My Job Is Murder: Of Confinement and Contracts
Ed. note: Welcome to ATL’s first foray into serial fiction. “My Job Is Murder,” a mystery set in a D.C. appellate boutique firm, will appear one chapter at a time, M-W-F, over the next few weeks.
The author, a former appellate lawyer, wishes to emphasize that any resemblance to any actual person, living or dead, is purely coincidental. Except for the geeky stuff. Appellate lawyers really are that geeky.
Susanna Dokupil can be reached by email at sdokupil@sbcglobal.net or on Facebook.
Tyler got onto the elevator and pressed the button marked 13. As the doors closed, he looked down at the golden manacles that signified his position as an associate. He must survive the tower another day, he thought. Only 657 more days until he paid off his student loans — that is, if he stuck to his budget. Until then, Tyler must serve out his apprenticeship as a squire to the knights of the realm, ensuring that the knights had the proper weapons for jousting with opposing counsel.
He reached his sparsely furnished cell in the law offices of MakoProphet, a D.C. appellate boutique, and turned on his +6 vorpal laptop. Tyler had a tendency to let his imagination wander. He scored high on Intelligence and Dexterity, but less so on Strength and Charisma. Tyler had spent — or rather misspent — the better portion of his youth immersed in fantasy fiction, various strategy games, SimWhatever, or some combination of the above. He tended to view the world in game terms. It helped him break down the complexities of real-life interactions into understandable bits to compensate for his obvious lack of social skills.
Tyler’s voicemail light was blinking. It was a message from his secretary, Jill. The firm’s travel office wanted him to fly from D.C. to New York through Cleveland in order to use some preferred airline. He imagined Jill talking to Patty and Selma from The Simpsons. Class: Bureaucrat. Level: Five. Hit Points: About a million. Bureaucrats were generally impossible to kill and not worth the effort. Better to work around them. He had his secretary research alternatives.
He checked his quest calendar. His team’s next brief was due in three weeks before the Fifteenth Circuit. Carol, the lead partner, represented a construction company in a suit against a supplier of copper pipe for breach of contract. They had won in the trial court. Tyler sighed. Only 657 more days until he could afford to pursue a career in academia.
He opened the record to where he had left off. Pages and pages of business records reminded him why he had majored in classics rather than accounting, but he rather wished at this moment that he had more than a passing acquaintance with a balance sheet. Assets equal … he racked his brain … liabilities plus owners’ equity? Yes, he was pretty sure that was it — the totals matched at the bottom. Tyler sighed again. Thankfully, his portion of the brief did not focus on calculating the damages.
A tap on the door frame startled him. It was Mark from down the hall. Class: Associate. Level: Three. Alignment: Lawful Neutral. Experience Points: About 2700/year, very respectable. Higher Charisma than Tyler’s.
Apparently Mark desired his presence at some sort of recruiting lunch. Tyler hated recruiting lunches, as they tended to require small talk. Tyler hated small talk, as it tended to require knowledge of sports, movies, reality TV shows, the love interests of celebrities, and other such plebian matters that he considered rather beneath his intelligence to follow. But, as Tyler hated appearing ignorant even more than he hated small talk, he quickly visited several local news sites to see how the city’s teams were doing, which movies were coming out this week, and the latest on the current financial crisis.
______________________________________________________________________
Susanna Dokupil is a former appellate lawyer who abandoned regular employment in favor of raising four kids. She can be reached by email at sdokupil@sbcglobal.net or on Facebook.




Comments
Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!
first is first
First...
This looks awful, please reconsider...
first to say EPIC FAIL
you cannot be serious
Oh God, NO
There are no 32 story buildings in D.C.
this sucks
Wow...... ATL is getting desperate.
657 days to pay off student loan debt???? Girl, please! Try 65.7 years!
awful
Was Hope Winters not a foray into serial fiction?
If so, what made you think you should try that again?
This "story" makes the baby Jesus cry.
What a terrible idea.
Reading this was worse than seeing Nancy Pelosi and her huge saggy breasts.
http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20091108/i/r4249994147.jpg?
1. edit your writing 2. plz have consistent characterization: how is it that this moron views life in terms of RPGs and spent the better part of his youth immersed in fantasy fiction and yet doesn't know what movies are coming out this week? You're saying he isn't refreshing Chris Nolan's wikipedia page every minute to see if he's signed on to the next Batman film?
Mystal = WALRUS!
Oh Noes please don't make me wait until Wednesday to read what happens next!!
Seriously, if I want to read garbage legal fiction, I'll pick up a Grisham book.
Shit Sandwich
15,
They are monstrous. I'll bet fifty years ago they garnered lots of attention. PE, as a 16 year old boy, may have fantasized about them.
Second sentence:
If he's just pressed the elevator button, then he's facing the doors. How, then, do the doors close behind him? Did he turn around for no reason and without narration?
So glad I went straight to the comments before embarking on this "novel"
7 nailed it on the head. Who doesn't know about DC's Height of Buildings Act? That's due diligence if you're writing a story set in DC. Jeesh.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heights_of_Buildings_Act_of_1910
Better than Roxana.
I smell a steaming pile of fail.
Mystal, soon you will feel the cold hard justice of my favorite hunting spear.
The Most Interesting Eskimo in the World
I state with no hyperbole whatsoever that this is the worst post in the entire history of ATL.
Another great column Roxana, keep up the good work!!!
-Hope Winters.
This is one of those mysteries that's best left unsolved . . . .
21 - Maybe it's one of those elevators with the double doors in front of you and behind you and the buttons are only on one side of the elevator.
I'm a gaming fanatic and total dork, but I still found this unreadable.
Kash is so much kuter than Susanna
http://www.texasbar.com/Images/tbj/ACF6284.jpg
Plus, no baggage.
Kash is so much kuter than Susanna
www.texasbar.com/Images/tbj/ACF6284.jpg
Plus, no baggage.
Keep your day job
Fail.
oh no, not another Roxana
Keep your night job (third shift proofreader). Hey-yo!
Ignore the haters. Keep it up. Let's see where this goes. As the Buddha says, no matter you do, people will criticize you.
Ignore the haters. Keep it up. Let's see where this goes. As the Buddha says, no matter what you do, people will criticize you.
Seriously though, people read this blog for funny news stories, speculation on layoffs and pay structures, and biglaw gossip.
The type of douchebags who frequent this site (myself included) would tear every Susanna Dokupil post apart, regardless of whether she had good writing. This just isn't what we come here to read.
30,
You're probably right. It sure makes the reader stop and reread it. But when we're talking about the 32d floor in a DC building . . .
Why did she put it in a real city? We're in the 15th Circuit, at a fake firm, but in a real city?
ATL loves to pwn its readers to the point of misery. See e.g. Hope Winters, Roxana St. Thomas, Elie Mystal (this one's been going forever), and now Susanna.
Kash,
Please, maybe today yes I make sexy sexy with your camel beaver toe?
ShaFeef
Well, I suppose I should have guessed that the unwashed law student masses who populate this blog of late would critique this post with the same nerdish intensity they bring to every comments section. Do you ever stop and listen to yourselves? "How could the elevator doors close behind him if he just pressed the button?" Really? Is this similar to your inner monologue when reading other fiction? So lame.
Nobody wants to read this crap on a blog. we read blog posts for blog posts, not ten page novels. is above the law losing stuff to write about now that everybody is laid off? i don't understand. lawyers with too much damn time on their hands. get back to writing juicy gossip on law please.
44,
Yeah, that was exactly my interior monologue. I was an English major at the University of Chicago. If you didn't notice that odd bit of writing in the post, you're probably dumb enough to have enjoyed it too.
-21, neither law student nor unwashed
Mystal's job is to murder the English language.
i thought this was a news blog?
Comment removed by moderator.
I'd rather read a story about a dog pooing on the keyboard of a laptop computer and then shutting it than this drivel.
I think the reason why these types of columns get bashed so hard is because people don't understand why this stuff is posted here. It's like this blog is trying to be something it's not - a place of legitimate intellectual thought and creative musings.
It's got Elie as an editor for crying out loud. There's no way this place will ever be intellectual or creative. Just post the pay raises (cuts) and layoffs. Sorry if that's boring to you Elie but that's all we care about.
I fear that this isn't a joke.
I think the reason why these types of columns get bashed so hard is because people don't understand why this stuff is posted here. It's like this blog is trying to be something it's not - a place of legitimate intellectual thought and creative musings.
It's got Elie as an editor for crying out loud. There's no way this place will ever be intellectual or creative. Just post the pay raises (cuts) and layoffs. Sorry if that's boring to you Elie but that's all we care about.
21/41 - Hmm good point on the DC thing. How can you be a DC firm and part of the 15th circuit at the same time? An author should make sure they are factually consistent.
44 - You're missing the point. FAIL
- 30
stop it, just stop it...
"Notes from the Breadline" was your first foray into fiction. Please don't bullshit us about that being real.
Dear author,
After you've realized that you're a washed up failure who wasted the last 5-8 years of her life in a now-dead career, why do you think you can just pick up a pen and become a writer? There are people who have been working on their fiction writing for years. Maybe you should try your hand at music composition and architectural design while you're at it.
"A tap on the door frame startled him. It was Mark from down the hall. Class: Associate. Level: Three. Alignment: Lawful Neutral. Experience Points: About 2700/year, very respectable. Higher Charisma than Tyler’s."
NERDS!!!!!!!!
Look, this whole "creative writing" thing is just a bad idea. Quit while you're ahead, because the commenters will just get more vicious.
Interesting premise. I wonder if the main character, Tyler would be able to bring some sort of promissory estoppel action (ie, Restatement 90) against his firm if things take a turn for the worse.
Hey, 21.
Wow, I can tell that you were an impressive lit student, given how you apparently mastered your in-which-direction-are-characters-facing-at-all-times criticism studies at U of C. I hear that's one of the strenghs in the English department at that fine instituion. I, by contrast, sometimes assume that characters do reasonable things that aren't explicitly mentioned in the text (like, turn around), and I even tend to focus on the narrative (instead of pettily seaching for minor flaws to call out like a whiny, prepubescent child) when reading something light, like something posted on a blog, for instance. But then again, you're, like, totally a scholar, so that probably explains the difference between our approaches.
- 44
Comment removed by moderator.
This is a bad idea for THIS website because:
1. We are here not for fiction, but for news;
2. This outside your core competency; and
3. Ad hominem attacks are typical for an author of any sort to experience, that is what being in the public eye means.
While the story might be fine, mediocre, or whatever one thinks, this is far outside the scope of what this website should be doing. Please discontinue.
Finally, a well-written interesting fictional story here at ATL. I say keep 'em coming!
This garbage would never be written in TEXAS!
Please don't do this. Please.
I predict lots of jokes about "of counsel" not being partner material, evidenced herein. I give the writer props for bravery and not using a pseudonym, but she's nuts not to have a pen name. Especially because the writing is lousy, at least in my opinion.
62, if you are who you say you are, this is why you're a shitty fiction writer. Using terms like "ad hominem" instead of personal is indicative of a fucking moron.
It takes courage to post something like this on here, and I give the author credit for that. But I'm afraid this is pretty awful. I would never buy it, let alone read the next chapter. And I actually like both appellate law and D&D. I don't care about the character Tyler, he seems more likely to turn out to be a serial killer with his strange penchant for thinking of everyone in D&D terms, than the hero of the story.
Suggestion to the author--if you want to avoid ad hominem attacks on your literary effort, find a writer's group of some sort and get their constructive input, in person, before posting here. People on this site are d'bags.
Comment removed by moderator.
Dear 44 (Susanna?),
If it's petty for me to ask a question about something that was unclear to me, what can we call what you're doing? (By that I mean, specifically, trying to bully people who ask questions about someone else's writing.) If you're just here for some light reading, why are you doing that?
I added that bit of autobiography not because it's staggeringly impressive. I wanted to say I was an English major to illustrate that the subject matters to me. I added the institution to save us the time and trouble of having you say: "well you must have gone to a TTT." I shouldn't have bothered.
- 21.
SPOILER ALERT: 69 nailed it. Now susie gonna have to find a new "unpredictable" ending and rewrite the last installment.
Editors, please reconsider making this a regular post. In all seriousness, you tried it and it didn't work. No big deal.
DOJ SECURE
13 stories is more plausible.
I see by all the comments that we have a number of soon-to-be-unemployed lawyers/law students taking a crap on a fellow lawyer trying something new. Good thing these comments are anonymous or you all would have to actually expose yourselves for the envious document review whores that you are. Enjoy! I for one think its nice to have something other than the usual epic disgraceful lawyer antics that normally grace the pages on ATL.
--Fomer lawyer who actually enjoys their job. Imagine that, you driveling idiots.
ATL please stop this
Susanna is a hero to everyone bored lawyer who wants to take a chance on something new! Thank you!!
--2700 hrs and you call that a bonus check?!
She changed the floor number in response to comments? That is even worse! Better to leave us wondering if it was an intentional plot element. Epic fail, suze!
Also, 13th floor is pretty rare in dc, due to superstition.
yikes. this is full of trite cliches: 13th floor? makoprophet? please, atl, don't publish this. for a blog that literally prides itself on intellectual snobbery and superiority, this is humilating.
and ANYONE who has ever been to dc knows that there is nary a 32 story building in town. banish this bull back to northern virginia, where is can languish in the land of tall buildings and broken dreams.
WHY?
Tyler sounds like my law school roommate. I just thought he was aspy...but maybe he was actually inspiration. Mike--you're famous!
We're all for fellow lawyers trying something new. Just not when it displaces a normal ATL story. Start your own blog, or convince ATL not to count fiction (including Roxanna) in the one-story-per-hour quota. We want gossip!
Yay for classics majors!!
Give it up, Lat. I second 56 on this being the second ATL work of fiction.
Like 82, I also am all for fellow lawyers trying something new. Just as long as they're good at it.
Had to google "+6 vorpal." Sounds like Susanna gave up law practice to play World of Warcraft full time.
Comment removed by moderator.
Leave Susanna alone! She got this gig because she is one of Lat's Federalist Society buddies, not because she merited or earned it. As we all know, being a member of the Federalist Society no longer opens many doors. It is good for Lat to offer her refuge and the chance to put ATL on her resume.
78 -
It's actually worse than that, I think. When I first checked out this post, it was the 10th floor (and I was confused as hell about all this 32-floors talk). Then I refreshed to read the comments, and it now read the 13th floor.
So she not only changed it from 32 to 10; she then went back and changed 10 to 13 (10 not being sufficiently creepy, I guess). Can anyone else verify that it was 10 before it was 13?
Agree with 45. You have to be an odd duck to push an elevator button, then physically turn around and ride with your back to the elevator doors. Maybe this is a reflection on Tyler's character?
Hate to ruin the ending, but knowing Susanna,
A liberal Democrat did it.
"I have a big house, a beautiful family and a passion for what I do." Yeah - 3500 sq. ft. and a Lexis, bitches!
Susanna Dokupil is an Assistant Solicitor General for the Office of the Attorney General of Texas. She received her J.D. from Harvard Law School, where she was Editor-in-Chief of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy and Line Editor for the Harvard International Law Journal. She clerked for the Honorable Jerry E. Smith, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit then joined the trial section of Baker Botts L.L.P., then was of counsel at Alexander, Dubose, Jones & Townsend LLP. Prior to law school, Ms. Dokupil received her B.A., magna cum laude, in the University Scholars program and her M.A. in Church-State Studies from Baylor University. Ms. Dokupil’s work has appeared in National Review Online, the Washington Times, The Houston Chronicle, the Texas Bar Journal, the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, the Texas Review of Law & Politics, the Cato Supreme Court Review, and The American Enterprise, among others. Ms. Dokupil currently serves as Executive Director of the Steering Committee for the Texas Review of Law & Politics, as VP Publications for the Religious Liberties Practice Group of the Federalist Society, and as treasurer for the R Club. She and her husband Michael reside in Houston, Texas with their twin boys, David and Benjamin.
http://www.trolp.org/main_pgs/steering_committee/Sdokupil.htm
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/susanna-dokupil/4/416/7b1
Her employer: http://www.trolp.org/
None of this is meant to be threatening or harassing. I'm just posting the information on her which is publicly available on the web.
I know where this is going. Tyler finds a portal on the 13th floor where he and other associates take turns entering Joe Jamail's body.
This is truly horrid stuff. My first thought was "I bet whoever wrote this nonsense thinks Sara Palin is 'neat'". Googled the author's name and (drum roll) ... Yup.
Is that ad hominem?
Hey 21...english major at u of chicago, huh?
If you really wanted an answer to your question (as you pretend now) you could have emailed Susanna personally. So save us your late-in-the-game excuses for being a name-dropping dbag. Or at least name drop better than U of C. Thanks! XoXo.
Hey 21...english major at u of chicago, huh?
If you really wanted an answer to your question (as you pretend now) you could have emailed Susanna personally. So save us your late-in-the-game excuses for being a name-dropping dbag. Or at least name drop better than U of C. Thanks! XoXo.
Susanna, thanks for braving all these comments and giving us your story. I wouldn't normally post after these ridiculous folks, but I thought you should know there are people out there who liked it. A lot!
This is like a high school creative writing assignment, a bad one. The only way it could have less potential is if it was on the ground. No legitimate stream of conciousness Biglaw associate narrative would go three sentences without at least a few F-bombs. So here's one: Fuck that story. I would rather play mindsweeper than read anymore of that bland depressing bullshit.
CHECK YOU EMAILS
95 - suze can see thr washington monument from her back yard in TEXAS. And to all u haters, washington monepument is weigh moar than 32 stories.
You should never let 23 year old 1Ls who haven't been laid in...ever...get you down. Thanks for the post Ellie!
Levi johnston did it!
99--guess what? once you turn 24, you'll realize that we (re: adults) think you sound like a wannabe frat boy who's been reading too much perez hilton when you drop f-bombs every three words. Its not actually some impressive mastery of the language. But for the next story about a dbag who can't get laid and then gets laid off, I'm sure the writer will keep your suggestions in mind.
103 = father of twins married to an of counsel who lives in texas and adores palin fur bein neat.
Wow. Just wow. I am really at a loss about how bad this is. I wouldn't even know how to begin offering criticism on this. The author would be well advised to workshop her writing with folks able to offer honest criticisms. This is embarrassingly awful writing, and probably could have been avoided had someone just been honest.
Having said that, this author should keep working and developing the craft of storytelling. Who knows? Maybe someday she could happen to write something worthwhile.
Only an oyt of touch conseevative would think thay frat boys or their wannabes read perez hilton. 103 definitely a texan.
http://abovethelaw.com/2007/11/more_about_the_fabulous_fed_so.php
96/97/Susanna
I posted the question as a comment in the hope that somebody might help me understand without having to inconvenience the author. Comments 30, 54, and 90, it turned out, confirmed my suspicions. I know you think you came up with a real "gotcha" point there. But, if emailing the author is always the answer, what's the point of the comments?
It's clear that you have some sort of personal stake in the reception this story gets. You've decided to start a fight with me because I had the audacity to ask a question?
You've abandoned your original point (that what the character is doing doesn't matter) and have decided to taunt me about U of C and insinuate that I'm lying by saying I went there. You were right to abandon your original point because it was a dog. Unfortunately you abandoned it in favor of something even less impressive. You sound like a common schoolyard bully. How, at this point, can you say I'm the one who sounds petty?
It made a great impression on me when Bill Veeder used a very literal reading of the Cask of Amontillado to illustrate the narrator's unreliability. I've read that way ever since. I can't fathom why that would make somebody as angry as you clearly are. Please disclose why you have such a stake in the story.
96/97/Susanna
I posted the question as a comment in the hope that somebody might help me understand without having to inconvenience the author. Comments 30, 54, and 90, it turned out, confirmed my suspicions. I know you think you came up with a real "gotcha" point there. But, if emailing the author is always the answer, what's the point of the comments?
It's clear that you have some sort of personal stake in the reception this story gets. You've decided to start a fight with me because I had the audacity to ask a question?
You've abandoned your original point (that what the character is doing doesn't matter) and have decided to taunt me about U of C and insinuate that I'm lying by saying I went there. You were right to abandon your original point because it was a dog. Unfortunately you abandoned it in favor of something even less impressive. You sound like a common schoolyard bully. How, at this point, can you say I'm the one who sounds petty?
It made a great impression on me when Bill Veeder used a very literal reading of the Cask of Amontillado to illustrate the narrator's unreliability. I've read that way ever since. I can't fathom why that would make somebody as angry as you clearly are. Please disclose why you have such a stake in the story.
As a geek who played D&D in high school and college, and still loves RPG's, this needs work. While I reserve harsh judgment until the writer has a chance to establish characters and a compelling plot, this better get good fast.
ATL, this is a slippery slope.
Dear 109,
No stake. Just like watching you waste your time. It amuses me. So by all means, keep posting. Longer next time please. My guess is that you are a first year law student who misses just how awesome senior year of college was because Prof. Veeder gave you an A- one time! And now you are afraid you'll never cut it with the big boys in law school. Tell us more.
106--the only excuse for that kind of spelling should be vodka. so ill assume you are an unemployed D from the corzine campaign. what else would you like to speculate about one another?
Listen, regardless of whether you like the writing, at least this aspiring authoress had the balls to try something new, and on a blog full of self-righteous, arrogant and bitter lawyers and lawyer wannabees, no less.
So before you criticize too much, why not take a step back and see if YOU have created anything of truly lasting value lately - or ever. Privilige logs and due diligence memos do not count.
And seeing as how so many commentators are trashing this writing, I can only assume that the halls of law firms all over the country must be crammed with John Steinbecks and Harper Lees who, if not for the great pleasure they took in setting legal precedent and inventing anti-takeover devices, would be churning out Great American Novels by the gross. Such is humanity's loss...
Cheers 113. Well put! --98.
fail fail fail
why is there frequent, poorly-written fiction on this site?
and if it IS fiction, why set it in a city the author clearly has ABSOLUTELY NO PASSING FAMILIARITY WITH (32d floor)?
but it's even worse to change this line once fact-checked by the commenters here. either go with the approach of not caring about accuracy, or do some (basic) research first.
fail (again)
I wonder how many of these posts in defense of this hack writing are actually by susanna herself. Or some family member. Or someone like that.
Some, I bet. I take a little comfort in knowing that the author of this hack piece has probably defended herself anonymously ok this board. For some reason that makes me chuckle deeply and heartily, because that is just how pathetic we all are.
Where is that "out lives are hollow" dbag?
103:
Writing is an attempt to capture your audience. Given that this is on ATL, I thought that adding a few profanities might close the gap. See cmmts. 19, 43. However, thank you for your discourse on acceptable conversation between adults. But I must point out that "stream of consciousness" is quite different from the things that come out of ones mouth. Like it or not, that is how regular people think. Yes, even "adults" who have turned 24. The filter between one's head and one's mouth is what separates the child from the adult. So keep reading your pocket version of "commonly mispronounced words" and "expand your vocabulary 365 day calendar" and continue being a douchebag. Sounding educated is much different from being educated.
-99
111,
If you enjoy wasting your own time picking fights and then losing them while looking like a moron, I'm glad I could help.
109
98, 113, & 114 = Susanna
109,
Yeah, see, that's the point. I don't care what I look like. I only care about making sure that you spend your time reading my idiotic comments. It assures me that you aren't effing up some deal that could actually make a difference in the world.
Please, please, tell me more about yourself! Which dorm at U of C? Did you like the burgers at the Medicis? How about the el train...chilly, right?
xoxo,
111
Couldn't agree more, 99. At least about the part where you acknowledge being poorly educated. Thanks for clarifying. Clears the whole misunderstanding up.
109- i enjoy stories about armadillos, especially when they are given a proper burial. such a thing rarely happens here in texas.
the story your prof read to you sounds interesting; please post up the author's name. thanks.
Susanna! Out thyself upon this board that thine self-defenses might be made clear. To light: thine pitious designs do fail most righteously to deflect the barbed curses of this scurrilous mob! Unwash'd and deformed, yea thy inscrutable audience be made to cut verily to the heart of it cleanly. Out thyself! An haggard bard, I beseech thee, do not cause they that suffer to suffer, but that such suffering be rewarded!
Why in the hell would anyone thinking to write serious fiction think to debut it here, among this crowd of super anal nerds relishing in the safety of anonymous posts as they hurl their vitriol?
Having said that... awful. Just awful.
Susanna:
I know that you Federalist Society types despise anything related to Democrats or the Democratic Party, nevertheless, Harry S. Truman's famous phrase seems appropriate here:
"If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."
To quote John McEnroe:
"You cannot be serious!!!"
I decided to skip the post and just be entertained by the comments. The comments were very entertaining, but I couldn't believe the piece was really that bad, so I read it. Oh my god, it really is that bad. Painfully bad -- and the pretentious tone and clunky sentences are ghastly. Stop. Please stop.
this sucks
I googled our erstwhile fiction writer, and this piece
http://www.texasbar.com/Template.cfm?Section=Current_Issue&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=8629
she wrote in the Texas Bar Journal several years back is actually excellent. Well written, funny, draws the reader in. So, don't give up on writing Susanna, but your current effort needs a lot of reworking, and that is probably best done off ATL unless you relish the slings and arrows hurled your way by anonymous haters and douchebags.
129: on your recommendation I read that piece and, negative Ghostrider, the pattern is full of suck.
shit posts shit posts everywhere, and not a shtick in sight (except for the Spinal Tap one, which is gay)
Can't believe she didn't have someone read this beforehand and tell her to reconsider posting this on ATL. Poor judgment.
Author's colleague's at Tx SG's office are laughing heartily at these comments . . . Wow, just because you went HLS does NOT mean you will be good at fiction. Didn't Grisham go to Ole Miss or something like that?
while we're posting shitty amateur fiction, I figured I would contribute
Doom: Reprecussions of Evil
John Stalvern waited. The lights above him blinked and sparked out of the air. There were demons in the base. He didn't see them, but had expected them now for years. His warnings to Cernel Joson were not listenend to and now it was too late. Far too late for now, anyway.
John was a space marine for fourteen years. When he was young he watched the spaceships and he said to dad "I want to be on the ships daddy."
Dad said "No! You will BE KILL BY DEMONS"
There was a time when he believed him. Then as he got oldered he stopped. But now in the space station base of the UAC he knew there were demons.
"This is Joson" the radio crackered. "You must fight the demons!"
So John gotted his palsma rifle and blew up the wall.
"HE GOING TO KILL US" said the demons
"I will shoot at him" said the cyberdemon and he fired the rocket missiles. John plasmaed at him and tried to blew him up. But then the ceiling fell and they were trapped and not able to kill.
"No! I must kill the demons" he shouted
The radio said "No, John. You are the demons"
And then John was a zombie.
bravo 133.
ditto. From now on, whenever this crap comes out, I encourage everyone to spam post 133.
I hope the author hasn't gotten to this comment (I wouldn't have had the stomach to get this far, if I were her), but I actually really liked this piece. Is it great literature? I don't know. I'm a lawyer. I don't know much about great literature. I also certainly don't expect to find it on a blog. Still, I like when ATL expands its horizons beyond the doom and gloom of layoffs and dwindling bonuses. I really hope this piece continues. Variety is good for the site.
Thank you for being brave enough to write for ATL, Susanna!
Or maybe we should continue to mock this completely asinine angle that ATL is taking by serializing 133 with updates every time that a certain unnamed author tries to further explain why a certain undeveloped character's job is murder?
Susanna, what you’ve written is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent writing were you even remotely close to anything that could be considered rational or entertaining. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Comment removed by moderator.
I can't believe you wasted perfectly good internet protons on this.
First rule of good mystery writing - hook the reader early. There is nothing in this drivel that makes me want to read any further.
Do everyone a favor and use chapter 2 to recast your mystery novel as a porn novel.
ABOVE THE LAW = THE FONZ ON WATER SKIS
reading these comments is like watching an episode of the office. my stomach hurts. it's actually painful how cruel you people are, and i certainly wouldn't wish it on our dear author, who i imagine is a nice person. but the flip side, of course, is that this piece is really embarrassingly bad. the prose is clunky and inelegant. the cadence is nonexistent. the vocabulary is mostly juvenile and otherwise trite. and most importantly (because lots of authors are not particularly impressive writers)-- there is no story! none! "installments" of fiction must leave the reader wanting more, knowing something but not quite enough. and for everyone (including the author) who claims that we are just lawyers, not literary critics, i beg to differ. we are readers, and carefully trained ones at that. we demand that words have meaning, that sentences have poetry, and that paragraphs have points. we are among the best critics of the written word in any form. i'm not sure why this is on ATL, perhaps some kind of collective bad judgment on the part of the author (who clearly did not screen this with any peers) and the editors (who clearly did not edit this). and then to have the author defend herself in the comments! ouch, my stomach! an expensive car? surely that is not responsive to allegations of truly bad writing? this entire exchange-- the appalling post, the vicious comments, the hubris of a defense-- is really the worst thing i've ever seen on ATL.
EDITORS: please say enough is enough on this string. your pixie-stix chugging readers will forget in three days that you ever tried this. but the suffering inflicted on all parties by continuing in this course is really unforgivable.
this story constitutes three holocausts: written, oral (when read), and aural (when heard). take a class ffs
well done Susanna - better than reading about the next installment of "swine flu approach at a firm I've never heard of" keep it coming.
Tyler pushed the button on the elevator button panel that said "1" on a summer day. Well, that's another long day of document review, he thought, but at least those stiff old partners he worked for at Macon, Bacon, & Spendin LLP didn't know that he was secretly a secret super hero by night. He stepped through the doorway of the garage where the associates parked their cars in the basement of the 157 story building where Macon Bacon's offices were located on 160-189th floors. He pulled out the keys to his Lexus SUV-- the keychain was in the shape of gold plated handcuffs, and he chuckled as they clicked together impressively in his hands, muted as the sound was by his thick winter gloves. Pew pew pew! He was under attack! He ducked into his SUV -- they can't hurt me in here, he thought, this is a nice car so I should be ok. But would he?
Tune in next time for more.
je ne comprend pas.
Moderator(s): Did you remove comments 62 and 87 because Susanna kept griping about "ad hominem" attacks when it was clear that the commenters were criticizing the story and not her personally?
And Susanna: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
On one hand, this is terrible writing, devoid of life, originality, campy self-awareness, humor, or any other redeeming quality - that's bad.
On the other hand, I and many others will happily tune in every week to bash it. - that's good.
Wow that sucked big, scaly, encrusted rhinoceros balls.
On second thought, this is potentially redeemable - apologies for my overly scathing initial reaction. Not to damn you with faint praise, Susanna, but this is better than, e.g., Tom Clancy.
- 148
Hope Winters was a terrible writer, but sometimes she was unintentionally funny. Unfortunately, this bad writing is just boring.
The details are all wrong, and the story doesn't make any sense.
"MakoProphet" sounds like the name of an auto painting company, not a law firm.
Why is an appellate boutique sending an associate to New York, via Cleveland or otherwise? Appellate lawyers don't conduct discovery, and surely the firm would not let a junior associate like Tyler handle an oral argument.
This is missing a story... I realize it is a serial piece, but without anything of interest (or even the prospect of something interesting in the future) being brought to the table, I have no motivation to read the next installment. Except for these comments. I'll be back for those. Keep up the good work.
133 is the most awesome thing in the history of ever.
After an evening at Rick's Cabaret, I felt a bit restless. I decided to read this story to help me sleep. I regret wasting the minute it took to skim over this. To the author of this piece I only have two words to describe your writing: "pura mierda," as my maid Rosa would say. That is all.
This comment is addressed to post no. 133.
I see genius in your creative writing. Your piece redeemed my decision to read this thread. I nominate you to replace the author of this horrid piece on the Federalist Society.
lulz, someone plays a lot of Eve
I hope they continue this story because I want a sequel ot 133. I laughed until I had tears.
I hope they continue this story because I want a sequel ot 133. I laughed until I had tears.
agreed. 133 made me cry. bravo.
Not the best start...
Moderating/deleting comments? Why does Suzie hate are freedoms? How unamerican!
Suzy moderated the comments because they gave away the next plot twist - someone is murdered!
i'm sorry, but who defends their writing by arguing that they have an expensive car and a nice family? i have an expensive car and, like the authory, live in houston: does this mean i will be the next faulkner?
163 - I think you missed the point. Some of the attacks implied that the author was poor, desperate and/or unsuccessful. Hence the response about already having financial and personal success.
-not Susanna
163 and others - 139 is not Susanna, nor were any of the similar posts that were previously removed.
--Gullible's Travels
Dear 133: I think I love you.
145: Excellent use of "Pew pew pew".
Keep these posts coming, please. The train wreck quotient is off the charts. I was R'ing OFL.
This is painful to move one's eyes over, and I was a judge for the "Bad Hemingway" competition.
Is there no "Learning Annex" near you?
I agree with 136. It's different from the usual fare and enjoyable to read.