Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:40 PM - By David Lat
It's not easy to be a two-time winner of our Lawyer of the Day award. But after reading this post, we think that you'll find Colorado lawyer Alison Maynard more than worthy of this honor.
Longtime readers of ATL will surely recall Alison "Sunny" Maynard from our prior coverage. But in case you don't, here's a refresher. Once upon a time, she filed this with a court:

And now she's come up with another winner of a filing. Who says lightning doesn't strike twice?
Check out Alison Maynard's latest handiwork, after the jump.
Continue reading "Lawyer of the Day: Alison Maynard (again)"
Thursday, March 8, 2007 2:02 PM - By David Lat
When we wrote about her amusing court filing earlier today, we redacted her name. But since she has shown that she has no problem with being identified, even going so far as to comment on our prior post, we're happy to shout her name from the blogospheric rooftops: ALISON MAYNARD.
Alison Maynard, who ran unsuccessfully for Colorado Attorney General as a Green Party candidate, is known in some circles as "Sunny" Maynard. And with her hilarious motion, Sunny Maynard has brightened the days of thousands of lawyers around the country.
This is why we're naming her our Lawyer of the Day. Congratulations, Ms. Maynard!
For those of you who didn't read our prior post, here's the relevant excerpt from Maynard's motion:

In the hours since we posted it, we've been bombarded by several lengthy email screeds from Maynard. Because most of them contained the words "water rights" and "bill of costs," they were initially banished to the "Boring Stuff" subfolder of our "Junk Mail" folder.
But we dutifully rescued them, and we even read them. Some excerpts, as well as links with biographical information about Alison Maynard, appear after the jump.
Continue reading "Lawyer of the Day: Alison Maynard"
Thursday, March 8, 2007 10:24 AM - By David Lat

In case you're wondering about the outcome, our tipster states: "Amazingly, the Judge granted the motion."
We contacted the attorney responsible for this court filing, to verify its authenticity. She responded: "Can I ask what your interest is, please, and how you acquired these?"
We're taking that as a "Yes, they're authentic." We gave the lawyer in question an opportunity to deny authenticity -- or to deny her use of a smiley-face emoticon in a court document -- and she did not.
We responded to her message, explaining that they were forwarded to us by tipsters (whose identities we always keep confidential, unless they request otherwise).
In her next email, she had a little more to say. We reprint her comments after the jump.
Continue reading "This Is WAY Better Than 'The Dog Ate My Pleading'"