Nancy Karibjanian

Delaware Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell may not be a witch, but she won’t be mistaken for a legal scholar either. In last night’s debate, when asked by moderator Nancy Karibjanian to name a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision with which she disagrees, O’Donnell came up empty. After Karibjanian noted the important responsibility that senators have to vote on appointments to the Supreme Court, this exchange ensued:

KARIBJANIAN: What opinions of late that have come from our high court do you most object to?
O’DONNELL: Oh, gosh, um…. Give me a specific one, I’m sorry.
KARIBJANIAN: Actually, I can’t, because I need you to tell me which ones you object to.
O’DONNELL: Um, I’m very sorry…. Right off the top of my head, I know that there are a lot. I’ll put it up on my website, I promise you.

Maybe this Mama Grizzly needs to crawl back to the den and curl up with some slip opinions?

But wait! We offer a defense of O’Donnell, who partially redeemed her initial flub, plus video — after the jump.

double red triangle arrows Continue reading “Christine O’Donnell Pulls a Palin and Flubs a SCOTUS Question”