Federal Judge Benchslaps Plaintiffs' Counsel: Stop Being Tools

A trial was scheduled to start in Kansas federal court on June 14, 2011. Defendants moved for a short continuance because one of their lawyers is expecting his first child on July 3. (The lawyer in question, Bryan Erman, is quite cute — check out that chin dimple.)

Plaintiffs’ counsel objected to the continuance — strenuously. This took Judge Eric Melgren by surprise. And not in a good way.

Judge Melgren granted the continuance — and took the opportunity to benchslap the lawyers who refused to consent….

Schenck Price Works Smarter with Lexis+ AI and Protégé

LexisNexis sat down with John Ursin, Managing Partner at Schenck Price, to learn how the firm is using legal AI to strengthen client service and daily legal work.

By The LexisNexis Pressroom

Check out the order, dated April 12, over here. Ouch. After shooting down all of the plaintiffs’ objections, one by one, Judge Melgren concluded as follows:

Certainly this judge is convinced of the importance of federal court, but he has always tried not to confuse what he does with who he is, nor to distort the priorities of his day job with his life’s role. Counsel are encouraged to order their priorities similarly.

Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. The Ermans are CONGRATULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

We’re glad that Judge Melgren, despite the commendable career commitment that led him to become U.S. Attorney and then a federal judge, has his priorities in order. Sometimes life trumps the law. Just ask The People’s Therapist.