Baker Botts to ‘Hybrid-Lockstep’ in 2010
(Plus more news from Reed Smith.)
Baker Botts will be throwing itself into the killing lockstep camp sometime in 2010. A tipster reports:
So, Baker Botts - Houston (should be firmwide, though I don’t have have all the details) is adopting a form of the Reed Smith pay structure. …My understanding may be imperfect, but the notion is that it’s something like a three part system of junior associates, mid level associates, and senior associates, with pay discrepancies laid out among the three. No more lockstep. Unclear what the bonus structure is beyond the nebulous “merit” nonsense.
The Reed Smith structure has received a lot of attention. Last month, we mentioned that Reed Smith will categorize associates as junior, mid-level, or senior associates. But those classifications won’t necessarily be tied to how long an associate has been out of law school. So you could see a fourth-year classified as a senior associate making significantly more than a sixth-year classified as a midlevel associate.
Today, the Legal Intelligencer reports that the Reed Smith plan will also include a cut in associate salaries and billing rates:
Reed Smith has cut starting salaries by about 20 percent for the 51 first-year associates set to start in January and, in turn, is cutting their billing rates by the same margin.
You can read the full Reed Smith memo about its salary and billing rate reductions after the jump.
Will the Reed Smith system become the template for associate compensation at other firms? Let’s take a look at what Baker Botts is planning.
Above the Law talked to a Baker Botts spokesperson about the firm’s hybrid-lockstep plan. Our sources had initially reported that Baker Botts would be moving in this direction before the end of the year, but Baker Botts told us that the move wouldn’t take place until 2010:
We are very much in the beginning/planning stages and only alerted our associates to the concept this past week. Most of your information is correct, with one exception — we are not rolling out the associate program until sometime in 2010. This program will be built upon our 2008 Associates Attributes Model, and will move the associate career track from the current “lockstep” model to a series of levels aligned with the model.
One of our tipsters noted that, thanks to the Reed Smith and Baker Botts decisions, we could be seeing the future of associate compensation at regional firms:
Perhaps this is remarkable insofar as it is indicative of methods that slightly more regional firms (this TX firm, anyway) are using to approach the economic terror in which we currently live. Whatever. Profits per partner at Baker Botts are crazy high. C’est la vie.
The Skaddens and Cravaths of the world might have trouble convincing associates who have been at the firm for years to take less money than an associate who hasn’t put in their time. Will this form of “meritocracy” make more sense at smaller shops? We’ll see if Reed Smith becomes a market leader in associate compensation models.
REED SMITH — STATEMENT — ASSOCIATE COMPENSATION
(November 10, 2009) — Reed Smith LLP today announced a 20% reduction from the 2008 level in the hourly billing rates and annual salary levels for first-year associates in its 15 U.S. offices. These changes will apply to the 51 new lawyers joining the firm in January 2010.
“In response to our clients’ feedback and concerns about driving down the cost of legal services, we wanted to send a clear message that we are listening. So, we have therefore reduced both the rates and the salaries of our incoming first year associates” said Gregory B. Jordan, Reed Smith’s Global Managing Partner. “We have also launched a new competency based development program to better prepare our new lawyers to meet the needs of our clients.”
Annual starting salaries for the new associates beginning in January 2010 will range from $130,000 in major markets such as New York City, Chicago, California, and Washington, D.C. (down from a high of $160,000 in 2008), to $110,000 in Pittsburgh, PA. These actions solely involve the new associates entering the firm’s U.S. offices. Salary levels for 2010 newly qualifying lawyers in the firm’s European, Middle Eastern and Asian offices will be determined in the normal course of business during 2010.
“Our new U.S. starting salaries represent a reasonable and appropriate reset based on today’s economic environment,” said Eugene Tillman, the firm’s Global Head of Legal Personnel. “We believe this will put Reed Smith in a stronger business position in a changing marketplace while still providing fair compensation to our new associates.”
In conjunction with the new compensation, Reed Smith has also reduced the first year associate annual billable hour expectation from 1,900 to 1,700 hours, allowing additional time and opportunity to take advantage of the training and development programs associated with CareeRS™, the firm’s newly launched talent development initiative.
UPDATE: Here’s the internal memo about the Reed Smith changes:
From: Jordan, Gregory B.
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:31:15 AM
To: All Associates
Subject: New Associate Salary and Rates
I wanted to let you know that we are announcing today a 20% reduction in both the billing rates and the starting salaries for our 51 incoming U.S. associates who will join us in January. While the firm is continuing to perform relatively well during the global slowdown, these decisions are in response to our clients’ feedback about the need to drive down the cost of legal services.
While we have decided not to defer further the start date for the 51 members of our incoming class, we are informing them today about these changes. The changes reduce the billing rates and the starting salaries by 20% from the 2008 levels. In our higher salary markets, this means the starting salary will be $130,000.
In addition, we will lower the chargeable hour expectations for first year associates in the U.S. to 1,700 for their first year, after which it will revert to the standard 1,900 level. This will allow the new associates to spend more time on training and development in their important first year. As I hope you appreciate, the recent CareeRS rollout likewise reflects our commitment to help you - our existing associates - develop to your fullest potential.
We have no plans for any further structural reduction of associate salaries. In the U.S., we plan to announce any individual salary changes in February at the same time as we announce 2009 bonus decisions. That way, we will have more complete data on both firm and individual financial performance for 2009. Any individual salary adjustments will be retroactive to January 1. Associates in France and Germany will receive 2010 salary and 2009 bonus determinations at the same time as the U.S. For London, Greece and Middle East associates, 2009 bonus decisions will be communicated in February, and the next salary review will occur as customary effective July 1. We will determine starting salaries for newly qualified associates in the London office in the normal course of business in 2010.
We believe the changes to the billing rates and the starting salaries we are announcing today further demonstrate that we are focused on our client relationships and listening to our clients. Thanks to all of you for your hard work and your outstanding service, especially during this difficult year. If you have any questions about today’s announcements, please feel free to contact your Practice Group Leader, your Office Managing Partner, Nicky Dingemans, or Mike Lynch.
Reed Smith Cuts First-Year Salaries, Billing Rates by 20 Percent [Legal Intelligencer]




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
First.
Mission Accomplished!
For many years I have been preaching that our business needs to adopt the "hybrid tough love" approach to deal with associates and compensation issues. Although mostly non-peer firms are adopting my model, I feel somewhat redeemed that my ideas are being executed nationwide as an ameliorative measure to Obama's anemic economy. With CSM's commendable step to curtail bonuses, is there a peer firm who will finally break ranks and adopt my "hybrid tough love" so that all can follow?
BB to 120!
Baker Botts to TTT
validation for PE!
At this point, it's just dumb to talk about "killing lockstep." There is no threat to lockstep at good firms.
Que la chupen, y que la sigan mamando.
Que la chupen, y que la sigan mamando.
5
Yes, but they sure are acting like they are FTT
This would never happen at MakoProphet
Baker Botts hates black people.
Black people get angry.
White people beat up by Black people.
is this reed smith pay cut on top of the 10% pay cut ATL reported on in May?
http://abovethelaw.com/2009/05/reed_smith_salary_cut.php?show=comments
PE, where do you propose peer firms find qualified applicants in a few years if they lower pay significantly (less than $125k), but law school still requires students incur around $120-200k in debt?
Won't the bright potential lawyers of the future simply pursue other opportunities?
-Student-loan-tution-inflation-deathspiral-SECURE
Reed Smith is cheap! It provides a nice business example of why you turn a bunch of mediocre attorneys and firms into a great firm just by stitching them together. Stop pretending. They have managed to pick up some quality office over seas, but the CA offices, of which I am quite familiar, are stocked with second rate partners feeding off of the scraps from the extremely few rain makers.
This 20% cut in first year hours is not help either, the current first years run around hunting for busy work they can overbill on and are all coming in below 80% of their hours
Only Elie wouldn't believe meritocracy is the best way to evaluate compensation. Way to go retard!!!
13 - No. This is down 20% from 2008 levels, not from the 2009 reduced salaries
Dont worry so much about getting your pay cut. You will make a lot of it back when you get your half cravath bonus.
The idiotic memes spread like wildfires on this site.
Meritocracies are for white people who work hard.
For the rest of us "un-fire-ables," lockstep is the only guarantor of continued prosperity in the face of otherwise harsh market realities.
LOCKSTEP SOCIAL JUSTICE SECURE
14 is on the money, so to speak. Goldman Sachs is already recruiting heavily at top law schools, which (a) offers a nice alternative to an uncertain big law career for debt-bearing students, and (b) will create some kind of a price "floor," so to speak, above which top firms will need to stay in order to attract the kind of talent they need to maintain their preeminence. Granted, lawyers are not in the profession for the money, per se, but paying off debt has to weigh heavily when career options are evaluated.
I blame Richard Glanton.
"of cloudless climes and starry skies."
- Shafeef
This comment is addressed to post no. 14.
Since when are qualified applicants ready to practice law? Foreign based attorneys receive practical training as part of their integration into the legal profession, often without compensation. These attorneys are willing to work for much less and produce acceptable work product at a fraction of the overhead. Consider the following:
American Educated Associate: 2,100hrs. x $400/hourly rate=$840,000.00 minus $160,000 salary minus $144,000 (benefits, pro-rated salary/benefits for secretary, pro-rated rent, perks, etc.)=$536,000.00 profit
Foreign Based Attorney: 2,100hrs x $300/hourly rate=$630,000 minus $50,000 salary minus 0 (no overhead)=$580,000.00 profit.
Conclusion: A foreign based attorney nets a $44,000 mark up on profit per associate over the American Educated attorney.
This isn't so bad. Comp lowered to 130K but billable hours are 1700 vs. 2000 at most firms.
Foreign based attorneys don't have the debt associated with the longer education American attorneys are required to receive.
For example, a British solicitor is only required to obtain a bachelor's degree - hence the need for more education after graduation as what we would think of as an intern.
14 here. PE, you ignore a few pertinent details:
(1) A foreign based attorney cannot do many duties required of an attorney, even an associate. While a foreign based attorney may save $44k for basic research and document review (and perhaps simple legal drafting), they are incapable of making any appearance other than a CourtCall. Also, you ignore the overhead required to ship documents to the foreign attorney, or pay an American worker to scan and transmit them.
(2) Some associates have to matriculate into the ranks of partners. You will not bring them in from India. Thus, you will need some American-based associates. These are the ones which will be driven off if tuition continues to increase and salary does not offer a commensurate "carrot on a stick."
That is all.
Foreign based attorneys don't have the debt associated with the longer education American attorneys are required to receive.
For example, a British solicitor is only required to obtain a bachelor's degree - hence the need for more education after graduation as what we would think of as an intern.
Hybrid tough love is PE and his Real Doll in the back of an electric-powered Honda Civic.
14: correctomundo. Also, the "cream of the crop" should pursue other professions. Where they go depends upon what industry is hot. If law school no longer makes sense financially, why would anyone go there? Fewer lawyers and law schools is not a bad thing.
This has been in the works for a while at BB - they rolled out a set of model associate attributes that broke associates into three tiers (junior, mid-level, and senior) last year and now they are aligning compensation accordingly. It's actually pretty smart: a merit-based compensation system with clearly defined standards. Now the firm can be more clear about what they expect out of associates for them to advance to the next level.
BB remains... underrated.
So is Baker Botts cutting salaries like RS or are they just altering the format of raises?
Oh, no! Mi salario ha sido comido por una morsa!
30 - Baker Botts is a decent place and has some great practice groups (Houston Energy and Corporate, NY and Dallas IP, DC Appellate). But BB is very cheap with its people at every opportunity - charging more for health insurance, paying lower bonuses, and providing fewer perks than comparable law firms.
33:
I'm curious to know which "comparable firms" have better benefits packages and in what respects. I'm not implying that it's not true, but I sort of assumed that V&E, Fulbright, and BB all had comparable compensation packages.
How is it going contract doc review monkeys?
Learn a new language, it will open up a new world of doc review possibilities.
I'd take $130,000 for a 1700-billable year
Way to be a trend-setter in an industry that is 20 years behind other service industries (e.g., consulting, accounting). Reed Smith should be applauded for having the guts to do what they're doing.
BB has been moving towards this for a while now, so this probably isn't a purely economic decision (though it might've been expedited by economic considerations).
Assuming their plan is to modify compensation increases and not to simply hide a pay cut for junior associates behind a new "compensation structure," I have no problem with this and I expect it will spread through the industry fairly quickly.
"The Skaddens and Cravaths of the world might have trouble convincing associates that have been at the firm for years to take less money than an associate who hasn’t put in their time. Will this form of “meritocracy” make more sense at smaller shops?"
Why would a more experienced associate expect to make more than a less experienced, but more competent associate?
Market based compensation should be 100% merit based.
9: D10S is everywhere... aguante!
I summered at reed smith (DC) ... I certainly dodged a bullet. On top of being elitist, racist and one of the worst working experiences I've ever had in my life, now they're cutting salaries for the associates they treat like crap! Their behavior at fordham was not a slip up, it's indicative of the firm I saw this summer.
Thank God I found another firm in this legal climate ...
To all persons starting or considering reed smith ... make other plans if you can... it's not worth it ... you'll hate your summer and then you might not get an offer ... their offer rate is 25% ... stay away if you can ...
#33 is correct; BB is CHEAP!!! Until management learns to treat their employees well, BB will always be second tier.
Reed Smith is a cesspool. Worse than Latham in the sense that the laid off first years to hire lawyers from Thelen and Heller after their respective collapses.
The 1700 billable requirement is only for first-years, who don't have nearly the pressure to hit their billable mark - whether the firm sets it at 1700 or 1900.
Just a way for the firm to justify lowering salaries, since it already knew that no first-year would bill 1900 hours anyway.
This would never happen at Mr. Pomeroy and Mr. Johnson's firm.
This would never happen at Mr. Pomeroy and Mr. Johnson's firm.
#41 is a fake. No chance he/she summered at DC this year. Elitist? Give me a break. Racist????? Managing Partner of the office is an AA, 25% of the summers were AA, and the office (mainly through the managing partner) is completely plugged into the DC AA community's business, political and social scene. $130K for 1700 hours sounds ok to me ...
by the way, how is Reed Smith a regional firm? the biggest office is in London and the best office is in Hong Kong ...
Dewey & LeBoeuf lays off attorneys..................
Does anyone know what the compensation will be for the rest of the first tier, and for the second and third tier as well?
# 47 - Only 1 out of 8 summers in DC was AA - this does not equal 25%. Apparently mediocre attorneys can't do math either...
41 - Must not have gotten an offer. Sorry. :)
Reed Smith is clearly having major problems. You guys can spin it all you want. But a firm doesn't take these types of actions unless it's absolutely necessary.
Reed Smith in 2009 = Wolf Block in 2008
(1) Happy to have my offer at Reed Smith - a few hours after getting my phone call yesterday, some good friends got their calls from Katten rescinding their offers
(2) There are only 51 of us RS 1st years in the entire world, I feel more secure than I would have if I accepted my summer offers last year from much more prestigious firms
(3) Happy the billable expectation was reduced: though I'm pretty sure to earn a small bonus you have to work just as hard as at any other firm for 'quality hours'
(4) WTF - Can Greg Jordan do math? sure $130k is about 20% less than $160k, but 1700 hrs is about 10% less than 1900, not 20% as claimed in the press release
55- Your post reads like someone who is scared shitless and trying to justify his/her recent career decisions, with confusing results. Save that for the head-shrinker or your parents.
Also I want to call shenanigans here- you don't have multiple "good friends" at Katten who had their offers rescinded only hours after you got the news from Reed Smith.
Reed Smith is very busy these days actually. I don't know why they want to take the lead with all this bad PR, but ....
56 - take your head out of your ass, you get rescinded or something?
If you are a first year associate at any 'big' firm, you'd have to be retarded not to be scared
34, I am not as sure about Fulbright, but V&E is much more generous with its associates than BB. For starters, V&E pays for Texas Bar dues and parking, which is more than I can say for BB!
BB pays for bar dues.