<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nationwide Salary Thaw Watch: Akin Gump</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/</link>
	<description>Above the Law: A Legal Web Site – News, Commentary, and Opinions on Law Firms, Lawyers, Law School, Law Suits, Judges and Courts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160450</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160450</guid>
		<description>13, 17 - using ATLs terminology: single bump in base salary; &quot;double bump&quot; via quarterly &quot;true up&quot; payments if you are on pace for 2000 hours in 2010 (500 hours per quarter).  Example, if you have a slow first half of 2010 and only get 900 hours by end of Q2, but things pick up in Q3 and you are at 1500 by end of Q3, you get the &quot;true up&quot; payment for Q1, Q2, and Q3 at end of Q3.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13, 17 &#8211; using ATLs terminology: single bump in base salary; &#8220;double bump&#8221; via quarterly &#8220;true up&#8221; payments if you are on pace for 2000 hours in 2010 (500 hours per quarter).  Example, if you have a slow first half of 2010 and only get 900 hours by end of Q2, but things pick up in Q3 and you are at 1500 by end of Q3, you get the &#8220;true up&#8221; payment for Q1, Q2, and Q3 at end of Q3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160449</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160449</guid>
		<description>Akin Gump is one of the most poorly managed firms out there and frankly I am surprised it hasn&#039;t received the type of infamy that L&amp;W received for its piss poor treatment of associates, particularly very junior ones, during the cap markets crisis.  Maybe that&#039;s because AG didn&#039;t enjoy a stellar reputation in the first place.  I personally witnessed the life of a colleague virtually destroyed either by the blatant mishandling of the associate&#039;s exit or the blatant exploitation of the individual&#039;s good nature in the process.  Hard to tell which.  Either way, pitiful.  To the poster above inquiring about &quot;taking&quot; AG bankruptcy over the other firms.  Don&#039;t even think about it.  Run the other way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Akin Gump is one of the most poorly managed firms out there and frankly I am surprised it hasn&#8217;t received the type of infamy that L&amp;W received for its piss poor treatment of associates, particularly very junior ones, during the cap markets crisis.  Maybe that&#8217;s because AG didn&#8217;t enjoy a stellar reputation in the first place.  I personally witnessed the life of a colleague virtually destroyed either by the blatant mishandling of the associate&#8217;s exit or the blatant exploitation of the individual&#8217;s good nature in the process.  Hard to tell which.  Either way, pitiful.  To the poster above inquiring about &#8220;taking&#8221; AG bankruptcy over the other firms.  Don&#8217;t even think about it.  Run the other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160448</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160448</guid>
		<description>22 -- MWE income partner, here (Los Angeles).
I know that the Executive Committee approved an upward adjustment for income partners, effective the second pay period in January.  I&#039;ve heard word that their may be a similar increase for associates, but I can&#039;t confirm if its final and for what associate classes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22 &#8212; MWE income partner, here (Los Angeles).<br />
I know that the Executive Committee approved an upward adjustment for income partners, effective the second pay period in January.  I&#8217;ve heard word that their may be a similar increase for associates, but I can&#8217;t confirm if its final and for what associate classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160447</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160447</guid>
		<description>FWIW, I&#039;ve heard some chatter that McDermott is planning a similar &quot;true-up&quot; of associate and income partner salaries, at least in certain markets.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I&#8217;ve heard some chatter that McDermott is planning a similar &#8220;true-up&#8221; of associate and income partner salaries, at least in certain markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160446</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160446</guid>
		<description>16,
you would be retarded to take AK bankr. over the other two.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16,<br />
you would be retarded to take AK bankr. over the other two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160445</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160445</guid>
		<description>deferral with no stiped? You guys are looking for jobs some place else, right? Because if Akin bails on you, you will be utterly screwed.
Didn&#039;t they withdraw offers after they made them last year? Not very trustworthy///
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>deferral with no stiped? You guys are looking for jobs some place else, right? Because if Akin bails on you, you will be utterly screwed.<br />
Didn&#8217;t they withdraw offers after they made them last year? Not very trustworthy///</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160444</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160444</guid>
		<description>18: lol. no. you are expected to find a paying legal gig for 1 year. good luck with that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18: lol. no. you are expected to find a paying legal gig for 1 year. good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160443</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160443</guid>
		<description>Great, does this mean Akin will think about offering a deferral stipend anytime soon?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, does this mean Akin will think about offering a deferral stipend anytime soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160442</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160442</guid>
		<description>Can someone confirm 13&#039;s reading - a single bump?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone confirm 13&#8242;s reading &#8211; a single bump?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/comment-page-1/#comment-160441</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2009/12/nationwide-salary-thaw-watch-akin-gump/#comment-160441</guid>
		<description>Comments on Akin&#039;s bankruptcy group? Are the partners a-holes? Would you take it over, say, Kirkland or Davis POlk?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments on Akin&#8217;s bankruptcy group? Are the partners a-holes? Would you take it over, say, Kirkland or Davis POlk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.028 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 387/419 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cache.abovethelaw.com

Served from: abovethelaw.com @ 2012-02-15 11:56:02 -->
