Biglaw Lawyers Behaving Badly: The Elite 8 (Part 1)
So, we are mid-March madness... is your bracket busted?
So, we are mid-March madness… is your bracket busted? With Villanova, Duke, and Florida State losing, there’s nary a perfect bracket in the country. But fret not! You can still get in on the madness with Above the Law’s Biglaw Lawyers Behaving Badly Bracket. The first half of the Sweet Sixteen matchups have concluded, so now we can move on to the Elite Eight in the Al Capone and Do Your Job regions. (Voting is still open until March 22nd at 6:00 a.m. in the Sweet Sixteen voting for the Infamous and Impulse Control regions.)
So, without further ado, here is where our bracket currently stands:
Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve
Yes, we are on a first name basis with these ne’er-do-wells. On to the voting!
The Biglaw partner who’s accused of running a litigation vendor scam that allegedly netted her and her husband nearly $8 million in embezzled fees easily won her opening matchup. But now Keila Ravelo has to take on someone who was sentenced to two years of jail time for his misdeeds.
John O’Brien was punished for not filing taxes on $9.2 million in partnership income. I can easily see how a little thing like $9.2 million can just fall through the cracks… oh, wait. No, I can’t.
Sponsored
Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
Who belongs in the Final Four of Lawyers Behaving Badly?
- # 1 Seed Keila Ravelo (84%, 427 Votes)
- # 2 Seed John O'Brien (16%, 83 Votes)
Total Voters: 510
Upset alert: on this side of the bracket we have a #4 seed who took out a former Biglaw associate serving 12 (!) years in prison for insider trading. But that 4 seed, Jeffrey Wertkin, does have the benefit of recency, and, you know, he was wearing a wig when he got arrested for selling a whistleblower complaint. So, you know, not the best look for a Biglaw partner.
Wertkin faces off against #2 seed Carlos Spinelli-Noseda. Spinelli-Noseda is the former Sullivan & Cromwell partner who simply could not get his reimbursements correct… to the tune of $500,000.
Sponsored
Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now
Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve
Who belongs in the Final Four of Lawyers Behaving Badly?
- # 4 Seed Jeffrey Wertkin (81%, 391 Votes)
- # 2 Seed Carlos Spinelli-Noseda (19%, 93 Votes)
Total Voters: 484
Voting is open until March 29th at 6:00 a.m., then we’ll announce our Final Four!
Kathryn Rubino is an editor at Above the Law. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).