* That hashtag you’re using might just be a registered trademark, but that doesn’t mean it should be. [Buzzfeed]
* Yale Law students filed a class action representing people held in quarantine for 21 days amid fear of the Ebola virus. [Hartford Courant]
* The Sixth Circuit holds 10 weeks of constant video surveillance from a public road does not constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment. You know if you just assume you are always being watched, none of this really bothers you. [Volokh Conspiracy]
Product Spotlight: Lexis® Verdict & Settlement Analyzer
Put away the guesswork—Lexis® Verdict & Settlement Analyzer helps legal professionals assess case potential with confidence by using data-driven insights from the industry’s largest collection of verdicts and settlements.
* Understanding the rapid fire world of SnapChat is essential if you don’t want to get left behind in the dustbin of history. [Associate’s Mind]
* Tackling the thorny issue of access to justice, in law school and after. [Reboot Your Law Practice]
* The ABA House of Delegates joins the call for cameras in the Supreme Court. What do they have against puppies? [Fix the Court]
Context Windows In Legal AI And Why Content Still Determines Quality
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
* When we say, “life without parole,” what do we really mean? [The New Yorker]