We have a liability gap when it comes to mass shootings and gun violence. It turns out that the perpetrators of violent crime often don’t have the deep pockets necessary to pay for the medical bills and the pain and suffering of their victims.
There’s been a lot of press about how gun manufacturers and sellers were able to lobby Congress for sweetheart shields that protect them from being held liable when their products kill people. But in fairness to the gun lobby (I can’t believe I’m saying that), holding products manufacturers liable just because other people use those products illegally would be a neat legal trick. I mean, we basically blamed Big Tobacco for the bad choices of their consumers, but that’s only recently. The gun lobby now is every bit as powerful as tobacco was in the 1960s.
Of course, the Sixties marked the end of Big Tobacco’s heyday, so there’s hope.
In any event, we’re not going to hold gun manufacturers liable for injuries sustained by victims of mass shootings. And the criminals have no money. And the same people who want us to have as many guns as possible also don’t want us to have universal health coverage so that nobody goes bankrupt dealing with their injuries. So it would seem that most victims of mass shootings are SOL.
Unless the victims are lucky enough to get shot up while on the private property of a rich company… like in a movie theater or something….