Non-Sequiturs, Politics, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, U.S. Attorneys Offices

Non-Sequiturs: 05.15.09

By  
on

* I would have no problem at all if potential SCOTUS justices had to answer this questionnaire and those answers had to be published and discussed during the confirmation hearing. [Daily News]
* Married men looking for sex slaves might want to consider the words of the wise Falstaff. Discretion is the better part of valor. [True/Slant]
* New Hampshire Governor John Lynch has some ideas about reelection religion. [Law Dork 2.0]
* New U.S. Attorneys have been named for New York and New Jersey. I suggest laid off associates start networking with these guys now. Remember, today’s U.S. Attorneys are tomorrow’s rainmakers. [City Room]
* Isn’t being forced to watch Maury Povich a clear violation of the 8th Amendment? I don’t mean liberal “whaaa, when I go to prison, sometimes they give me bad touches” violation. I mean a straight up, dress you in a bonnet and make you watch surveillance DVDs of your mom having sex with your stepdad, violation of the 8th Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. [Popsquire]

Sponsored

Topics