<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adventures in Lawyer Advertising: What the MoFo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/</link>
	<description>Above the Law: A Legal Web Site – News, Commentary, and Opinions on Law Firms, Lawyers, Law School, Law Suits, Judges and Courts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179145</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179145</guid>
		<description>As a partner in a design and communication firm I&#039;m really surprised and disappointed by this site. Like most designers, I am familiar with Pentagram&#039;s body of work and their many talented partners. How this slipped through the cracks I can&#039;t frankly fathom? All the components of a strong site are missing; branding, messaging, navigation, consistency. To top it all off, the commitment to MOFO is a infantile choice for a law firm or any company that&#039;s not in fashion, snowboards or surfing. Overall, this is an excellent example of name recognition beating common sense into submission.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a partner in a design and communication firm I&#8217;m really surprised and disappointed by this site. Like most designers, I am familiar with Pentagram&#8217;s body of work and their many talented partners. How this slipped through the cracks I can&#8217;t frankly fathom? All the components of a strong site are missing; branding, messaging, navigation, consistency. To top it all off, the commitment to MOFO is a infantile choice for a law firm or any company that&#8217;s not in fashion, snowboards or surfing. Overall, this is an excellent example of name recognition beating common sense into submission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179144</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179144</guid>
		<description>For the last several years Mofo management has been living under the delusion that they are becoming a major presence in NY, even suggesting that their headquarters would be moving there from San Francisco. It hasn&#039;t quite worked out that way. In pursuing this folly they&#039;ve gained a mediocre practice in NY while losing their edge in California. Certain NY partners have capitalized on management&#039;s zeal by playing them like a Madoff violin, thus the new website.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last several years Mofo management has been living under the delusion that they are becoming a major presence in NY, even suggesting that their headquarters would be moving there from San Francisco. It hasn&#8217;t quite worked out that way. In pursuing this folly they&#8217;ve gained a mediocre practice in NY while losing their edge in California. Certain NY partners have capitalized on management&#8217;s zeal by playing them like a Madoff violin, thus the new website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179143</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179143</guid>
		<description>Imposing + Agile = We&#039;re fat as elephants and drive Jaguars.
#29 is a meta-shtick.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imposing + Agile = We&#8217;re fat as elephants and drive Jaguars.<br />
#29 is a meta-shtick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179142</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179142</guid>
		<description>they cut associate salaries for this??
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they cut associate salaries for this??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179141</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 08:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179141</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain what this even means?
&quot;Ranking in the top 10 firms takes a little something extra something about a firm&#039;s culture and it speaks volumes.&quot;
- direct quote from square 18 of the advent calendar thing.
Please don&#039;t tell me the &quot;MoFo difference&quot; is crap grammar and/or nonsensical reasoning.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain what this even means?<br />
&#8220;Ranking in the top 10 firms takes a little something extra something about a firm&#8217;s culture and it speaks volumes.&#8221;<br />
- direct quote from square 18 of the advent calendar thing.<br />
Please don&#8217;t tell me the &#8220;MoFo difference&#8221; is crap grammar and/or nonsensical reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179140</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179140</guid>
		<description>So it only looks like their english site is on crack...maybe this is in keeping with their year of Asia or whatever plan...as in they will only try to maintain a professional appearance in Asian languages
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it only looks like their english site is on crack&#8230;maybe this is in keeping with their year of Asia or whatever plan&#8230;as in they will only try to maintain a professional appearance in Asian languages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179139</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179139</guid>
		<description>I met the firm&#039;s chair at a LGBTG fundraiser in SF a couple years ago, when I was 2nd year @ peer BigLaw firm. He was completely bland, notably dapper, and oddly kind of out of it...maybe the place is on autopilot and it&#039;s whoever grabs the throttle gets to fly the plane. Or the design the website.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met the firm&#8217;s chair at a LGBTG fundraiser in SF a couple years ago, when I was 2nd year @ peer BigLaw firm. He was completely bland, notably dapper, and oddly kind of out of it&#8230;maybe the place is on autopilot and it&#8217;s whoever grabs the throttle gets to fly the plane. Or the design the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179138</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179138</guid>
		<description>When a rogue partner (even a female NY partner) can get away with hijacking so much of a firm’s resources and money -- without any knowing!!! -- one has to wonder what else may be remiss and mismanaged within the firm. As a potential client, I would never trust them to manage my matters, based purely on the evidence this embarrassingly bad and useless, backfiring web site indicates about runaway costs, hideous judgment, and totally absent management oversight (or the cajones to stop this kind of recklessness). Stay away from my matters, please, or I might have a cow!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a rogue partner (even a female NY partner) can get away with hijacking so much of a firm’s resources and money &#8212; without any knowing!!! &#8212; one has to wonder what else may be remiss and mismanaged within the firm. As a potential client, I would never trust them to manage my matters, based purely on the evidence this embarrassingly bad and useless, backfiring web site indicates about runaway costs, hideous judgment, and totally absent management oversight (or the cajones to stop this kind of recklessness). Stay away from my matters, please, or I might have a cow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179137</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179137</guid>
		<description>I sent this to my mom and she has now added the phrase &quot;What the MoFo?&quot; to her daily lexicon.  Everything from, &quot;What the MoFo is this about an NFL lockout?&quot; to &quot;What the MoFo am I going to do about my messed up highlights?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent this to my mom and she has now added the phrase &#8220;What the MoFo?&#8221; to her daily lexicon.  Everything from, &#8220;What the MoFo is this about an NFL lockout?&#8221; to &#8220;What the MoFo am I going to do about my messed up highlights?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/comment-page-3/#comment-179136</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.abovethelaw.com/2010/02/adventures-in-lawyer-advertising-what-the-mofo/#comment-179136</guid>
		<description>As a former MoFo, all I can say is Jesus, God.  Who the f*ck designed this monstrosity?  And did they design the site for the blind?  Or were the designers themselves blind?  This is awful.  Associating myself with this panty-waste marketing drivel totally degrades my resume.  Thanks, a**holes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former MoFo, all I can say is Jesus, God.  Who the f*ck designed this monstrosity?  And did they design the site for the blind?  Or were the designers themselves blind?  This is awful.  Associating myself with this panty-waste marketing drivel totally degrades my resume.  Thanks, a**holes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.061 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 387/419 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: cache.abovethelaw.com

Served from: abovethelaw.com @ 2012-02-15 12:10:47 -->
