After John Oliver used dogs to create a recap of the Holt v. Hobbs argument, he asked other media outlets to use his raw footage in their own reporting. As much as we enjoyed the subsequent recreation of the entire Hobby Lobby argument with the aid of Oliver’s raw footage, this may be the ultimate realization of Oliver’s dream yet.
Rather than matching the audio of the whole argument uncut, these folks used the footage as part of an otherwise straight-up report on the Court’s shortcomings in addressing technological innovation. And included scenes like the Court’s back-and-forth about whether cutting-edge innovator Aereo operated “more like a car dealership or a valet service” but with the aid of Oliver’s dog footage. Check it out below….
Looking for a job? Check out Above the Law’s new job board. You can find it under the “Career Center” navigation tab on the top of the page, and the five most recent jobs posted can be found in the column on the right side of the page. While there, you can easily find jobs like:
Earlier this week, we learned that Whittier Law School was one of the “most challenged” in the nation when it came to its graduates’ ability to get jobs as lawyers. The administration, of course, isn’t pleased that about 40 percent of graduates are unemployed, so they’re “working very hard to implement programs and changes that should help … graduates with employment.”
Alas, the school might have to try harder — especially since it looks like not even its professors are quite sure what “lawyering skills” are…
My number one rule of lawyer advertising is to always avoid “old guy in suit in front of books,” but there are limits. And that limit falls somewhere beyond a dark Metallica tribute and somewhere around putting an ersatz Muppet in front of a camera to shill for a law firm.
Yes, this is a puppet. Promoting a law firm. Specifically, Professor Hans von Puppet.
What the holy hell?
I had to watch it a few times to convince myself I wasn’t having an acid trip. Or watching some high-concept sitcom.
With all the hubbub over cigarette companies advertising to kids, where was the outrage over a law firm making lawyering look fun?
As the saying goes, death and taxes are both certainties — as is the fact that politicians lie. But another near universal certainty is that Marvel will totally freak out whenever it gets the slightest inkling that its intellectual property is threatened. The latest head-scratching example of this was yesterday’s leak of a trailer for The Avengers 2, which Marvel promptly DMCA’d.
So in last week’s legal recap I expressed some mild appreciation for this show, but I think I just must have been overwhelmed by the ridiculous amazingness of Annalise confronting her husband over his sexting habits. Either that or I was a feverish as a Doctor Without Borders volunteer going bowling in Brooklyn fresh off a plane from West Africa (yup, it’s an Ebola joke — too soon, bro?) when I said that I enjoyed this show because holy plot holes Batman! Well maybe they won’t prove to be giant as there is still a lot of information to be filled in about the season-long arc regarding the night Sam Keating gets murdered, but there are definitely enough legal and logical inconsistencies to pull me right out of enjoying the show. HTGAWM cares way more about being sensational than being intelligent.
By now I’m guessing you’re wondering just how does HTGAWM play fast and loose with reality?
* Thanks to this Government Accountability Office ruling, the company that cleared NSA leaker Edward Snowden and Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis may lose a $210M contract. [Legal Times]
* After being acquitted on insider trading charges, Rengan Rajaratnam agreed to settle the civil suit filed against him for a cool $840K. At least he’s not in jail like his brother. [DealBook / New York Times]
* Those interested in going to law school may want to know that Philadelphia is purportedly home to some of the cheapest law schools in the country — not Penn Law, though, sorry ’bout that. [Main Street]
* Professors at WUSTL Law held a “teach-in” to discuss the Michael Brown police shooting case. According to them, the likelihood Darren Wilson will be federally charged is “slim to none.” [Student Life]
* Attack of the aggrieved ex: a man drove a burning pickup truck loaded with explosives into a law firm, destroying much of the building. He had apparently dated one of the firm’s former clients. [Virginian-Pilot]
Millennials are mad as hell, and they’re not going to take it anymore! Or get that reference!
Well, at least one is. The always entertaining “millennial op-ed” showed up in a business magazine this morning. After reading an entire Crain’s Business feature full of anecdotal evidence from millennials about how “screwed” they are in the current job market, a different millennial wrote an op-ed citing anecdotal evidence about how she’s… unscrewed.
While the feature piece focused on young people who were bartenders, nannys, and “perma-students,” the counter-narrative comes from a millennial who is a 2L in law school. And everything is going to work out for her, don’t ya know…
* Don’t go to jail in Alabama. Just a general rule. [Mother Jones]
* Interesting. LexisNexis is partnering with Microsoft to create a cloud-based system for small law firms. [PR Web]
* The remains of famed athlete Jim Thorpe will remain in the Pennsylvania town where he was buried, ruled Judge Richard Caputo. His family wanted the remains returned to his birthplace. Even in death this guy is getting jerked around. [Associated Press via ABC News]
* Man Okie State is litigious all of a sudden. Oklahoma State is suing the University of Texas for poaching the former Cowboys Offensive Line coach to be the Longhorns’ Offensive Coordinator. I can see the deposition now. Imagined transcript after the jump…. [ESPN]
Ed. note: This is the latest installment in a series of posts Lateral Link’s team of expert contributors. Michael Allen is Managing Principal at Lateral Link, focusing exclusively on partner placements with Am Law 200 clients.
When an Am Law 50 partner filed for divorce in 2010, she had no idea she was ending not only her marriage, but also her tenure as a Biglaw partner. The career she built on three degrees and over thirty years of hard work, ended unceremoniously as a casualty of a rancorous divorce.
What went wrong? It’s no secret that Biglaw firms scarcely differ from large corporations when it comes to employees’ personal matters. They tend to take a laissez-faire approach, unless they are pressured to protect the firm’s image or assets. The managing partner of the local office explained to her that it would be important to the firm that the partner’s productivity or the office atmosphere not be impacted by the divorce, but was otherwise unconcerned with the proceedings.
Jaffe & Clemen’s ace divorce attorney, Frisco Fayer, explicates that “[m]ost modern big firms recognize the need to support their partners and they do so whenever possible. That said, the demands placed on a divorcing partner by his or her career are not going to disappear. The partner’s clients are still going to expect the same level of service and the other partners in the firm are still going to be interested in maintaining billable hours.”