* Barry Ostrager of Simpson Thacher bills out at $1,000 an hour? Well, just keep him away from your bathroom. [WSJ Law Blog]

* Eager to soak the rich (hedge fund kings)? Good luck with that. [DealBreaker]

* Remember the wacky Stephen Dunne, who blames the gays for his bar failure? Not being admitted may be the least of his problems. [Keeping Up With Jonas]

* A funny parody? Or a disturbingly accurate account of how the law review submission process works? [Concurring Opinions]

* Truth in advertising? This was probably well-intentioned, but ultimately unwise. [copyranter]

* Voting irregularities: not limited to "coolest law school" contests. [Machinist]

* Last Tuesday, a civil action captioned Aaron Brett Charney v. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP was filed in New York Supreme Court -- and the world of Biglaw has never been the same ever since. Click here to access the complete archives of our Aaron Charney coverage.

* Of course, Sullivan & Cromwell partners aren't the only bosses who are jerks challenging (allegedly).

* Don't forget the Divine Miss C, Shanetta Cutlar, whose delicious reign continues over at the Justice Department's Special Litigation Section.

Compared to Aaron Charney and Shanetta Cutlar, other topics pale by comparison. But here are other highlights from the past week in legal news:

* Charles "Cully" Stimson apologizes for ranking on Gitmo lawyers.

* In New Orleans, trials get rescheduled for football.

* Barry Ostrager of Simpson Thacher, the renowned business litigator, has poor bathroom manners (or aim).

* The justices of the Michigan Supreme Court just can't stop squabbling.

* Now we know the real reason -- or rather, the 25 million reasons -- that the Dewey Ballantine / Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe merger was scuttled.

* Third Circuit Judge Marjorie Rendell, who also serves as the First Lady of Pennsylvania, sings a duet with Jon Bon Jovi. We don't know whether to be delighted or frightened.

We now interrupt your regularly scheduled programming of Charney v. Sullivan & Cromwell to bring you some embarrassing news about another ultra-prestigious New York law firm: Simpson Thacher & Bartlett.

From Decision of the Day:

From the "it can happen to anyone" file, the Second Circuit dismisses a cross-appeal by Travelers Insurance Company because its law firm filed the notice of appeal one day late. After the losing party in the district court filed a notice of appeal, Travelers had 14 days to file its notice of cross-appeal. However, the firm calculated the 14 days from the date it received the notice, not from the date the notice was actually filed. The district court denied Traveler’s motion to extend the deadline by one day, explaining that this was a case of "garden variety attorney inattention" and not excusable neglect. The Second Circuit affirms (PDF).

The law firm that made this rookie mistake was one of the whitest of the white shoes, the venerable Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. The partners on the brief have stunning resumes, and the fifth-year associate has done plenty of litigating, given that he is admitted to practice in three jurisdictions and thirteen courts. So, yes, it can happen to anyone. (And in case you’re wondering, no, STB did not reject me.)

Decision of the Day is too nice to name the STB lawyers on the brief, but we have no such qualms. These are matters of public record. The attorneys who screwed up here are partner Barry R. Ostrager, partner Andrew T. Frankel, and associate Robert J. Pfister.

Barry Ostrager, by the way, is routinely named as one of the country's top business litigators and trial lawyers. See, e.g., here, here, and here. He's not particularly nice; as one litigator diplomatically observed, Ostrager "doesn't suffer from the need to be loved." But he has been very successful for his clients.

Given Ostrager's stellar reputation, this latest defeat is particularly embarrassing. It's one thing when you litigate a case as best you can, then lose because the law just isn't on your side. It's another thing when a federal trial judge finds you guilty of "garden variety attorney inattention," and then an appeals court affirms, holding that your "attorney inadvertence" -- a charitable phrasing -- does not constitute "excusable neglect." Great litigators, after all, are supposed to be careful, attentive, and detail-oriented.

But this is not Barry Ostrager's only lapse. His failure to pay attention to detail extends to the men's room -- as we have had the misfortune of observing, firsthand.

Read all about it, if you dare -- don't say we didn't warn you -- after the jump.