{"id":29499,"date":"2023-12-08T10:04:13","date_gmt":"2023-12-08T15:04:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/?p=1020105"},"modified":"2023-12-08T10:04:13","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T15:04:13","slug":"even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/","title":{"rendered":"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"ArtificialOver the past few days I\u2019ve been hearing lots of buzz claiming that either today or tomorrow Senator Josh Hawley is going to push to \u201chotline\u201d the bill he and Senator Richard Blumenthal introduced months back to\u00a0explicitly exempt AI from Section 230<\/a>.\u00a0Hotlining<\/a>\u00a0a bill is basically an attempt to move the bill quickly by seeking unanimous consent (i.e., no one objecting) to a bill.<\/p>\n

Let me be extremely explicit: this bill would be a danger to the internet. And that\u2019s even if you hate both AI and Section 230. We\u2019ve\u00a0discussed this bill before<\/a>, and I explained its problems then, but let\u2019s do this again, since there\u2019s a push to sneak it through.<\/p>\n

First off, there remains an ongoing debate over whether or not Section 230 actually protects the output of generative AI systems. Many people say it should not, arguing that the results are from the company in question, and thus\u00a0not third party speech<\/a>. Lawyer Jess Miers made the (to me)\u00a0extremely convincing case as to why this was wrong<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In short, the argument is that courts have already determined that algorithmic output derived from content provided by others is protected by Section 230. This has been true in cases involving things like automatically generated search snippets or things like autocomplete. And that\u2019s kind of important or we\u2019d lose algorithmically generated summaries of search results.<\/p>\n

From there, you now have to somehow distinguish \u201cgenerative AI output\u201d from \u201calgorithmically generated summaries\u201d and there\u2019s simply no limiting principle here. You\u2019re just arbitrarily declaring some algorithmically generated content \u201cAI\u201d and some of it\u2026 not?<\/p>\n

I remain somewhat surprised that Section 230\u2019s authors, Ron Wyden and Chris Cox, have enthusiastically supported the claim that 230\u00a0shouldn\u2019t protect AI output<\/a>. It seems wrong on the law and wrong on the policy as noted above.<\/p>\n

Still, Senators Hawley and Blumenthal introduced this bill that would make a mess of everything, because it\u2019s drafted so stupidly and so poorly that it should never have been introduced, let alone be considered for moving forward.<\/p>\n

First of all, if Wyden and Cox and those who argue 230 doesn\u2019t apply are right, then this bill isn\u2019t even needed in the first place, because the law already wouldn\u2019t apply.<\/p>\n

But, more importantly, the way the law is drafted would basically end Section 230, but in the dumbest way possible. First the bill defines generative AI extremely broadly:<\/p>\n

GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.\u2014The term \u2018generative artificial intelligence\u2019 means an artificial intelligence system that is capable of generating novel text, video, images, audio, and other media based on prompts or other forms of data provided by a person.\u2019<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That\u2019s the entirety of the definition. And that could apply to all sorts of technology. Does autocomplete meet that qualification? Probably. Arguably, spellchecking and grammar checking could as well.<\/p>\n

But, again, even if you could tighten up that definition, you\u2019d still run into problems. Because the bill\u2019s exemption is insanely broad:<\/p>\n

\u2018\u2018(6) NO EFFECT ON CLAIMS RELATED TO GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.\u2014Nothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit any claim in a civil action or charge in a criminal prosecution brought under Federal or State law against the provider of an interactive computer service if the conduct underlying the claim or charge involves the use or provision of generative artificial intelligence by the interactive computer service.\u2019\u2019;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

We need to break down the many problems with this. Note that the exemption from 230 here is not\u00a0just<\/em>\u00a0on the output of generative AI. It\u2019s\u00a0if the conduct \u201cinvolves the use or provision\u201d\u00a0<\/em>of generative AI. So, if you write a post, and an AI grammar\/spellchecker suggests edits, then the company is no longer protected by Section 230?<\/p>\n

Considering that AI is currently being built into basically everything, this \u201cexemption\u201d will basically eat the entire law, because increasingly all content produced online will involve \u201cthe use or provision\u201d of generative AI, even if the content itself has nothing to do with the service provider.<\/p>\n

In short, this bill doesn\u2019t just strip 230 protections from AI output, in effect it\u00a0strips 230 from any company that offers AI in its products<\/strong>. Which is basically a set of internet companies rapidly approaching \u201call of them.\u201d At the very least, plaintiffs will sue and\u00a0claim<\/em>\u00a0that the content had some generative AI component\u00a0just to avoid a 230 dismissal<\/em>\u00a0and drag the case out.<\/p>\n

Then, because you can\u00a0tell an AI-based systems to do something that violates the law, you can automatically remove all 230 protections from the company<\/em>. Over at R Street, they give an example where they\u00a0deliberately convince ChatGPT to defame Tony Danza<\/a>.<\/p>\n

And, under this law, doing so would open up OpenAI to liability, even though all it was doing was following the instructions of the users.<\/p>\n

Then there\u2019s a separate problem here. It creates a massive state law loophole. As we\u2019ve discussed for years, for very good reasons, Section 230 preempts any state laws that would undermine it. This is to prevent states from burdening the internet with vexatious liability as a punishment (something that is increasingly popular across the political spectrum as both major political parties seek to punish companies for ideological reasons).<\/p>\n

But, notice that this exemption\u00a0deliberately carves out \u201cstate law.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0That would open the floodgates to terrible state laws that introduce liability for anything related to AI, and again help to effectively strip any protections from companies that offer any product that has AI. It would enable a ton of mischief from politically motivated states.<\/p>\n

The end result would harm a ton of internet speech, because when you add liability, you get less of the thing you add liability to. Companies would be way less open to hosting any kind of content, especially content that has any algorithmic component, as it opens them up to liability under this law.<\/p>\n

It would also make so many tools too risky to offer. Again, this could include things as simple as spelling and grammar checkers, as such tools might strip the companies and the content from any kind of 230 protections.<\/p>\n

I mean, you could even see scenarios like: if someone were to post a defamatory post that includes an unrelated generative AI image to Facebook, the defamed party could now sue Meta, rather than the person doing the defamation. Because the use of generative AI in the post would strip Meta of the 230 protections.<\/p>\n

So, basically, under this law, anyone who wants to get any website in legal trouble just has to post something defamatory and include some generative AI content with it, and the company loses all 230 protections for that content. At the very least, this would lead companies to be quite concerned about allowing\u00a0any<\/em>\u00a0content that is partially generated by AI on their sites, but it\u2019s difficult to see how one would even police that?<\/p>\n

Thus, really, you\u2019re just adding liability and stripping 230 from the entire internet.<\/p>\n

Again, even if you think AI is problematic and 230 needs major reform, this is not the way to do that. This is not a narrowly targeted piece of legislation. It\u2019s a poorly drafted sledgehammer to the open internet, at least in the US. Section 230 was the key to the US becoming a leader in the original open internet. American companies lead the internet economy, in\u00a0large part because of Section 230<\/a>. As we enter the generative AI era, this law would basically be handing the next technology revolution to any other country that wants it, by adding ruinous liability to companies operating in the US.<\/p>\n

Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI<\/a><\/p>\n

More Law-Related Stories From Techdirt:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Court Shuts Down Union\u2019s Assertion That NYPD Officers Should Be Allowed To Choke People To Death<\/a>
\nWyoming\u2019s Top Court Says It\u2019s OK To For Cops To Steal Money Obtained From Legal Drug Sales<\/a>
\nCourt Tosses Libel Suit Brought Against A Legal Doc Site For \u2018Failing\u2019 To Report On A Settlement Agreement<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This bill would be a danger to the internet.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":205,"featured_media":983424,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[20,1636,7],"class_list":["post-29499","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-section-230","tag-technology"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nEven If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This bill would be a danger to the internet.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-08T15:04:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Techdirt\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Techdirt\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/\",\"name\":\"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-08T15:04:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-08T15:04:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/4a1bdbf630074fc9f1feca42159f08d6\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/\",\"name\":\"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event\",\"description\":\"A Legal Tech Adoption Guide For Perplexed Lawyers\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/4a1bdbf630074fc9f1feca42159f08d6\",\"name\":\"Techdirt\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a4151b2f088dc890067fc9e6faefefce91880d605c40cc46dd473049e5d123e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a4151b2f088dc890067fc9e6faefefce91880d605c40cc46dd473049e5d123e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Techdirt\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/author\/techdirt\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","og_description":"This bill would be a danger to the internet.","og_url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/","og_site_name":"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","article_published_time":"2023-12-08T15:04:13+00:00","author":"Techdirt","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Techdirt","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/","url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/","name":"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI - Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"","datePublished":"2023-12-08T15:04:13+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-08T15:04:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/4a1bdbf630074fc9f1feca42159f08d6"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#primaryimage","url":"","contentUrl":""},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/2023\/12\/08\/even-if-you-hate-both-ai-and-section-230-you-should-be-concerned-about-the-hawley-blumenthal-bill-to-remove-230-protections-from-ai\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Even If You Hate Both AI And Section 230, You Should Be Concerned About The Hawley\/Blumenthal Bill To Remove 230 Protections From AI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#website","url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/","name":"Above The Law's Legal Tech Non-Event","description":"A Legal Tech Adoption Guide For Perplexed Lawyers","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/4a1bdbf630074fc9f1feca42159f08d6","name":"Techdirt","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a4151b2f088dc890067fc9e6faefefce91880d605c40cc46dd473049e5d123e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8a4151b2f088dc890067fc9e6faefefce91880d605c40cc46dd473049e5d123e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Techdirt"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/"],"url":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/author\/techdirt\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29499","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/205"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29499"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29499\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abovethelaw.com\/legal-innovation-center\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}