Anatomy Of A Prosecutorial Meltdown

A wild clash over forfeited assets.

There’s a lot going on here, and while we can’t necessarily say the local prosecutor is solely to blame for the governmental crisis in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, he’s certainly not making things any easier. Craig Stedman, the Lancaster DA, is embroiled in a legal scorched earth conflict against the Lancaster County Commissioners that’s become so wild it’s hard to look away from the trainwreck.

Let’s just breakdown how we got here.

  • Confronted with these concerns, Stedman doubles down: The county commissioners noted that they would have leased him a vehicle through proper channels if he’d asked for one, but that using the forfeited funds to get a car on his own violated protocol. Rather than immediately apologize for the oversight, Stedman doubled down:

    Stedman’s office defended the lease, saying he is always on call and that most crimes he prosecutes are drug-related in some way, making the use of the money for a vehicle permissible.

    “In some way.” He also says the controller was aware of what he was doing. The commissioners don’t consider that in line with the rules.

  • The media seeks documents — Stedman fights the request: At this point, Stedman could turn over records of the use of forfeiture funds requested by the paper, LNP, under the Pennsylvania transparency law and neuter the claims against him by showing that everything was handled on the up and up. He fights them instead. He also tells the commissioners that he is “disappointed” that they’ve decided to intervene to back the journalists in the document request tussle and hints that he considers they’re accusations defamatory and that he doesn’t answer to the county commissioners but to the Pennsylvania Attorney General.
  • Stedman turns over documents but…: The media is less than impressed at the scope of the disclosure. Stedman claimed that the disclosure represented “the maximum we can give as allowed by law and not jeopardize public safety or investigations.” However, the newspaper points out the turned over records lack “receipts documenting what specific seized items were sold and what items were bought with the proceeds,” which seem hardly relevant to “protecting public safety” but very relevant to “covering up potential mismanagement.”

Sponsored

This is a criminal justice system in meltdown. Whether Stedman actually used the funds properly or not is now beside the point. His handling of the controversy has rapidly eroded any public trust in his office. At this point the battle isn’t over the propriety of the expenditures but whether or not asset forfeiture is subject to any oversight or transparency at all and once a prosecutor reaches that point, it’s probably for the best to step aside for the good of the office.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Sponsored