Section 230
-
Third Circuit’s Section 230 TikTok Ruling Deliberately Ignores Precedent, Defies Logic
From the that’s-not-how-any-of-this-works dept.
-
From the that’s-not-how-any-of-this-works dept.
-
-
-
Ninth Circuit Dumps Lawsuit Against YouTube Brought By Anti-Vaxxer Whose Account Was Terminated
Why do these lawsuits keep getting filed?
-
From the the-land-of-magical-thinking dept
-
This bill would be a danger to the internet.
-
-
-
Taamneh Case Gave Us A Glimpse Of The Horror Websites Would Face In A Post-Section 230 World
Sliding doors SCOTUS edition
-
-
Your ‘Simple Solution’ To Section 230 Is Bad: Julia Angwin Edition
That’s not how any of this works.
-
It’s like the Spider-Man pointing meme, but legal!
-
* Another effort to strike “non-lawyer” from the industry vernacular. Deploying the phrase to denigrate other professionals is bad, but… it’s pretty important for a host of ethical reasons that folks know if their law firm contact is a lawyer or not. [Law.com]
* Shocking absolutely no one, when faculty met to discuss an effort by some Christian law students to get official recognition for new clubs to exclude LGBTQ students, the meeting was recorded and leaked to Fox News. Because the whole point for these initiatives is to get on Fox News. But now police are involved and students are getting a crash course in the difference between one- and two-party consent states. [NHPR]
* Alex Murdaugh’s lawyer pulled a gun on the prosecutor? Meh, seems par for this course. [Intelligencer]
* Even if Section 230 survives, it won’t shield ChatGPT. [Lawfare]
* Regulators are starting to think billion-dollar crypto deals might be a problem. Welcome to the party. [Reuters]
-
A Second Bite At The Apple: Does Section 230 Protect Content Providers That Aid Terrorists?
The things the algorithm puts in your recommended videos can be baffling.
-
* Law firms don’t appreciate associates building their own brand through social media. Because “professional development” only flows one direction. [Legal Intelligencer]
* Hunter Biden seems to have found lawyers who are aware that ripping private data off a computer is generally a crime. [Washington Post]
* Real Criminal Defendants Of Beverly Hills. [Reuters]
* Andrew Tate’s got a new lawyer. He’s probably mansplaining how the law works to her right now. [Rolling Stone]
* Supreme Court considers whether algorithms might evade the spirit of internet laws. [The Atlantic]
-
-
Senator Roger Wicker Threatens Twitter For Cancel Culturing Conservative ‘Humor’ Site
Bakers don’t have to bake gay wedding cakes, but websites have to host offensive content? Cool, got it.
-
-
CNN Shutting Down Its Facebook In Australia Shows How Removing 230 Will Silence Speech
The liability is too great.