<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Contracts Exam Hypothetical: Review Levi Johnston&#8217;s Gay Porn Offer Letter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/</link>
	<description>Above the Law: A Legal Web Site – News, Commentary, and Opinions on Law Firms, Lawyers, Law School, Law Suits, Judges and Courts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150072</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150072</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d recommend also considering whether or not he could make a great deal more money by producing and releasing such materials on his own. If he were just a good looking guy, professional production quality might matter more, but what is being sold is his celebrity. And more specifically, the nature of his celebrity holds a premium to the target market considering that his appearance in adult media is all the more sensational given his link to a prominent darling champion of social conservatism. In this respect, production values aren&#039;t going to be that important to those who will be paying to see him perform autoerotic sex acts. As long as they can see it clearly, they&#039;ll pay. So, I&#039;d say set up a web cam, learn some software, and jack your way off to the bank. Well, at the very least, I&#039;d say that he could command twice as much plus royalty on all sales. And by the way, Levi, when you get this big chunk of money, invest it correctly—don&#039;t buy a bunch of stupid junk. Your celebrity status has a major time limit rivaled only by the time limit on your youthful body. Strike while you&#039;re still in the news and use the money wisely to create multiple streams of income. When the time limit on your celebrity is up, you&#039;re back to being an undereducated unemployed guy with a child support payment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d recommend also considering whether or not he could make a great deal more money by producing and releasing such materials on his own. If he were just a good looking guy, professional production quality might matter more, but what is being sold is his celebrity. And more specifically, the nature of his celebrity holds a premium to the target market considering that his appearance in adult media is all the more sensational given his link to a prominent darling champion of social conservatism. In this respect, production values aren&#8217;t going to be that important to those who will be paying to see him perform autoerotic sex acts. As long as they can see it clearly, they&#8217;ll pay. So, I&#8217;d say set up a web cam, learn some software, and jack your way off to the bank. Well, at the very least, I&#8217;d say that he could command twice as much plus royalty on all sales. And by the way, Levi, when you get this big chunk of money, invest it correctly—don&#8217;t buy a bunch of stupid junk. Your celebrity status has a major time limit rivaled only by the time limit on your youthful body. Strike while you&#8217;re still in the news and use the money wisely to create multiple streams of income. When the time limit on your celebrity is up, you&#8217;re back to being an undereducated unemployed guy with a child support payment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150071</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150071</guid>
		<description>This is gay.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150070</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150070</guid>
		<description>prOn = prawn = distant relative of Kash&#039;s lobster?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prOn = prawn = distant relative of Kash&#8217;s lobster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150069</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150069</guid>
		<description>just like to note that I opened this at work and the url that came up was levi_johnston_gay_porn.   Yeah, thanks ATL.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just like to note that I opened this at work and the url that came up was levi_johnston_gay_porn.   Yeah, thanks ATL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150068</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150068</guid>
		<description>58,
Lick anus.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>58,<br />
Lick anus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150067</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150067</guid>
		<description>Fuck, 100,000 bones? If I were him, I&#039;d do it. I mean honestly, what else does the little fucker have to do?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck, 100,000 bones? If I were him, I&#8217;d do it. I mean honestly, what else does the little fucker have to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150066</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150066</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why is it that when a man jacks off on film it is classified as gay porn?&quot;
Because masturbation is inherently gay.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why is it that when a man jacks off on film it is classified as gay porn?&#8221;<br />
Because masturbation is inherently gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150065</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150065</guid>
		<description>No surprise Lat poasted this....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise Lat poasted this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150064</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150064</guid>
		<description>Why is it that when a man jacks off on film it is classified as gay porn? Is it gay because it is man-on-man action? Presumably, homosexual men and heterosexual women could watch and enjoy the film.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that when a man jacks off on film it is classified as gay porn? Is it gay because it is man-on-man action? Presumably, homosexual men and heterosexual women could watch and enjoy the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/comment-page-3/#comment-150063</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/a-contracts-exam-hypothetical-review-levi-johnstons-gay-porn-offer-letter/#comment-150063</guid>
		<description>I say a resounding YES...Levi should make all the MOOLAH he can from this whole ordeal and shove it right in the face of the GOP!!!  Levi take it and negotiate upward....the ball is in YOUR court....May as well become an IN-DEMAND Pornstar and make MILLIONS!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say a resounding YES&#8230;Levi should make all the MOOLAH he can from this whole ordeal and shove it right in the face of the GOP!!!  Levi take it and negotiate upward&#8230;.the ball is in YOUR court&#8230;.May as well become an IN-DEMAND Pornstar and make MILLIONS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.086 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 387/419 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cache.abovethelaw.com

Served from: abovethelaw.com @ 2012-02-15 13:27:44 -->
