Salary Cuts.jpgFirst year associates at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman got a poke last night that didn’t make them “hee-hee.” The announcement was not made on the Acela. It came via a firm-wide email from executive partners Jeffrey Grill and Sheryl Stein.
All first years, except those in New York, are having their salaries cut. From the memo:

Based on our current assessment of the market for associate salaries and with our incoming first year associates joining the Firm shortly, the Firm has decided that, effective January 1, 2010, first year associates resident in our U.S. offices (other than New York) will be paid at an annual base salary rate of $145,000. First year associates resident in our New York office will be paid at an annual base salary rate of $160,000.

This isn’t the first salary cut at Pillsbury. Back in June 2009, the firm cut salaries based on utilization rates.
There is a caveat to this latest announcement. The firm recognizes that the market outside of New York is still “in flux” and it might raise salaries accordingly (and retroactively) if it sees fit in the future. Alternately, if first year associates outside of New York bake up 1950 hours, they’ll pull a $15k bonus out of the oven at the end of the year. See the full memo, after the jump.
What about the 2010 pay scale for the rest of Pillsbury’s associates?


For now, salaries at Pillsbury can be found in the frozen section (at the 2009 reduced scale, we presume):

For all other Firm associates, because of the significant changes still developing in the associate compensation market among our peer firms, we are not yet prepared to announce our 2010 salary schedule. We take the task of determining associate compensation very seriously and want to be sure that we have considered as much relevant information as possible before announcing a decision.
We expect to announce a 2010 salary schedule within the next month…. In the interim, until the 2010 salary schedule is announced, all second year (class of 2008) and more senior associates, including counsel, will continue to be paid at their rate of pay as of December 31, 2009.

There’s good news at the end of the email though. Piping hot 2009 bonuses will be served at the end of the month.
Earlier: Salary Cut Watch: Pillsbury Cuts Salaries Based on Utilization Rates
PILLSBURY E-MAIL TO ALL ASSOCIATES
From: Grill, Jeffrey B.
To: All-Associates; All-Senior Associates; All-Counsel
Cc: All-Partners; Green, Sara A. (Director); Johnson, Deborah L.
Sent: Wed Jan 06 19:45:45 2010
Subject: 2010 Associate Compensation – Update
Based on our current assessment of the market for associate salaries and with our incoming first year associates joining the Firm shortly, the Firm has decided that, effective January 1, 2010, first year associates resident in our U.S. offices (other than New York) will be paid at an annual base salary rate of $145,000. First year associates resident in our New York office will be paid at an annual base salary rate of $160,000.
We recognize that the market for first year associate salaries outside of New York among our peer firms is still in flux. Given that, we will continue to assess starting salaries outside of New York over the next month or so and may elect to increase starting salaries to ensure that we are paying competitive first year associate base salaries in all offices. If we elect to increase the starting salaries outside of New York, the salary increase will be retroactive to January 1, 2010.
In the event first year associate salaries outside of New York remain at the levels stated above, first year associates paid an annual base salary of $145,000 will be eligible for a $15,000 bonus at 1950 billable hours so that their total base compensation is equivalent to that paid to first year associates in New York.
For those first year associates outside of New York who joined the Firm before the end of 2009, your January 15 paycheck will reflect the new first year associate base salary. Your adjusted salary will be prospective, effective January 1, 2010.
For all other Firm associates, because of the significant changes still developing in the associate compensation market among our peer firms, we are not yet prepared to announce our 2010 salary schedule. We take the task of determining associate compensation very seriously and want to be sure that we have considered as much relevant information as possible before announcing a decision.
We expect to announce a 2010 salary schedule within the next month. In addition, as has been the case previously, counsel base salaries are determined by the Firm on an annual basis and will be communicated directly to each individual counsel once the 2010 salary schedule has been determined. In the interim, until the 2010 salary schedule is announced, all second year (class of 2008) and more senior associates, including counsel, will continue to be paid at their rate of pay as of December 31, 2009.
As always, at such time as the 2010 salary schedule is announced, increases in salary, where applicable, will be paid retroactive to January 1, 2010.
In addition, 2009 hours bonuses and 2009 utilization true-ups under the Firm’s 2009 productivity-based salary reduction program will be paid on January 31, 2010.
Please call either of us or Sara Green with any questions. Thanks so much.
Jeffrey Grill and Sheryl Stein
ADC Executive Partners

Comments are hidden for your protection. Click here to show them.

View Comments

  1. Posted by Dubya | January 7, 2010 at 10:05 AM

    Mission Accomplished!

  2. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:15 AM

    too long, didn’t read

  3. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:15 AM

    [That] money, money won’t get you too far, get you too far.
    - Daryl Hall

  4. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM

    “For now, salaries at Pillsbury can be found in the frozen section”
    Well done, Kash.

  5. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:23 AM

    CHECK YOU SALARY!!!

  6. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:24 AM

    CHECK YOU KASHEEF

  7. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:33 AM

    The memo was sent January 6. But it says, “Your adjusted salary will be prospective, effective January 1, 2010.”
    How can a salary adjustment be prospectively effective on a date nearly a week prior to the notification?

  8. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM

    I’d poke Sheryl Stein in the pooper.

  9. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:38 AM

    “The system worked.”

  10. Posted by Partner Emeritus | January 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM

    Although not a peer firm, Pillsbury has adopted my visionary hybrid tough love model. With the announcement of the voluntary/involuntary departure program last year and this latest salary reduction, the hybrid tough love package is now complete–as far as this non-peer firm is concerned.
    $145K is a paltry sum to work for in NYC. After taxes, you will be forced to live a pauper’s life. So much for the devaluing law degree. Kids, if you are in law school right now, I regret to inform you that you have no future in this profession. For you, there is no tomorrow. That is all.

  11. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 10:54 AM

    10: Um, you have become doted with old age. The memo clearly states that the pay in NY is $160 and not $145.

  12. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:00 AM

    Lay off PE, 11. He just got booted from partnership and had his gold Rick’s Cabaret card canceled.

  13. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:06 AM

    This would never happen at Paul Hastings.

  14. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM

    Rumor has it that senior associates are going to take a 25k hit across the board. It will be interesting to see if it actually happens.

  15. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM

    Lock Lorde first-year associates are starting at 160K.

  16. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:26 AM

    NYC offices bill out at higher rates so NYC associates should get paid more.

  17. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:28 AM

    “because of the significant changes still developing in the associate compensation market among our peer firms, we are not yet prepared to announce our 2010 salary schedule.”
    translation – we are followers, not leaders

  18. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:30 AM

    14 – can you elaborate?

  19. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:40 AM

    How are they going to pay their student loans on only $145k?

  20. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:55 AM

    Pillsbury is Busch League. Always has been.

  21. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 11:58 AM

    I think most firms wil be waiting because with some firms raising the salaries it will hard to keep your associates happy if you lower their salaries.

  22. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:00 PM

    I think most firms wil be waiting because with some firms raising the salaries it will hard to keep your associates happy if you lower their salaries.

  23. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:04 PM

    20 – is that like “bush league”?

  24. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:14 PM

    no, he means ‘busch’ league, ass.

  25. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:18 PM

    I second the “frozen section” kudos. Nice.

  26. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:19 PM

    21-24 – who is hiring laterals? A dissatisfied work force only matters to the extent there are alternatives.

  27. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM

    Kash secretly hates poor people.

  28. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM

    DLA Piper is paying their first years $123,250. But we all have the “potential” to receive “above market” compensation next year…

  29. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM

    28 – there are quite a few in-house opportunities for transactional attorneys. Also, there is always lateral opportunites available at least in major markets, but you have to network and/or engage a really good headhunter.

  30. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 1:03 PM

    What? DLA Piper is paying 123 k? No f-in way. In NY?

  31. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 1:05 PM

    28, Wow, spoken like an abusive spouse: Who else is going to love your ugly face other than me? You got no other alternative. Now, get in that kitchen and make my dinner before I slap you again.

  32. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 1:09 PM

    PE @ 10 This is new?

  33. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 1:18 PM

    Come to Pillsbury, where you work just as hard for $15k less!
    Come to Latham, where you work just as hard for 6 months!
    Talent drain.

  34. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM

    bullshit they’re going to adjust for the market outside NY. latham already set market in LA as 160k last week.

  35. Posted by Pacific Reporter | January 7, 2010 at 1:31 PM

    It’s no surprise that there are three Ts in the firm’s name.

  36. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 2:59 PM

    Pillsbury needs to dump their useless unproductive partners

  37. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM

    Cahill is laying off associates again. Does anyone know how many?

  38. Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | January 7, 2010 at 5:09 PM

    The ship be sinking…

  39. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 5:09 PM

    Pillsbury is circling the drain

  40. Posted by guest | January 7, 2010 at 5:31 PM

    With a semester of contract law under my belt, I am quite sure that being eligable for a 15k bonus at 1950 hours does not equate to automatically receiving a 15k bonus at 1950 hours.

  41. Posted by guest | January 8, 2010 at 9:27 AM

    Less associates comp = more money to put food “IN MY BELLY”
    - Bob “the Doh’Boy” Robbins

  42. Posted by guest | January 8, 2010 at 9:27 AM

    Less associates comp = more money to put food “IN MY BELLY”
    - Bob “the Doh’Boy” Robbins

blog comments powered by Disqus