Firts!

Suck my ass, Mystal, you bloated racist walrus!

Wow! I never thought it could happen to me!

I'm taking the rest of the day off.

-1

PE,
Do you believe that Republican Congressman Paul Ryan from Wisconsin is a future presidential contender?

Some type of assumption of risk, perhaps?

Or is the dance floor an attractive nuisance?

The DealBreaker post is a thousand times better than this. You suck Elie.

Oh my god!! He flung her "of" a dance floor!! Fat idiot.

What a money hungry cunt!

Hair on her nipples and zits on her box...
In Sarasota, FL Kash is considered a fox.

-Satchel

This lawsuit will be dismissed on a summary judgment motion. If it goes to trial, the jury will come back with no cause. These types of lawsuits will be flooding the dockets as unemployed attorneys turn to handling these frivolous cases. Mr. Watters, a stripper caused me to sustain a hairline fracture on my hip after a lap dance a few months ago. Do you think you can represent me in suing the establishment? I need a response before the SOL runs out.

This comment is addressed to post no. 5.

Nothing and no one from Wisconsin has a bright future.

PE,
You should drown that stripper in your bathtub.

lol "Mancision"

I hope whoever invited Christine to the wedding never speaks to her again!!! In fact, not only does Christine suck, but anyone who would be friends with her probably does too...what a greedy person to sue somoene for an accident, and then ruin the wedding because of it!!!

people who live uptown are awful. look at this woman she is a preppy mess with her unironic headband and such.

uptown = awful.

since when is social host liability a reason passing understanding?

yeah 14, she should be named Christine Circumcision

PE, have you had that hairline fracture on your hip checked out by Doctor Emeritus?

19 = FAIL

I beg to differ with Mr. Emeritus. My administration firmly supports the trial bar in its efforts to redistribute wealth based on the flimsiest reasoning. Ms. Mancision will undoubtedly recover a sizable judgment or settlement from both her ham handed dance partner and, more importantly, the corporate giant Hyatt. In the absence of tort reform, the trial bar will use every weapon in their arsenal to extract funds from the graceless Mr. Graeber and the socially irresponsible Hyatt Corporation. My administration supports any such redistribution of wealth as a matter of principle although the fact that Ms. Mancission is a hedge fund employee weighs against her.

In summation, summary judgment will not be granted against the plaintiff and she will recover a substantial amount of damages (minus 33%).

Barack x.

I've been cut off at weddings before. Never at a Hyatt, though, and never in Morristown.

11 - good call, the fall to the floor probably didn't cause her broken wrist. it's a liability case if anything; reread prosser on torts for class and give me a two page memo on why you have no idea what you're talking about.

she just can't handle a strong man

20, it's an invitation for DE (who I like) to comment, not a joke. But that's apparently too subtle for you, so next time I'll spell it out more literally. 19

This comment is addressed to post no. 23.

You are clearly a law school plebe that has no idea how the law works. The jury will no cause (as in no cause of action you nimrod) this case if it goes to trial.

26 - that's great. jury coming back with no cause means they came back with no cause of action. i think it's time for contracts bucko. where is the special verdict line for "cause of action" anyways?

If she had any alcohol contributory negligence. . . .Oh I hope NJ is a pure state and she's 1% at fault and gets NOTHING. . . .what a waste of carbon this chick is

NJ follows the modified comparative negligence rule (i.e., 51%)

Mystal,

You are a fat talentless walrus monster.

That is all.

From the NY POST comments section

I was at the wedding. I saw him spinning her on the floor and the subsequent fall. The article fails to mention how drunk she was. So much so that the paramedics mentioned their concern over it. I hope I get the opportunity to testify to that fact. What a joke.

I wonder if she has a raging fire bush.

http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:xHiy4E5PRjIJ:www.linkedin.com/pub/christine-mancision/7/99a/281+Christine+Mancision&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Reported only in the police report is the fact that the guy fucked her in the ass right before he flung her to the side of the room as his dick slid out of her ass. Her only complaint at the time was the brievity of the ass fucking.

Partner Emeritus: I received your message but you did not provide an email address for me to send you my examination notes. I trust you will not object to my posting the notes here:

"Can no longer cover up problems. Pervasive and persistent memory loss impacts life across settings. Rambling speech, unusual reasoning, confusion about current events, time, and place. Potential to become lost in familiar settings, sleep disturbances, and mood or behavioral symptoms accelerate. Emotional and behavioral problems which are aggravated by stress and change. Slowness, rigidity, tremors, and gait problems impact mobility and coordination. Need structure, reminders, and assistance with activities of daily living."

Please call my office so JaKe and I can coordinate interviews with the assisted living facilities.

@34 - I think the same thing happened at the rooftop ATL gathering.

Miserable cunt

JaKe,

May I please pleasure myself with your mouth and anus?

Shafeef

This is why nobody likes women.

I am amazed at how little law Mystal, PE, and most others on this site actually know.

Dram shop and social host liability. Google it. There is cause of action against the hotel.

And for you, PE, it might be foreseeable that serving a drunk guy more alcohol would result in a dancing mishap . . . at least to the point of being a question for the jury to decide.

LOL @ Doctor Emeritus, keep it coming

19/25

39, a bitch ain't a woman.

Most people here know about dram shop and host liability. They also know a BS claim when they see one.

good post elie

This comment is addressed to post no. 40 a/k/a Mr. Watters:

So will you undertake my social host liability case against a well established go-go facility? I think ultimately the jury will decide that your client was 51% or more liable for her own injuries and you will lose. Morris County, New Jersey has about 1 lawyer for every 12 residents so I am sure there will be at least one juror that will see this case for what it truly is.

@40

I know a dram shop case and a bunch of crap when I see it. See 31, process information, give me a short 1 paragraph memo on why you are wrong.

Mystal has his period today.

@41 just blow him and get it over with already

Since she's suing any and everybody she thinks she can squeeze a dime out of, why not her sister or new brother-in-law; they're the ones that invited the oaf to the wedding reception! What a money hungry twit!

Mystal=walrus

I'd throw her on the floor too!

48 = 20 = Dick

Unfortunately, neither the plaintiff nor her attorney will be "dancing to the bank." That is all.

I have to say, this lawsuit isn't that crazy. It's not like she is claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress and is too scared to go to weddings now. She did break her wrist. The fact that she danced in college is completely unremarkable. This may be the worst post I've seen on ATL all year. We seem to be getting to high school-level sniping.

@ PE and 46:

She may have been contributorily negligent by being intoxicated, but if she were only 49% negligent, she still recovers. Just because one is drunk doesn't necessarily make her totally--or mostly--at fault. In addition, there has to be causation between her recklessness (i.e. the drinking) and the injury: if he threw her in a drunken rage, her own intoxication may not be relevant.

Moreover, her own intoxication may even be used against the Hyatt as evidence it was negligent in (or even knowledgeable of) its over-distribution of alcohol.

I'm not saying she will win, but I am saying the case is not so cut-and-dry. I don't make the laws, I just enforce them.

- 40

32

Not anymore. I used my baby gravy to put out the fire on her crotch not that long ago. Hopefully she didn't let it get out of control again.

-Satchel

This chick is probably the dumbest mofo ever. First, she is suing her boyfriends boss's brother, nice way to get him fired. Second, she obviously hired Lionel Hutz because she is suing the Hyatt for $1,000,000 (for a broken wrist) because they host weddings. The dram shop act, really? Finally, I am sure she had nothing to drink and will not fold like a cheap suit on cross. Yeah, good luck with this one.

Stuff like this will cause "drink tickets" to be handled out at receptions. *Sigh* There goes the neighborhood.

I wonder if her attorney has had a chance to ass fuck her yet. He should at least get that out of the case, because he isn't likely to get much of a fee.

I bet all joy in this wedding was quickly siphoned out by this lawsuit. Hope people don't blame it on the lawyers.

Mystal, repeat after me: contributory negligence is not a defense to an intentional tort.

Dear Mr. Partner E.:

After practicing 25 years plus, I know exactly how the system works. BigLaw representing the wedding venue will overstaff and milk its client like Elsie the cow.

Comment removed by moderator.

Her Linked In profile included "dance ensmble" while at Gettysberg. She must have focussed her extracurricular efforts at the Alpha Delta Pi Sorority rather than the dance studio. Now works at a hedge fun - well, they ar epretty piggy aboiut everything, so this may be in character,

Her parents must be mortified by the responses (especially on ATL) that this lawsuit is engendering.

Wow, there are a lot of unemployed attorneys hear, especially that weird partner emeritus dude...all he does is post and respond all day. Do you ever go outside?

Wow, there are a lot of unemployed attorneys here, especially that weird partner emeritus dude...all he does is post and respond all day. Do you ever go outside?

Her Linked In profile included "dance ensmble" while at Gettysberg. She must have focussed her extracurricular efforts at the Alpha Delta Pi Sorority rather than the dance studio. Now works at a hedge fun - well, they ar epretty piggy aboiut everything, so this may be in character,

Her parents must be mortified by the responses (especially on ATL) that this lawsuit is engendering.

I'm a big, oafish, hulking man often seen at weddings and other shindigs. I played Football in Middle School and now I'm like a big "Teddy Bear" kind of guy. When awesome songs come on, like House of Pain's "Jump Around", well, I'm gonna grab some girl, twirl her and then Jump Around - on her head, WHATEVER. It's a WEDDING for Chrissakes. Someone said it was impossible for her to twirl in the same direction that I grabbed her wrist, tangling her all up. Yeah and so what? The most important things is that I JUMP AROUND, with full legal impugnity for anyone I assault while Jumping Around.

Glad you all agree.

I don't blame her for suing, and no, I have never met the girl. The drunk bastard broke her wrist and it required very serious surgery. I think if it was your wife or sister or something, you would see this differently. I would kick the guy's ass (I can't believe this board supports some hedge fund asshole) and sue him - both!

69: She is the hedge fund asshole

69,

I agree, but I would not go after the hotel. If I could not get the oaf then I would just leave it alone as far as legal matters.

I had a mancision once, but I had it stitched shut,

This is a tricky case. The claim against Graeber seems to be one for both battery and negligence; all you corporate types with Top tier educations can figure those out.

The interesting part of this case involves the Hyatt's liability. Absent a claim of defective dance floor (which seems omitted) the only remainder avenue towards recompense is dram-shop... i.e. foreseeable that by serving a visibly intoxicated individual, the Hyatt, via its agents, employees and independent contractors and those who held themselves out as the same, increased the likelihood of harm caused by said visibly drunk guy to unsuspecting litigant.

At least in New York, Dram Shop is not an easy theory to win on. However, Hyatt likely has a million dollar liability policy and the holder of the account will not want to risk big exposure, so the case settles for $65,000 after a summary judgment is defeated because the Plaintiff will raise a question of fact as to whether the Hyatt served a visibly intoxicated individual based on the testimony of her equally litigious but slightlly less attractive friend of the Plaintiff.

When will plaintiff's lawyers learn to tell their clients: take down your social media postings BEFORE filing the lawsuit?

"right OFF OF a dance floor" -- stop it with the double prepositions already!!!

GET OFF OF HER!!!!

i'd do her if wasn't so obvious she didn't like it rough. actually, who am i kidding? i'd do her anyways.

I'd do her but it'd take a bottle of champagne and some qualudes.

- Roman

re this lawsuit.......the pussification of America continues. Ridiculous.

Comment censored by commentator.

57 - +1. She will soon be single and her ex-boyfriend unemployed and she totally deserves it if she was hammered enough on the dance floor to be medically concerning, was unable to maintain balance, and is suing the hotel and her dance partner for the resulting injury.

Looks like she broke her face on the dance floor.