Non-Sequiturs: 07.30.15

* Donald Trump's lawyer responds to the flap over his spousal rape comments. Sort of. Not really. [Funny or Die] * Does the Supreme Court need an ethics code? And yes, yes it does. [The Faculty Lounge] * James Woods is suing a Twitter troll for claiming the actor is a "cocaine addict." They probably just misspelled "hypersensitive blowhard." [Gawker] * In baseball, does the "tie go to the runner"? Are you sure? [PrawfsBlawg] * Tom Brady provides that rare opportunity for sports fans to care about forum selection clauses. But the best part of this story is the comment: "Out of habit, the NRA filed an amicus brief on behalf of the NFL when they heard 'Clinton' & 'Brady' in the same sentence." It's refreshing when commenters are funny. [Deadspin] * Keeping up with Supreme Court is hard. Even the Fifth Circuit struggles with it (though they've since seen the error of their ways). [Huffington Post] * If you think academia can be a cushy job, you should see what retiring from academia looks like? [TaxProf Blog] * Can you quit your job without another one lined up? Leigh Abramson has thoughts. [CNN Money] * A comprehensive snapshot of the business record of the Roberts Court. [Constitutional Accountability Center]