<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McDermott Will &amp; Emery: Another December Deferral Extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/</link>
	<description>Above the Law: A Legal Web Site – News, Commentary, and Opinions on Law Firms, Lawyers, Law School, Law Suits, Judges and Courts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153125</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153125</guid>
		<description>what do people think about mcgregian going to KLGates?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what do people think about mcgregian going to KLGates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153124</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153124</guid>
		<description>Yet another up and comer gone from MWE LA to that other firm that pretty much has taken all the good guys.    WTF is going on at MWE?  That ship is sinking fast.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another up and comer gone from MWE LA to that other firm that pretty much has taken all the good guys.    WTF is going on at MWE?  That ship is sinking fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153123</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153123</guid>
		<description>If you &quot;grind&quot; it, I think you may be doing it wrong.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you &#8220;grind&#8221; it, I think you may be doing it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153122</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153122</guid>
		<description>wow. $5,000 a month to sit at home and masturbate. too good to be true. who says biglaw is a meat grinder? (unless you count masturbation of course)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. $5,000 a month to sit at home and masturbate. too good to be true. who says biglaw is a meat grinder? (unless you count masturbation of course)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153121</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153121</guid>
		<description>wow. $5,000 a month to sit at home and masturbate. too good to be true. who says biglaw is a meat grinder? (unless you count masturbation of course)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. $5,000 a month to sit at home and masturbate. too good to be true. who says biglaw is a meat grinder? (unless you count masturbation of course)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153120</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153120</guid>
		<description>#35/72 is a FRAUD and a COWARD!  MWE-NYC only had three re-deferrals, all from Corporate, and nobody that required a plane ticket.
Man up 35 and stop cowering behind the NYC re-deferrals just to get your message out.  You&#039;re a weasel and a bitch, but you already know this!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#35/72 is a FRAUD and a COWARD!  MWE-NYC only had three re-deferrals, all from Corporate, and nobody that required a plane ticket.<br />
Man up 35 and stop cowering behind the NYC re-deferrals just to get your message out.  You&#8217;re a weasel and a bitch, but you already know this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153119</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153119</guid>
		<description>177 - the secondment where you are strongly encouraged to go to work for a client for free, indefinitely?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>177 &#8211; the secondment where you are strongly encouraged to go to work for a client for free, indefinitely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153118</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153118</guid>
		<description>83,
actually i was told 20 people were deferred
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>83,<br />
actually i was told 20 people were deferred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153117</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153117</guid>
		<description>Now they are &quot;encouraging&quot; (used very loosely) the deferred associates to do this secondment deal.  Man, they are really trying to milkkkkkkk that $5K they are giving us!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now they are &#8220;encouraging&#8221; (used very loosely) the deferred associates to do this secondment deal.  Man, they are really trying to milkkkkkkk that $5K they are giving us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/comment-page-5/#comment-153116</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/mcdermott-will-emery-another-december-deferral-extension/#comment-153116</guid>
		<description>Incomings...don&#039;t plan on having a job.  MWE just laid off associates with not enough hours b/c the firm doesn&#039;t have enough work.  Three in Chicago Trial let go. Rumor is that one of them is former federal appellate clerk.  Firms don&#039;t lay those people off unless its really bad.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incomings&#8230;don&#8217;t plan on having a job.  MWE just laid off associates with not enough hours b/c the firm doesn&#8217;t have enough work.  Three in Chicago Trial let go. Rumor is that one of them is former federal appellate clerk.  Firms don&#8217;t lay those people off unless its really bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/18 queries in 0.120 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 387/419 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cache.abovethelaw.com

Served from: abovethelaw.com @ 2012-02-15 13:17:33 -->
