haha, I was just reading the article, I've never actually tried to be first.

-first?

Is everyone at lunch?

-first?

2: fail.
1: this was one of the few times that "firsty" would have been appropriate.

Elie- do you propose only the innocent get representation?

LateralLink must love this being posted right above their "It's Always Sunny in Texas" ad. Nice!

"Hormones racing at the speed of light
But that don't mean it's gonna be tonight."

And if you got a DUI, you'd be singing a different tune, I'm sure. This guy shouldn't be a target, he's just doing his job.

Elie - if it were alleged that police were targeting a minority group (rather than wealthy) for selective enforcement would you be so blase?

You, sir, are a transparently hypocritical walrus.

Crim defense lawyers (I am not one) serve a very important role, even those that manage to get clearly guilty people off--they (hopefully) keep the government honest and make it work its tail off before it can deprive you of your liberty (or life).

Elie,

Taken to its logical conclusion, you are against the adversarial legal system and feel that if one is charged one is guilty. How very fascist of you. Do you support shutting down the Public Defenders office too?

Substitute "Flood" with "FTT corporate criminal enterprise enablers," "drunk people/drivers" with "CEOs, "and "baby prosecutors" with "the SEC," and you've got an even more true story.

Funny how Elie's willing to cut down Flood, but not the FTT corporate enablers that kill far more economic lives than drunk drivers each year.

Who cares about the moral slant? People will pay the guy to do what he does.

most people find black criminal suspects to be an unsympathetic clientele, which is why it's ok for them to go straight to jail without trial or counsel.

Shafeef and I recently tag-teamed Kash. We took turns eating out her ass. We both detected a crusty brown sediment during our feast. I think it was a combination of mold and ear wax. Shafeef believes it was dried shit.

5 and 11: what part of "Everybody is of course entitled to a competent defense," do you not understand?
-- Elie

He went to the same law school as me. Go, TTT <3<3<3 !!!

Well said 10!

- not 10 and not a crim defense attny

15 - did you felch with Kash?

16- Elie - I must say for the first time - you eviscerated 5/11. FTW, nicely played...nicely played...

16,

That’s a good argument. But aren’t we fundamentally talking about black suspects walking around and potentially raping or killing people? We aren’t exactly dealing with a sympathetic clientele.

Elie - congrats on your recent speech!!!

http://www.junglewalk.com/popup.asp?type=a&AnimalAudioID=6056

16: "Aren't we fundamentally talking about drunk people driving cars..............."

It's a fine line between a .06 and a .08. I wonder how Mr. Holier Than Thou would like it if he were stopped after having a glass of wine with dinner, and accused by a crooked cop of being much more intoxicated than he really was.

Is he really rocking a fauxhawk or is his hair just piled up in the center?

Why do black people always give white people dirty looks on the subway?

Is that a fauxhawk or a Moehawk?

Elie,

You followed that up with:

"But aren’t we fundamentally talking about drunk people driving cars and potentially injuring or killing people?"

I took that to mean that the people charged shouldn't have a chance at defense because they were endangering the public. Please feel free to clarify.

-11

His paralegal (see article) is not bad. Decent rack. Kind of like a plump(er) Kash.

Elie--what's the point of this blog? A lawyer acknowledges that most people acquitted of drunk driver were, in fact, drunk driving. Is that really a surprise? Then why try to make a big deal out of it with all the sanctimonious language?

You can't try to stir up a false controversy and then point to a single sentence as an excuse.

I wonder if it is legal or ethical to "economically" profile someone? It wouldn't exactly be the same as a pretextual stop based on race.

16: That's like when Glenn Beck takes back everything he says with a quick half sentence after making an absurd claims.

Although, it's hard to imagine how a prosecutor can screw up a DUI case... either you were above the legal limit while the car was in your control or you weren't. I guess it has to do with how testing is done? It's the only avenue I could imagine.

A friend of my family was sentenced to 8 years in prison for a simple DUI... .1 where the legal limit is .08. There were rumors that the judge recently had a family member die in a DUI accident. Federal habeas appeals went nowhere. It was awful. Dude has his entire life derailed because of a judge on a mission. Granted he was guilty, even pleaded guilty. But lawyers like this, as scummy as the rest of us decide they may be, are still important.

Elie, take off your MADD hat you douchebag shill.

Elie - You're ridiculous. Why is representing drunk drivers reprehensible while representing rapist, drug dealers and other criminals who can't afford it noble? It's the justice system, either everyone has a right to counsel or only the innocent have a right.

If it wasn't clear before, it is now: Elie has no understanding at all of the profession he so breathlessly covers.

Mystal--Neither you nor your racist dad ever had a few drinks and then drove home? Be honest, race bater.

Elie's response:

http://www.junglewalk.com/popup.asp?type=a&AnimalAudioID=6056

They could stop DWI in an instant if they wanted to by requiring alcohol testers in cars. Why don't they? Easy - because it is EXTREMELY PROFITABLE for the state to issue hundreds of thousands of fines, each in the thousands of dollars, every year. It's about the politicians and bureaucrats wanting more revenue, plain and simple.

This is no different than the way the state deals with smoking if you think about it for a second - they have to talk it down in order to justify the ever-rising so called sin taxes, but if everyone stopped smoking tomorrow, the loss of revenue would just result in them finding something new to vilify and tax.

Mystal, suck my ass, you obese race bating baby eating WALRUS!

"Your tax dollars hard at work." --> stupid comment

"Hey, lawyers gotta eat to" --> stupid comment

"If the prosecutors didn't suck" -->see above

Next time, just post a link to vaguely interesting stories like the above rather than giving us your "perspective."

THIS IS NOT JOURNALISM PEOPLE!!!!

*****David Lat - if you read this article, ask yourself if you want your name to be associated with this crap. Elie really should be paid for the hour he spent on this "story."

Thanks

Does Attorney Flood have PacMan or Defender in his office? Hard to tell from the photo.

"Your tax dollars hard at work." --> stupid comment

"Hey, lawyers gotta eat to" --> stupid comment

"If the prosecutors didn't suck" -->see above

Next time, just post a link to vaguely interesting stories like the above rather than giving us your "perspective."

THIS IS NOT JOURNALISM PEOPLE!!!!

*****David Lat - if you read this article, ask yourself if you want your name to be associated with this crap. Elie really should be paid for the hour he spent on this "story."

Thanks

"Your tax dollars hard at work." --> stupid comment

"Hey, lawyers gotta eat to" --> stupid comment

"If the prosecutors didn't suck" -->see above

Next time, just post a link to vaguely interesting stories like the above rather than giving us your "perspective."

THIS IS NOT JOURNALISM PEOPLE!!!!

*David Lat - if you read this article, ask yourself if you want your name to be associated with this crap.

Thanks

"Your tax dollars hard at work." --> stupid comment

"Hey, lawyers gotta eat to" --> stupid comment

"If the prosecutors didn't suck" -->see above

Next time, just post a link to vaguely interesting stories like the above rather than giving us your "perspective."

THIS IS NOT JOURNALISM PEOPLE!!!!

*David Lat - if you read this article, ask yourself if you want your name to be associated with this crap.

Thanks

37 - um, maybe its because we don't live in a nanny state that treats all adults, no matter how responsible, as if they were three year olds. Well, Californians might. But the rest of us still live in a free society - and we're gd proud of it too.

Elie (16) - 11 here:

Maybe you have reading comprehension issues - I raised a cry against your blase attitude. I fail to see how your attempt at a rebuttal ("Everybody is of course entitled to a competent defense,") suceeds in defeating my argument.

I reiterate - you are a hypocrit.

Elie (16) - 11 here:

Maybe you have reading comprehension issues - I raised a cry against your blase attitude. I fail to see how your attempt at a rebuttal ("Everybody is of course entitled to a competent defense,") suceeds in defeating my argument.

I reiterate - you are a hypocrite.

"But aren’t we fundamentally talking about drunk people driving cars and potentially injuring or killing people? Attorneys like Flood aren’t exactly dealing with a sympathetic clientele."

Good to know that Elie is against allowing DD defendants their day in court, but I'm sure he is all in favor of those murder defendants having top-flight representation and wails against the system being unfair to capital defendants. Better 100 poor murderers go free than 1 rich drunk driver?

A personal message to T. Flood.

Although you are not a peer, I congratulate you on your "success." You obviously have a sense of fashion (nice suit by the way); however, I believe you may be color blind as you do not know how to match ties with suits (stripped tie + stripped suit=style faux paus). Also, I would suggest a different haircut. Lastly, you are trying too hard to project a successful image. In Texas, wearing a Baume & Mercier watch and toting a Mont Blanc pen may impress your simple minded friends and family. However, next to my Patek Philippe and Visconti pen, your possessions are mere accoutrements of a pauper trying to appear to a member of high society. That is all.

30,

I don't know about unethical with respect to the targeted individual, but I think it is unethical for a police officer to essentially cherry pick his targets for the purposes of bilking the system for overtime spent sitting around in court. Yes those rich drunk drivers are dangerous, but what about all the less affluent neighborhoods who aren't being patrolled as often because the cops are looking to bust a fat cat.

I'm not a big fan of Elie, but I think the point he was making here, is that the lawyer plainly stated that most of their clients were actually drunk. Drunk drivers kill people all the time. Seriously dangerous. And if *lost* someone to a DD you would feel differently. There shouldn't be tricky ways to get out of punishment for someone who legitimately drove drunk and killed or paralyzed someone. The friend mentioned above in post 31 with 8 years in jail deserves it if he killed someone. if not, then I agree that was overly severe and unjust. I agree with poster 10 to, but the general point Elie made is worth mentioning.

Obviously only black people have a right to defense counsel. Most drunk drivers are white because black people can't afford cars. Therefore, people accused of drunk driving should not be allowed to retain counsel.

I would suck a date out of a dead camels ass if it gave me the chance to make sexy sexy with Kash and her magical beaver.

ShaFeef

drunk driving is a victimless "crime"

uh, he name is Elie. And he can't practice. and he's doughy. and bitchy. you think he is smart?

Regarding drunk driving. Breathalyzers are blatant 5th Amendment violations. Ever wonder why cops who are pinched dor DUI always refuse to take them, even in NY where refusal=admission of guilt (another unconstitutional statute). .08 should not be agst the law. Bad driving period shd be against the law, whether done DUI or not.

uh, his name is Elie. And he can't practice. and he's doughy. and bitchy. you think he is smart?

uh, his name is Elie. And he can't practice. and he's doughy. and bitchy. you think he is smart?

But the real question is this: Of the people reading this in Houston, how many of you just put his name and number in your cell phone?

43-44,

Who the F told you this was supposed to be journalism? This is a blog idiot. If you want journalism, there are several places you can go ...

Ship all muslims back to africa.

Um Tyler Flood is HOT

No...YOU'RE out of control, occifer.

Oh and it's 42-43, sorry 44!

I tooootally agree with Elie. It is definitely a more noble pursuit to force top-flight prosecutors to fully prove a case using reliable evidence when you're defending murderers like OJ Simpson. You HAVE to draw the line, though, when it comes to vigorously defending accused drunken drivers who were arrested based on unreliable evidence and subjective determinations by a self-interested police officer. And preying on poor young prosecutors! The nerve!

Hahaha... from his bio:

"There are two types of lawyers, Lions and Lambs. Lions fight and Lambs get SLAUGHTERED."

http://www.whiteflood.com/trial_attorneys/trial_attorney_flood.html

Ridiculous. I agree the dude is hot.

Elie,

You said, "Really? You think people would be concerned by your practice of setting drunk drivers free to careen down the streets of your city? Who would have a problem with that? " and followed it up with "Everybody is of course entitled to a competent defense."

Reconcile the statements.

Is DUI the only crime (other than traffic speeding) where guilt or innocence is based on a mechanical measurement (BAC)? Without measuring BAC, it is impossible to determine whether a person is at .06 or .12.

Most people who drink socially and drive a car have probably driven with a BAC of 0.08+ on multiple occasions, but did not feel or appear drunk.

Considering the increasingly devastating stigma of DUI, everyone with a reputation to protect should keep and use a portable BAC breathalyzer in their glove box.

http://www.junglewalk.com/popup.asp?type=a&AnimalAudioID=6056

http://www.junglewalk.com/popup.asp?type=a&AnimalAudioID=6056

I am fascinated by this guy.

50,

In addition to drunk drivers, know who else kill people every day? murderers. should they also not get lawyers?

Obama says "don't jump to conclusions about Ft. Hood shooting"!

I think the Hasan yelled Alahu Ahkbar as he was slaughtering people, not L'chaim!!!!

Islam - TTT religion.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091106/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_fort_hood

50,

In addition to drunk drivers, know who else kill people every day? -muslims. should they also not get raped?

71 - no; they should get Elie.

Today is officially punch a Muslim day.

Dick Cheney

Pointless post . . . great advertising for Tyler Flood, though!

KASH BEAVER-SHOT:

http://redtube.com/12255

9- When was the last time you heard the wealthy who are concerned about being selectively targeted complain about racial profiling?

Ironically call people hypocrites much?

Everyone is so self righteous. FTW.

Okay, time to ban Douchie - posting porn links. Seriously, tool, get a life.

PE (40),

This isn't 1952, you know nothing of modern style. Everyone knows that a two stripe combination is perfectly acceptable so long as the stripes are different sizes. Additionally, no one outside of European royalty would recognize your Patek Philippe, so your efforts to set yourself apart from the common man would go completely unnoticed. That is all.

-Clinton Kelly

Go fuck yourself with this ridiculous post. Its the job of defense attorneys to do their best for their clients, whether the are guilty are not. What would you rather they act as one-man juries and lay down when they think their client is guilty? How old are you? Are you really this fucking naive? Fucking loser.

"aren’t we fundamentally talking about drunk people driving cars and potentially injuring or killing people"
The key word being "potentially." It should be a crime to "potentially" cause harm.

The article is really embarrassing to ATL. Why single out DWI defenses? There are so many heinous charges - child molestation, rape -- for which legal defenses make you go "hmmn." How childish to whine about returning drunk drivers to the road and not even mention the same quandary for defending *all* icky crimes. Ever heard of public defenders? I can't believe Lat lets this stuff through.

65 - thanks for posting that. He named his kid March? March Flood?

I would hit that very very hard

http://www.whiteflood.com/images/texas_injury_attorney_flood.jpg

61, 65, 85: Slow Friday, Lat?

This comment is directed to number 48, Partner Emeritus:

You may pretend to own a Patek, but your inability to spell "striped" - indeed, twice in the same sentence - demonstrates you to be an idiot, no matter how hard you may try to acquire the veneer of a "peer" attorney. That is all.

Picture of the dude next to his urinal ad:

http://www.houstonpress.com/photoGallery/index/?section=news&gallery=1520379&position=5&page=1

The article is hilarious:

"His monthly tab at CVS is through the roof for all the hair products he purchases"

"His wife has one drawer in the closet, and he has Drawer-sssssssss"

Hahaha --- 88, Elie should have included those gems

The same is true of the plaintiff bar. They make tons of $$$ because BigLaw has no real trial lawyers left. Just overpaid pretend lawyers called "litigators".

Don't feed the trolls, Elie.

Douchebag 78 - try to make sense. It makes it so much more meaningful for the reader.

Toodles,

9

Carrie Prejean in "God helps those, who help themselves"

Oh give me a break. DUI arrests have gotten completely out of control due to MADDs crazy overbearing campaign. If you have 2 glasses of wine at a nice dinner and drive home, which all of us always do - and which is not a bad thing b/c we are able to drive and not too drunk, you can get a DUI. That's ridiculous. These people are drunk and potentially killing people? Give me a break. Total overreaction. Elie, you have fallen prey to the marketing campain of overcriminalizing our behaviors!

94- Amen!

I wonder if Flood's prestigious firm can get this lady off:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2009/11/03/2009-11-03_wisconsin_woman_mary_strey_calls_911_to_report_herself_as_drunk_driver.html

PE, will knowing how to spell "striped" help me get a job at a peer law firm? Please advise.

Carrie Prejean in "Watch me make my hand disappear"

Can't we just agree that drug peddlers, rapists, and murderers deserve vigilant legal representation, and drunk drivers do not?

Or do I have to spell it out in black and white?

There was a brilliant, but habitually drunk attorney I had the pleasure of knowing (now dead), Vincent Lyons, who was so intoxicated during a DUI trial that when summoned into chambers by the court, Vince missed the door and walked into the all in front of the jury--who of course acquitted his client.

Regarding Ellie's ethical dilemma, in this day and age of pro prosecution juries and scientific testing, if the police and prosecutors are so incompetent that the occasional guilty drunk driver slips through the bear trap--so be it.

Regarding Ms. Prejean, there is a far more pleasing photograph posted here:

http://blogonaut-blogonaut.blogspot.com/2009/11/pageant-lawyer-uses-sex-tape-to-force.html

This would never happen in Texas.

Oh wait . . . .

Guys in my high school used to drink and drive all the time. It was no big deal.

I AM WALRUS WATCH ME EAT !!!

Could he be any cuter?!?!

I am surprised that nobody has commented about the part of the article where Flood admits he wrote a review of himself on Yahoo!

I found it really cringe-inducing that Flood openly admits to manipulating people when it comes to things like toning down his flashiness for the jury, preying on the "baby" prosecutors, and other things. You can tell the other DUI attorneys in the article are a lot smarter about the things they tell the reporter because they attack the flaws of Flood and the police but they don't reveal too much about their legal strategies in court. I guess Flood is the type of attorney who thinks any publicity is good publicity. However, it's not really good for your business to reveal your whole set of playing cards to the whole Houston metropolitan area.

From the article, this guy sounded like the biggest D-bag . C'mon, reading the jurors to decide whether you should sport a Montblanc or a Bic? What a sleazebag. "I'm fighting for your constitutional rights. . ." what sanctimonious bullshit.

Read the article - this guy is every negative stereotype of lawyers - and remember that when you tell people you are a lawyer, this is the image that pops into their head.

This guy represents people who ADMIT THAT THEY WERE DRUNK. The biggest profile of one of his clients was someone who blazed through a light and T-boned a police car, with bloodshot eyes and slurred speech. And he was acquitted. And this self-entitled motherfucker bitched to the reporter about how his life was turned upside down because he had to breathe into a breathalyzer to START HIS CAR for nine months and was forced to *gasp* drive to work instead of biking a few times a week.

Granted, it's Houston Press, whose articles are written by people with about a 15 year old's maturity level.

My wife and I drive the streets of Houston, and our kids probably will someday too and it's scary how much drunk driving goes on here.

I'm not saying drunk drivers don't deserve a defense. And the article hints at (but does not attempt to verify or explore) flaws in the justice system re: DWIs (e.g. that cops target wealthy drivers who are likely to go to trial so they get overtime for testifying, that breathalyzers are "junk science"). But I see the little white flowered crosses on the side of the road all along the highways in this state and they weigh more heavily on my mind than cops profiling BMWs and Infinitis on Washington Avenue.

I also found his Twitter account that seems to be abandoned.

http://twitter.com/DWIGOD

Such an interesting username.

But according to Trichter, the brunt of the state's abuse of power soon shifted to DWI, for which he estimates more innocent people are arrested than any other crime combined. Trichter paints breathalyzers as junk science, field sobriety tests as outrageous affairs cooked up to incriminate, and forced blood tests, which take place during no-refusal weekends and have recently been permitted in any stop involving a child passenger or an injury, as a menacing specter for a modern democracy.

I had a friend arrested for DUI because he was entering an address into the GPS in his Porsche on the freeway and swerved. He had zero alcohol in his blood stream, only very low levels of common prescription antidepressants, and was plainly not intoxicated at the time. (Either that or, if a low level of Prozac is intoxicating, half the housewives in Orange County are DUI every day...)

The officer completely and utterly fabricated several parts of the report he wrote in trying assert that my friend was intoxicated before the blood work came back.

The DA chose to go to trial anyway, apparently either utterly incompetent or wanting trial practice no matter what, because the state's own expert would not testify on cross that he thought the levels of drugs in the defendant's bloodstream would render him intoxicated.

My friend was acquitted, but not before spending over $20,000 on a trial. The cop took the pay to go to court, perjured himself on the stand, then retired the following month.

The system of DUI enforcement is very, very broken.

Dear 109:

From what you describe, the system of DUI enforcement works very well.

The innocent are cut loose.

Their lawyers are well paid , if not well paid, for their time + have the bragging rights.

Lying cops lose.

The baby DDA in your friend’s case took more shit in the 72-160 hours following his ignominious loss than you could ever imagine.

Your friend saved at least what he spent in attorneys fees and costs in the increase in insurance premiums and fines he would otherwise have paid.

Its pretty much win, win from what I gather.....

BTW, to the poster willing to suck a date out of a dead camel’s ass in exchange for a date with Kash, I doubt she would appreciate you desperation or allow you to kiss her with that mouth afterward.

Oh, great article Elie! A lawyer getting drunk clients off the hook for DWI. What a scumbag, huh? Nothing like those Big SHIT LAW minions pushing shit paper, helping take down a world economy while lining their pockets.

I can definitely see how this guy would upset you. I mean for the love of GOD... a lawyer actually defending his client. What a fucking douchebag!

Tick-tock till the next Craveth story leaks in!! Happy masturbating!!

Are you f---ing joking 110, or just a moron?

You spend $20,000+ defending yourself (plus take substantial time off from work unpaid) from a false charge of which you are obviously, abjectly innocent, based on perjured testimony for which the cop pays no price, for a system which knowingly falsely charges people for profit, and you call this "win win" and the system working? How would you feel if you had to empty your savings defending a charge of which you were totally and clearly innocent? The guy should never have been arrested, and even if he was, once the blood work came back, the charges should have been immediately dropped. The fact that they weren't dropped was bad faith on the part of the DA, who didn't have a snowball's chance on trial and was knowingly trying to extract a plea from an innocent defendant.

I take it you're a prosecutor based on your attitude, your statement about the guff you're sure the DDA got, and the fact that you refer to him as a DDA (much more precise than most posters here, who have no exposure to prosecutors).

Let's hope a member of your family is subsequently arrested and then tried all the way to the end for something it's obvious they're not guilty of and you spend the bulk of your savings defending them, and then you can call it "win-win." You are disgusting and prosecutors like you who knowingly victimize innocent people are a blight upon the bar and this country.

Lawyers are whores, so what's the big deal. Getting drunks back on the road is nothing compared to getting child molestors back on the street to make nice with small children. How about organized crime, terrorists, black people, you name it, and scumbag attorney-whores will represent them for whatever price the market will bear. Yes, we're all whores, even though some of us might represent nice white folks in suits.

First off...I personally know Tyler Flood and he is an excellent defense attorney. Everyone seems to forget this is a Houston Press article. He was followed around for months and only a tiny portion of his everyday life was captured in the article. Tyler does not brag about putting drunk drivers back on the street. His only concern is to make sure that his client's rights are protected. I think it's easy to judge when you read an article. I also think that it is interesting that no one is interested in the positive aspects of the article. Like the fact that one of his peers quoted, "he tries cases and he wins." How about the end when he is arguing with HPD to allow him into the blood draw area on a Saturday night to watch the procedure on a no refusal weekend. Any other defense attorneys fighting to get into the PD on a Saturday night in order to make sure that the PD is following procedures??? Nope. There are a lot of people talking bad about a person that they don't even know. It shouldn't matter how much he spends at CVS or where he advertises. I think some of his competition is jealous. He "did come out of nowhere." The man is a marketing genius. People can talk all the shit they want...his face is everywhere...his name is everywhere...he has a great reputation as a trial attorney. He is respected by judges and court staff. Anyone who has been around the press knows that comments and quotes get chopped up and mis-used. I have never heard Tyler bad mouth any other attorney. Another misquote..."I can't help it" refers to not being about to help texting clients to follow up...not that he can't help bad mouthing other attorneys. Tyler never bad mouthed anyone in front of the reporter that was a comment from another attorney that is competing with T for business. Of course, some of the other DWI attorneys around town are jealous. The man knows how to market and earn business. He is a good salesman with a great service for sale. If he knew the man...you would like him. It's easy to cast judgment on others...we need to look at ourselves and make sure our words arent turning us into hypocrites.

Keep your head up T!!! You are a great lawyer who deserves a lot of respect. People just don't know how to handle an attorney that advertises, has a high volume of clients but still fights each and every case until the end. I walk next to you with my head held high any day!!!

Yep 84 - March Flood, and my four year old's name is Senator! And by the way - its a Golden Tee in my office, no pac-man or defender! These are all very interesting comments. Duly noted. No offense intended by this article!

T. Flood

#114 - Hey, Tyler!

Seriously, the story was entertaining, but I hope all those drunk drivers quoted will stay off the roads whenever they tie one on (this means you, Sergei).

The Texas lawyer with the slogan, "Representing those who mess with Texas" beat Tyler Flood in the catchphrase contest.

Wow, this guy managed to throw all prosecutors, a judge, all court staff, and all other defense attorneys under the bus in one fluff article. Well done, counsel. See how that works for you.

114 = Tyler Flood

118 = try again...not Tyler Flood

http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2009/11/dwi_no_refusal_halloween_blood.php

http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2008/08/dwi_dui_crackdown.php

119 (or Mr. Flood, whichever you prefer),

You admittedly review yourself on Yahoo. Knowing that, I am right to assume that you are the author of every anonymous post about you on the internet.

121 or whatever you prefer...you're wrong...there are people who know Tyler...me being one of them...the review was a complete joke...you might want to check it out...Tyler used his name to review himself...it's not an anonymous post but I don't expect simple minded people to understand.

121 or whatever you prefer...you're wrong...there are people who know Tyler...me being one of them...the review was a complete joke...you might want to check it out...Tyler used his name to review himself...it's not an anonymous post but I don't expect simple minded people to understand.

As most criminal defense attorneys will tell you, the worst criminal client to represent is an innocent one.