Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 10.13.10

By  
on

* If I tell you a check “cleared,” do you know what I’m talking about? No, you don’t. According to bankers, you have no freaking idea what I just said. Mwahahaha. Pick up the pieces of your mind, ’cause I just blew it. [New York Personal Injury Law Blog]

* Finally, we have two lesbians on the federal bench. Now it’s a party. [MetroWeekly]

* Being required to get fingerprinted in order to apply for food stamps is demeaning. And it’s not like signing up for food stamps is a big jolt of self-esteem in the first place. [WSJ Law Blog]

* Honestly, I think UNC should just go pro. [WRAL Sports]

* Really, we’re protesting people’s houses now? I have an idea: how about we get to stone one random rich person every day the economy fails to improve for the common man? Wait, that might actually work. [Huffington Post]

* Are you too important to return calls to your clients? [What About Clients?]

* JD Match continues to gain momentum. [JD Match]

Sponsored

Topics