Bernard Fried
-
Aaron Charney, Bernard Fried, Biglaw, Gay, H. Rodgin Cohen
Brokeback Lawfirm: Score One for S&C
After a quiet period, in which we were reduced to wishing Gera Grinberg a happy birthday, there’s some actual news about Charney v. Sullivan & Cromwell. From Keeping Up With Jonas: Judge Fried issued his decision in response to S&C’s partial motion to dismiss. Though both sides landed blows, it seems that S&C can claim […] -
Aaron Charney, Arthur Leonard, Bernard Fried, Biglaw, Gay, Gera Grinberg
Brokeback Lawfirm: 'Slew of Activity' Last Friday
LEWW is ashamed to admit that we have not followed the Charney versus Sullivan & Cromwell lawsuit with the attention it so richly deserves. Fortunately, there are other bloggers who’ve got you (and us) covered regarding coverage and analysis of this complex affair in Lat’s absence. Keeping Up With Jonas has a nice capsule summary […] - Sponsored
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
ChatGPT ushers in the age of generative AI – even for law firms. -
Aaron Charney, Arthur Leonard, Bernard Fried, Biglaw, Gay, Lavi Soloway
Brokeback Lawfirm: Good News for Aaron Charney
We’re having one of those days — computer problems, email troubles, etc. We never should have returned from vacation. It’s a bad time for us to be so distracted, because there’s breaking news in the Aaron Charney and Sullivan & Cromwell litigation — two decisions from Justice Bernard Fried. A tipster sums them up: FYI […]
-
Aaron Charney, Bernard Fried, Biglaw, Gallion & Spielvogel, Gandolfo "Vince" DiBlasi, Gay, Gera Grinberg
Brokeback Lawfirm: A Bit of Monkey Business?
Remember our post from last week, hinting at the possibility that false affidavits were created in the Aaron Charney / Sullivan & Cromwell litigation? Well, a few more details — or allegations, at least — are drifting in. Check out this order by Justice Bernard Fried: Second page, after the jump. -
Aaron Charney, Bernard Fried, Biglaw, Fashion, Gay
Back from the Charney v. Sullivan & Cromwell Hearing
We’re back from today’s hearing in Charney v. Sullivan & Cromwell. In terms of entertainment value, it was a bit of a disappointment. It was a pretty straightforward proceeding. No salacious accusations of destroyed hard drives; no mystery lawyers popping out of the audience to join in the fun; no mention of attorney disciplinary proceedings. […]
Hide This extra mobile ad.