How To Get Away With Murder

HTGAWMSo in last week’s legal recap I expressed some mild appreciation for this show, but I think I just must have been overwhelmed by the ridiculous amazingness of Annalise confronting her husband over his sexting habits. Either that or I was a feverish as a Doctor Without Borders volunteer going bowling in Brooklyn fresh off a plane from West Africa (yup, it’s an Ebola joke — too soon, bro?) when I said that I enjoyed this show because holy plot holes Batman! Well maybe they won’t prove to be giant as there is still a lot of information to be filled in about the season-long arc regarding the night Sam Keating gets murdered, but there are definitely enough legal and logical inconsistencies to pull me right out of enjoying the show. HTGAWM cares way more about being sensational than being intelligent.

By now I’m guessing you’re wondering just how does HTGAWM play fast and loose with reality?

Continue reading over at Redline…

how to get away with murder RFYou guys, I think I have a problem. I think I am starting to like “How To Get Away With Murder.” Yeah, I know what I’ve said about the show in the past. And it’s still all true. Truth time: a basic girl who once dated a law student for all of a week probably has a better grasp of what law school is actually like than the writers of this show. It is kind of like eating a fluffernutter sandwich, it’s sticky and too sweet and is only barely classified as a food stuff but, man is it tasty. Who cares that your teeth will ache from the sweetness and your stomach will protest for hours after it’s finished? It is good going down. So is HTGAWM. It’s outrageous and unrealistic but I have fun screaming at the TV and scornfully glaring at anyone who dares to interrupt.

So what crazy hijinks are the gang getting into this week, what moment had me saying, “that is exactly what law school is like,” and what are the final nine words of the episode ABC kept teasing all week?

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “A Dose Of Reality In Week Four Of ‘How To Get Away With Murder’”

Oh, “How To Get Away With Murder,” I just can’t quit you. Earlier this week, I was resolved that the legal inaccuracies were too great to continue watching, but here I am again on a Thursday night. Sure, this time I’ve had the foresight to arm myself with a bottle of whiskey I’m mixing with haterade. But the internet is vast and there are recaps aplenty, so I am focusing on the legal inaccuracies — actually that could turn into a treatise, so let’s just focus on the big whoppers.

Spoilers after the jump…

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “The Inaccuracies Grow In Week 3 Of ‘How To Get Away With Murder’”


It’s officially fall, and beyond the brisk temperatures and ubiquitous pumpkin spice lattes, that means there’s a new crop of television shows all vying for our attention. This season there seems to be a higher rate of shows that use the law or lawyers as a backdrop for the drama, but few have received as much attention (and as many positive reviews) as the Shonda Rhimes/Viola Davis joint effort, “How To Get Away With Murder.” And it makes sense; ABC has pretty much gone all in on Shonda Rhimes as their personal lord and saviour, and the talented Viola Davis has joined the flock of film actresses who’ve decided the best roles are now on the small screen.

But until now I’ve resisted the the urge to watch. I mean, the show is loosely (very, very loosely) based on attending Penn Law and now that it’s over, who really wants to revisit law school? However, when bad weather and a lingering cold conspire to keep me at home all weekend, the siren call of the On Demand listing just proved too much for me to resist…

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “‘How To Get Away With Murder’ Is Just Wrong”

Think carefully. Everything after this moment will not only determine your career, but life. You can spend it in a corporate office drafting contracts and hitting on chubby paralegals before finally putting a gun in your mouth, or you can join my firm and become someone you actually like. So decide: do you want the job or not?

– Professor Annalise Keating, played by Viola Davis, after confronting a first-year law student during a scene on How to Get Away with Murder, a new legal thriller that premiered last night on ABC.

(The show, complete with absurd dialogue — like the 1L who brags about his recent summer internship with Chief Justice Roberts — and even more ridiculous plotlines — like the 1Ls who quote case law while deciding where to bury a body — is loosely based on attending Penn Law.)

* When people tell you that you can do anything with a law degree, they’re wrong. Sounds like… everything Elie writes. [Slate]

* Student debt is dragging down the economy. Is today “every news outlet catches up with Elie Day”? [New York Times]

* Everyone’s also talking about the law student turned prostitute. What about the law professor who was a gigolo? [The Nota Bene]

* Baker Hostetler lawyer leaving the law to start a gym. With any luck he’ll have a championship dodgeball team in no time. [Crain's Cleveland Business]

* Just a reminder, there isn’t a “telling a university everything you’ve done for an oral history” privilege. [BBC]

* An argument for Republicans to get serious about loosening the reins on technological innovation like the Republican Party of old. But that might require saying no to some billionaire donor, so that’s off the table. [The American Conservative]

* Professor Will Baude pointed us to a fun new law professor blog from Professor Richard Re, soon to be of UCLA Law, with an even more fun title. Here he compares Justice Sotomayor’s dissent in Schuette to Quidditch. [Re's Judicata]

* A new show about law school. It’s supposedly about criminal law, but the trailer looks more like a professional responsibility fact pattern. [YouTube]

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Non-Sequiturs: 05.14.14″