McDermott logo.JPGMcDermott Will & Emery was supposed to have its incoming class start in January. But now that January is almost upon us, MWE is the latest firm to change its mind.
The news first broke on Facebook late last week, via status updates of unhappy incoming associates:

♫ “re-deferment in december. happy holidays.”

Yeah, there is a lot of that going around. It’s like the Biglaw version of the Lexus “December to Remember” ad campaign.
McDermott will be offering the (now standard) deferral extension stipend of $5,000/month. Given that the firm has been cost cutting for a while, incoming associates should probably be grateful for the stipend they will receive.
Additional details, plus a statement from the firm, after the jump.


A spokesperson for McDermott Will & Emery furnished Above the Law with the following statement:

At this time, we have deferred the start date for a number of our incoming associates based on need for associate services in select practice groups. Deferred associates will be paid $5,000 per month, receive medical and dental insurance coverage, as well as other benefits.

The firm did not say how long these associates are being deferred, so it appears that we have a classic flipping the bird situation.
Of course, when Alston & Bird re-deferred its incoming class, we were way back in September. MWE is pulling the rug out from people in early December. I hope nobody had apartments lined up for January.
With that in mind, people should really contact their firms before they sign a lease or fork over a security deposit. Given the fact that some firms seem willing to defer associates so late in the game, it is better for incoming people to be safe than sorrily locked into a rent situation they cannot afford.
Good luck.
Earlier: Reversed Perk Watch: McDermott Will & Emery Scales Back on Benefits
Deferral Extension Season: Alston & Bird Make Indefinite Deferral
Mayer Brown Re-Deferment: A December Surprise

Comments are hidden for your protection. Click here to show them.

View Comments

  1. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:01 PM

    This firm is the definition of suck.

  2. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:02 PM

    Come on, ATL – put together a chart or list of all the re-deferrals, with original deferred start dates, extensions, and stipend amounts.

  3. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM

    1 – Agreed. Scorn shall flow to all firms who defer associates the month prior to their start date.
    I heap scorn upon you, MWE.
    /me throws scorn.

  4. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:03 PM

    Come on, ATL – put together a chart or list of all the re-deferrals, with original deferred start dates, extensions, and stipend amounts.

  5. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM

    This is beyond cruel. Why couldn’t the firm determine their “need for associate services” back in September?

  6. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM

    Come on, ATL – put together a chart or list of all the re-deferrals, with original deferred start dates, extensions, and stipend amounts.

  7. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:04 PM

    Elie, get some perspective…it is ridiculous to refer to $5,000 per month for not working as “the little stipend” when that’s more than most Americans receive for actually working

  8. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM

    A very merry Christmas, indeed. F*ck these firms–it’s beyond cruel to pull this stunt so late in the game.

  9. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM

    well Elie, kudos for removing the word “little” so quickly
    – 7

  10. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:07 PM

    since when does 3 firms equate to “a lot” of them?

  11. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM

    Indefinite deferral? Any word on this?

  12. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM

    11–read the article, they wouldn’t say how long.

  13. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM

    1. Did incoming associates at MWE ever get a specific start date for January?
    2. How many incoming associates were impacted by this absolutely brutal decision?
    3. This firm should be BANNED from law school recruitment.

  14. Posted by Dubya | December 8, 2009 at 1:12 PM

    Mission Accomplished!

  15. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:12 PM

    What’s worse? To be re-deferred at this shitbag firm, or have your offer revoked at sister shitbag like Arent Fox?
    And THEN what’s worse after that? To find out that both shitbag firms are having new summer classes, or to actually be a part of a summer class at one of those shitbag firms?
    YIKES!

  16. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:16 PM

    12, I saw the article, but I am surprised that in the firm’s discussions with the incoming associates nothing was thrown around in terms of starting date–i.e., “We are hoping to start everyone in April, but we just need to see where the market is . . . .”

  17. Posted by The Dow is Down Guy | December 8, 2009 at 1:16 PM

    The Dow is down.
    What did you expect?

  18. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:16 PM

    ELIE – ARE YOU GOING TO APOLOGIZE FOR YOUR PEARL HARBOR DAY INSULT?

  19. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:17 PM

    Which practice groups? All?

  20. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:18 PM

    there is NO more money. anywhere.

  21. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    As a Mormon, I feel sorry for these poor souls. However, this is a great time to find themselves and reevaluate their life decisions. It is times like these that I find the Scriptures most comforting.
    I remember helping a distressed gay man on my Mission. He was upset over another failed relationship. He opened his heart to the Scriptures and was Baptized a mere four weeks later. I’m proud to say he is now married and expecting a child!

  22. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    This is just poor management.
    Leaving aside all the arguments that law students will boycott the firm, this decreases morale among existing employees, and it sends the wrong message to clients, I just don’t understand how this could benefit the firm financially. It appears they are shuffling the chairs on the deck of a sinking ship.

  23. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    I just hope these LOSER firms have their feet held to the firm when (if??) things get better.
    Then i hope their feet burn off and they have only melty-bubbly stumps for legs. HA!

  24. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    16–this firm just fucked those people in the ass, and you think the firm cares about making them feel better by saying “we hope to see you in april”? what planet do you live on?

  25. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    I just hope these LOSER firms have their feet held to the fire when (if??) things get better.
    Then i hope their feet burn off and they have only melty-bubbly stumps for legs. HA!

  26. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:20 PM

    I was told last May that I would be deferred until October of 2010 . . . and because my firm planned ahead they were able to adjust their 2010 incoming class accordingly.
    I would be worried to be an incoming associate at one of these firms that continue to mismanage this situation.

  27. Posted by BHO | December 8, 2009 at 1:20 PM

    I inherited this mess!
    I’m Barack Obama?

  28. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM

    Elie Mystal I wish you worked for MWE. That is how much I hate you.
    Son of Pearl Harbor survivor

  29. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    How are these places not incredibly busy? We are swamped (thank God). What a fucking shithole.

  30. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM

    29 – name firm or it didn’t happen.

  31. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM

    It is beyond belief that even the worst of firm management did not know the staffing situation weeks ago. While the stipend may be helpful, this is too late in the game to be forgiveable.

  32. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:26 PM

    31 – somehow I’m not sure the partners are worried about your forgiveness.

  33. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:27 PM

    Let me get this straight, they get paid $5,000 per month and dont have to do any work? Fuck every last one of you in the ass for bitching about something like this, and fuck ATL and Elie for presenting it in such a manner. They’re making well above the median HOUSEHOLD income in this country for NOT GOING TO WORK. HELLO- they wont the fucking lottery.
    You realize you can live like an emperor on a tropical island in thailand for well under 1500/mo right…

  34. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:28 PM

    McDeferral Will & Emery

  35. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM

    MWE re-deferred associate here. Got the call last week from a hiring partner. Once I realized what was happening, I started to give a lot of attitude. I asked them why they couldn’t have decided this earlier. He had no response!
    I signed a NYC lease two weeks ago! I am now in the hole $4k (deposit), as well as the flight I booked. MWE just ruined my life. I will now make it my mission to make sure this TTT firm never recruits good talent ever again.

  36. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM

    30: S&C, oh it did happen

  37. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM

    I’d wish these deferred associates good luck but they wouldn’t know what to do with it if they got it.
    And to answer your question, pal: why am I here? I came here because Will and Emery asked me to, they asked me for a favor. I said, the real favor, follow my advice and fire their fucking asses because a loser is a loser.

  38. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM

    33,
    60k a year in a major market is like living with the poors. You’re a fucking retard.

  39. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM

    Pre-emptive severance pay!!

  40. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM

    The firms that managed their business well during the downturn are currently very busy. The firms that did not are currently re-deferring.
    I guess we know which one MWE is.

  41. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:31 PM

    The ship be sinking!

  42. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM

    30,
    Debevoise and its fucking insane.

  43. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM

    So glad I didn’t accept an offer from them! This shows how highly they value young associates. Understandably times are tough, but you wait this long to tell deferred associates that they’ll be deferred for longer?!?!? Dodged a bullet by not going there….

  44. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM

    So glad I didn’t accept an offer from them! This shows how highly they value young associates. Understandably times are tough, but you wait this long to tell deferred associates that they’ll be deferred for longer?!?!? Dodged a bullet by not going there….

  45. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM

    So glad I didn’t accept an offer from them! This shows how highly they value young associates. Understandably times are tough, but you wait this long to tell deferred associates that they’ll be deferred for longer?!?!? Dodged a bullet by not going there….

  46. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:33 PM

    34 for the win..nice

  47. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:34 PM

    My balls are massive.

  48. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:35 PM

    33=47

  49. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:35 PM

    With apologies to 34, McDeferral Will (not be) Ephemery?

  50. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:36 PM

    38: 60k in a major market is now living with the poors? You self-entitled yuppie, get a hold of yourself. Unless you live beyond your means, 60 k plus full health benes is enough to live in NYC and have a great time. I know mad peeps who get buy on 50k.
    I would more concerned that they will tell you to go fuck yourself and find other employment before tbd start date.

  51. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:36 PM

    Where are we at with layoffs? It is really quiet compared to this time last year. Are stealth layoffs still happening at the rate they were last year?

  52. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM

    I was getting re-deferred before it was cool.
    Winston insecure

  53. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    Hey Lat, I bet you want to see 47’s balls.

  54. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    Welcome to McUnemployment bitches. Thanks Obama!

  55. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    congratulations 38 on completely missing 33’s point
    to repeat: they are getting paid 60k per year for NOT working
    – not 33

  56. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:39 PM

    35,
    That does suck. However, given these times you should have had the wisdom to call recruiting before you signed a lease and booked your flight to confirm your start date and let them know you were moving forward.
    They would have either told you (a) to hold on or (b) come on over and would now be on the hook for an argument that they should pay those expenses.

  57. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:41 PM

    This whole entitlement/you’re lucky for a stipend line of reasoning seriously needs to end. The plight of class of 2009 incoming associates is not a matter of entitlement or making less money than originally anticipated. Rather, the issue is that we took an offer in 2008 and didn’t seek out other avenues because of that offer. By the time firms told us we were effed it was too late to seek cover. Criticize whinny deferreds as much as you want, but at least get the issue right.

  58. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:42 PM

    38- 60k in a major market is living with the poors if you also spend 12 hours a day delivering pizzas on a bike in 10 degree Manhattan weather. 60k in a mm doing whatever you please all day would probably anger any poor enough to stab you to death if he knew.

  59. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM

    People need to stop complaining about the $5k + insurance, but I do agree that people have a legitimate complaing about notifying incoming associates in December–that should have been avoided!

  60. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:45 PM

    33/50
    Your incoherent analogy of “an emporor living in Thailand on 1500/month” is retarded. 1. These offers aren’t in Thailand. 2. No experience is being gained by not working (you’re obviously an idiot who doesn’t realize many of these people would rather be working than sitting on their ass). 3. The mentality is not, “cool, I make 5k a month for sitting on my ass!” The menatlity at this point is fear, “will I ever start? can I trust this firm? Will I have a job in the future?” 4. This is about a 100k pay cut (as of now). Calling me a “self-entitled yuppie” is ridiculous and illogical. BUT YOU ARE A FUCKING RETARD.

  61. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:46 PM

    Echo 62
    – 58

  62. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM

    What about the class of 2010 deferrals that aren’t getting a stipend? What should they do?

  63. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM

    62, STFU, no one gives a crap about your plight

  64. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:48 PM

    #35 you just helped them identify you, you dumb ass! They only deferred 15 people. And not many in NY. They should fire you for beging so stupid.

  65. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM

    #35 you just helped them identify you, you dumb ass! They only deferred 15 people. And not many in NY. They should fire you for being so stupid.

  66. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM

    Deferred associates do need to stop whining–you still have some hope of a future job. Nothing significant has been taken from you, the firm is paying you to wait until things pick up. You should be thanking them, it would have been easier and cheaper for them to just let you go.
    Now if after your deferral you never get a job, you can proceed to whine because of lost opportunities . . .

  67. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM

    #35 you just helped them identify you, you dumb ass! They only deferred 15 people. And not many in NY. They should fire you for being so stupid.

  68. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM

    59, because the pizza guy has so much debt to deal with and is smart enough to work in biglaw. We live in a meritocracy, get over your retarded liberal agenda.

  69. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:50 PM

    At least they didn’t rescind offers entirely like Wildman Harrold did.
    Wildman Harrold is a sinking ship.

  70. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:51 PM

    67 -
    Do I give a fuck? My biglaw career is over before it even started. If they identify me I will tell them to fuck off myself.
    –35

  71. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:52 PM

    Pizza guy to 190!

  72. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:53 PM

    You are all idiots.
    - SMU secure

  73. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:53 PM

    Its hard to feel pity for a 5k def. (plus insurance coverage???). There wasn’t a provision to not seek other employment was there? It would be wise to treat this money as gravy on top of doing something productive, as opposed to living in mom’s garage playing xbox all day (though that has appeal).

  74. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:53 PM

    I am firmly of the opinion that this blog is most often frequented by: (1) TTT grads with absolutely no prospect of ever finding meaningful legal employment; (2) young associates; (3) law firm staff. Why else would there be so much venom for a group of people who simply want to take their place in their respective legal communities? The TTT grad resents prospective incoming biglaw associates. Young associates are mad because they don’t want to share. And staff gets burned up when they see a person half their age making three times as much money. Grow up.

  75. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:54 PM

    70, you sound like the one with the “liberal agenda” (getting paid for not working)…some people become roadkill in a free market economy, and deferred associates are among them

  76. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:56 PM

    I AM PERSONALLY FORWARDING THIS POST TO ALL T-14 SCHOOLS. I WILL MAKE IT MY LIFE-LONG MISSION TO ENSURE THAT MWE NEVER RECRUITS A SINGLE STUDENT FROM A TOP SCHOOL.
    MWE — YOUR DAYS ARE FUCKING NUMBERED. I HOPE YOU ALL GO BROKE.

  77. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:56 PM

    There are still biglaw partners, seniors and mid levels here. Though we’re far outnumbered by the autoadmit kids who are also the most vocal.

  78. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM

    yale is #1

  79. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM

    77,
    You suck at reading. I’m pressing for people to work dipshit.
    I second 76.
    -70

  80. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:58 PM

    LQTM at 78

  81. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM

    67 – actually, only 11 people were deferred.

  82. Posted by Nigel Tufnel | December 8, 2009 at 2:00 PM

    To All Deferred Associates:
    Gigs are canceled all the time. It’s no big deal. Find another gig in your city, or move on to the next city.
    Nigel

  83. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:00 PM

    What happened to the glimmer of hope for PHJW kids that I read back on the Mayer Brown thread?

  84. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:02 PM

    78 – Don’t get me wrong, I hate MWE too. Spent some of the worst years of my life grinding away there hopelessly. I’m glad to be free now, but c’mon. You’re going to make it your “LIFE-LONG MISSION” to fuck with their recruiting? Just do like the rest of us and occasionally post at ATL about how shitty the firm is. Especially around recruiting season.
    Also, if you wind up in-house, like I did, steer work away from them. It’s funny and gratifying.

  85. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:03 PM

    Did MWE actually tell deferred associates they were deferred, or did they let them read it on ATL before any communication was made to them?
    They used ATL to announce the reduction in summer associate salary and the layoffs during the summer.
    Terrible, terrible firm.

  86. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM

    64 – you are never starting

  87. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM

    70/81 – you suck at writing dipshit…oh, and go fuck yourself too
    – 70

  88. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM

    Good luck to 78 and all the other people threatening to make it their “mission” to ensure that MWE never recruits from top schools. You’re going to need it.
    Are you that arrogant to think that you, and you alone, can’t prevent a firm from recruiting at top schools? If you are, then you’re an idiot.
    I feel bad for any laid off/deferred associates. I sincerely do, as I was laid off at one point. However, for those of you who think like 78, you really need to get over yourself. You’re just not that important or powerful. Welcome to the world. None of are.

  89. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:06 PM

    Nixon Peabody still hasn’t said anything about January 2010 –are they next to redefer?

  90. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:08 PM

    Does anyone know how the deferral stipends are treated for tax purposes? Are they considered income or like a bonus? That is significant because $60k quickly turns into $35k if it’s a bonus.

  91. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    @92 – CHECK YOU COAT HANGERS

  92. Posted by Partner Emeritus | December 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    These re-deferrals are further evidence of Commissar Obama’s failure to ameliorate our anemic economy. Obama’s stimulus plan has provided some temporary shovel jobs to a few manual laborers but that has been the extent of his job saving plan. The irony is that most of the associates that are being re-deferred voted for Commissar Obama. Thus, they are getting their “hope and change.” Regardless, $5,000.00 to sit and do dick is nothing to be ungrateful about.

  93. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    90 – Except Obama, who can single-handedly save our economy with willpower and superior-teleprompter-reading skills!

  94. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    70/81 – you suck at writing dipshit…oh, and go fuck yourself too
    – 77

  95. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:13 PM

    90 – it’s not a surprise you got fired with writing skills like that. Please don’t tell me what I can and can’t do. Just worry about your own shit.

  96. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:13 PM

    If PHJW incoming associates are redeferred, they probably shouldn’t send scathing emails to the entire firm. And by redeferred, I mean fired.

  97. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:16 PM

    93 – you’re an idiot. A bonus is regular taxable income.
    You’re used to seeing a large chunk of it disappear not because it’s treated differently by the IRS, but because your employer tends to withhold your taxes from it at the highest marginal rate to which they think you’ll be subject.

  98. Posted by Tibor | December 8, 2009 at 2:19 PM

    Hey, PE! Fuck you…or did the Bush (Mis)Administration never happen? Oh, I know, it’s like Dana Perino told us; there were no terrorist attacks on this country during the Cheney Years…oh, yeah, except for a little dustup in September ‘01. Obama was not the cause of the recession, it was your fucktard friends in the Congress and the banking industry that sold us down the river. Keep reaching, you’ll find it…

  99. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    If you summered at a firm and got an offer, then got deferred, then revoked, do you qualify as “alumni”? Because it’s nice to feel like you’re part of the team.

  100. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    Same boat as 53
    -Making $1400/month less than this ‘re-deferral standard’

  101. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    Same boat as 53
    -Making $1400/month less than this ‘re-deferral standard’

  102. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:27 PM

    Those who are actually starting in January will be paid $145,000. Time to update that NALP form, McDeferral Will & Emery.

  103. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    Is there a claim under Section 90 of the Restatement of Contracts here?

  104. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    I just can’t believe how much time and effort is spent (including me) reading and responding to this crap. Geez…..

  105. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:29 PM

    I just can’t believe how much time and effort is spent (including me) reading and responding to this crap. Geez…..

  106. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    106 raises a good point. Ar e any incomings actually making 160?

  107. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:34 PM

    Was it really only 15?

  108. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    62 – You will never start. You have been fired. Now STFU and look for a job.
    V10 SECURE

  109. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:39 PM

    How should I document the fact that I got an offer but I got deferred and then redeferred on my resume in case someone at Whataburger wants to hire me?

  110. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM

    Any one know how many were deferred and what practice groups they belonged to?

  111. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:50 PM

    Does anyone know if MWE made their offers yet to last summer’s associates?

  112. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    ATL to PHJW!

  113. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:54 PM

    115 – they did, eventually.

  114. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:58 PM

    ATTENTION MWE SUMMERS (2009 & 2010): LOL @ thinking you’ll ever start.

  115. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM

    Many lawyers have trouble making conversation, this leads to awkward silences, lost opportunities, and lost confidence. There are three main elements to great conversation that all revolve around taking an interest in other people. They are 1) Listening-listen to what the other person is saying and look for seeds (seeds-=things they may want to elaborate on) and ask questions about those seeds. 2)Asking/Answering Questions- If they ask a question, give an elaborate answer (more than one word) so they can ask you more questions OR if you are shy repeat the question back to them OR ask a question about one of the seeds they mentioned earlier. 3) Empathize – match experiences with a person, this really helps facilitate conversation.. If they tell you about a situation you respond with a story about a similar situation. If you practice the aforementioned skills every day with every conversation you have you will be able to converse easily with anyone, anywhere.

  116. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 3:09 PM

    117 – Any news w/r/t offer rate? I don’t recall ever seeing it discussed here.

  117. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 3:14 PM

    120 – who cares? These offers are meaningless!

  118. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 3:22 PM

    120 – Afraid I dunno. I left a while back, but one of the summers I kept in touch with eventually got his offer, after being on tenterhooks for a few months (late September, I think the offer came in).

  119. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 3:39 PM

    Don’t want to get re-deferred??? Go work in Texas.

  120. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    better deferred than to start, work a few months and get laid off. ‘08 grads really got f’ed by this firm.

  121. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    anyone else notice how this firm keep showing up on ATL every other month?

  122. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 3:48 PM

    Only in this online community of weirdos is this a bad thing. $5k/month to *not* work? Even with big student loans, this is nice.

  123. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 4:11 PM

    Are you complainers joking? These kids are getting $60,000/year plus generous benefits to do nothing? Christ, I’d be having the time of my life backpacking around Europe and would trade places with one of these guys in an instant if I had the opportunity.

  124. Posted by Michael Ray Richardson | December 8, 2009 at 4:18 PM

    The ship be sinking…

  125. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 4:22 PM

    Anyone claiming that re-deferred associates are ungrateful and lucky to be getting 5k/month is an idiot. It has nothing to do with the money. I was re-deferred, and if I had the choice I would happily start working in January, even if it meant a salary of 5k/month. We’ve been sitting on our asses doing nothing since August, and some of us already backpacked through Europe. I think I speak for more than myself when I say that we really just want to have a job.

  126. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 4:28 PM

    That’s wild they didn’t give a new date. Maybe the next step is the firm shuts down.

  127. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 4:32 PM

    127 and people arguing along the same vein:
    Don’t you get it. These deferred associated don’t care about the money. They are gaining NO SUBSTANTIVE EXPERIENCE. Ass-uming that they never start at the firm in any case (when does a re-deferred associated become a fired associate?) how are they ever going to find another job in the biglaw community, which is what they surely deserve. It’s like that episode of Seinfeld where George has an attractive girlfriend, which entitles him to enter the world of hot girls. These associates are like George, and have been allowed past the plush rope into the VIP rooms where they get free table service and attractive women (or men) cater to their every whim. Now, being deferred, they’re locked out, and will be lucky to see some action at the local Foreign Legion chapter. Sucks, don’t it?!

  128. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM

    I am a law clerk and I make about this to put up with the insanity of my judge, day in and day out. I’d rather get the money and be volunteering any day of the week.

  129. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:23 PM

    98 – reading comprehension fail, see 97…LOSER

  130. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:40 PM

    I wonder if MWE attorneys are so deluded that they actually get offended by the comments on here.

  131. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:42 PM

    Would anyone use any MWE gear in public? I would be afraid to even show the MWE coffee mug to a guest.

  132. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:44 PM

    MWE is a shitty firm that’s been trying for years to be something it’s not. Its true colors are finally showing. It continues to treat all its people horribly. Now most people will say, oh well what do you expect, it’s a big firm, etc. and they all treat their associates badly. Well the difference with MWE is they try and sell themselves as if they are a big firm with a heart. Well they think they are one of the big players and they aren’t. And every time they get negative press they have one of their all firm meetings and say how everything is great, and they have no debt, etc. Well guess what people – they are lying! How can they be doing so well when they continually have lay offs, defferals, screw people out of bonuses, and even take money from their own partners just to stay afloat. Wake up and smell the coffee MWE associates (well not the starbucks coffee anymore since they took that away). You work in a shit firm, but in all honesty I feel bad for you cause the job market is so bad you just have to ride it out.

  133. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:49 PM

    ive MWE a break- they have had to pay out mucho $$ in response to sanction orders this year. There just isn’t any money left.

  134. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:53 PM

    137 – How did the appeal on that sanction against Terry and Vera go? The hearing was in November, right? Anyone hear anything?

  135. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 5:59 PM

    You people who say you’d trade places with us deferred associates — fantastic. Ring any one of us up, and we’ll switch places. Let your firm know you’ll switch, and offer to take the deferral so they can bring one more of us on. You can sit on your ass (or go to some island, or backpack across Europe… whatever the hell you want to do) and collect $5k and insurance for 10 months, and then have no job at the end of it. I will take your job and I will work.
    Wait, what’s that? You say you don’t *really* want to switch places? You want to keep your job? You don’t actually want to be in limbo for several months, with no job in sight, an no experience to speak of?
    I thought so.
    For the record, if I wanted to backpack across fucking Europe or go live on an island somewhere, I’d have done that. I went to law school instead, because I wanted to work as a lawyer. So STFU already about how dare we be unhappy about being deferred. I want to work. And unless that is actually you on the phone offering to switch places with me, so do you.

  136. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 6:47 PM

    A while ago, I gave MWE swag (clothing, water bottles, bags, etc. ) to a charity for street people. Now, when I see a someone loitering on the street with such MWE stuff, I’ll ponder whether they are homeless or a deferred MWE associate.

  137. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 6:56 PM

    140 FTW

  138. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 7:07 PM

    140 – or both?

  139. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 7:10 PM

    139 – completely agree with you. don’t want to hear another associate bitch about the perceived entitlement.

  140. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 7:10 PM

    139 – completely agree with you. don’t want to hear another associate bitch about the perceived entitlement.

  141. Posted by Deferred for Life | December 8, 2009 at 7:12 PM

    What kind of operation is MWE running exactly? This might be the most classless move in biglaw history, excepting maybe the Latham Massacre.
    What kind of half-assed organization determines their staffing needs one month out? My little sisters lemonade stand is run more efficiently than this piece of shit.
    Tell me, MWE partners, would you tell your mothers what you did to these kids? The same people you wined and dined just over a year ago?
    Believe me or not, but I have family members who are in-house for major corporations. I will forward them this article and let them judge for themselves, but I certainly wouldn’t trust my legal issues with a firm that pulls this kind of crap.

  142. Posted by Deferred for Life | December 8, 2009 at 7:15 PM

    [P.S., I have not been re-deferred and feel confident I will start in January. I plan on passing on my account to a friend who is deferred until "Fall 2010".]

  143. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 7:24 PM

    What groups were impacted? Does anyone have more specific numbers?

  144. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 8:46 PM

    35 is not a real MWE re-deferred associate in NYC. I know all three, and not a single one would be so stupid. 35 is a bitter SA reject or worse.
    148, practice groups affected varied by office and, apparently, number of incoming associates

  145. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM

    A+B may have given out the indefinite deferrals early, but did they compensate the afflicted? I heard no stipend money for their permanent limbo status.

  146. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 10:00 PM

    Is “deferred for life” Al Bundy?

  147. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 11:24 PM

    OK, I am one of the deferreds here, and I heard the number was around 20 (making it about 1/3 of the incoming class) but it may be less and the numbers were inflated a little to make me feel better.
    Maybe it is true that this is only a prelude to being let go completely – but that is not the feeling I get from the move. They have no real reason to keep stringing us out and paying out (yes – the period is indefinite) instead of just terminating us outright at this time.
    I already took out a lease and moved, and McDermott already agreed to pay moving expenses when we got our original offer – so we can take that complaint out of the pot here. Is my lease painful considering the new deferral? Yes. But because of the economy I took out a lease on a much smaller place than would have really suited me so it doesn’t hurt as much as it would have for someone who truly believed the sun was rising on a golden tomorrow in January.
    I’ve run the numbers – $5000 a month, post taxes, will just barely cover bills and debt service for me. It will go a little way toward food for my family. (I am not in the economically fortunate situation of being young and single and I have around $200k in debt.) However, not only is additional paying work not prohibited by the firm – it is encouraged to a degree. The only restriction I have heard is taking full time employment that suggests you will be leaving the firm. In that case you lose the stipend. I defy you to logically show that as unreasonable or a sign of a firm that is really hoping you will just go away.
    Am I pissed about the timing? Yes. Do I wish I could start working in the field I chose with the firm I chose? Yes. Is it difficult right now to find legal work so that I can gain some experience somewhere? Seriously – you know the answer. But I am still better off than some, even most, of my fellow 2009 graduates.
    So to those who want to whine – go ahead. You have the right; no reasonable person can tell you that what MWE did doesn’t suck. But then man up, tighten up the belt, and go do something productive while hoping things will pick back up. That is unless you have some other path into the golden halls of Biglaw – in which case quit whining and take the other path. Otherwise accept that life is sometimes harder than you want and quit pitying yourself. Many of our classmates are also locked out of our potential salaries (they always were – that is the difference) and are currently gaining no legal experience. And they have no one to help them cover the bills while they continue searching for a lifeline.

  148. Posted by guest | December 8, 2009 at 11:40 PM

    152 – I’m impressed that MWE’s marketing department was able to whip that up on fairly short notice. I assume it was short notice, because if the firm had planned this re-deferral for any length of time, I would hope that they would have just told the incoming class that much sooner.

  149. Posted by Deferred for Life | December 8, 2009 at 11:59 PM

    152 – Did you ask the partner who called you why the firm waited so long to make this decision? Given the timing, I think it’s a fair question.

  150. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 2:34 AM

    As an associate at a big firm, I want to apologize for any of those in my position who are complaining about the “entitlement” of re-deferred associates. The fact is that we all know that this situation sucks for deferred people. However, we also know that in many cases, if a firm brings on a first year, it will lay off a more senior associate to make room for the first year. It’s a really awful reality any way you slice it.
    I am sincerely sorry to see so many of my friends deferred and re-deferred, and I think the majority of associates feel the same as I do. Good luck to you all.

  151. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 11:03 AM

    154 – isn’t one possible answer simply that the firm wanted to wait as long as possible to see if work picked up so that they could avoid the re-deferral?

  152. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 11:25 AM

    153 – I’m not sure that I understand what you are referring to by your comment about MWE marketing unless you are trying to suggest that I am with MWE marketing, which I assure you I am not.
    154 – Yes I did, and the answer I received was less that concise and clear, but it was something along the lines of 156’s proposed answer. Again, though I am generally a pessimist, I am giving MWE the benefit of the doubt here. Why? Well, I fail to see how I benefit in any way from simply recriminating or forming conspiracy theories. No matter what their reason for the wait – it is what it is.
    -152

  153. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 11:26 AM

    153 – I’m not sure that I understand what you are referring to by your comment about MWE marketing unless you are trying to suggest that I am with MWE marketing, which I assure you I am not.
    154 – Yes I did, and the answer I received was less that concise and clear, but it was something along the lines of 156’s proposed answer. Again, though I am generally a pessimist, I am giving MWE the benefit of the doubt here. Why? Well, I fail to see how I benefit in any way from simply recriminating or forming conspiracy theories. No matter what their reason for the wait – it is what it is.
    -152

  154. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 11:46 AM

    152 wrote: “The only restriction I have heard is taking full time employment that suggests you will be leaving the firm. In that case you lose the stipend. I defy you to logically show that as unreasonable or a sign of a firm that is really hoping you will just go away.”
    Um….so basically, you can’t take paying legal employment. Which is probably the only way you would get any legal experience until October 2010 as the “public service” sector is saturated. So you can either (i) work at Macy’s or (ii) sit on your ass and develop no useful legal experience until 10/2010 arrives and you get cut off completely.
    Generous firm!

  155. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    @159:
    My understanding is that on a case by case basis contract work could be acceptable. Clearly conflicts are an issue. But what do you want from MWE here exactly? It is already established that they have further deferred and that sucks. Even I, as a deferred, cannot say that it would be reasonable on my part to go accept full time legal work somewhere else and continue taking a stipend from McDermott. That is just asinine. And they certainly do not prohibit you from taking that other full-time job. This is an employment at will country – by all means go take that job and that experience. Just don’t expect them to pay you while you do it or necessarily take you back at the other end.
    And yes the public service sector is saturated if you are only willing to look at big name charities and government positions. There are still, however, many small organizations that could always use help and you could always man up and see about pro-bono criminal defense. I am not in New York, so I don’t know the situation there, but something tells me that there is no lack of people in the Bronx who need a little legal help. Granted it might take a little initiative to find such work. God forbid.
    And yes, 10/2010 could arrive and I get cut off completely. That would suck and piss me off. But, as stated earlier, I fail to see how that leaves me any worse off that many of my classmates out jobless and searching right now and I will have had at least a few months of income at about the level many of them can ever expect to make.
    Seriously, isn’t it time for the pity party to end?
    -152

  156. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 6:52 PM

    After reading and hearing about all the sanctions and complaints about McDermott for the past few years, why would anyone, especially a new attorney, want to work there? After the first deferral, wouldn’t the smart 1L look for employment at another firm?

  157. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 8:00 PM

    161,
    You are absolutely correct. The place sucks. See what you can do to find something else.

  158. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 9:37 PM

    PHJW deferred associates will start on time. I have it from the inside.

  159. Posted by guest | December 9, 2009 at 11:21 PM

    So, why is this AmLaw 20 firm deferring people so late in the game? As one of America’s top firms, shouldn’t they have figured out long before now that they wouldn’t need as many people?

  160. Posted by Deferred for Life | December 10, 2009 at 1:42 AM

    152 -
    You are either an MWE drone or completely delusional. These “deferreds” wasted the past year relying on an offer from what they thought to be a reputable–and honorable–firm. They could have found something else, but (naively) believed that an offer from MWE meant something. Yes, we live in uncertain times, but there is a way to do things properly.
    Again, the issue here is simple–MWE displayed horrible management by waiting until the last possible second to defer. There is absolutely no excuse. Any rational hiring partner would have determined staffing needs months ago, especially when he knows that a bunch of recent law grads are relying on having a job.
    So, MWE hiring partners, if you are reading this, just admit to yourselves that you fucked up.

  161. Posted by guest | December 10, 2009 at 10:53 AM

    It appears that it is McDermott’s “character” to say one thing and do another. From what has been reported on this site, McDermott routinely commits to bonuses, promotions, etc. and then fails to deliver on any of those commitments. Isn’t that what TPM did to deserve their sanctions. From the Fed Cir papers and argument, it seems he represented to the court that he would not use certain evidence to establish infringment but only use it to support his damages theory. However, at the end of the trial it was clear that their strategy was to use it to mislead the jury into evaluating it for infringment purposes since it was used by their infringment witness and not their damages expert. Something is seems so wrong about that place.

  162. Posted by guest | December 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    160 – “Even I, as a deferred, cannot say that it would be reasonable on my part to go accept full time legal work somewhere else and continue taking a stipend from McDermott.”
    You are an idiot. It is completely reasonable to take other full time legal employment so long as it does not conflict. Wait til they kick your ass to the curb and then.

  163. Posted by guest | December 10, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    167 – I did not say that it would not be reasonable to take other full time legal employment. I said that it would be unreasonable to do so AND accept a stipend. Sorry if I have too high an ethical standard for you.
    -160

  164. Posted by guest | December 10, 2009 at 4:36 PM

    The original start date was supposed to be JANUARY 4th. They called us and informed us about the re-deferment on Friday, DECEMBER 4th. Exactly 1 month before we were supposed to start.
    I started looking for apartments, and even emailed them to re-confirm on Monday Nov 30th..and they said that they will try to get back to me with more info.
    $5,000 a month for an indefinite start date is LITTLE, especially since we didn’t get ANYTHING for the last 4 months!
    Many of us figured that we should just relax for the 3 months after our post-bar trip and especially during the holidays — no point in starting another job.
    BUT now, I realize I should have been job hunting…..
    very very very very annoying, inconsiderate…

  165. Posted by guest | December 10, 2009 at 4:45 PM

    How many people have been deferred?
    Some one earlier wrote about “20″?
    Who gave them that number?

  166. Posted by guest | December 10, 2009 at 4:56 PM

    58 -
    YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!

  167. Posted by guest | December 10, 2009 at 5:44 PM

    146 – can your in-house relatives help me out?

  168. Posted by guest | December 11, 2009 at 12:36 AM

    How many people have been deferred here? Out of how many?

  169. Posted by guest | December 11, 2009 at 1:37 PM

    173-
    20 incoming associates firm wide

  170. Posted by guest | December 11, 2009 at 1:54 PM

    169 – good luck on your job search
    At least you did not sign a lease. I bet some of the other deferred associates aren’t as lucky.

  171. Posted by guest | December 15, 2009 at 4:50 PM

    Incomings…don’t plan on having a job. MWE just laid off associates with not enough hours b/c the firm doesn’t have enough work. Three in Chicago Trial let go. Rumor is that one of them is former federal appellate clerk. Firms don’t lay those people off unless its really bad.

  172. Posted by guest | December 24, 2009 at 6:16 PM

    Now they are “encouraging” (used very loosely) the deferred associates to do this secondment deal. Man, they are really trying to milkkkkkkk that $5K they are giving us!

  173. Posted by guest | December 24, 2009 at 6:21 PM

    83,
    actually i was told 20 people were deferred

  174. Posted by guest | December 30, 2009 at 5:21 PM

    177 – the secondment where you are strongly encouraged to go to work for a client for free, indefinitely?

  175. Posted by guest | December 31, 2009 at 12:38 AM

    #35/72 is a FRAUD and a COWARD! MWE-NYC only had three re-deferrals, all from Corporate, and nobody that required a plane ticket.
    Man up 35 and stop cowering behind the NYC re-deferrals just to get your message out. You’re a weasel and a bitch, but you already know this!

  176. Posted by guest | January 2, 2010 at 5:39 AM

    wow. $5,000 a month to sit at home and masturbate. too good to be true. who says biglaw is a meat grinder? (unless you count masturbation of course)

  177. Posted by guest | January 2, 2010 at 5:40 AM

    wow. $5,000 a month to sit at home and masturbate. too good to be true. who says biglaw is a meat grinder? (unless you count masturbation of course)

  178. Posted by guest | January 6, 2010 at 2:51 PM

    If you “grind” it, I think you may be doing it wrong.

  179. Posted by guest | January 9, 2010 at 4:33 PM

    Yet another up and comer gone from MWE LA to that other firm that pretty much has taken all the good guys. WTF is going on at MWE? That ship is sinking fast.

  180. Posted by guest | January 29, 2010 at 9:19 PM

    what do people think about mcgregian going to KLGates?

blog comments powered by Disqus