These days we spend a lot of our time chasing down rumors of attorney and staff layoffs at large law firms. It's a sign of the times.
Over at Adam Smith, Esq., lawyer and law-firm consultant Bruce MacEwen has compiled a helpful tally of acknowledged layoffs by major law firms. But note his caveat, which we also adopt: "I have not been able to include firms that have implemented stealth layoffs or, inhumanely, dismissed associates for "performance" reasons when that was actually not the case."
Many of the layoff rumors we hear turn out to be false, some of them comically so (like the one about a firm that supposedly laid off 40 associates, but has actually had just three depart, voluntarily, year to date). But some gossip turns out to have a certain amount of truth to it.
We recently heard that D.C.-based powerhouse Patton Boggs, known for its leading lobbying and administrative / regulatory practices, laid off four associates in its Dallas office. We reached out to the firm for comment.
A spokesperson for the firm, Rebecca Carr, stated that "eight to nine" associates were "let go" firm-wide. She didn't provide a precise breakdown in terms of offices of practice areas of the affected associates (so we're not sure about that Dallas number). She resisted characterizing these personnel changes as "layoffs" per se, chalking them up to "a combination of factors."
"For the past eight years, we have done mid-year evaluations of associates," Ms. Carr explained. "We evaluate them and determine whether or not there's a good fit. This year the state of the economy is somewhat soft, which made us take a harder look when conducting our evaluations."
"We made decisions to let go associates where we didn't feel we'd have enough work to keep them employed here," she said. "It's not a reflection on their work at all or on them. It's just that we have to take a harder look this year."
"Given the state of the economy, we don't have the luxury of carrying folks who aren't going to make it here, whom we don't think are going to be a good long-term fit," Ms. Carr added. "Patton Boggs is having a very good year. But the economy is soft, and we have to tread carefully in a soft economic climate."
Finally, in response to questions from us, she stated that no cuts have been made to staff ranks or to lawyers more senior than associates (like partners or of counsel).
We thank Ms. Carr for the information, and we commend Patton Boggs for its candor. We suspect that many other Biglaw shops, due to tough economic times, are ratcheting up standards when it comes to performance reviews. Most of these firms chalk up the subsequent dismissals as purely due to performance issues. But if they were going to be more honest, they'd admit (as Patton has) that the definition of "good performance" changes when the economy is weak.
If you have layoff information -- not rumor, which we hear a lot of, but hard info -- that hasn't been previously reported in these pages, please email us (subject line: "Nationwide Layoff Watch"). Thanks.
Update: More info about the Patton Boggs layoffs appears over at Tex Parte.
A Modest Suggestion re Associate Layoffs [Adam Smith, Esq.]
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of layoffs (scroll down)