the "sinking ship" on your own terms. I hope you have found a job, I truly do, but bitterness is not constructive. I understand you are frustrated, but the horse is dead. Move on. Let me enjoy a piece of good news in an otherwise bleak year.

- 46

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 10:43 PM

Better than nothing.

avatar
62 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, October 5, 2009 10:43 PM

Better than nothing.

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 6, 2009 1:22 AM

please, just give me back my fucking soda and bagels?

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 6, 2009 1:41 AM

The big banks will pay much larger than expected bonuses this year. Expect junior banking associates to get between $100K and $200K bonuses. You heard it here first.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 6, 2009 9:22 AM

I just want to wish Justice Ginsburg good luck, we're all counting on her

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, October 6, 2009 12:09 PM

64 - that's good news, right? Let's face it -- wall street is the only reason we ever saw starting salaries of $160,000 in the first place.

Post Your Comment