Law Schools

Penn State Law Will Continue To Have Two Campuses, Because Politicians Are Even Dumber Than You Think



The faculty voted overwhelmingly at our October 8 meeting to pursue separate accreditation of our campuses in the event the DLA or Redevelopment Authority or Governor were to reject our proposal to consolidate our 1L class in University Park while simultaneously expanding various upper-level J.D. and international programs in Carlisle. You asked that I make one last effort to secure passage of our 1L consolidation proposal before advising the University, the DLA and the Board of Counselors of our desire to proceed with separate accreditation.

I informed the DLA and the Board of Counselors of our October 8 vote in an October 9 email and in a meeting on October 13. Senior University leaders and I also met with the DLA on October 17. On October 22, I sent the DLA and Board of Counselors a follow-up memo (copy attached) responding to their questions, reaffirming our preference for our 1L consolidation proposal and reiterating our desire for separate accreditation if we are not allowed to manage the law school’s educational program on a unified basis.

As I mentioned during our faculty meeting this past Tuesday (Nov. 13), the law school is in the process of negotiating agreements with top Chinese law schools for five-year English-language LL.B programs that would include two years for qualified students to gain advanced standing in our law school’s J.D. program, for dual LL.B/J.D. degrees. We have similar negotiations under way with leading law schools in Brazil and in the Middle East. I suspect that it would not be long under our consolidation proposal before the total number of upper-level law students in Carlisle would exceed by a fair margin the total number of J.D. students there today (170 and likely to decline further), albeit with a different composition than traditionally. The increased contribution to the local economy likely would be appreciable.

Since we publicly disclosed our 1L consolidation proposal last July, the law school has hosted open forums to discuss the proposal with law school alumni in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Wilmington, Baltimore, and New York. In August and again in September, we emailed copies and explanations of the proposal to all law school alumni, and since have discussed the proposal in individual meetings with scores of alumni. We also discussed the proposal openly with law school alumni during Alumni Weekend in Carlisle.

Invariably, law school alumni from outside the Carlisle-Harrisburg area, and many from within the area, including on the Board of Counselors, understand the market forces the law school confronts and unreservedly support our efforts to overcome these challenges by consolidating our 1L program in order to save expenses while expanding our upper-level programs in order to produce new revenue. They appreciate that interest in J.D. legal education among American students continues to decline dramatically, thus sustaining the trend of the last two years and making a response all the more urgent: just this week, for example, the LSAC announced that first-time LSAT takers for the October LSAT declined by another 18 percent over last year; applications to sit for the December LSAT reflect a comparable decline.

Last week, nonetheless, the Cumberland County Commissioners sent letters to me, the DLA and the Redevelopment Authority opposing our 1L consolidation proposal. Governor Corbett then declared his administration’s opposition to our proposal. On Sunday, the Harrisburg Patriot News published an editorial opposing our proposal. Previously, several state representatives announced their opposition to our proposal. I have attached a PDF that compiles these various efforts. All of the opposition seems predicated on the mistaken assumption that the consolidation of the law school’s 1L program in University Park means fewer students in Carlisle, not more.

In light of this political opposition, we have decided to discontinue efforts to secure approval of our 1L consolidation proposal and proceed instead with our alternative plan of separately accredited campuses of the Dickinson School of Law. The Dickinson School of Law will remain a single academic unit of Penn State, but each of our campuses will develop and implement separate identities, separate admissions policies, and separate educational programs, similar to Rutgers Law-Newark and Rutgers Law-Camden, or Arkansas Law-Fayetteville and Arkansas Law-Little Rock. Of course, even though separately accredited, our two campuses will continue to collaborate in various ways consistent with accreditation requirements and the independent educational program of each, including via our reciprocally-equipped AV classrooms.

I will schedule a faculty meeting for shortly following Thanksgiving break so that we might discuss implementation details for separate accreditation, including instituting separate strategic planning and other campus-specific faculty committees, and transitioning to separate administrations.

I will be scheduling meetings with our staff soon to explain the process.


Earlier: Crowdsourcing Declining Enrollment Figures

(hidden for your protection)

comments sponsored by

Show all comments