Wearable Technology
-
Technology
Things That Didn't Happen In 2015
A lot has happened in the legal technology world in 2015; legal tech columnist Jeff Bennion discusses what hasn't shown up this year. -
Technology
Today's Tech: How A Biglaw Attorney Uses Apple Watch
Learn how one firm has been incorporating the Apple Watch into its day-to-day practice. - Sponsored
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
ChatGPT ushers in the age of generative AI – even for law firms. -
Biglaw, Technology
Today's Tech: How A Biglaw Attorney Uses Wearable Technology In His Practice
Which Biglaw firm is keeping up with the latest in wearable technology, and how has it helped their lawyers?
-
Technology
Is The New Apple Watch A Gimmick Or Useful Technology?
It can be useful to have a smart watch as a lawyer -- you can use it to better manage your day. -
Technology
Cybersecurity Litigation Monthly Newsletter
Significant Case Developments P.F. Chang’s Seeks Dismissal of Data Breach Class Actions, Arguing the Existence of an Express Contract and Lack of Damages Preclude Claims Lewert v. P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-04787 (N.D. Ill.). As we described in July and September, P.F. Chang’s was hit with three putative class actions following its announcement of a point-of-sale data breach. On August 29, P.F. Chang’s moved for dismissal of the first two cases, now consolidated in the Northern District of Illinois. In their complaints, plaintiffs John Lewert and Lucas Kosner alleged that by failing to safeguard customer information, P.F. Chang’s breached an implied contract and violated consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs did not bring a breach of express contract claim. P.F. Chang’s argues that the plaintiffs acknowledge the existence of an express contract by alleging that “a portion of the services [they] purchased” at P.F. Chang’s was “compliance with industry-standard measures” for data security and that they were “deprived of the full monetary value of [their] transaction.”
Hide This extra mobile ad.