{"id":23535,"date":"2022-04-05T12:23:59","date_gmt":"2022-04-05T16:23:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/?p=848118"},"modified":"2022-04-05T12:23:59","modified_gmt":"2022-04-05T16:23:59","slug":"gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/","title":{"rendered":"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"lawyerDiscovery can be hard. But plaintiffs in the class action against Facebook — or Meta or whatever we’re supposed to call it these days — think the social media giant and its attorneys from Gibson Dunn have made it a lot harder than it needs to be. And they’ve got a hefty sanctions motion<\/a> over it.<\/p>\n

First noted by Reuters<\/a>, the newly unsealed motion in the Cambridge Analytica class action seeks around $854K in compensation for alleged bad faith in delaying the discovery process. And while there are indications that Facebook and Gibson Dunn have moved more swiftly in recent days, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria noted back in February that he’d “developed ‘quite a strong preliminary view’ that the company and Gibson Dunn had engaged in sanctionable conduct.”<\/p>\n

Which is never a great message to receive from a federal judge.<\/p>\n

As the motion states:<\/p>\n

Most fundamentally, the statements of Facebook\u2019s counsel at the January 19, 2022 hearing indicate that the delays here were not accidental, but a two-step litigation strategy of bad faith: first, delay discovery on the ground that it is too early; second, evade it on the ground that it is too late. This strategy merits sanctions.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

According to plaintiffs’ attorneys from Keller Rohrback and Bleichmar Fonti, a number of document requests adjudicated by the special master last fall remained unfulfilled as of mid-February and Facebook still hadn’t produced any documents on a number of those requests as of mid-March. Another dispute seems to reveal a troublesome reversal on Gibson Dunn’s part:<\/p>\n

At the February 10 conference, though, attorney Snyder stated that Facebook would be able to produce all ADI materials \u201cwithin one month, if not sooner.\u201d Ex. 28 at 13:4\u20135. The Court responded that they needed be produced \u201c21 days from today.\u201d Id. at 13:10. \u201cThat\u2019s fine, your Honor,\u201d replied attorney Snyder. Id. at 13:11.<\/p>\n

These statements cast grave doubts on past representations. When Facebook moved for reconsideration of the Special Master\u2019s initial ADI order, counsel claimed that producing all ADI communications would be wildly burdensome. One of Facebook\u2019s attorneys claimed, for example, that producing the communications would \u201cdelay the case for at least another year while we collect, review, and analyze millions of additional documents.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Now… on the one hand, discovery is a fluid process and tasks that appear onerous at first can ultimately turn out to be mundane. On the other hand, it’s a hell of a leap from “delay the case for at least another year” to “21 days from today” being “fine.”<\/p>\n

There are allegations of contentious negotiations over depositions Facebook claimed it needed to take urgently… and then canceled 36 hours beforehand claiming that plaintiffs hadn’t produced the necessary documents. Somewhat begging the question why the depositions were scheduled in the first place. Another set of allegations claim Facebook used all these delays “to argue that it was now too late<\/em> for Plaintiffs to be seeking rulings on discovery disputes,” which if accurate is chutzpah of the highest order.<\/p>\n

The motion is dated March 14, but just got unsealed. Facebook and Gibson Dunn are due to respond next week.<\/p>\n

Unless they request a postponement, which would be totally epic.<\/p>\n

Facebook, Gibson Dunn face $854K sanctions demand in Cambridge Analytica class action<\/a> [Reuters]<\/p>\n

\n

\"Headshot\"Joe Patrice<\/a>\u00a0is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer<\/a>. Feel free to\u00a0email<\/a> any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on\u00a0Twitter<\/a>\u00a0if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It’s only one side of the story, but it certainly doesn’t look good.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":147,"featured_media":450122,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[102,10020,120,471,1610,10023,7],"class_list":["post-23535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-biglaw","tag-bleichmar-fonti","tag-discovery","tag-facebook","tag-gibson-dunn","tag-keller-rohrback","tag-technology"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nGibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It's only one side of the story, but it certainly doesn't look good.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-05T16:23:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Joe Patrice\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Joe Patrice\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/\",\"name\":\"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-05T16:23:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-04-05T16:23:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/79d334169706fb219ff99177283474ad\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/\",\"name\":\"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\",\"description\":\"A Legal Tech Adoption Guide For Perplexed Lawyers\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/79d334169706fb219ff99177283474ad\",\"name\":\"Joe Patrice\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/39725f4befa491dfd9b10a60abee0488ed3cd456e04382c0ba7a6af9b0acd30b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/39725f4befa491dfd9b10a60abee0488ed3cd456e04382c0ba7a6af9b0acd30b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Joe Patrice\"},\"description\":\"Joe Patrice joined Above the Law in 2013. Joe received a degree in Economics and Political Science from the University of Oregon and a J.D. from the NYU School of Law. From 2001, he worked as a litigator for both Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton and Lankler Siffert & Wohl, representing a variety of individuals, institutions, and foreign sovereigns in criminal and civil matters. Joe left legal practice in 2012 to pursue writing, contributing to numerous publications, including ATL, before joining the full-time staff.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/author\/joe-patrice\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","og_description":"It's only one side of the story, but it certainly doesn't look good.","og_url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/","og_site_name":"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","article_published_time":"2022-04-05T16:23:59+00:00","author":"Joe Patrice","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Joe Patrice","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/","url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/","name":"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"","datePublished":"2022-04-05T16:23:59+00:00","dateModified":"2022-04-05T16:23:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/79d334169706fb219ff99177283474ad"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#primaryimage","url":"","contentUrl":""},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2022\/04\/05\/gibson-dunn-on-wrong-end-of-854k-sanctions-motion\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gibson Dunn On Wrong End Of $854K Sanctions Motion"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website","url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/","name":"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","description":"A Legal Tech Adoption Guide For Perplexed Lawyers","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/79d334169706fb219ff99177283474ad","name":"Joe Patrice","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/39725f4befa491dfd9b10a60abee0488ed3cd456e04382c0ba7a6af9b0acd30b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/39725f4befa491dfd9b10a60abee0488ed3cd456e04382c0ba7a6af9b0acd30b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Joe Patrice"},"description":"Joe Patrice joined Above the Law in 2013. Joe received a degree in Economics and Political Science from the University of Oregon and a J.D. from the NYU School of Law. From 2001, he worked as a litigator for both Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton and Lankler Siffert & Wohl, representing a variety of individuals, institutions, and foreign sovereigns in criminal and civil matters. Joe left legal practice in 2012 to pursue writing, contributing to numerous publications, including ATL, before joining the full-time staff.","url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/author\/joe-patrice\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/147"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23535"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23535\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}