Comments on: Adventures in Lawyer Advertising: Texas Firm’s Kiddie Porn Practice Group

By: guest

guest — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:46:34 +0000

What gets me is this law firm shelled out $30,000 and they got a shoddy web site with stock imagery, and that not well thought out obviously. Clearly, whoever selected those photos had no clue how to present the firm to the public. The copy is rife with misspellings, which to me spells only one thing: carelessness. And for that amount of money we would happily have gone through the steps of submitting the site to the State Bar of Texas for the firm.
The takeaway from this? True value of good web design is not measured by its cost. Talk about lawyers having a bad reputation. This gives web designers a bad reputation too.
Joni Mueller
Pixelita Designs
Houston, Texas

By: guest

guest — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:51:06 +0000

This was a pretty snazzy discussion – until that bogus post from lawdogpatriot who is obviously a disgruntled “Texas patriot” who just can’t stand it that the Supreme Court interprets the constitution in a manner different from his own unenlightened interpretation.

By: LawDogPatriot

LawDogPatriot — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:48:52 +0000

The Constitutionality and Legality of the arrest and or enforcement of any Law even if it was only to issue a Traffic Ticket is the question of discussion here.
Has anyone from this Law Firm been arrested for anything? Or is someone just peeved because they did not think of this angle themselves.
Anyone can challenge any Ticket, Arrest and or Incarceration on the grounds that they were not constitutionally legally arrested or not constitutionally legally issued a Traffic Ticket by proper authority.
Please allow me to explain.
Recently in a College Law class that I was taking I asked the Professor who is a Jurist Doctorate in Law and had been a Lawyer for 20 years and a Professor for 10 years the following question;
What in the United States Constitution gives any level of government the Constitutionally Legal Right to create Law Enforcement Agencies and or Departments and for them to enforce the Laws of the United States?
His answer was the 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution which states;
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The Professor claims that because the United States Constitution does not specifically delegate the authority to the United States (Union) to Enforce (envoke) the Law then this authority has been given over to the States because the United States Constitution also says “nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
My Law Professor stated that this is what he was taught in the Law School that he attended and that this is what is taught in all Law Schools and Police Academies. Therefore it must be true.
My problem here is that in the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 8 says “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;”
As it is clearly stated that “The Congress shall have Power…. To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute (enforce) the Laws of the Union (United States)”.
You may use this defense in any Court against any Ticket issued you as well as against any charge that you have been Arrested for.
If you were not arrested by the Militia when called forth to execute the Laws of the Union then you were not constitutionally legally arrested.
We are taking into particular interest here in this subject matter from the lowest level of Law Enforcement being the Village and or Township Police to City Police, County or Parish Police or Sheriff, State Police or Troopers and of course Federal levels which include U.S. Marshall, F.B.I., D.E.A., Homeland Security, Secret Service, N.S.A., C.I.A. and any other secret Police that may be in existence for those conspiracy theorists who may be reading this.
None of these Law Enforcement Agencies and or Law Enforcement Departments is Constitutionally Legal to enforce any Laws.
The United States Constitution delegates solely the right of Law enforcement to the Militia and only when Congress calls them forth to do so.
Disclaimer:
You are welcome to test this understanding of the Law and the United States Constitution at your own risk. I denounce and refuse any and all liability as to someone else’s actions that they may take after reading this my understanding of the Law and the United States Constitution.

By: LawDogPatriot

LawDogPatriot — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:48:38 +0000

By: LawDogPatriot

LawDogPatriot — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:48:12 +0000

By: guest

guest — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:58:59 +0000

I wonder what Lindeman's GPA was at Principia College. One of America's Finest Christian Science Liberal Arts Colleges. http://www.prin.edu

By: guest

guest — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:26:54 +0000

“Why are white people so sexually deviant?”
the same reason blacks are so violent and asian’s just can’t drive to save their own lives.

By: guest

guest — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:45:29 +0000

FINDLAW DID IT!
Er, over a year ago.
Er, and we got all these hits.
Er, and we never looked at the website. That has been up for a year. And had all those hits.
Well, we did, but only at the washing machine full of money. MONEY LAUNDERING! Get it?!? Hahahaha. That’s a good one.

By: guest

guest — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:39:50 +0000

You pay someone to design a website, you’re responsible for what gets put up. Period. If you didn’t review the final product…still your responsibility. I have no beef with criminal defense work. Using images of victimization to promote your business is sleazy.

By: guest

guest — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:18:15 +0000

Anyone wonder how many innocent people have been convicted by jurors who assumed that these guys represent no one but the most egregiously guilty scum available. WTF kind of idiot would put this crap on the web where, in any trial that lasts more than a day, every juror will see or hear about it (at the latest) by lunch on day 2?